arXiv:1912.02711 · Physical Review A

Generalized conditional expectations for quantum retrodiction and smoothing

Mankei Tsang

Published Apr 21, 2022• 18 citations

Abstract

The inference of a hidden variable's historical value, based on observations before and after the fact, is a controversial subject in quantum mechanics. Here I address the controversy by proposing a formalism that unifies and generalizes some of the previous proposals for the task, including the quantum minimum-mean-square-error estimators proposed by Ohki, the generalized conditional expectation proposed by Accardi and Cecchini, the quantum smoothing theory proposed by Tsang, the optimal observables for parameter estimation proposed by Personick, Belavkin, and Grishanin, and the weak values proposed by Aharonov, Albert, and Vaidman. The formalism is based on Ohki's suggestion of a distance between two observables in the Heisenberg picture, which remains well defined for incompatible observables and serves as a more general foundation for quantum inference than Belavkin's nondemolition principle.

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.105.042213

Related papers

Quantum analogs of the conditional expectation for retrodiction and smoothing: a unified view.

Mankei Tsang

Ohki recently proposed a decision-theoretic approach to the retrodiction and smoothing of a quantum observable. Here I convert it to the Schrodinger picture and demonstrate its connections to prior works in quantum estimation theory.

Dec 5, 20193 citations

Operational meanings of a generalized conditional expectation in quantum metrology

Mankei Tsang

A unifying formalism of generalized conditional expectations (GCEs) for quantum mechanics has recently emerged, but its physical implications regarding the retrodiction of a quantum observable remain controversial. To address the controversy, here I offer operational meanings for a version of the GCEs in the context of quantum parameter estimation. When a quantum sensor is corrupted by decoherence, the GCE is found to relate the operator-valued optimal estimators before and after the decoherence. Furthermore, the error increase, or regret, caused by the decoherence is shown to be equal to a divergence between the two estimators. The real weak value as a special case of the GCE plays the same role in suboptimal estimation – its divergence from the optimal estimator is precisely the regret for not using the optimal measurement. For an application of the GCE, I show that it enables the use of dynamic programming for designing a controller that minimizes the estimation error. For the frequentist setting, I show that the GCE leads to a quantum Rao-Blackwell theorem, which offers significant implications for quantum metrology and thermal-light sensing in particular. These results give the GCE and the associated divergence a natural, useful, and incontrovertible role in quantum decision and control theory.

arXiv:2212.13162QuantumNov 3, 20238 citations

A smoothing theory for open quantum systems: The least mean square approach

Kentaro Ohki

Unlike the classical smoothing theory, it is well known that quantum smoothers are, in general, not well-defined by the quantum conditional expectation. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new quantum smoothing theory based on the least mean squared errors. The least mean square estimate of quantum physical quantity composes from symmetric part and skew part, and we developed the recursive equations, respectively.

arXiv:2112.13330IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)Dec 1, 20158 citations

How to Estimate Past Quantum Measurement Interventions After Continuous Monitoring

John Edward Gough

We analyze the problem of estimating past quantum states of a monitored system from a mathematical perspective in order to ensure self-consistency with the principle of quantum nondemolition. Despite several claims of “measuring noncommuting observables” in the physics literature, we show that we are always measuring commuting processes. Our main interest is in the notion of quantum smoothing, or retrodiction. In particular, we examine proposals to estimate the result of an external measurement made on an open quantum systems during a period where it is also undergoing continuous monitoring. A full analysis shows that the nondemolition principle is in place, and so a well-posed statistical inference problem can be formulated. We extend the formalism to consider multiple independent external measurements made on the system over the course of a continual period of monitoring.

arXiv:1904.06364Russian Journal of Mathematical PhysicsApr 1, 20204 citations

Conditional probabilities in quantum theory and the tunneling-time controversy

Aephraim M. Steinberg

It is argued that there is a sensible way to define conditional probabilities in quantum mechanics, assuming only Bayes's theorem and standard quantum theory. These probabilities are equivalent to the ``weak measurement'' predictions due to Aharonov, Albert, and Vaidman [Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988)] and hence describe the outcomes of real measurements made on subensembles. In particular, this approach is used to address the question of the history of a particle that has tunneled across a barrier. A gedanken experiment is presented to demonstrate the physically testable implications of the results of these calculations, along with graphs of the time evolution of the conditional probability distribution for a tunneling particle and for one undergoing allowed transmission. Numerical results are also presented for the effects of loss in a band-gap medium on transmission and on reflection, as a function of the position of the lossy region; such loss should provide a feasible, though indirect, test of the present conclusions. It is argued that the effects of loss on the pulse delay time are related to the imaginary value of the momentum of a tunneling particle and it is suggested that this might help explain a small discrepancy in an earlier experiment.

arXiv:quant-ph/9502003Physical Review AJul 1, 1995155 citations

What does quantum parameter estimation estimate? A no-go result for true quantity values

Jacques L. Pienaar, Eran Tal, Asya Ciftci

We examine the conditions under which quantum parameter estimation is compatible with the concept of a ``true'' quantity value: a unique value of the estimated quantity that exists prior to and independently of measurement. While quantum parameter estimation typically assumes that the quantity to be estimated is a parameter, we argue that this assumption can be lifted, opening the way to a more general formulation of estimation that may apply even in situations where the quantity to be estimated is no longer a parameter, but instead a quantum variable susceptible to quantum fluctuations. We identify three assumptions that characterize the way estimation is often presented in the quantum metrology literature, namely, as a procedure for inferring an unknown ``true value", which is assumed to be unique and to exist prior to and independently of measurement. Using our more general framework, we prove a no-go theorem showing that the preceding assumptions are jointly incompatible with two further assumptions: the completeness of the quantum state (no `hidden variables'), and the presence of entanglement between the probe systems and the system under measurement. We note that the presence of such entanglement is a generic prediction of standard quantum theory. Consequently, if one is not willing to accept hidden variables, nor willing to modify standard quantum theory by introducing a new physical mechanism that destroys entanglement at some scale or regime, then a realist account of estimation is ultimately impossible.

quant-pharXiv:2610.31632Oct 23, 20260 citations