Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2001.04951 · Physical Review Research

Ground-state phase diagram of the three-band Hubbard model from density matrix embedding theory

Zhi‐Hao Cui, Chong Sun, Ushnish Ray, Bo-Xiao Zheng, Qiming Sun, Garnet Kin‐Lic Chan

Published Nov 19, 2020• 47 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The authors use a density matrix embedding theory to characterize the ground-state phase diagram of the three-band Hubbard model, and focus on the atomic-scale nature of the antiferromagnetic and superconducting orders by including the oxygen degrees of freedom.
DOI
10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043259

Related papers

Ground-state phase diagram of the three-band Hubbard model in various parametrizations from density matrix embedding theory

Zhi‐Hao Cui, Chong Sun, Ushnish Ray +3 more

We compute the ground-state phase diagram of the three-band Hubbard model in various published parametrizations using density matrix embedding theory. We study the atomic-scale nature of the antiferromagnetic (AF) and superconducting (SC) orders, explicitly including the oxygen degrees of freedom. In the case of the AF order, as expected, the local magnetic moment localizes entirely at the copper sites and decays with doping, while in the SC phase we observe a local $p_{x (y)}$ [or $d_{xz (yz)}$]-symmetry modulation of the pair density on the Cu-O bonds within the larger scale $d_{x^2 - y^2}$-wave SC pairing order between Cu-Cu and O-O. While all parametrizations of the model display AF and SC phases, the decay of AF order with doping is too slow compared to the experimental phase diagram, and further, coexistence of AF and SC orders occurs in all parameter sets. Our work highlights the importance of the oxygen degrees of freedom in the study of atomic-scale SC orders, as well as the necessity of re-evaluating current parametrizations of the three-band Hubbard model.

•Jan 14, 2020•1 citation

Ground-state phase diagram of the square lattice Hubbard model from density matrix embedding theory

Bo-Xiao Zheng, Garnet Kin‐Lic Chan

We compute the ground-state phase diagram of the Hubbard and frustrated Hubbard models on the square lattice with density matrix embedding theory using clusters of up to 16 sites. We provide an error model to estimate the reliability of the computations and complexity of the physics at different points in the diagram. We find superconductivity in the ground state as well as competition between inhomogeneous charge, spin, and pairing states at low doping. The estimated errors in the study are below ${T}_{c}$ in the cuprates and on the scale of contributions in real materials that are neglected in the Hubbard model.

arXiv:1504.01784•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jan 21, 2016•184 citations

Finite-temperature density matrix embedding theory

Chong Sun, Ushnish Ray, Zhi‐Hao Cui +3 more

We describe a formulation of the density matrix embedding theory at finite temperature. We present a generalization of the ground-state bath orbital construction that embeds a mean-field finite-temperature density matrix up to a given order in the Hamiltonian, or the Hamiltonian up to a given order in the density matrix. We assess the performance of the finite-temperature density matrix embedding on the one-dimensional Hubbard model both at half-filling and away from it, and the two-dimensional Hubbard model at half-filling, comparing to exact data where available, as well as results from finite-temperature density matrix renormalization group, dynamical mean-field theory, and dynamical cluster approximations. The accuracy of finite-temperature density matrix embedding appears comparable to that of the ground-state theory, with, at most, a modest increase in bath size, and competitive with that of cluster dynamical mean-field theory.

arXiv:1911.07439•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Feb 24, 2020•36 citations

Phase separation in the Hubbard model

Antonis N. Andriotis, Eleftherios N. Economou, Qiming Li +1 more

We use the correlated-random-field approximation and a conditional coherent-potential approximation to study the ground-state phase diagram of the one-band Hubbard model. Our approach incorporates both spin and electron correlations. It has been found that for certain values of the parameters of the model, in addition to paramagnetic, ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, and spin-glass or spin-liquid phases found in our earlier studies, a phase-separated phase is found to be favored for 0.7\ensuremath{\le}n\ensuremath{\le}1.0 and U/B\ensuremath{\ge}2 in good agreement with results obtained in the t-J model using the technique of the 1/N expansion. The present approach also allows one to watch the dependence of the electron density of states on the number of electrons per site and gives a single physical picture for the occurrence of a metal-insulator transition. Implications of these results for the existence of superconducting ground state as well as comparison to other studies will be briefly discussed.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Apr 15, 1993•22 citations

Ground-state phase diagram of the triangular lattice Hubbard model by the density-matrix renormalization group method

Tomonori Shirakawa, Takami Tohyama, J. Kokalj +2 more

Two-dimensional density-matrix renormalization group method is employed to examine the ground-state phase diagram of the Hubbard model on the triangular lattice at half-filling. The calculation reveals two discontinuities in the double occupancy with increasing the repulsive Hubbard interaction $U$ at ${U}_{\mathrm{c}1}\ensuremath{\sim}7.8t$ and ${U}_{\mathrm{c}2}\ensuremath{\sim}9.9t$ ($t$ being the hopping integral), indicating that there are three phases separated by first-order transitions. The absence of any singularity in physical quantities for $0\ensuremath{\le}U<{U}_{\mathrm{c}1}$ implies a metallic phase in this regime. For $U>{U}_{\mathrm{c}2}$, the local spin density induced by an applied pinning magnetic field exhibits a three sublattice feature, which is compatible with the ${120}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$ N\'eel-ordered state realized in the limit of $U\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$. For ${U}_{\mathrm{c}1}<U<{U}_{\mathrm{c}2}$, a response to the applied pinning magnetic field is comparable to that in the metallic phase with a relatively large spin correlation length, but showing neither valence bond nor chiral magnetic order, which therefore resembles gapless spin liquid. However, the spin structure factor for the intermediate phase exhibits the maximum at the $\mathrm{K}$ and ${\mathrm{K}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ points in the momentum space, which is not compatible to spin liquid with a large spinon Fermi surface. The calculation also finds that the pairing correlation function monotonically decreases with increasing $U$ and thus the superconductivity is unlikely in the intermediate phase.

arXiv:1606.06814•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Nov 15, 2017•88 citations

Antiferromagnetism, Superconductivity and Phase Diagram in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model —Off-Diagonal Wave Function Monte Carlo Studies of Hubbard Model III—

Takashi Yanagisawa

We investigate the ground-state phase diagram of the two-dimensional Hubbard model based on the optimization variational Monte Carlo method. We use a wave function that is an off-diagonal type given as $ψ=\exp(-λK)P_Gψ_0$, where $ψ_0$ is a one-particle state, $P_G$ is the Gutzwiller operator, $K$ is the kinetic operator, and $λ$ is a variational parameter. The many-body effect plays an important role as an origin of spin correlation and superconductivity in correlated electron systems. We examine the competition between the antiferromagnetic state and superconducting state by varying the Coulomb repulsion $U$, the band parameter $t'$ and the electron density $n_e$. We show a phase diagram that includes superconducting and antiferromagnetic phases and that $t'=0$ is most favorable for superconductivity.

arXiv:1903.09368•Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Apr 5, 2019•13 citations
We compute the ground-state phase diagram of the three-band Hubbard model in various published parametrizations using density matrix embedding theory. We study the atomic-scale nature of the antiferromagnetic (AF) and superconducting (SC) orders, explicitly including the oxygen degrees of freedom. In the case of the AF order, as expected, the local magnetic moment localizes entirely at the copper sites and decays with doping, while in the SC phase we observe a local px(y)p_{x (y)}px(y)​ [or dxz(yz)d_{xz (yz)}dxz(yz)​]-symmetry modulation of the pair density on the Cu-O bonds within the larger scale dx2−y2d_{x^2 - y^2}dx2−y2​-wave SC pairing order between Cu-Cu and O-O. While all parametrizations of the model display AF and SC phases, the decay of AF order with doping is too slow compared to the experimental phase diagram, and further, coexistence of AF and SC orders occurs in all parameter sets. Our work highlights the importance of the oxygen degrees of freedom in the study of atomic-scale SC orders, as well as the necessity of re-evaluating current parametrizations of the three-band Hubbard model.
We compute the ground-state phase diagram of the Hubbard and frustrated Hubbard models on the square lattice with density matrix embedding theory using clusters of up to 16 sites. We provide an error model to estimate the reliability of the computations and complexity of the physics at different points in the diagram. We find superconductivity in the ground state as well as competition between inhomogeneous charge, spin, and pairing states at low doping. The estimated errors in the study are below Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ in the cuprates and on the scale of contributions in real materials that are neglected in the Hubbard model.
We describe a formulation of the density matrix embedding theory at finite temperature. We present a generalization of the ground-state bath orbital construction that embeds a mean-field finite-temperature density matrix up to a given order in the Hamiltonian, or the Hamiltonian up to a given order in the density matrix. We assess the performance of the finite-temperature density matrix embedding on the one-dimensional Hubbard model both at half-filling and away from it, and the two-dimensional Hubbard model at half-filling, comparing to exact data where available, as well as results from finite-temperature density matrix renormalization group, dynamical mean-field theory, and dynamical cluster approximations. The accuracy of finite-temperature density matrix embedding appears comparable to that of the ground-state theory, with, at most, a modest increase in bath size, and competitive with that of cluster dynamical mean-field theory.
We use the correlated-random-field approximation and a conditional coherent-potential approximation to study the ground-state phase diagram of the one-band Hubbard model. Our approach incorporates both spin and electron correlations. It has been found that for certain values of the parameters of the model, in addition to paramagnetic, ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, and spin-glass or spin-liquid phases found in our earlier studies, a phase-separated phase is found to be favored for 0.7\ensuremath{\le}n\ensuremath{\le}1.0 and U/B\ensuremath{\ge}2 in good agreement with results obtained in the t-J model using the technique of the 1/N expansion. The present approach also allows one to watch the dependence of the electron density of states on the number of electrons per site and gives a single physical picture for the occurrence of a metal-insulator transition. Implications of these results for the existence of superconducting ground state as well as comparison to other studies will be briefly discussed.
Two-dimensional density-matrix renormalization group method is employed to examine the ground-state phase diagram of the Hubbard model on the triangular lattice at half-filling. The calculation reveals two discontinuities in the double occupancy with increasing the repulsive Hubbard interaction UUU at ${U}_{\mathrm{c}1}\ensuremath{\sim}7.8t$ and ${U}_{\mathrm{c}2}\ensuremath{\sim}9.9t$ (ttt being the hopping integral), indicating that there are three phases separated by first-order transitions. The absence of any singularity in physical quantities for $0\ensuremath{\le}U<{U}_{\mathrm{c}1}$ implies a metallic phase in this regime. For U>Uc2U>{U}_{\mathrm{c}2}U>Uc2​, the local spin density induced by an applied pinning magnetic field exhibits a three sublattice feature, which is compatible with the ${120}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$ N\'eel-ordered state realized in the limit of $U\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$. For Uc1<U<Uc2{U}_{\mathrm{c}1}<U<{U}_{\mathrm{c}2}Uc1​<U<Uc2​, a response to the applied pinning magnetic field is comparable to that in the metallic phase with a relatively large spin correlation length, but showing neither valence bond nor chiral magnetic order, which therefore resembles gapless spin liquid. However, the spin structure factor for the intermediate phase exhibits the maximum at the K\mathrm{K}K and ${\mathrm{K}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ points in the momentum space, which is not compatible to spin liquid with a large spinon Fermi surface. The calculation also finds that the pairing correlation function monotonically decreases with increasing UUU and thus the superconductivity is unlikely in the intermediate phase.
We investigate the ground-state phase diagram of the two-dimensional Hubbard model based on the optimization variational Monte Carlo method. We use a wave function that is an off-diagonal type given as ψ=exp⁡(−λK)PGψ0ψ=\exp(-λK)P_Gψ_0ψ=exp(−λK)PG​ψ0​, where ψ0ψ_0ψ0​ is a one-particle state, PGP_GPG​ is the Gutzwiller operator, KKK is the kinetic operator, and λλλ is a variational parameter. The many-body effect plays an important role as an origin of spin correlation and superconductivity in correlated electron systems. We examine the competition between the antiferromagnetic state and superconducting state by varying the Coulomb repulsion UUU, the band parameter t′t't′ and the electron density nen_ene​. We show a phase diagram that includes superconducting and antiferromagnetic phases and that t′=0t'=0t′=0 is most favorable for superconductivity.