Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2006.00347

The Uncertainty Principle Revisited

A. Mann, Pier A. Mello, M. Revzen

Published May 30, 2020• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study the quantum-mechanical uncertainty relation originating from the successive measurement of two observables $\hat{A}$ and $\hat{B}$, with eigenvalues $a_n$ and $b_m$, respectively, performed on the same system. We use an extension of the von Neumann model of measurement, in which two probes interact with the same system proper at two successive times, so we can exhibit how the disturbing effect of the first interaction affects the second measurement. Detecting the statistical properties of the second {\em probe} variable $Q_2$ conditioned on the first {\em probe} measurement yielding $Q_1$ we obtain information on the statistical distribution of the {\em system} variable $b_m$ conditioned on having found the system variable $a_n$ in the interval $δa$ around $a^{(n)}$. The width of this statistical distribution as function of $δa$ constitutes an {\em uncertainty relation}. We find a general connection of this uncertainty relation with the commutator of the two observables that have been measured successively. We illustrate this relation for the successive measurement of position and momentum in the discrete and in the continuous cases and, within a model, for the successive measurement of a more general class of observables.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2006.00347

Related papers

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

S. Rajasekar, R. Velusamy

One of the most striking deviations of quantum mechanics from classical mechanics is that any measurement of a microscopic system involves the interaction with the measuring instruments. The interaction cannot be neglected and in fact leads to uncontrollable disturbance on the system. In 1927, Werner Karl Heisenberg in his celebrated paper established the quantitative expression for unavoidable momentum disturbance caused by any position measurement. The crucial word here is simultaneously. The uncertainty relation gives the lower bound on the product of the uncertainties of two pairs of variables. But it says nothing about the accuracy with which individual observables can be measured. The physical meaning of energy-time uncertainty is different from that of x-px uncertainty. Position and momentum are observables to which Hermitian operators are assigned and which are measured at a particular time. An important implication of the uncertainty principle is that quantum systems do follow classical trajectories which conflict with our everyday experience.

CRC Press eBooks•Sep 29, 2022•1 citation

A Universal Formulation of Uncertainty Relation for Error and Disturbance

Jaeha Lee, Izumi Tsutsui

We present a universal formulation of uncertainty relation valid for any conceivable quantum measurement and the resultant observation (observer) effect of statistical nature. Owing to its simplicity and operational tangibility, our general relation is also experimentally verifiable. Our relation violates the traditional na{ï}ve bound $\hbar/2$ for the position-momentum measurement while respecting Heisenberg's original philosophy of the uncertainty principle. Our error-disturbance relation admits a parallel formulation to our relation for errors, which also embraces the standard Kennard--Robertson (Schr{ö}dinger) relation as a special case; this attains a unified picture of the three orthodox realms of uncertainty regarding quantum indeterminacy, measurement, and observation effect within a single framework.

arXiv:2004.06099•Apr 13, 2020•0 citations

Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is usually taken to express a limitation of operational possibilities imposed by quantum mechanics.Here we demonstrate that the full content of this principle also includes its positive role as a condition ensuring that mutually exclusive experimental options can be reconciled if an appropriate trade-off is accepted.The uncertainty principle is shown to appear in three manifestations, in the form of uncertainty relations: for the widths of the position and momentum distributions in any quantum state; for the inaccuracies of any joint measurement of these quantities; and for the inaccuracy of a measurement of one of the quantities and the ensuing disturbance in the distribution of the other quantity.Whilst conceptually distinct, these three kinds of uncertainty relations are shown to be closely related formally.Finally, we survey models and experimental implementations of joint measurements of position and momentum and comment briefly on the status of experimental tests of the uncertainty principle.

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•May 1, 2000•0 citations

Uncertainty relations for quantum particles

Σπυρίδων Κεχριμπάρης

The focus of the present investigation is uncertainty relations for quantum particles, which quantify the fundamental limitations on some of their properties due to their incompatibility. In the first, longer part, we are concerned with preparational uncertainty \nrelations, while in the second we touch upon measurement inequalities through a generalisation of a model of joint measurement of position and momentum. \nSpecifically, starting from a triple of canonical operators, we prove product and sum inequalities for their variances with bounds larger than those following from combining the pairwise ones. We extend these results to N observables for a quantum particle and prove uncertainty relations for the sums and products of their variances \nin terms of the commutators. \nFurthermore, we present a general theory of preparational uncertainty relations for a quantum particle in one dimension and derive conditions for a smooth function of the second moments to assume a lower bound. The Robertson-Schroedinger inequality \nis found to be of special significance and we geometrically study the space of second moments. We prove new uncertainty relations for various functions of the variances and covariance of position and momentum of a quantum particle. Some of our findings are shown to extend to more than one spatial degree of freedom and we derive \nvarious types of inequalities. \nFinally, we propose a generalisation of the Arthurs-Kelly model of joint measurement of position and momentum to incorporate the case of more than two observables and derive joint-measurement inequalities for the statistics of the probes. For the case of \nthree canonical observables and suitable definitions of error and disturbance we obtain a number of error-error-error and error-error-disturbance inequalities and show that the lower bound is identical to the preparational one.

•Dec 1, 2015•1 citation

Uncertainty principle for joint measurement of noncommuting variables

M. G. Raymer

Does the Heisenberg uncertainty principle refer to errors of measurement, or to the spread of values of the physical variables intrinsic to a particle’s state, or to some combination of these? The most commonly quoted form of the uncertainty principle relates the spread of an ensemble of separate measurements of some variable to the analogous spread of its conjugate variable. In contrast, Heisenberg’s original argument for the uncertainty principle involved the perturbation to a particle’s state by a measurement of one variable, which affects one’s ability to predict the outcome of a subsequent measurement of the conjugate variable. The relation between these two views of the uncertainty principle is discussed in this paper. A familiar example is considered: an ensemble of identically prepared particles passing through a slit, and after further propagation being detected. From this arrangement it is possible to infer joint (although necessarily imprecise) information on both transverse position and conjugate momentum for each member of the ensemble. It is shown that in this case of joint measurement the product of standard deviations for the measurement outcomes is at least twice as large as the lower bound implied by the usual uncertainty principle. The discussion is meant to help clarify the different roles played in the various statements of the uncertainty principle by the initial state and by measurement error.

American Journal of Physics•Nov 1, 1994•70 citations

Quantum-mechanical histories and the uncertainty principle. II. Fluctuations about classical predictability

J. J. Halliwell

This paper is concerned with two questions in the decoherent histories approach to quantum mechanics: the emergence of approximate classical predictability, and the fluctuations about it necessitated by the uncertainty principle. It is in part a continuation of an earlier paper on the uncertainty principle for quantum-mechanical histories. We consider histories characterized by position samplings at n moments of time. This includes the case of position sampling continuous in time in the limit n\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. We use this to construct a probability distribution on the value of (discrete approximations to) the field equations, F=mx\ifmmode\ddot\else\textasciidieresis\fi{}+V'(x), at n-2 times. We find that it is peaked around F=0; thus classical correlations are exhibited. We show that the width of the peak \ensuremath{\Delta}F is largely independent of the initial state. We show that the uncertainty principle takes the form 2${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\sigma}}}^{2}$(\ensuremath{\Delta}F${)}^{2}$\ensuremath{\ge}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Elzxh}}}^{2}$/${\mathit{t}}^{2}$, where \ensuremath{\sigma} is the width of the position samplings, and t is the time scale between projections. We determine the modifications to this result when the system is coupled to a thermal environment, thus obtaining a measure of the comparative sizes of quantum and thermal fluctuations. We show that the thermal fluctuations become comparable to the quantum fluctuations under the same conditions that decoherence effects come into play, in agreement with earlier work. We also study an alternative measure of classical correlations, namely, the conditional probability of finding a sequence of position samplings, given that particular initial phase space data have occurred.We use these results to address the issue of the formal interpretation of the probabilities for sequences of position samplings in the decoherent histories approach to quantum mechanics. Under appropriate conditions, which we describe, they admit an interpretation as a statistical ensemble of classical solutions, with the probability of each individual classical solution given by a smeared Wigner function of its initial data. We study the decoherence properties of histories characterized by the value of the field equations, F, at a sequence of times. We argue that they will be decoherent if their initial data are decoherent.

arXiv:gr-qc/9307013•Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Nov 15, 1993•49 citations
We study the quantum-mechanical uncertainty relation originating from the successive measurement of two observables A^\hat{A}A^ and B^\hat{B}B^, with eigenvalues ana_nan​ and bmb_mbm​, respectively, performed on the same system. We use an extension of the von Neumann model of measurement, in which two probes interact with the same system proper at two successive times, so we can exhibit how the disturbing effect of the first interaction affects the second measurement. Detecting the statistical properties of the second {\em probe} variable Q2Q_2Q2​ conditioned on the first {\em probe} measurement yielding Q1Q_1Q1​ we obtain information on the statistical distribution of the {\em system} variable bmb_mbm​ conditioned on having found the system variable ana_nan​ in the interval δaδaδa around a(n)a^{(n)}a(n). The width of this statistical distribution as function of δaδaδa constitutes an {\em uncertainty relation}. We find a general connection of this uncertainty relation with the commutator of the two observables that have been measured successively. We illustrate this relation for the successive measurement of position and momentum in the discrete and in the continuous cases and, within a model, for the successive measurement of a more general class of observables.
One of the most striking deviations of quantum mechanics from classical mechanics is that any measurement of a microscopic system involves the interaction with the measuring instruments. The interaction cannot be neglected and in fact leads to uncontrollable disturbance on the system. In 1927, Werner Karl Heisenberg in his celebrated paper established the quantitative expression for unavoidable momentum disturbance caused by any position measurement. The crucial word here is simultaneously. The uncertainty relation gives the lower bound on the product of the uncertainties of two pairs of variables. But it says nothing about the accuracy with which individual observables can be measured. The physical meaning of energy-time uncertainty is different from that of x-px uncertainty. Position and momentum are observables to which Hermitian operators are assigned and which are measured at a particular time. An important implication of the uncertainty principle is that quantum systems do follow classical trajectories which conflict with our everyday experience.
We present a universal formulation of uncertainty relation valid for any conceivable quantum measurement and the resultant observation (observer) effect of statistical nature. Owing to its simplicity and operational tangibility, our general relation is also experimentally verifiable. Our relation violates the traditional na{ï}ve bound ℏ/2\hbar/2ℏ/2 for the position-momentum measurement while respecting Heisenberg's original philosophy of the uncertainty principle. Our error-disturbance relation admits a parallel formulation to our relation for errors, which also embraces the standard Kennard--Robertson (Schr{ö}dinger) relation as a special case; this attains a unified picture of the three orthodox realms of uncertainty regarding quantum indeterminacy, measurement, and observation effect within a single framework.
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is usually taken to express a limitation of operational possibilities imposed by quantum mechanics.Here we demonstrate that the full content of this principle also includes its positive role as a condition ensuring that mutually exclusive experimental options can be reconciled if an appropriate trade-off is accepted.The uncertainty principle is shown to appear in three manifestations, in the form of uncertainty relations: for the widths of the position and momentum distributions in any quantum state; for the inaccuracies of any joint measurement of these quantities; and for the inaccuracy of a measurement of one of the quantities and the ensuing disturbance in the distribution of the other quantity.Whilst conceptually distinct, these three kinds of uncertainty relations are shown to be closely related formally.Finally, we survey models and experimental implementations of joint measurements of position and momentum and comment briefly on the status of experimental tests of the uncertainty principle.
The focus of the present investigation is uncertainty relations for quantum particles, which quantify the fundamental limitations on some of their properties due to their incompatibility. In the first, longer part, we are concerned with preparational uncertainty \nrelations, while in the second we touch upon measurement inequalities through a generalisation of a model of joint measurement of position and momentum. \nSpecifically, starting from a triple of canonical operators, we prove product and sum inequalities for their variances with bounds larger than those following from combining the pairwise ones. We extend these results to N observables for a quantum particle and prove uncertainty relations for the sums and products of their variances \nin terms of the commutators. \nFurthermore, we present a general theory of preparational uncertainty relations for a quantum particle in one dimension and derive conditions for a smooth function of the second moments to assume a lower bound. The Robertson-Schroedinger inequality \nis found to be of special significance and we geometrically study the space of second moments. We prove new uncertainty relations for various functions of the variances and covariance of position and momentum of a quantum particle. Some of our findings are shown to extend to more than one spatial degree of freedom and we derive \nvarious types of inequalities. \nFinally, we propose a generalisation of the Arthurs-Kelly model of joint measurement of position and momentum to incorporate the case of more than two observables and derive joint-measurement inequalities for the statistics of the probes. For the case of \nthree canonical observables and suitable definitions of error and disturbance we obtain a number of error-error-error and error-error-disturbance inequalities and show that the lower bound is identical to the preparational one.
Does the Heisenberg uncertainty principle refer to errors of measurement, or to the spread of values of the physical variables intrinsic to a particle’s state, or to some combination of these? The most commonly quoted form of the uncertainty principle relates the spread of an ensemble of separate measurements of some variable to the analogous spread of its conjugate variable. In contrast, Heisenberg’s original argument for the uncertainty principle involved the perturbation to a particle’s state by a measurement of one variable, which affects one’s ability to predict the outcome of a subsequent measurement of the conjugate variable. The relation between these two views of the uncertainty principle is discussed in this paper. A familiar example is considered: an ensemble of identically prepared particles passing through a slit, and after further propagation being detected. From this arrangement it is possible to infer joint (although necessarily imprecise) information on both transverse position and conjugate momentum for each member of the ensemble. It is shown that in this case of joint measurement the product of standard deviations for the measurement outcomes is at least twice as large as the lower bound implied by the usual uncertainty principle. The discussion is meant to help clarify the different roles played in the various statements of the uncertainty principle by the initial state and by measurement error.
This paper is concerned with two questions in the decoherent histories approach to quantum mechanics: the emergence of approximate classical predictability, and the fluctuations about it necessitated by the uncertainty principle. It is in part a continuation of an earlier paper on the uncertainty principle for quantum-mechanical histories. We consider histories characterized by position samplings at n moments of time. This includes the case of position sampling continuous in time in the limit n\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. We use this to construct a probability distribution on the value of (discrete approximations to) the field equations, F=mx\ifmmode\ddot\else\textasciidieresis\fi{}+V'(x), at n-2 times. We find that it is peaked around F=0; thus classical correlations are exhibited. We show that the width of the peak \ensuremath{\Delta}F is largely independent of the initial state. We show that the uncertainty principle takes the form 2${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\sigma}}}^{2}$(\ensuremath{\Delta}F)2{)}^{2})2\ensuremath{\ge}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Elzxh}}}^{2}$/t2{\mathit{t}}^{2}t2, where \ensuremath{\sigma} is the width of the position samplings, and t is the time scale between projections. We determine the modifications to this result when the system is coupled to a thermal environment, thus obtaining a measure of the comparative sizes of quantum and thermal fluctuations. We show that the thermal fluctuations become comparable to the quantum fluctuations under the same conditions that decoherence effects come into play, in agreement with earlier work. We also study an alternative measure of classical correlations, namely, the conditional probability of finding a sequence of position samplings, given that particular initial phase space data have occurred.We use these results to address the issue of the formal interpretation of the probabilities for sequences of position samplings in the decoherent histories approach to quantum mechanics. Under appropriate conditions, which we describe, they admit an interpretation as a statistical ensemble of classical solutions, with the probability of each individual classical solution given by a smeared Wigner function of its initial data. We study the decoherence properties of histories characterized by the value of the field equations, F, at a sequence of times. We argue that they will be decoherent if their initial data are decoherent.