Abstract The theory of quantum Darwinism aims to explain how our objective classical reality arises from the quantum world, by analysing the distribution of information about a quantum system that is accessible to multiple observers, who probe the system by intercepting fragments of its environment. Previous work showed that, when the number of environmental fragments grows, the quantum channels modelling the information flow from system to observers become arbitrarily close—in terms of diamond norm distance—to ‘measure-and-prepare’ channels, ensuring objectivity of observables; the convergence is formalised by an upper bound on the diamond norm distance, which decreases with increasing number of fragments. Here, we derive tighter diamond norm bounds on the emergence of objectivity of observables for quantum systems of infinite dimension, providing an approach which can bridge between the finite- and the infinite-dimensional cases. Furthermore, we probe the tightness of our bounds by considering a specific model of a system-environment dynamics given by a pure loss channel. Finally, we generalise to infinite dimensions a result obtained by Brandão et al (2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7908), which provides an operational characterisation of quantum discord in terms of one-sided redistribution of correlations to many parties. Our results provide a unifying framework to benchmark quantitatively the rise of objectivity in the quantum-to-classical transition.
Abstract The theory of quantum Darwinism aims to explain how our objective classical reality arises from the quantum world, by analysing the distribution of information about a quantum system that is accessible to multiple observers, who probe the system by intercepting fragments of its environment. Previous work showed that, when the number of environmental fragments grows, the quantum channels modelling the information flow from system to observers become arbitrarily close—in terms of diamond norm distance—to ‘measure-and-prepare’ channels, ensuring objectivity of observables; the convergence is formalised by an upper bound on the diamond norm distance, which decreases with increasing number of fragments. Here, we derive tighter diamond norm bounds on the emergence of objectivity of observables for quantum systems of infinite dimension, providing an approach which can bridge between the finite- and the infinite-dimensional cases. Furthermore, we probe the tightness of our bounds by considering a specific model of a system-environment dynamics given by a pure loss channel. Finally, we generalise to infinite dimensions a result obtained by Brandão et al (2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7908), which provides an operational characterisation of quantum discord in terms of one-sided redistribution of correlations to many parties. Our results provide a unifying framework to benchmark quantitatively the rise of objectivity in the quantum-to-classical transition.
Quantum Darwinism posits that information becomes objective whenever multiple observers indirectly probe a quantum system by each measuring a fraction of the environment. It was recently shown that objectivity of observables emerges generically from the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics, whenever the system of interest has finite dimensions and the number of environment fragments is large [F. G. S. L. Brandão, M. Piani, and P. Horodecki, Nat. Commun. 6, 7908 (2015)NCAOBW2041-172310.1038/ncomms8908]. Despite the importance of this result, it necessarily excludes many practical systems of interest that are infinite dimensional, including harmonic oscillators. Extending the study of quantum Darwinism to infinite dimensions is a nontrivial task: we tackle it here by using a modified diamond norm, suitable to quantify the distinguishability of channels in infinite dimensions. We prove two theorems that bound the emergence of objectivity, first for finite mean energy systems, and then for systems that can only be prepared in states with an exponential energy cutoff. We show that the latter class includes any bounded-energy subset of single-mode Gaussian states.
Abstract Classical objectivity arises when many independent observers can retrieve the same information about a quantum system without disturbing it. Quantum Darwinism (QD) explains this by treating the environment as a communication channel that redundantly broadcasts information about pointer observables. We develop an operational framework for quantifying this redundancy through the lens of functional information. By introducing a one-sided adequacy criterion based on the Holevo bound, we measure the \emph{abundance} of environment fragments that individually contain nearly all classically accessible pointer information. Using a heterogeneous pure–dephasing model, we sample fragments to extract onset statistics and apply isotonic regression to obtain stable estimates of redundancy and its functional-information counterpart FIQD=log2Rδ. The results reveal a generic onset–plateau structure: redundancy grows rapidly at early times, then saturates at a capacity-limited ceiling, universally across adequacy tolerances. We further connect FIQD to thermodynamic bounds, showing that each additional bit of redundancy implies exponentially increasing minimal heat costs for record stabilization. This approach provides a conservative, model-agnostic measure of emergent classicality, suitable for both theoretical analysis and experimental probing.
"How much information about a system S can one extract from a fragment F of the environment E that decohered it?" is the central question of Quantum Darwinism. To date, most answers relied on the quantum mutual information of SF, or on the Holevo bound on the channel capacity of F to communicate the classical information encoded in S. These are reasonable upper bounds on what is really needed but much harder to calculate-the accessible information in the fragment F about S. We consider a model based on imperfect c-not gates where all the above can be computed, and discuss its implications for the emergence of objective classical reality. We find that all relevant quantities, such as the quantum mutual information as well as various bounds on the accessible information exhibit similar behavior. In the regime relevant for the emergence of objective classical reality this includes scaling independent of the quality of the imperfect c-not gates or the size of E, and even nearly independent of the initial state of S.
An explanation for the quantum-to-classical transition has long been sought after since the haydays of the field. Decoherence theory and open quantum system dynamics have paved the way, showing how a system can become correlated with, and so lose information into the environment. Quantum Darwinism, and its more stringent cousins Strong Quantum Darwinism and Spectrum Broadcast Structures, seek to explain how this information loss is achieved in such a way as to be objective, classical and redundant. However there remains questions as to how the structure of the environment, states and types of interactions can give rise to this redundant encoding. In this thesis, we collect the work of 3 of our papers, exploring these questions. First, we show how information from one environment can spread to another. Then we show how commutativity can play a role in the emergence of objectivity. Lastly, we move beyond a single, pure system to a more realistic bipartite one, with both classical and quantum correlations between the subsystems. We shall show how interactions between only these subsystems can mediate the redundancy of others, and how these can lower bound and upper bound other forms of interactions between said subsystems and the environment.
Quantum Darwinism explains why the everyday world looks classical: a system's state is copied redundantly into many pieces of its environment, so that independent observers reading different pieces all agree on the same fact. The mathematical signature of this "objectivity" is a special state structure. Existing theory mostly asks whether a state has that structure; it says little about how far a realistic, imperfectly copied state is from it. This paper supplies a complete, self-contained quantitative theory of that distance for the widely studied class of states produced by pure decoherence. Its central results are an exact formula for how far such a state sits from perfect objectivity, and a sharp two-sided bound that pins the distance between two simple, physically meaningful quantities — the overlap between environmental records and the leftover quantum coherence. It also gives an exact condition for perfect objectivity and a stability guarantee under small disturbances. A single algebraic identity drives every exact result, and that identity has been formally verified by proof-checking software. The work is deliberately scoped: it quantifies the "necessity" side of objectivity and its exact geometry, complementing — not replacing — existing criteria for when objectivity is sufficient. In short, it turns objectivity from a yes/no property into a precisely measurable one, giving the field an exact ruler for how classical a quantum state has become.
Quantum mechanics describes the smallest systems, whilst classical physics describes macroscopic scales. However, the quantum-to-classical transition is a major unsolved problem. In this thesis, we develop further understanding of the transition through the concept of objectivity. The objects we perceive in our everyday world are objective: they exist regardless of observation, and their properties are independent of observers. This is because information about everyday objects came be found, for example, in the surrounding photon environment. Quantum Darwinism is a conceptual and theoretical framework that describes the emergence of objectivity. The “Darwinistic” part refers to how certain types of information tends to spread at the expense of others. The thesis addresses the quantitative description of objectivity, the dynamics of emergent objectivity, and the analysis of non-objectivity in experimental and biology-inspired systems. Firstly, we propose two new mathematical frameworks to describe objectivity, Strong Quantum Darwinism and invariant spectrum broadcast structure. Then we unite them with the pre-existing frameworks, Zurek's Quantum Darwinism and spectrum broadcast structure, by identifying their deep connections and differences. These conditions highlight how Each framework considers varying amounts of objectivity in the system and environments and together, they create a hierarchy of objectivity. We then analyse objectivity in a scenario where system-environment interactions are strong and non-Markovian, highlighting some practical differences between the Quantum Darwinism frameworks. Next, we describe the quantum channels that create objective states, leading us to discuss the contribution of non-Markovianity to the emergence of objectivity. Then, we introduce a witnessing scheme that simplifies the detection of non-objectivity to promote further experimental testing of Quantum Darwinism with larger environments. Finally, we examine the contribution of quantum coherence and non-objectivity to the performance of a biological-inspired quantum magnetic sensor that operates close to the quantum-classical boundary. We find that the sensor operates in a non-objective regime, and that quantum coherence is necessary for the sensor's performance. The quantum-to-classical transition is a longstanding open question: these findings deepen our knowledge of how objectivity emerges, and contributes to and the types of interactions that keep systems quantum, which is relevant for understanding quantum biological systems and exploiting environment effects in novel quantum technologies. While the quantum-to-classical transition remains unsolved, Quantum Darwinism and its frameworks contribute to the understanding of emergent objectivity and have much potential to further explore aspects of the transition within the structure of quantum mechanics.