We construct an Ising Hamiltonian with an engineered energy landscape such that it has a local energy minimum which is near the true global minimum solution and further away from a false minimum. Using a technique established in previous experiments, we design our experiment such that (at least on timescales relevant to our study) the false minimum is reached preferentially in forward annealing due to high levels of quantum fluctuations. This allows us to demonstrate the key principle of reverse annealing, that the solution space can be searched locally, preferentially finding nearby solutions, even in the presence of a false minimum. The techniques used here are distinct from previously used experimental techniques and allow us to probe the fundamental search range of the device in an alternative way. We perform these experiments on two flux qubit quantum annealers, one with higher noise levels than the other. We find evidence that the lower noise device is more likely to find the more distant energy minimum (the false minimum in this case), suggesting that reducing noise fundamentally increases the range over which flux qubit quantum annealers are able to search. Our work explains why reducing the noise leads to improved performance on these quantum annealers. This supports the idea that these devices may be able to search over broad regions of the solution space quickly, one of the core reasons why quantum annealers are viewed as a potential avenue for a quantum computational advantage.
We construct an Ising Hamiltonian with an engineered energy landscape such that it has a local energy minimum which is near the true global minimum solution and further away from a false minimum. Using a technique established in previous experiments, we design our experiment such that (at least on timescales relevant to our study) the false minimum is reached preferentially in forward annealing due to high levels of quantum fluctuations. This allows us to demonstrate the key principle of reverse annealing, that the solution space can be searched locally, preferentially finding nearby solutions, even in the presence of a false minimum. The techniques used here are distinct from previously used experimental techniques and allow us to probe the fundamental search range of the device in an alternative way. We perform these experiments on two flux qubit quantum annealers, one with higher noise levels than the other. We find evidence that the lower noise device is more likely to find the more distant energy minimum (the false minimum in this case), suggesting that reducing noise fundamentally increases the range over which flux qubit quantum annealers are able to search. Our work explains why reducing the noise leads to improved performance on these quantum annealers. This supports the idea that these devices may be able to search over broad regions of the solution space quickly, one of the core reasons why quantum annealers are viewed as a potential avenue for a quantum computational advantage.
I describe how real quantum annealers may be used to perform local (in state space) searches around specified states, rather than the global searches traditionally implemented in the quantum annealing algorithm (QAA). Such protocols will have numerous advantages over simple quantum annealing. By using such searches the effect of problem mis-specification can be reduced, as only energy differences between the searched states will be relevant. The QAA is an analogue of simulated annealing, a classical numerical technique which has now been superseded. Hence, I explore two strategies to use an annealer in a way which takes advantage of modern classical optimization algorithms. Specifically, I show how sequential calls to quantum annealers can be used to construct analogues of population annealing and parallel tempering which use quantum searches as subroutines. The techniques given here can be applied not only to optimization, but also to sampling. I examine the feasibility of these protocols on real devices and note that implementing such protocols should require minimal if any change to the current design of the flux qubit-based annealers by D-Wave Systems Inc. I further provide proof-of-principle numerical experiments based on quantum Monte Carlo that demonstrate simple examples of the discussed techniques.
Quantum annealing is a promising heuristic for combinatorial optimization, but on current hardware its performance degrades for larger and more complex problems due to noise and small energy gaps. Reverse annealing has been proposed as a refinement strategy, yet it remains unclear when it provides systematic advantages over standard forward annealing or simply increasing annealing time. We find that combining forward and reverse annealing consistently improves solution quality and efficiency across multiple problem classes. The benefits of reverse annealing increase with problem complexity and are strongest in regimes where forward annealing is increasingly limited. Moreover, reverse annealing yields larger efficiency gains than simply extending forward annealing times. We establish these results through a systematic experimental study on a D-Wave Advantage system, benchmarking reverse annealing across Max-Cut, Number Partitioning, and sparse clustering problems while varying reverse distance, pause duration, and annealing time. We identify a narrow optimal regime for reverse annealing parameters linked to the location of freeze-out points and energy-level crossings in the annealing schedule. These findings demonstrate that reverse annealing is most valuable for large, high-complexity optimization problems and is likely to gain importance as quantum annealing hardware scales toward more realistic applications.
Quantum annealing represents an essential milestone towards the goal of adiabatic quantum computing. In quantum annealing, the computation involves finding the ground state of a classical Ising-like Hamiltonian realized as interactions between qubits. Quantum fluctuations are introduced to allow the wavefunction of the qubits to explore the energy landscape, the hope being that the wavefunction finds a minimum energy configuration and possibly giving the result of the computation. While quantum annealing likely may not be as powerful as adiabatic quantum computing, it is possible that it may be better at optimization compared to analogous classical algorithms. In physical realizations of quantum annealing, there are still questions as to the role of quantum fluctuations in the operation of a device given the short coherence times of the individual qubits. These questions have consistently posed a serious theoretical challenge making it difficult to verify experimental results. Here we simplify the problem by considering a system of qubits with ferromagnetic interactions, modeling the decoherence effects as classical noise in the transverse-field of each qubit. We compare the calculations to data collected from a system of manufactured qubits produced by D-wave Systems by performing a finite-size scaling analysis that captures the competition between quantum fluctuations of the transverse-field and bit-flip errors from the noise. We argue that on time-scales larger than the single-qubit decoherence time, the device produces the expected quantum fluctuations for the many-body system. Using this finite-size scaling, one can diagnose sources of noise in the system. Hopefully, in the near future, these devices will not only be realizing coherent quantum annealing but will likely be useful as another example of synthetic quantum matter.
Finding the global minimum in a rugged potential landscape is a computationally hard task, often equivalent to relevant optimization problems. Annealing strategies, either classical or quantum, explore the configuration space by evolving the system under the influence of thermal or quantum fluctuations. The thermal annealing dynamics can rapidly freeze the system into a low-energy configuration, and it can be simulated well on a classical computer, but it easily gets stuck in local minima. Quantum annealing, on the other hand, can be guaranteed to find the true ground state and can be implemented in modern quantum simulators; however, quantum adiabatic schemes become prohibitively slow in the presence of quasidegeneracies. Here, we propose a strategy which combines ideas from simulated annealing and quantum annealing. In such a hybrid algorithm, the outcome of a quantum simulator is processed on a classical device. While the quantum simulator explores the configuration space by repeatedly applying quantum fluctuations and performing projective measurements, the classical computer evaluates each configuration and enforces a lowering of the energy. We have simulated this algorithm for small instances of the random energy model, showing that it potentially outperforms both simulated thermal annealing and adiabatic quantum annealing. It becomes most efficient for problems involving many quasidegenerate ground states.
Quantum annealing is a computational paradigm in which optimisation problems are mapped onto the energy landscape of an interacting quantum system and explored through its dynamical evolution. By continuously transforming a simple initial Hamiltonian into one whose ground state encodes the solution, the system traverses a complex landscape via a combination of quantum fluctuations, tunnelling processes, and dissipative dynamics. Unlike gate-based quantum computing, quantum annealing is a specialised and near-term approach aimed primarily at discrete optimisation and sampling tasks. While it is not expected to provide polynomial-time solutions to NP-hard problems in the worst case, it offers a physically motivated heuristic for navigating rugged energy landscapes that arise across science and engineering. Modern quantum annealers realise programmable spin systems with thousands of qubits, placing them among the largest controllable quantum devices currently available. As a result, their significance extends beyond optimisation: they also function as experimental platforms for studying non-equilibrium many-body quantum dynamics in regimes that are difficult to access using classical simulation. In this review we present an accessible introduction to the principles of quantum annealing, describe the main hardware platforms and algorithmic techniques, and analyse how tunnelling, spectral gaps, and open-system effects shape computational performance. We survey applications ranging from optimisation and machine learning to quantum simulation and many-body physics, and discuss the central challenges in benchmarking, scaling, and control. These perspectives position quantum annealing as a distinctive framework at the interface of optimisation, stochastic sampling, and programmable quantum dynamics, with a role that is complementary to both classical algorithms and gate-based quantum computing.
Abstract Quantum annealing, a method of computing where optimization and machine learning problems are mapped to physically implemented energy landscapes subject to quantum fluctuations, allows for these fluctuations to be used to assist in finding the solution to some of the world’s most challenging computational problems. Recently, this field has attracted much interest because of the construction of large-scale flux-qubit based quantum annealing devices. These devices have since implemented a technique known as reverse annealing which allows the solution space to be searched locally, and algorithms based on these techniques have been tested. In this paper, I develop a formalism for algorithmic design in quantum annealers, which I call the ‘inference primitive’ formalism. This formalism naturally lends itself to expressing algorithms which are structurally similar to genetic algorithms, but where the annealing processor performs a combined crossover/mutation step. I demonstrate how these methods can be used to understand the algorithms which have already been implemented and the compatibility of such controls with a wide variety of other current efforts to improve the performance of quantum annealers.