Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2005.06886 · Physical Review A

Quantum key distribution with any two independent and identically distributed states

Akihiro Mizutani

Published Aug 17, 2020• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

To prove the security of quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols, several assumptions have to be imposed on users' devices. From an experimental point of view, it is preferable that such theoretical requirements are feasible and the number of them is small. In this paper, we provide a security proof of a QKD protocol where the usage of any light source is allowed as long as it emits two independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) states. Our QKD protocol is composed of two parts: the first part is characterization of the photon-number statistics of the emitted signals up to three-photons based on the method [M. Kumazawa, T. Sasaki, and M. Koashi, Opt. Express 27, 5297 (2019)], followed by running our differential-phase-shift protocol [A. Mizutani, T. Sasaki, Y. Takeuchi, K. Tamaki, and M. Koashi, npj Quantum Inf. 5, 87 (2019)]. It is remarkable that as long as the light source emits two i.i.d. states, even if we have no prior knowledge of the light source, we can securely employ it in the QKD protocol. As this result substantially simplifies the requirements on light sources, it constitutes a significant contribution to realizing truly secure quantum communication.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.102.022613

Related papers

Quantum key distribution with simply characterized light sources

Akihiro Mizutani, Toshihiko Sasaki, Yuki Takeuchi +2 more

Abstract To guarantee the security of quantum key distribution (QKD), security proofs of QKD protocols have assumptions on the devices. Commonly used assumptions are, for example, each random bit information chosen by a sender to be precisely encoded on an optical emitted pulse and the photon-number probability distribution of the pulse to be exactly known. These typical assumptions imposed on light sources such as the above two are rather strong and would be hard to verify in practical QKD systems. The goal of the paper is to replace those strong assumptions on the light sources with weaker ones. In this paper, we adopt the differential-phase-shift (DPS) QKD protocol and drastically mitigate the requirements on light sources, while for the measurement unit, trusted and photon-number-resolving detectors are assumed. Specifically, we only assume the independence among emitted pulses, the independence of the vacuum emission probability from a chosen bit, and upper bounds on the tail distribution function of the total photon number in a single block of pulses for single, two and three photons. Remarkably, no other detailed characterizations, such as the amount of phase modulation, are required. Our security proof significantly relaxes demands for light sources, which paves a route to guarantee implementation security with simple verification of the devices.

arXiv:1904.02364•npj Quantum Information•Oct 11, 2019•13 citations

Security of quantum key distribution with light sources that are not independently and identically distributed

Yuichi Nagamatsu, Akihiro Mizutani, Rikizo Ikuta +3 more

Although quantum key distribution (QKD) is theoretically secure, there is a gap between the theory and practice. In fact, real-life QKD may not be secure because component devices in QKD systems may deviate from the theoretical models assumed in security proofs. To solve this problem, it is necessary to construct the security proof under realistic assumptions on the source and measurement unit. In this paper, we prove the security of a QKD protocol under practical assumptions on the source that accommodate fluctuation of the phase and intensity modulations. As long as our assumptions hold, it does not matter at all how the phase and intensity distribute or whether or not their distributions over different pulses are independently and identically distributed. Our work shows that practical sources can be safely employed in QKD experiments.

arXiv:1602.02914•Physical Review A•Apr 18, 2016•26 citations

Practical Quantum Key Distribution That is Secure Against Side Channels

Álvaro Navarrete, Margarida Pereira, Marcos Curty +1 more

There is a large gap between theory and practice in quantum key distribution (QKD) because real devices do not satisfy the assumptions required by the security proofs. Here, we close this gap by introducing a simple and practical measurement-device-independent-QKD type of protocol, based on the transmission of coherent light, for which we prove its security against any possible imperfection and/or side channel from the quantum communication part of the QKD devices. Our approach only requires to experimentally characterize an upper bound of one single parameter for each of the pulses sent, which describes the quality of the source. Moreover, unlike device-independent (DI) QKD, it can accommodate information leakage from the users' laboratories, which is essential to guarantee the security of QKD implementations. In this sense, its security goes beyond that provided by DI QKD, yet it delivers a secret key rate that is various orders of magnitude greater than that of DI QKD.

arXiv:2007.03364•Physical Review Applied•Mar 24, 2021•29 citations

Quantum key distribution with setting-choice-independently correlated light sources

Akihiro Mizutani, Go Kato, Koji Azuma +6 more

Abstract Despite the enormous theoretical and experimental progress made so far in quantum key distribution (QKD), the security of most existing practical QKD systems is not rigorously established yet. A critical obstacle is that almost all existing security proofs make ideal assumptions on the QKD devices. Problematically, such assumptions are hard to satisfy in the experiments, and therefore it is not obvious how to apply such security proofs to practical QKD systems. Fortunately, any imperfections and security-loopholes in the measurement devices can be perfectly closed by measurement-device-independent QKD (MDI-QKD), and thus we only need to consider how to secure the source devices. Among imperfections in the source devices, correlations between the sending pulses and modulation fluctuations are one of the principal problems, which unfortunately most of the existing security proofs do not consider. In this paper, we take into account these imperfections and enhance the implementation security of QKD. Specifically, we consider a setting-choice-independent correlation (SCIC) framework in which the sending pulses can present arbitrary correlations but they are independent of the previous setting choices such as the bit, the basis and the intensity settings. Within the framework of SCIC, we consider the dominant fluctuations of the sending states, such as the relative phases and the intensities, and provide a self-contained information-theoretic security proof for the loss-tolerant QKD protocol in the finite-key regime. We demonstrate the feasibility of secure quantum communication, and thus our work constitutes a crucial step towards guaranteeing the security of practical QKD systems.

arXiv:1803.09484•npj Quantum Information•Jan 23, 2019•36 citations

Finite-key security analysis of decoy-state QKD with source and detector imperfections

Xoel Sixto, Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Margarida Pereira +3 more

Decoy-state quantum key distribution (QKD) is the most widely adopted approach for overcoming the limitations of imperfect single-photon sources. However, existing security proofs typically either neglect important device imperfections or rely on assumptions that are difficult to justify in realistic high-speed implementations, such as the independent and identically distributed nature of the emitted signals. In this work, we combine and extend several recent theoretical advances to provide a comprehensive analytical finite-key security proof for decoy-state QKD that simultaneously incorporates multiple practically relevant transmitter and receiver imperfections, including state-preparation flaws, bit and basis side-channel leakage and correlations, setting-independent intensity fluctuations, and detection-efficiency mismatches.

quant-pharXiv:2606.29943•Jun 30, 2026•0 citations

Security of round-robin differential-phase-shift quantum-key-distribution protocol with correlated light sources

Akihiro Mizutani, Go Kato

Among various quantum-key-distribution (QKD) protocols, the round-robin differential-phase- shift (RRDPS) protocol has a unique feature where its security is guaranteed without monitoring the signal disturbance. Moreover, this protocol has the remarkable property of being robust against source imperfections, assuming that the emitted pulses are independent. Unfortunately, some experiments with high-speed QKD systems confirmed the violation of the independence due to pulse correlations, and therefore the lack of a security proof, without taking into account this effect is an obstacle for guaranteeing the implementation security. In this paper, we show that the RRDPS protocol is secure against any source imperfections by establishing a security proof with the pulse correlations. The proof is simple in the sense that we make only three experimentally simple assumptions on the source. Our numerical simulation based on the proof shows that the long-range pulse correlation does not cause a significant impact on the key rate, which reveals another striking feature of the RRDPS protocol. Our security proof is thus effective and applicable to a wide range of practical sources and paves the way to realizing truly secure QKD in high-speed systems.

arXiv:2107.02593•Physical Review A•Dec 15, 2021•12 citations
To prove the security of quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols, several assumptions have to be imposed on users' devices. From an experimental point of view, it is preferable that such theoretical requirements are feasible and the number of them is small. In this paper, we provide a security proof of a QKD protocol where the usage of any light source is allowed as long as it emits two independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) states. Our QKD protocol is composed of two parts: the first part is characterization of the photon-number statistics of the emitted signals up to three-photons based on the method [M. Kumazawa, T. Sasaki, and M. Koashi, Opt. Express 27, 5297 (2019)], followed by running our differential-phase-shift protocol [A. Mizutani, T. Sasaki, Y. Takeuchi, K. Tamaki, and M. Koashi, npj Quantum Inf. 5, 87 (2019)]. It is remarkable that as long as the light source emits two i.i.d. states, even if we have no prior knowledge of the light source, we can securely employ it in the QKD protocol. As this result substantially simplifies the requirements on light sources, it constitutes a significant contribution to realizing truly secure quantum communication.
Abstract To guarantee the security of quantum key distribution (QKD), security proofs of QKD protocols have assumptions on the devices. Commonly used assumptions are, for example, each random bit information chosen by a sender to be precisely encoded on an optical emitted pulse and the photon-number probability distribution of the pulse to be exactly known. These typical assumptions imposed on light sources such as the above two are rather strong and would be hard to verify in practical QKD systems. The goal of the paper is to replace those strong assumptions on the light sources with weaker ones. In this paper, we adopt the differential-phase-shift (DPS) QKD protocol and drastically mitigate the requirements on light sources, while for the measurement unit, trusted and photon-number-resolving detectors are assumed. Specifically, we only assume the independence among emitted pulses, the independence of the vacuum emission probability from a chosen bit, and upper bounds on the tail distribution function of the total photon number in a single block of pulses for single, two and three photons. Remarkably, no other detailed characterizations, such as the amount of phase modulation, are required. Our security proof significantly relaxes demands for light sources, which paves a route to guarantee implementation security with simple verification of the devices.
Although quantum key distribution (QKD) is theoretically secure, there is a gap between the theory and practice. In fact, real-life QKD may not be secure because component devices in QKD systems may deviate from the theoretical models assumed in security proofs. To solve this problem, it is necessary to construct the security proof under realistic assumptions on the source and measurement unit. In this paper, we prove the security of a QKD protocol under practical assumptions on the source that accommodate fluctuation of the phase and intensity modulations. As long as our assumptions hold, it does not matter at all how the phase and intensity distribute or whether or not their distributions over different pulses are independently and identically distributed. Our work shows that practical sources can be safely employed in QKD experiments.
There is a large gap between theory and practice in quantum key distribution (QKD) because real devices do not satisfy the assumptions required by the security proofs. Here, we close this gap by introducing a simple and practical measurement-device-independent-QKD type of protocol, based on the transmission of coherent light, for which we prove its security against any possible imperfection and/or side channel from the quantum communication part of the QKD devices. Our approach only requires to experimentally characterize an upper bound of one single parameter for each of the pulses sent, which describes the quality of the source. Moreover, unlike device-independent (DI) QKD, it can accommodate information leakage from the users' laboratories, which is essential to guarantee the security of QKD implementations. In this sense, its security goes beyond that provided by DI QKD, yet it delivers a secret key rate that is various orders of magnitude greater than that of DI QKD.
Abstract Despite the enormous theoretical and experimental progress made so far in quantum key distribution (QKD), the security of most existing practical QKD systems is not rigorously established yet. A critical obstacle is that almost all existing security proofs make ideal assumptions on the QKD devices. Problematically, such assumptions are hard to satisfy in the experiments, and therefore it is not obvious how to apply such security proofs to practical QKD systems. Fortunately, any imperfections and security-loopholes in the measurement devices can be perfectly closed by measurement-device-independent QKD (MDI-QKD), and thus we only need to consider how to secure the source devices. Among imperfections in the source devices, correlations between the sending pulses and modulation fluctuations are one of the principal problems, which unfortunately most of the existing security proofs do not consider. In this paper, we take into account these imperfections and enhance the implementation security of QKD. Specifically, we consider a setting-choice-independent correlation (SCIC) framework in which the sending pulses can present arbitrary correlations but they are independent of the previous setting choices such as the bit, the basis and the intensity settings. Within the framework of SCIC, we consider the dominant fluctuations of the sending states, such as the relative phases and the intensities, and provide a self-contained information-theoretic security proof for the loss-tolerant QKD protocol in the finite-key regime. We demonstrate the feasibility of secure quantum communication, and thus our work constitutes a crucial step towards guaranteeing the security of practical QKD systems.
Decoy-state quantum key distribution (QKD) is the most widely adopted approach for overcoming the limitations of imperfect single-photon sources. However, existing security proofs typically either neglect important device imperfections or rely on assumptions that are difficult to justify in realistic high-speed implementations, such as the independent and identically distributed nature of the emitted signals. In this work, we combine and extend several recent theoretical advances to provide a comprehensive analytical finite-key security proof for decoy-state QKD that simultaneously incorporates multiple practically relevant transmitter and receiver imperfections, including state-preparation flaws, bit and basis side-channel leakage and correlations, setting-independent intensity fluctuations, and detection-efficiency mismatches.
Among various quantum-key-distribution (QKD) protocols, the round-robin differential-phase- shift (RRDPS) protocol has a unique feature where its security is guaranteed without monitoring the signal disturbance. Moreover, this protocol has the remarkable property of being robust against source imperfections, assuming that the emitted pulses are independent. Unfortunately, some experiments with high-speed QKD systems confirmed the violation of the independence due to pulse correlations, and therefore the lack of a security proof, without taking into account this effect is an obstacle for guaranteeing the implementation security. In this paper, we show that the RRDPS protocol is secure against any source imperfections by establishing a security proof with the pulse correlations. The proof is simple in the sense that we make only three experimentally simple assumptions on the source. Our numerical simulation based on the proof shows that the long-range pulse correlation does not cause a significant impact on the key rate, which reveals another striking feature of the RRDPS protocol. Our security proof is thus effective and applicable to a wide range of practical sources and paves the way to realizing truly secure QKD in high-speed systems.