Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2010.13810 · Physical Review Research

Coherent randomized benchmarking

Jorge Miguel-Ramiro, Alexander Pirker, Wolfgang Dür

Published Jul 9, 2021• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Randomized benchmarking is a powerful technique to efficiently estimate the performance and reliability of quantum gates, circuits, and devices. Here, we propose to perform randomized benchmarking in a coherent way, where superpositions of different random sequences rather than independent samples are used. We show that this leads to a uniform and simple protocol having significant advantages with respect to gates that can be benchmarked, and in terms of efficiency and scalability. We show that, e.g., universal gate sets, the set of $n$-qudit Pauli operators or more general sets including arbitrary unitaries, as well as a particular $n$-qudit Clifford gate using only the Pauli set, can be efficiently benchmarked. The price to pay is an additional complexity to add control to the involved quantum operations. However, we demonstrate that this can be done by using auxiliary degrees of freedom that are naturally available in basically any physical realization, and are independent of the gates to be tested.

DOI
10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033038

Related papers

Demonstrating Scalable Randomized Benchmarking of Universal Gate Sets

Jordan Hines, Marie Lu, Ravi Naik +12 more

Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols are the most widely used methods for assessing the performance of quantum gates.However, the existing RB methods either do not scale to many qubits or cannot benchmark a universal gate set.Here, we introduce and demonstrate a technique for scalable RB of many universal and continuously parametrized gate sets, using a class of circuits called randomized mirror circuits.Our technique can be applied to a gate set containing an entangling Clifford gate and the set of arbitrary single-qubit gates, as well as gate sets containing controlled rotations about the Pauli axes.We use our technique to benchmark universal gate sets on four qubits of the Advanced Quantum Testbed, including a gate set containing a controlled-S gate and its inverse, and we investigate how the observed error rate is impacted by the inclusion of non-Clifford gates.Finally, we demonstrate that our technique scales to many qubits with experiments on a 27-qubit IBM Q processor.We use our technique to quantify the impact of crosstalk on this 27-qubit device, and we find that it contributes approximately 2=3 of the total error per gate in random many-qubit circuit layers.

arXiv:2207.07272•Physical Review X•Nov 14, 2023•24 citations

Scalable randomised benchmarking of non-Clifford gates

Andrew W. Cross, Easwar Magesan, Lev S. Bishop +2 more

Randomised benchmarking is a widely used experimental technique to characterise the average error of quantum operations. Benchmarking procedures that scale to enable the characterisation of n-qubit circuits rely on efficient procedures for manipulating those circuits and, as such, have been limited to subgroups of the Clifford group. However, universal quantum computers require additional, non-Clifford gates to approximate arbitrary unitary transformations. We define a scalable randomised benchmarking procedure over n-qubit unitary matrices that correspond to protected non-Clifford gates for a class of stabiliser codes. We present efficient methods for representing and composing group elements, sampling them uniformly and synthesising corresponding poly(n)-sized circuits. The procedure provides experimental access to two independent parameters that together characterise the average gate fidelity of a group element. A scalable procedure to determine the error of quantum operations has been developed by researchers in the United States. Andrew Cross and colleagues at the IBM T.J. Watson Research Center have expanded previously used protocols to a broader range of quantum circuits, thereby enabling error benchmarking for all common logical operations used in leading quantum computing protocols. The standard technique for error characterization in these devices is randomized benchmarking, which provides benefits such as insensitivity to measurement errors, but on the other hand only functions in a limited number of circumstances. In their theoretical study, the researchers demonstrate how randomized benchmarking approaches can be expanded to a much broader range of logical operations. The procedure can be readily implemented experimentally, and provides access to important experimental noise parameters in quantum computing.

npj Quantum Information•Apr 26, 2016•91 citations

Randomized benchmarking with random quantum circuits

Heinrich, Markus, Martin Kliesch, Ingo Roth

In its many variants, randomized benchmarking (RB) is a broadly used technique for assessing the quality of gate implementations on quantum computers. A detailed theoretical understanding and general guarantees exist for the functioning and interpretation of RB protocols if the gates under scrutiny are drawn uniformly at random from a compact group. In contrast, many practically attractive and scalable RB protocols implement random quantum circuits with local gates randomly drawn from some gate-set. Despite their abundance in practice, for those non-uniform RB protocols, general guarantees for gates from arbitrary compact groups under experimentally plausible assumptions are missing. In this work, we derive such guarantees for a large class of RB protocols for random circuits that we refer to as filtered RB. Prominent examples include linear cross-entropy benchmarking, character benchmarking, Pauli-noise tomography and variants of simultaneous RB. Building upon recent results for random circuits, we show that many relevant filtered RB schemes can be realized with random quantum circuits in linear depth, and we provide explicit small constants for common instances. We further derive general sample complexity bounds for filtered RB. We show filtered RB to be sample-efficient for several relevant groups, including protocols addressing higher-order cross-talk. Our theory for non-uniform filtered RB is, in principle, flexible enough to design new protocols for non-universal and analog quantum simulators.

arXiv:2212.06181•Dec 12, 2022•4 citations

Every Benchmark All at Once

Ana Silva, Eliška Greplová

As quantum technology matures, the efficient benchmarking of quantum devices remains a key challenge. Although sample-efficient, information-theoretic benchmarking techniques have recently been proposed, there is still a gap in adapting these techniques to contemporary experiments. In this work, we re-formulate five of the most common randomized benchmarking techniques in the modern language of the gate-set shadow tomography. This reformulation brings along several concrete advantages over conventional formulations of randomized benchmarking. For standard and interleaved randomized benchmarking, we can reduce the required gate-set size and, using median-of-means estimators, also reduce the required experimental sample size. For simultaneous and correlated randomized benchmarking, we can additionally reconstruct the Pauli-terms of correlated noise channels using additional post-processing of only a single experimental dataset. We also present a minimal approach to extract leakage errors. Our work provides a clear avenue for comprehensive, reliable, and convenient benchmarking of quantum devices, with all methods formulated under a single umbrella technique that can be easily adapted to a range of experimental quantities and gate sets.

arXiv:2510.18453•Oct 21, 2025•0 citations

Direct Randomized Benchmarking for Multiqubit Devices

Timothy J Proctor, Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Kenneth Rudinger +3 more

Benchmarking methods that can be adapted to multiqubit systems are essential for assessing the overall or "holistic" performance of nascent quantum processors. The current industry standard is Clifford randomized benchmarking (RB), which measures a single error rate that quantifies overall performance. But, scaling Clifford RB to many qubits is surprisingly hard. It has only been performed on one, two, and three qubits as of this writing. This reflects a fundamental inefficiency in Clifford RB: the n-qubit Clifford gates at its core have to be compiled into large circuits over the one- and two-qubit gates native to a device. As n grows, the quality of these Clifford gates quickly degrades, making Clifford RB impractical at relatively low n. In this Letter, we propose a direct RB protocol that mostly avoids compiling. Instead, it uses random circuits over the native gates in a device, which are seeded by an initial layer of Clifford-like randomization. We demonstrate this protocol experimentally on two to five qubits using the publicly available ibmqx5. We believe this to be the greatest number of qubits holistically benchmarked, and this was achieved on a freely available device without any special tuning up. Our protocol retains the simplicity and convenient properties of Clifford RB: it estimates an error rate from an exponential decay. But, it can be extended to processors with more qubits-we present simulations on 10+ qubits-and it reports a more directly informative and flexible error rate than the one reported by Clifford RB. We show how to use this flexibility to measure separate error rates for distinct sets of gates, and we use this method to estimate the average error rate of a set of cnot gates.

arXiv:1807.07975•Physical Review Letters•Jul 19, 2019•118 citations

From Randomized Benchmarking Experiments to Gateset Circuit Fidelity

Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Kristine Boone, Joel J. Wallman +1 more

Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols have become an essential tool for providing a meaningful partial characterization of experimental quantum operations. While the RB decay rate is known to enable estimates of the average fidelity of those operations under gate-independent Markovian noise, under gate-dependent noise this rate is more difficult to interpret rigorously. In this paper, we prove that single-qubit RB experiments provide direct estimates of the gateset circuit fidelity, a novel figure of merit which characterizes the expected average fidelity over arbitrary circuits of operations from the gateset. We also prove that, in the limit of high-fidelity single-qubit experiments, the difficulty introduced by gate-dependence reduces to a basis mismatch between the gates and the state-preparation and measurement procedures, that is, to a unitary degree of freedom in labeling the Pauli matrices. Based on numerical evidence and physically motivated arguments, we conjecture that these result hold for higher dimensions.

•Apr 3, 2018•0 citations
Randomized benchmarking is a powerful technique to efficiently estimate the performance and reliability of quantum gates, circuits, and devices. Here, we propose to perform randomized benchmarking in a coherent way, where superpositions of different random sequences rather than independent samples are used. We show that this leads to a uniform and simple protocol having significant advantages with respect to gates that can be benchmarked, and in terms of efficiency and scalability. We show that, e.g., universal gate sets, the set of nnn-qudit Pauli operators or more general sets including arbitrary unitaries, as well as a particular nnn-qudit Clifford gate using only the Pauli set, can be efficiently benchmarked. The price to pay is an additional complexity to add control to the involved quantum operations. However, we demonstrate that this can be done by using auxiliary degrees of freedom that are naturally available in basically any physical realization, and are independent of the gates to be tested.
Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols are the most widely used methods for assessing the performance of quantum gates.However, the existing RB methods either do not scale to many qubits or cannot benchmark a universal gate set.Here, we introduce and demonstrate a technique for scalable RB of many universal and continuously parametrized gate sets, using a class of circuits called randomized mirror circuits.Our technique can be applied to a gate set containing an entangling Clifford gate and the set of arbitrary single-qubit gates, as well as gate sets containing controlled rotations about the Pauli axes.We use our technique to benchmark universal gate sets on four qubits of the Advanced Quantum Testbed, including a gate set containing a controlled-S gate and its inverse, and we investigate how the observed error rate is impacted by the inclusion of non-Clifford gates.Finally, we demonstrate that our technique scales to many qubits with experiments on a 27-qubit IBM Q processor.We use our technique to quantify the impact of crosstalk on this 27-qubit device, and we find that it contributes approximately 2=3 of the total error per gate in random many-qubit circuit layers.
Randomised benchmarking is a widely used experimental technique to characterise the average error of quantum operations. Benchmarking procedures that scale to enable the characterisation of n-qubit circuits rely on efficient procedures for manipulating those circuits and, as such, have been limited to subgroups of the Clifford group. However, universal quantum computers require additional, non-Clifford gates to approximate arbitrary unitary transformations. We define a scalable randomised benchmarking procedure over n-qubit unitary matrices that correspond to protected non-Clifford gates for a class of stabiliser codes. We present efficient methods for representing and composing group elements, sampling them uniformly and synthesising corresponding poly(n)-sized circuits. The procedure provides experimental access to two independent parameters that together characterise the average gate fidelity of a group element. A scalable procedure to determine the error of quantum operations has been developed by researchers in the United States. Andrew Cross and colleagues at the IBM T.J. Watson Research Center have expanded previously used protocols to a broader range of quantum circuits, thereby enabling error benchmarking for all common logical operations used in leading quantum computing protocols. The standard technique for error characterization in these devices is randomized benchmarking, which provides benefits such as insensitivity to measurement errors, but on the other hand only functions in a limited number of circumstances. In their theoretical study, the researchers demonstrate how randomized benchmarking approaches can be expanded to a much broader range of logical operations. The procedure can be readily implemented experimentally, and provides access to important experimental noise parameters in quantum computing.
In its many variants, randomized benchmarking (RB) is a broadly used technique for assessing the quality of gate implementations on quantum computers. A detailed theoretical understanding and general guarantees exist for the functioning and interpretation of RB protocols if the gates under scrutiny are drawn uniformly at random from a compact group. In contrast, many practically attractive and scalable RB protocols implement random quantum circuits with local gates randomly drawn from some gate-set. Despite their abundance in practice, for those non-uniform RB protocols, general guarantees for gates from arbitrary compact groups under experimentally plausible assumptions are missing. In this work, we derive such guarantees for a large class of RB protocols for random circuits that we refer to as filtered RB. Prominent examples include linear cross-entropy benchmarking, character benchmarking, Pauli-noise tomography and variants of simultaneous RB. Building upon recent results for random circuits, we show that many relevant filtered RB schemes can be realized with random quantum circuits in linear depth, and we provide explicit small constants for common instances. We further derive general sample complexity bounds for filtered RB. We show filtered RB to be sample-efficient for several relevant groups, including protocols addressing higher-order cross-talk. Our theory for non-uniform filtered RB is, in principle, flexible enough to design new protocols for non-universal and analog quantum simulators.
As quantum technology matures, the efficient benchmarking of quantum devices remains a key challenge. Although sample-efficient, information-theoretic benchmarking techniques have recently been proposed, there is still a gap in adapting these techniques to contemporary experiments. In this work, we re-formulate five of the most common randomized benchmarking techniques in the modern language of the gate-set shadow tomography. This reformulation brings along several concrete advantages over conventional formulations of randomized benchmarking. For standard and interleaved randomized benchmarking, we can reduce the required gate-set size and, using median-of-means estimators, also reduce the required experimental sample size. For simultaneous and correlated randomized benchmarking, we can additionally reconstruct the Pauli-terms of correlated noise channels using additional post-processing of only a single experimental dataset. We also present a minimal approach to extract leakage errors. Our work provides a clear avenue for comprehensive, reliable, and convenient benchmarking of quantum devices, with all methods formulated under a single umbrella technique that can be easily adapted to a range of experimental quantities and gate sets.
Benchmarking methods that can be adapted to multiqubit systems are essential for assessing the overall or "holistic" performance of nascent quantum processors. The current industry standard is Clifford randomized benchmarking (RB), which measures a single error rate that quantifies overall performance. But, scaling Clifford RB to many qubits is surprisingly hard. It has only been performed on one, two, and three qubits as of this writing. This reflects a fundamental inefficiency in Clifford RB: the n-qubit Clifford gates at its core have to be compiled into large circuits over the one- and two-qubit gates native to a device. As n grows, the quality of these Clifford gates quickly degrades, making Clifford RB impractical at relatively low n. In this Letter, we propose a direct RB protocol that mostly avoids compiling. Instead, it uses random circuits over the native gates in a device, which are seeded by an initial layer of Clifford-like randomization. We demonstrate this protocol experimentally on two to five qubits using the publicly available ibmqx5. We believe this to be the greatest number of qubits holistically benchmarked, and this was achieved on a freely available device without any special tuning up. Our protocol retains the simplicity and convenient properties of Clifford RB: it estimates an error rate from an exponential decay. But, it can be extended to processors with more qubits-we present simulations on 10+ qubits-and it reports a more directly informative and flexible error rate than the one reported by Clifford RB. We show how to use this flexibility to measure separate error rates for distinct sets of gates, and we use this method to estimate the average error rate of a set of cnot gates.
Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols have become an essential tool for providing a meaningful partial characterization of experimental quantum operations. While the RB decay rate is known to enable estimates of the average fidelity of those operations under gate-independent Markovian noise, under gate-dependent noise this rate is more difficult to interpret rigorously. In this paper, we prove that single-qubit RB experiments provide direct estimates of the gateset circuit fidelity, a novel figure of merit which characterizes the expected average fidelity over arbitrary circuits of operations from the gateset. We also prove that, in the limit of high-fidelity single-qubit experiments, the difficulty introduced by gate-dependence reduces to a basis mismatch between the gates and the state-preparation and measurement procedures, that is, to a unitary degree of freedom in labeling the Pauli matrices. Based on numerical evidence and physically motivated arguments, we conjecture that these result hold for higher dimensions.