Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2008.11550

The non-individuals interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Décio Krause, Jonas R. Becker Arenhart, Otávio Bueno

Published Aug 26, 2020• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The non-individuals interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented with the aim of clarifying it and highflying some of its salient features. Alternative formulations of it are proposed and examined.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2008.11550

Related papers

The Non-Reflexive Formulation of Quantum Mechanics: the Whys and the Hows

Décio Krause

In the non-reflexive formulation of quantum physics, attention is given to a metaphysical view of quantum objects (q-objects) as non-individuals, characterised as entities to which the standard notion of identity lacks sense. The reference to the nature of q-objects is usually omitted in other interpretations and the most we can find is some vague reference to “to each [quantum] system we associate a Hilbert space”, and nothing more is said about them; we need to infer from the theory their characteristics, and it gives us several alternatives. One of them, to be justified here in broad aspects, is the non-individual view. It is important to enlighten that we are not trying to just find a way to deal with quantum entities but to defend a possible ontology of non-individuals, which can be applied also to ‘particles’ arising from quantum fields. Our account is based on two assumptions: (i) the ‘classical theory of identity’ does not apply to q-objects, and (ii) their non-individuality must be attributed from the start, that is, as a primitive notion and not ‘made a posteriori’ say by assuming symmetry principles. The underlying logic is called non-reflexive because the reflexive law of identity \(\forall{x{({x = x})}}\) is supposed not to hold for q-objects. Since all the details demand a lot of space, here we only sketch and justify our view. The references provide a more detailed account.

Qeios•Mar 19, 2025•0 citations

An unorthodox view on quantum mechanics

Gerard ’t Hooft

The author's opinion on the interpretation of quantum mechanics is further elucidated. Not only may quantum mechanics be a description of the sub-microscopic world that is profoundly different from what is often asserted, particularly concerning 'what is really going on', but questions such as these may well be essential for finding new ways of constructing models beyond what is now called the Standard Model of the sub-atomic particles.

arXiv:2104.03179•Apr 7, 2021•0 citations

Non-seperability, Non-supervenience, and Quantum Ontology

Darrin W.S. Belousek

An argument to the effect that quantum mechanics commits us to the existence of non-supervenient relations, and therefore that we should admit such relations into our quantum ontology as fundamental entities, has been given by Teller and reformulated by French. This paper aims, first, to explicate and evaluate that argument; second, to extend its premises in order to assess its relevance for other interpretations of quantum mechanics; and, third, to clarify its implications for holism and individuation in quantum ontology.

Philosophy of Science•Oct 1, 2003•20 citations

On the problem of the interpretation of quantum physics

A A Grib

Current thinking on the interpretation of quantum physics is reviewed, with special detail given to the Copenhagen and Everett many-worlds interpretations.

arXiv:1404.2784•Physics-Uspekhi•Dec 4, 2013•17 citations

Adaptive Constraint Cascades in Quantum Measurement

Thanh Minh Nguyen

This work proposes a structural framework for quantum measurement based on adaptive constraint operators.Instead of treating wavefunction collapse as an instantaneous and fundamental discontinuity, measurement is interpreted as the effective result of a sequence of constraint operations acting on the quantum state. The approach introduces a clear separation between dynamical evolution, governed by the Schrödinger equation, and constraint-based selection, which captures admissibility and measurement structure.Within this framework, measurement is modeled as a constraint cascade, where each constraint operator progressively restricts the state space. A key feature of the formulation is the incorporation of adaptive constraint operators, which depend on time and measurement history.This naturally leads to non-commutativity and provides a structural interpretation of contextuality in quantum measurement. A concrete example based on polarization measurement is presented, demonstrating consistency with standard quantum mechanics while offering an alternative interpretation of state reduction. This work does not aim to replace existing quantum theory, but rather to complement it by introducing an additional structural layer that may help clarify the role of measurement and admissibility in physical systems. Keywords: quantum measurement, constraint operators, contextuality, non-commutativity, quantum foundations Notes:This paper is part of an ongoing series exploring constraint-based formulations of physical theory.

•May 4, 2026•0 citations

On the Copenhagen Interpretation and Its Alternative Theories

Haiwen Zhang

Quantum mechanics has become the rising trend in modern physics and has completely changed people’s views of physics. This essay delves into the once-existing problems underlying quantum mechanics such as the conflict between substantiality and completeness in quantum mechanics and the relationship between causality and observation and analyzes the solutions to the controversies. The Copenhagen Interpretation is widely considered the most orthodox explanation of quantum mechanics; therefore, this paper focuses on the Copenhagen Interpretation and examines how it delicately manages to explain quantum mechanics. It also examines its alternative theories, such as Einstein’s local hidden variable theory, and disproves them with Bell’s inequality and other reasonings. The essay aims to clarify and systematize the historical development of quantum mechanics, showing the current progress of quantum mechanics.

Theoretical and Natural Science•Feb 20, 2023•0 citations
In the non-reflexive formulation of quantum physics, attention is given to a metaphysical view of quantum objects (q-objects) as non-individuals, characterised as entities to which the standard notion of identity lacks sense. The reference to the nature of q-objects is usually omitted in other interpretations and the most we can find is some vague reference to “to each [quantum] system we associate a Hilbert space”, and nothing more is said about them; we need to infer from the theory their characteristics, and it gives us several alternatives. One of them, to be justified here in broad aspects, is the non-individual view. It is important to enlighten that we are not trying to just find a way to deal with quantum entities but to defend a possible ontology of non-individuals, which can be applied also to ‘particles’ arising from quantum fields. Our account is based on two assumptions: (i) the ‘classical theory of identity’ does not apply to q-objects, and (ii) their non-individuality must be attributed from the start, that is, as a primitive notion and not ‘made a posteriori’ say by assuming symmetry principles. The underlying logic is called non-reflexive because the reflexive law of identity ∀x(x=x)\forall{x{({x = x})}}∀x(x=x) is supposed not to hold for q-objects. Since all the details demand a lot of space, here we only sketch and justify our view. The references provide a more detailed account.
An argument to the effect that quantum mechanics commits us to the existence of non-supervenient relations, and therefore that we should admit such relations into our quantum ontology as fundamental entities, has been given by Teller and reformulated by French. This paper aims, first, to explicate and evaluate that argument; second, to extend its premises in order to assess its relevance for other interpretations of quantum mechanics; and, third, to clarify its implications for holism and individuation in quantum ontology.
This work proposes a structural framework for quantum measurement based on adaptive constraint operators.Instead of treating wavefunction collapse as an instantaneous and fundamental discontinuity, measurement is interpreted as the effective result of a sequence of constraint operations acting on the quantum state. The approach introduces a clear separation between dynamical evolution, governed by the Schrödinger equation, and constraint-based selection, which captures admissibility and measurement structure.Within this framework, measurement is modeled as a constraint cascade, where each constraint operator progressively restricts the state space. A key feature of the formulation is the incorporation of adaptive constraint operators, which depend on time and measurement history.This naturally leads to non-commutativity and provides a structural interpretation of contextuality in quantum measurement. A concrete example based on polarization measurement is presented, demonstrating consistency with standard quantum mechanics while offering an alternative interpretation of state reduction. This work does not aim to replace existing quantum theory, but rather to complement it by introducing an additional structural layer that may help clarify the role of measurement and admissibility in physical systems. Keywords: quantum measurement, constraint operators, contextuality, non-commutativity, quantum foundations Notes:This paper is part of an ongoing series exploring constraint-based formulations of physical theory.
Quantum mechanics has become the rising trend in modern physics and has completely changed people’s views of physics. This essay delves into the once-existing problems underlying quantum mechanics such as the conflict between substantiality and completeness in quantum mechanics and the relationship between causality and observation and analyzes the solutions to the controversies. The Copenhagen Interpretation is widely considered the most orthodox explanation of quantum mechanics; therefore, this paper focuses on the Copenhagen Interpretation and examines how it delicately manages to explain quantum mechanics. It also examines its alternative theories, such as Einstein’s local hidden variable theory, and disproves them with Bell’s inequality and other reasonings. The essay aims to clarify and systematize the historical development of quantum mechanics, showing the current progress of quantum mechanics.