Reply to a Comment on “Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity”

Howard R. Reiss

Milonni [preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. A 45, 2138 (1992)] raises objections to my work [Phys. Rev. A 42, 1476 (1990)] on Keldysh-like methods in photoionization. His results are shown to follow from procedures that are inappropriate to the strong-field environment of the Keldysh method. These procedures lead to physical inconsistencies. My technique is verified to be rigorous and unique.

Richard Healey

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

In a recent comment [arXiv:2112.05658], Grudka and Wójcik object to some of our earlier claims concerning a link between fundamental postulates of quantum theory and special relativity extended to superluminal frames of reference. In this short reply we refute these criticisms.

J. Acácio de Barros

David Thomas Pegg, Stephen Mark Barnett

We assess the objections raised by Ma and Rhodes [preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2576 (1991)]. These objections seem to arise from a misinterpretation of our theory and a confusion between states of precise phase and states of precise field.

David Cienfuegos Salgado, J. L. Sánchez‐Gómez