© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

arXiv:1909.04027

Non-Associative Algebras and Quantum Physics -- A Historical Perspective

Manfred Liebmann, Horst Rühaak, Bernd Henschenmacher

Published Sep 7, 2019• 4 citations

Abstract

We review attempts by Pascual Jordan and other researchers, most notably Lawrence Biedenharn to generalize quantum mechanics by passing from associative matrix or operator algebras to non-associative algebras. We start with Jordan's work from the early 1930ies leading to Jordan algebras and the first attempt to incorporate the alternative ring of octonions into physics. Jordan's work on the octonions from 1932 till 1952 will be covered, discussing aspects of the exceptional Jordan algebra and how to express probabilities when working with the octonions and the exceptional Jordan algebra. From the 1950ies onwards Jordan and others also considered one-sided distributive systems like near-fields, near-rings, quasi-fields and exceptional Segal systems (the last two examples being not necessarily associative). As the set of non-linear operators forms a near-ring and even a near-algebra, this may be of interest for attempts to pass from a linear to a non-linear setting in the study of quantum mechanics. Moreover, ideas introduced in the late 1960ies to use non-power-associative algebras to formulate a theory of a minimal length will be covered. Lawrence Biedenharn's and Jordan's ideas related to non-power-associative octonionic matrix algebras will be briefly mentioned, a long section is devoted to a summary of Horst Rühaak's PhD thesis from 1968 on matrix algebras over the octonions. Finally, recent attempts to use non-associative algebras in physics will be described.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1909.04027

Related papers

An algebraic formulation of nonassociative quantum mechanics

Peter Schupp, Richard J. Szabo

Abstract We develop a version of quantum mechanics that can handle nonassociative algebras of observables and which reduces to standard quantum theory in the traditional associative setting. Our algebraic approach is naturally probabilistic and is based on using the universal enveloping algebra of a general nonassociative algebra to introduce a generalized notion of associative composition product. We formulate properties of states together with notions of trace, and use them to develop Gel’fand–Naimark–Segal constructions. We describe Heisenberg and Schrödinger pictures of completely positive dynamics, and we illustrate our formalism on the explicit examples of finite-dimensional matrix Jordan algebras as well as the octonion algebra.

arXiv:2311.03647•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•May 9, 2024•3 citations

A Review of The Algebraic Approaches to Quantum Mechanics. Appraisals on Their Theoretical Relevance

Antonino Drago

I review the various algebraic foundations of quantum mechanics. They have been suggested since the birth of this theory till up to last year. They are the following ones: Heisenberg-Born-Jordan (1925), Weyl (1928), Dirac (1930), von Neumann (1936), Segal (1947), T.F. Jordan (1986), Morchio and Strocchi (2009) and Buchholz and Fregenhagen (2019). Three cases are stressed: 1) the misinterpretation of Dirac foundation; 2) von Neumann conversion from the analytic approach of Hilbert space to the algebraic approach of the rings of operators; 3) the recent foundation of quantum mechanics upon the algebra of perturbation Lagrangians. Moreover, historical considerations on the go-and-stop path performed by the algebraic approach in the history of QM are offered. The level of formalism has increased from the mere introduction of matrices till up to group theory and C*-algebras. But there was no progress in approaching closer the foundations of physics; therefore the problem of discovering an algebraic formulation of QM organized as a problem-based theory and making use of no more than constructive mathematics is open.

arXiv:2102.00861•Jan 29, 2021•0 citations

The Jordan formulation of Quantum Mechanics: a review

Paul K. Townsend

This is a transcription of a conference proceedings from 1985. It reviews the Jordan algebra formulation of quantum mechanics. A possible novelty is the discussion of time evolution; the associator takes over the role of $i$ times the commutator in the standard density matrix formulation, and for the Jordan algebra of complex Hermitian matrices this implies a Hamiltonian of the form $H= i[x,y] + λ\mathbb{I}$ for traceless Hermitian $x,y$ and real number $λ$. Other possibilities for time evolution in the Jordan formulation are briefly considered.

arXiv:1612.09228•Dec 29, 2016•10 citations

On an Algebraic Generalization of the Quantum Mechanical Formalism

P. Jordan, J. v. Neumann, Eugene Paul Wigner

One of us has shown that the statistical properties of the measurements of a quantum mechanical system assume their simplest form when expressed in terms of a certain hypercomplex algebra which is commutative but not associative.1 This algebra differs from the non-commutative but associative matrix algebra usually considered in that one is concerned with the commutative expression ½(A × B + B × A) instead of the associative product A × B of two matrices. It was conjectured that the laws of this commutative algebra would form a suitable starting point for a generalization of the present quantum mechanical theory. The need of such a generalization arises from the (probably) fundamental difficulties resulting when one attempts to apply quantum mechanics to questions in relativistic and nuclear phenomena.

Annals of Mathematics•Jan 1, 1934•891 citations

Non-Hermitian physics

Yuto Ashida, Zongping Gong, Masahito Ueda

A review is given on the foundations and applications of non-Hermitian classical and quantum physics. First, key theorems and central concepts in non-Hermitian linear algebra, including Jordan normal form, biorthogonality, exceptional points, pseudo-Hermiticity, and parity-time symmetry, are delineated in a pedagogical and mathematically coherent manner. Building on these, we provide an overview of how diverse classical systems, ranging from photonics, mechanics, electrical circuits, and acoustics to active matter, can be used to simulate non-Hermitian wave physics. In particular, we discuss rich and unique phenomena found therein, such as unidirectional invisibility, enhanced sensitivity, topological energy transfer, coherent perfect absorption, single-mode lasing, and robust biological transport. We then explain in detail how non-Hermitian operators emerge as an effective description of open quantum systems on the basis of the Feshbach projection approach and the quantum trajectory approach. We discuss their applications to physical systems relevant to a variety of fields, including atomic, molecular and optical physics, mesoscopic physics, and nuclear physics with emphasis on prominent phenomena and subjects in quantum regimes, such as quantum resonances, superradiance, the continuous quantum Zeno effect, quantum critical phenomena, Dirac spectra in quantum chromodynamics, and nonunitary conformal field theories. Finally, we introduce the notion of band topology in complex spectra of non-Hermitian systems and present their classifications by providing the proof, first given by this review in a complete manner, as well as a number of instructive examples. Other topics related to non-Hermitian physics, including nonreciprocal transport, speed limits, nonunitary quantum walk, are also reviewed.

arXiv:2006.01837•Advances In Physics•Jul 2, 2020•1,878 citations

Some Nearly Quantum Theories

Howard Barnum, Matthew A. Graydon, Alexander Wilce

We consider possible non-signaling composites of probabilistic models based on euclidean Jordan algebras. Subject to some reasonable constraints, we show that no such composite exists having the exceptional Jordan algebra as a direct summand. We then construct several dagger compact categories of such Jordan-algebraic models. One of these neatly unifies real, complex and quaternionic mixed-state quantum mechanics, with the exception of the quaternionic "bit". Another is similar, except in that (i) it excludes the quaternionic bit, and (ii) the composite of two complex quantum systems comes with an extra classical bit. In both of these categories, states are morphisms from systems to the tensor unit, which helps give the categorical structure a clear operational interpretation. A no-go result shows that the first of these categories, at least, cannot be extended to include spin factors other than the (real, complex, and quaternionic) quantum bits, while preserving the representation of states as morphisms. The same is true for attempts to extend the second category to even-dimensional spin-factors. Interesting phenomena exhibited by some composites in these categories include failure of local tomography, supermultiplicativity of the maximal number of mutually distinguishable states, and mixed states whose marginals are pure.

arXiv:1507.06278•Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science•Nov 4, 2015•19 citations

We review attempts by Pascual Jordan and other researchers, most notably Lawrence Biedenharn to generalize quantum mechanics by passing from associative matrix or operator algebras to non-associative algebras. We start with Jordan's work from the early 1930ies leading to Jordan algebras and the first attempt to incorporate the alternative ring of octonions into physics. Jordan's work on the octonions from 1932 till 1952 will be covered, discussing aspects of the exceptional Jordan algebra and how to express probabilities when working with the octonions and the exceptional Jordan algebra. From the 1950ies onwards Jordan and others also considered one-sided distributive systems like near-fields, near-rings, quasi-fields and exceptional Segal systems (the last two examples being not necessarily associative). As the set of non-linear operators forms a near-ring and even a near-algebra, this may be of interest for attempts to pass from a linear to a non-linear setting in the study of quantum mechanics. Moreover, ideas introduced in the late 1960ies to use non-power-associative algebras to formulate a theory of a minimal length will be covered. Lawrence Biedenharn's and Jordan's ideas related to non-power-associative octonionic matrix algebras will be briefly mentioned, a long section is devoted to a summary of Horst Rühaak's PhD thesis from 1968 on matrix algebras over the octonions. Finally, recent attempts to use non-associative algebras in physics will be described.

Abstract We develop a version of quantum mechanics that can handle nonassociative algebras of observables and which reduces to standard quantum theory in the traditional associative setting. Our algebraic approach is naturally probabilistic and is based on using the universal enveloping algebra of a general nonassociative algebra to introduce a generalized notion of associative composition product. We formulate properties of states together with notions of trace, and use them to develop Gel’fand–Naimark–Segal constructions. We describe Heisenberg and Schrödinger pictures of completely positive dynamics, and we illustrate our formalism on the explicit examples of finite-dimensional matrix Jordan algebras as well as the octonion algebra.

I review the various algebraic foundations of quantum mechanics. They have been suggested since the birth of this theory till up to last year. They are the following ones: Heisenberg-Born-Jordan (1925), Weyl (1928), Dirac (1930), von Neumann (1936), Segal (1947), T.F. Jordan (1986), Morchio and Strocchi (2009) and Buchholz and Fregenhagen (2019). Three cases are stressed: 1) the misinterpretation of Dirac foundation; 2) von Neumann conversion from the analytic approach of Hilbert space to the algebraic approach of the rings of operators; 3) the recent foundation of quantum mechanics upon the algebra of perturbation Lagrangians. Moreover, historical considerations on the go-and-stop path performed by the algebraic approach in the history of QM are offered. The level of formalism has increased from the mere introduction of matrices till up to group theory and C*-algebras. But there was no progress in approaching closer the foundations of physics; therefore the problem of discovering an algebraic formulation of QM organized as a problem-based theory and making use of no more than constructive mathematics is open.

This is a transcription of a conference proceedings from 1985. It reviews the Jordan algebra formulation of quantum mechanics. A possible novelty is the discussion of time evolution; the associator takes over the role of

i

times the commutator in the standard density matrix formulation, and for the Jordan algebra of complex Hermitian matrices this implies a Hamiltonian of the form

H= i[x,y] + λ\mathbb{I}

for traceless Hermitian

x,y

and real number

λ

. Other possibilities for time evolution in the Jordan formulation are briefly considered.

One of us has shown that the statistical properties of the measurements of a quantum mechanical system assume their simplest form when expressed in terms of a certain hypercomplex algebra which is commutative but not associative.1 This algebra differs from the non-commutative but associative matrix algebra usually considered in that one is concerned with the commutative expression ½(A × B + B × A) instead of the associative product A × B of two matrices. It was conjectured that the laws of this commutative algebra would form a suitable starting point for a generalization of the present quantum mechanical theory. The need of such a generalization arises from the (probably) fundamental difficulties resulting when one attempts to apply quantum mechanics to questions in relativistic and nuclear phenomena.

A review is given on the foundations and applications of non-Hermitian classical and quantum physics. First, key theorems and central concepts in non-Hermitian linear algebra, including Jordan normal form, biorthogonality, exceptional points, pseudo-Hermiticity, and parity-time symmetry, are delineated in a pedagogical and mathematically coherent manner. Building on these, we provide an overview of how diverse classical systems, ranging from photonics, mechanics, electrical circuits, and acoustics to active matter, can be used to simulate non-Hermitian wave physics. In particular, we discuss rich and unique phenomena found therein, such as unidirectional invisibility, enhanced sensitivity, topological energy transfer, coherent perfect absorption, single-mode lasing, and robust biological transport. We then explain in detail how non-Hermitian operators emerge as an effective description of open quantum systems on the basis of the Feshbach projection approach and the quantum trajectory approach. We discuss their applications to physical systems relevant to a variety of fields, including atomic, molecular and optical physics, mesoscopic physics, and nuclear physics with emphasis on prominent phenomena and subjects in quantum regimes, such as quantum resonances, superradiance, the continuous quantum Zeno effect, quantum critical phenomena, Dirac spectra in quantum chromodynamics, and nonunitary conformal field theories. Finally, we introduce the notion of band topology in complex spectra of non-Hermitian systems and present their classifications by providing the proof, first given by this review in a complete manner, as well as a number of instructive examples. Other topics related to non-Hermitian physics, including nonreciprocal transport, speed limits, nonunitary quantum walk, are also reviewed.

We consider possible non-signaling composites of probabilistic models based on euclidean Jordan algebras. Subject to some reasonable constraints, we show that no such composite exists having the exceptional Jordan algebra as a direct summand. We then construct several dagger compact categories of such Jordan-algebraic models. One of these neatly unifies real, complex and quaternionic mixed-state quantum mechanics, with the exception of the quaternionic "bit". Another is similar, except in that (i) it excludes the quaternionic bit, and (ii) the composite of two complex quantum systems comes with an extra classical bit. In both of these categories, states are morphisms from systems to the tensor unit, which helps give the categorical structure a clear operational interpretation. A no-go result shows that the first of these categories, at least, cannot be extended to include spin factors other than the (real, complex, and quaternionic) quantum bits, while preserving the representation of states as morphisms. The same is true for attempts to extend the second category to even-dimensional spin-factors. Interesting phenomena exhibited by some composites in these categories include failure of local tomography, supermultiplicativity of the maximal number of mutually distinguishable states, and mixed states whose marginals are pure.