Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1807.00421 · Foundations of Physics

Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity

Richard Healey

Published Sep 19, 2018• 94 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-018-0216-6

Related papers

Reply to a Comment on “Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity”

Richard Healey

arXiv:1907.10395•Foundations of Physics•Aug 15, 2019•3 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Objectivity

Patrick A. Heelan

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1965•66 citations

Scientific Objectivity and Its Limits

Richard Healey

Measurement outcomes provide data for a physical theory. Unless they are objective they support no objective scientific knowledge. So the outcome of a quantum measurement must be an objective physical fact. But recent arguments purport to show that if quantum theory is universally applicable then there is no such fact. This calls for a reappraisal of the notions of fact and objectivity. If quantum theory is universally applicable the facts about the physical world include a fact about each quantum measurement outcome. These physical facts lack an ideal kind of objectivity but their more modest objectivity is all that science needs.

arXiv:2010.01013•The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Jul 6, 2021•25 citations

Objective interpretations of quantum mechanics and the possibility of a deterministic limit

Anthony Sudbery

Examines a suggestion by Bell (1984) that a deterministic model might be furnished by the continuum limit of an objective stochastic model which he has proposed for quantum field theory on a lattice. The virtues of models of Bell's type for general quantum systems are discussed, and it is shown that for a system of a fixed number of particles such a model does yield the deterministic de Broglie-Bohm model in an appropriate limit. It is argued, however, that a deterministic limit is unlikely to emerge from a quantum field theory capable of describing particle production and decay. An interpretation of quantum field theory is proposed which has the advantages of Bell's interpretation but is closer to conventional quantum mechanics.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•May 11, 1987•64 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Objectivity

J J MacMahon

Philosophical Studies•Jan 1, 1967•1 citation

Are there fundamental limits for observing quantum phenomena from within quantum theory?

Johannes Kofler, Časlav Brukner

Does there exist a limit for the applicability of quantum theory for objects of large mass or size, or objects whose states are of large complexity or dimension of the Hilbert space? The possible answers range from practical limitations due to decoherence within quantum theory to fundamental limits due to collapse models that modify quantum theory. Here, we suggest the viewpoint that there might be also fundamental limits without altering the quantum laws. We first demonstrate that for two quantum spins systems of a given spin length, no violation of local realism can be observed, if the measurements are sufficiently coarse-grained. Then we show that there exists a fundamental limit for the precision of measurements due to (i) the Heisenberg uncertainty relation which has to be applied to the measuring apparatus, (ii) relativistic causality, and (iii) the finiteness of resources in any laboratory including the whole universe. This suggests that there might exist a limit for the size of the systems (dimension of the Hilbert space) above which no violation of local realism can be seen anymore.

arXiv:1009.2654•Sep 14, 2010•9 citations
Measurement outcomes provide data for a physical theory. Unless they are objective they support no objective scientific knowledge. So the outcome of a quantum measurement must be an objective physical fact. But recent arguments purport to show that if quantum theory is universally applicable then there is no such fact. This calls for a reappraisal of the notions of fact and objectivity. If quantum theory is universally applicable the facts about the physical world include a fact about each quantum measurement outcome. These physical facts lack an ideal kind of objectivity but their more modest objectivity is all that science needs.
Examines a suggestion by Bell (1984) that a deterministic model might be furnished by the continuum limit of an objective stochastic model which he has proposed for quantum field theory on a lattice. The virtues of models of Bell's type for general quantum systems are discussed, and it is shown that for a system of a fixed number of particles such a model does yield the deterministic de Broglie-Bohm model in an appropriate limit. It is argued, however, that a deterministic limit is unlikely to emerge from a quantum field theory capable of describing particle production and decay. An interpretation of quantum field theory is proposed which has the advantages of Bell's interpretation but is closer to conventional quantum mechanics.
Does there exist a limit for the applicability of quantum theory for objects of large mass or size, or objects whose states are of large complexity or dimension of the Hilbert space? The possible answers range from practical limitations due to decoherence within quantum theory to fundamental limits due to collapse models that modify quantum theory. Here, we suggest the viewpoint that there might be also fundamental limits without altering the quantum laws. We first demonstrate that for two quantum spins systems of a given spin length, no violation of local realism can be observed, if the measurements are sufficiently coarse-grained. Then we show that there exists a fundamental limit for the precision of measurements due to (i) the Heisenberg uncertainty relation which has to be applied to the measuring apparatus, (ii) relativistic causality, and (iii) the finiteness of resources in any laboratory including the whole universe. This suggests that there might exist a limit for the size of the systems (dimension of the Hilbert space) above which no violation of local realism can be seen anymore.