Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2002.01457 · Quantum Information Processing

Quantum Carnot cycle with inner friction

Selçuk Çakmak, Ferdi Altintas

Published Jul 18, 2020• 17 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s11128-020-02746-x

Related papers

Irreversible quantum Carnot cycle and its comparison with quantum Otto cycle

Ferdi Altintas

Physics Letters A•Jan 6, 2025•3 citations

Construction of a quantum Carnot heat engine cycle

Selçuk Çakmak, Mustafa Çandır, Ferdi Altintas

Quantum Information Processing•Aug 27, 2020•16 citations

Irreversible Quantum Carnot Cycle and its Comparisonwith Quantum Otto Cycle for Non-Scalable Quantumsystems

Ferdi Altintas

•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Different constructions and optimization of the irreversible quantum Carnot cycle

Selçuk Çakmak, Ferdi Altintas

The European Physical Journal Plus•Apr 1, 2021•10 citations

Comparison of the coupled quantum Carnot and Otto cycles

Ferdi Altintas

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Feb 4, 2019•28 citations

Probing non-adiabaticity in a quantum Otto cycle through quantum texture and imaginarity

Jonas F. G. Santos

Finite-time driving in quantum thermodynamic cycles inevitably generates coherences in the instantaneous energy basis, leading to quantum friction and degrading the operational performance. In this work, we demonstrate that the non-adiabatic inner friction produced during unitary driving of a two-level system can be faithfully quantified by combining two distinct resource-theoretic notions: quantum texture (rugosity) and imaginarity. We show that neither rugosity nor imaginarity alone is sufficient to track the total non-adiabaticity, and we introduce a combined witness, which is strictly non-negative and vanishes if and only if the driving is quasi-static. Applying this framework to a finite-time quantum Otto refrigerator, we establish an exact closed-form relation connecting the coefficient of performance directly to the quantum texture and imaginarity, evaluated at the end of the unitary compression and expansion strokes. Furthermore, we show that local minima of the non-adiabatic witness accurately identify the operating regimes that maximize cooling performance. Our findings provide a geometric and resource-theoretic foundation for inner friction, offering practical diagnostic tools for optimizing finite-time quantum thermal machines.

quant-pharXiv:2611.02291•Nov 3, 2026
Finite-time driving in quantum thermodynamic cycles inevitably generates coherences in the instantaneous energy basis, leading to quantum friction and degrading the operational performance. In this work, we demonstrate that the non-adiabatic inner friction produced during unitary driving of a two-level system can be faithfully quantified by combining two distinct resource-theoretic notions: quantum texture (rugosity) and imaginarity. We show that neither rugosity nor imaginarity alone is sufficient to track the total non-adiabaticity, and we introduce a combined witness, which is strictly non-negative and vanishes if and only if the driving is quasi-static. Applying this framework to a finite-time quantum Otto refrigerator, we establish an exact closed-form relation connecting the coefficient of performance directly to the quantum texture and imaginarity, evaluated at the end of the unitary compression and expansion strokes. Furthermore, we show that local minima of the non-adiabatic witness accurately identify the operating regimes that maximize cooling performance. Our findings provide a geometric and resource-theoretic foundation for inner friction, offering practical diagnostic tools for optimizing finite-time quantum thermal machines.