Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1909.10974 · Letters in Mathematical Physics

An operational construction of the sum of two non-commuting observables in quantum theory and related constructions

Nicolò Drago, Sonia Mazzucchi, Valter Moretti

Published Oct 4, 2020• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract The existence of a real linear space structure on the set of observables of a quantum system—i.e., the requirement that the linear combination of two generally non-commuting observables A, B is an observable as well—is a fundamental postulate of the quantum theory yet before introducing any structure of algebra. However, it is by no means clear how to choose the measuring instrument of a general observable of the form $$aA+bB$$ a A + b B ( $$a,b\in {{\mathbb {R}}}$$ a , b ∈ R ) if such measuring instruments are given for the addends observables A and B when they are incompatible observables. A mathematical version of this dilemma is how to construct the spectral measure of $$f(aA+bB)$$ f ( a A + b B ) out of the spectral measures of A and B. We present such a construction with a formula which is valid for general unbounded self-adjoint operators A and B, whose spectral measures may not commute, and a wide class of functions $$f: {{\mathbb {R}}}\rightarrow {{\mathbb {C}}}$$ f : R → C . In the bounded case, we prove that the Jordan product of A and B (and suitably symmetrized polynomials of A and B) can be constructed with the same procedure out of the spectral measures of A and B. The formula turns out to have an interesting operational interpretation and, in particular cases, a nice interplay with the theory of Feynman path integration and the Feynman–Kac formula.

DOI
10.1007/s11005-020-01332-7

Related papers

Postulates for General Quantum Mechanics

Irving E. Segal

We present in this paper a set of postulates for a physical system and deduce from these the main general features of the quantum theory of stationary states. Our theory is strictly operational in the sense that only the observables of the physical system are involved in the postulates. The collection of all bounded self-adj oint operators on a Hilbert space, which has previously been used as a mathematical model for the observables in quantum mechanics, satisfy the postulates, as do a variety of considerably more general mathematical structures. We show that for any two observables there exists a pure state of the system (this term being defined essentially as done by von Neumann and Weyl) in which they have different (expectation) values. Each observable has a spectral resolution, and a state of the system induces, in a natural way, a probability distribution on the range of spectral values of each observable. A number of observables are simultaneously observable if and only if they commute (although the product of two observables is not defined in general, a reasonable notion of commutativity can be introduced). Inasmuch as Hilbert space plays no role in our theory, our proofs are necessarily of a different character from the proofs of these results for the case of the system of all bounded selfadjoint operators. Actually, Hilbert space appears to be somewhat inadequate as a state space even for the latter system, in that there exist pure states of the system which cannot be represented in the usual way by rays of the Hilbert space. The postulates are partly algebraic and partly metric. The algebraic postulates require essentially that an observable can be multiplied by real numbers and raised to integral powers, and that any two observables can be added. It is assumed that the usual algebraic laws are satisfied so that (1) the observables can be treated like the elements of a linear space, and (2) the usual rules for dealing with polynomials in one variable with real coefficients remain valid when the variable is replaced by an observable. It is not assumed that two observables have a product. The metric postulates require that for each observable there be defined a kind of maximum numerical value, which plays the part of a norm, and has various properties in accord with its physical significance. While this norm is quite essential to the development of the theory, an interesting consequence of the theory is that the norm can be (uniquely) defined in a purely algebraic fashion. This shows that the objective features of a physical system,-the spectral values and probability distributions of the observables, and the pure states,-are completely determined by the algebra of observables, i.e., by the rules for addition, scalar multiplication, and powers, of observables.

Annals of Mathematics•Oct 1, 1947•422 citations

An application of operator *-algebras to the theory of quantum measurement

Juan Sotelo-Campos

In this thesis we adapt the Davies and Lewis’ operational approach to quantum probability to the Op*-algebra framework. In Chapter I we introduce our formalism of quantum mechanics. We define the space of pure states U as a nuclear-Frechet space generated by a self-adjoint operator M whose inverse is nuclear. The algebra of observables is taken to be L+, the adjoint-stable set of linear maps from U into itself. This algebra and its dual under the uniform topology form a dual pair. We derive several algebraic and topological properties of this dual pair and show that it forms a suitable structure for the adaptation of Davies and Lewis’ theory to the Op*-algebra framework. In Chapter II we set the basis of the Davies and Lewis’ operational approach to quantum probability within the framework developed in chapter I. Here we define the fundamental concepts of an expectation and an instrument and discuss their relationship. We show that instruments are bounded Radon measures and that the compose of two of them is not in general a stable operation on the universe of all instruments. We conclude the chapter discussing the general Robertson-Heisenberg uncertainty relations. In Chapter III we build a special class of instruments to measure Q, P and H on S; these are based on Davies’ approximate position measurements. In particular we show that the compose of any two, hence any finite number, of these instruments is an instrument.

•Jan 1, 1987•0 citations

Composite systems and the role of the complex numbers in quantum mechanics

Gerd Niestegge

An axiomatic approach to the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics, based upon a certain concept of conditional probability, has been proposed in two recent papers by the author. It leads to Jordan operator algebras and thus comes rather close to the standard Hilbert space model of quantum mechanics, but still includes the so-called exceptional Jordan algebras, for which a Hilbert space representation does not exist. This approach is now extended by defining a mathematical model of composite systems. Such a model is required for the study of the joint distribution of two quantum observables. A very general type of observables (not only the real-valued observables corresponding to the self-adjoint operators) is considered. The joint distribution is defined, using the concept of conditional probability, and exhibits a certain dependence on the succession of the observations which is different from the classical case and unknown so far in quantum mechanics. Finally, it turns out that, at least in the finite-dimensional case, a really satisfying model of the composite system exists only if each single system is modeled by a complex Jordan matrix algebra (or a direct sum), and the model then becomes the tensor product. This provides some reasoning why the exceptional Jordan algebras can be ruled out, why quantum mechanics needs the complex numbers and the complex Hilbert space, and why the tensor product is the right choice for the model of a composite system.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Nov 12, 2004•16 citations

Quantifying incompatibility between positive operator-valued measures via negativity of the Jordan product

Yi Rong Guo, Shunlong Luo

A fundamental feature of quantum mechanics is the incompatibility between quantum measurements, which leads to the Heisenberg uncertainty relations and is intrinsically related to detection of many other quantum features such as nonlocality and steering. Given the significance and ubiquity of incompatibility, it is desirable to quantify the degree of incompatibility between two quantum measurements which are mathematically described by positive operator valued measures. The commutator (Lie product) between operators has widely been used in quantifying incompatibility (noncommutativity) and plays a crucial role in quantum mechanics. In contrast, the anticommutator (Jordan product) between operators has been relatively less employed in the study of quantum mechanics. In this work, we explore the role of the Jordan product in characterizing measurement incompatibility. The key observation lies in that while the product of two non-negative classical observables is automatically non-negative, this is not the case for quantum observables. Indeed the Jordan product of two non-negative observables is not necessarily non-negative. This negativity of the Jordan product is a purely quantum phenomenon and is here exploited to quantify a kind of measurement incompatibility, which interpolates between noncommutativity and joint measurability. We reveal basic features of this approach, make some comparisons with existing quantifiers of incompatibility and suggest the issue of investigating its applications and implications in quantum information tasks.

Physical Review A•Dec 5, 2024•9 citations

Order Properties of Bounded Observables

Neal Zierler

Continuing the development [4] of an aspect of the approach to the axiomatization of quantum mechanics of G. W. Mackey [3], we consider here the real linear space X of signed measures on the set P of events generated by the states, and the set F0 of linear functionals on X which are induced in a natural way by the bounded observables. A necessary and sufficient condition for two events to be simultaneously measurable is found in terms of the order structure of F0, with the following consequence: if F0 is a lattice, P is deterministic. At the opposite extreme, F0 is said to be an anti-lattice1 if the greatest lower bound exists only for comparable pairs of its elements and we show in this case that the center of P is trivial. Our results extend those of R. V. Kadison [l], in which F0 and P are the self-adjoint operators and projections respectively in a uniformly closed self-adjoint operator algebra. While the framework and plan of the proofs were inspired by Kadison's work, almost none of the apparatus used by him is available here with the result that, in detail, our techniques are quite different from his. Let P be a weakly modular partially ordered set (see [4]). A function x from P to the non-negative real numbers and + oo is said to be a measure if x(0) =0 and x is countably additive in the sense that whenever {a,} is a pairwise orthogonal sequence of elements of P, then x(Ua?) = 2Zxiad- If x is a measure and {bt} EP is an increasing (decreasing) sequence with supremum (infimum) b, then x(&?) —*x(6). A countably additive function x from P to the extended real numbers is a signed measure if x(0) =0 and x takes on at most one of the values + =o and — oo ; x is finite if x(l) is finite. Define the functions 5 and i on the signed measures on P by six) = sup(x(a) : aEP\, fx) =inf {x(a): aEP} and set ||x|| =s(x)—?(x). Clearly ||x|| < oo if and only if x is finite. It iseasy toseethat||x|| = sup {x(a)— xia'):aE P} ■ Lemma 1. Let X be a real linear space of finite signed measures on P. Then the function || || defined above is a norm for X and, under this norm and its natural partial ordering, X is a partially ordered normed linear space. That is,2

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society•Apr 1, 1963•10 citations

THE PROBLEM OF ENTANGLEMENT OF QUANTUM STATES

On Matem, Atica Argentina

G.A. RAGGIO Abstract. We give a brief and incomplete survey of the problem of entan- glement of of composite quantum systems. 1960's - 1980's there were serious attempts (all of them anticipated by J. von Neu- mann) to do away with the underlying Hilbert space and work directly with the abstract algebraic structure modeled by C � -algebras or W � -algebras (abstract von Neumann algebras)(1, 2, 3). This was particularly fruitful when dealing with sys- tems of infinitely many degrees of freedom (quantum fields, thermodynamic limits, etc.). The problem of entanglement which we want to address here can be formu- lated quite straightforwardly in this algebraic framework of quantum theory. But we will stick to the quantum mechanics of the 1930's and keep the Hilbert space. Mainly because the results which are available concern the finite dimensional case. The states of the quantum system specified by H are associated with the lin- ear functionals f : B(H) → C which are positive (i.e., f(a) ≥ 0 for all positive a ∈ B(H)), normalized (i.e., f(1) = 1) and normal (i.e., f(supn{an}) = supnf(an) for any increasing family of selfadjoint operators {an : n = 1,2, � � � } which is uni- formly bounded). It is this normality condition which guarantees that the are in one-to-one correspondence with positive trace class operators d of unit trace (density operators) via the formula B(H) ∋ a 7→ tr(da). This gives an extremely convenient representation of and one often confuses the state f as a linear functional with the associated density operator d for which f(a) = tr(da). States are automatically continuous, and satisfy f(a � ) = f(a). The complex number f(a) is interpreted probabilistically as the expected value of the observable associated with the operator a when the system is in the state f. The normalization condi- tion is thus necessary for the consistency of this interpretation and the normality condition is seen as a non-commutative version of the �-additivity of probability measures. Clearly states, which we will denote by �(H), form a convex set which is closed

•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations
Abstract The existence of a real linear space structure on the set of observables of a quantum system—i.e., the requirement that the linear combination of two generally non-commuting observables A, B is an observable as well—is a fundamental postulate of the quantum theory yet before introducing any structure of algebra. However, it is by no means clear how to choose the measuring instrument of a general observable of the form aA+bBaA+bBaA+bB a A + b B ( a,b∈Ra,b\in {{\mathbb {R}}}a,b∈R a , b ∈ R ) if such measuring instruments are given for the addends observables A and B when they are incompatible observables. A mathematical version of this dilemma is how to construct the spectral measure of f(aA+bB)f(aA+bB)f(aA+bB) f ( a A + b B ) out of the spectral measures of A and B. We present such a construction with a formula which is valid for general unbounded self-adjoint operators A and B, whose spectral measures may not commute, and a wide class of functions f:R→Cf: {{\mathbb {R}}}\rightarrow {{\mathbb {C}}}f:R→C f : R → C . In the bounded case, we prove that the Jordan product of A and B (and suitably symmetrized polynomials of A and B) can be constructed with the same procedure out of the spectral measures of A and B. The formula turns out to have an interesting operational interpretation and, in particular cases, a nice interplay with the theory of Feynman path integration and the Feynman–Kac formula.
We present in this paper a set of postulates for a physical system and deduce from these the main general features of the quantum theory of stationary states. Our theory is strictly operational in the sense that only the observables of the physical system are involved in the postulates. The collection of all bounded self-adj oint operators on a Hilbert space, which has previously been used as a mathematical model for the observables in quantum mechanics, satisfy the postulates, as do a variety of considerably more general mathematical structures. We show that for any two observables there exists a pure state of the system (this term being defined essentially as done by von Neumann and Weyl) in which they have different (expectation) values. Each observable has a spectral resolution, and a state of the system induces, in a natural way, a probability distribution on the range of spectral values of each observable. A number of observables are simultaneously observable if and only if they commute (although the product of two observables is not defined in general, a reasonable notion of commutativity can be introduced). Inasmuch as Hilbert space plays no role in our theory, our proofs are necessarily of a different character from the proofs of these results for the case of the system of all bounded selfadjoint operators. Actually, Hilbert space appears to be somewhat inadequate as a state space even for the latter system, in that there exist pure states of the system which cannot be represented in the usual way by rays of the Hilbert space. The postulates are partly algebraic and partly metric. The algebraic postulates require essentially that an observable can be multiplied by real numbers and raised to integral powers, and that any two observables can be added. It is assumed that the usual algebraic laws are satisfied so that (1) the observables can be treated like the elements of a linear space, and (2) the usual rules for dealing with polynomials in one variable with real coefficients remain valid when the variable is replaced by an observable. It is not assumed that two observables have a product. The metric postulates require that for each observable there be defined a kind of maximum numerical value, which plays the part of a norm, and has various properties in accord with its physical significance. While this norm is quite essential to the development of the theory, an interesting consequence of the theory is that the norm can be (uniquely) defined in a purely algebraic fashion. This shows that the objective features of a physical system,-the spectral values and probability distributions of the observables, and the pure states,-are completely determined by the algebra of observables, i.e., by the rules for addition, scalar multiplication, and powers, of observables.
In this thesis we adapt the Davies and Lewis’ operational approach to quantum probability to the Op*-algebra framework. In Chapter I we introduce our formalism of quantum mechanics. We define the space of pure states U as a nuclear-Frechet space generated by a self-adjoint operator M whose inverse is nuclear. The algebra of observables is taken to be L+, the adjoint-stable set of linear maps from U into itself. This algebra and its dual under the uniform topology form a dual pair. We derive several algebraic and topological properties of this dual pair and show that it forms a suitable structure for the adaptation of Davies and Lewis’ theory to the Op*-algebra framework. In Chapter II we set the basis of the Davies and Lewis’ operational approach to quantum probability within the framework developed in chapter I. Here we define the fundamental concepts of an expectation and an instrument and discuss their relationship. We show that instruments are bounded Radon measures and that the compose of two of them is not in general a stable operation on the universe of all instruments. We conclude the chapter discussing the general Robertson-Heisenberg uncertainty relations. In Chapter III we build a special class of instruments to measure Q, P and H on S; these are based on Davies’ approximate position measurements. In particular we show that the compose of any two, hence any finite number, of these instruments is an instrument.
An axiomatic approach to the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics, based upon a certain concept of conditional probability, has been proposed in two recent papers by the author. It leads to Jordan operator algebras and thus comes rather close to the standard Hilbert space model of quantum mechanics, but still includes the so-called exceptional Jordan algebras, for which a Hilbert space representation does not exist. This approach is now extended by defining a mathematical model of composite systems. Such a model is required for the study of the joint distribution of two quantum observables. A very general type of observables (not only the real-valued observables corresponding to the self-adjoint operators) is considered. The joint distribution is defined, using the concept of conditional probability, and exhibits a certain dependence on the succession of the observations which is different from the classical case and unknown so far in quantum mechanics. Finally, it turns out that, at least in the finite-dimensional case, a really satisfying model of the composite system exists only if each single system is modeled by a complex Jordan matrix algebra (or a direct sum), and the model then becomes the tensor product. This provides some reasoning why the exceptional Jordan algebras can be ruled out, why quantum mechanics needs the complex numbers and the complex Hilbert space, and why the tensor product is the right choice for the model of a composite system.
A fundamental feature of quantum mechanics is the incompatibility between quantum measurements, which leads to the Heisenberg uncertainty relations and is intrinsically related to detection of many other quantum features such as nonlocality and steering. Given the significance and ubiquity of incompatibility, it is desirable to quantify the degree of incompatibility between two quantum measurements which are mathematically described by positive operator valued measures. The commutator (Lie product) between operators has widely been used in quantifying incompatibility (noncommutativity) and plays a crucial role in quantum mechanics. In contrast, the anticommutator (Jordan product) between operators has been relatively less employed in the study of quantum mechanics. In this work, we explore the role of the Jordan product in characterizing measurement incompatibility. The key observation lies in that while the product of two non-negative classical observables is automatically non-negative, this is not the case for quantum observables. Indeed the Jordan product of two non-negative observables is not necessarily non-negative. This negativity of the Jordan product is a purely quantum phenomenon and is here exploited to quantify a kind of measurement incompatibility, which interpolates between noncommutativity and joint measurability. We reveal basic features of this approach, make some comparisons with existing quantifiers of incompatibility and suggest the issue of investigating its applications and implications in quantum information tasks.
Continuing the development [4] of an aspect of the approach to the axiomatization of quantum mechanics of G. W. Mackey [3], we consider here the real linear space X of signed measures on the set P of events generated by the states, and the set F0 of linear functionals on X which are induced in a natural way by the bounded observables. A necessary and sufficient condition for two events to be simultaneously measurable is found in terms of the order structure of F0, with the following consequence: if F0 is a lattice, P is deterministic. At the opposite extreme, F0 is said to be an anti-lattice1 if the greatest lower bound exists only for comparable pairs of its elements and we show in this case that the center of P is trivial. Our results extend those of R. V. Kadison [l], in which F0 and P are the self-adjoint operators and projections respectively in a uniformly closed self-adjoint operator algebra. While the framework and plan of the proofs were inspired by Kadison's work, almost none of the apparatus used by him is available here with the result that, in detail, our techniques are quite different from his. Let P be a weakly modular partially ordered set (see [4]). A function x from P to the non-negative real numbers and + oo is said to be a measure if x(0) =0 and x is countably additive in the sense that whenever {a,} is a pairwise orthogonal sequence of elements of P, then x(Ua?) = 2Zxiad- If x is a measure and {bt} EP is an increasing (decreasing) sequence with supremum (infimum) b, then x(&?) —*x(6). A countably additive function x from P to the extended real numbers is a signed measure if x(0) =0 and x takes on at most one of the values + =o and — oo ; x is finite if x(l) is finite. Define the functions 5 and i on the signed measures on P by six) = sup(x(a) : aEP\, fx) =inf {x(a): aEP} and set ||x|| =s(x)—?(x). Clearly ||x|| < oo if and only if x is finite. It iseasy toseethat||x|| = sup {x(a)— xia'):aE P} ■ Lemma 1. Let X be a real linear space of finite signed measures on P. Then the function || || defined above is a norm for X and, under this norm and its natural partial ordering, X is a partially ordered normed linear space. That is,2
G.A. RAGGIO Abstract. We give a brief and incomplete survey of the problem of entan- glement of of composite quantum systems. 1960's - 1980's there were serious attempts (all of them anticipated by J. von Neu- mann) to do away with the underlying Hilbert space and work directly with the abstract algebraic structure modeled by C � -algebras or W � -algebras (abstract von Neumann algebras)(1, 2, 3). This was particularly fruitful when dealing with sys- tems of infinitely many degrees of freedom (quantum fields, thermodynamic limits, etc.). The problem of entanglement which we want to address here can be formu- lated quite straightforwardly in this algebraic framework of quantum theory. But we will stick to the quantum mechanics of the 1930's and keep the Hilbert space. Mainly because the results which are available concern the finite dimensional case. The states of the quantum system specified by H are associated with the lin- ear functionals f : B(H) → C which are positive (i.e., f(a) ≥ 0 for all positive a ∈ B(H)), normalized (i.e., f(1) = 1) and normal (i.e., f(supn{an}) = supnf(an) for any increasing family of selfadjoint operators {an : n = 1,2, � � � } which is uni- formly bounded). It is this normality condition which guarantees that the are in one-to-one correspondence with positive trace class operators d of unit trace (density operators) via the formula B(H) ∋ a 7→ tr(da). This gives an extremely convenient representation of and one often confuses the state f as a linear functional with the associated density operator d for which f(a) = tr(da). States are automatically continuous, and satisfy f(a � ) = f(a). The complex number f(a) is interpreted probabilistically as the expected value of the observable associated with the operator a when the system is in the state f. The normalization condi- tion is thus necessary for the consistency of this interpretation and the normality condition is seen as a non-commutative version of the �-additivity of probability measures. Clearly states, which we will denote by �(H), form a convex set which is closed