Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1901.09974 · Physical Review A

Quantum networks for single photon detection

Tzula B. Propp, S. J. van Enk

Published Sep 30, 2019• 11 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Single photon detection generally consists of several stages: the photon has to interact with one or more charged particles, its excitation energy will be converted into other forms of energy, and amplification to a macroscopic signal must occur, thus leading to a ``click.'' We focus here on the part of the detection process before amplification (which we have studied in a separate publication). We discuss how networks consisting of coupled discrete quantum states and structured continua (e.g., band gaps) provide generic models for that first part of the detection process. The input to the network is a single continuum (the continuum of single photon states); the output is again a single continuum describing the next irreversible step. The process of a single photon entering the network, its energy propagating through that network, and finally exiting into another output continuum of modes can be described by a single dimensionless complex transmission amplitude, $T(\ensuremath{\omega})$. We discuss how to obtain from $T(\ensuremath{\omega})$ the photodetection efficiency, how to find sets of parameters that maximize this efficiency, as well as expressions for other input-independent quantities such as the frequency-dependent group delay and spectral bandwidth. We then study a variety of networks, discuss how to engineer different transmission functions $T(\ensuremath{\omega})$ amenable to photodetection, and discuss implications for single photon detection technology.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.100.033836

Related papers

Fundamental Limits to Single-Photon Detection

Tzula B. Propp

Quantum mechanics cements the intimate relationship between the nature of light and its detection. Historically, quantum theories of photodetection have generally fallen into two categories: the first tries to determine what quantum field observable is measured when photoelectrons are detected, laying the theoretical groundwork for photodetection being possible. The second type are phenomenological theories, which take great care to model the details of specific photodetectors. In this dissertation, we fill in the gap between these two models in the modern literature on photodetection by constructing a fully quantum-mechanical and sufficiently realistic model that includes all stages of the photodetection process. We accomplish this within the framework of quantum information theory using the language of positive operator valued measures (POVMs). \n\nA POVM provides the most general description of a quantum measurement. In the context of single-photon detection, the photodetector POVM provides a complete characterization of the single-photon detector (SPD) from which all figures of merit can be calculated. Each element of the POVM is comprised of a weighted sum over single-photon state projectors. To construct SPD POVMs, we identify the states projected onto by a measurement and the associated weights. We first accomplish this for a simple time-dependent system, laying out how to efficiently project onto arbitrary single-photon states. Then, we describe the three stages of a realistic SPD: transmission, amplification, and measurement.\n\nIn the transmission stage of photodetection a photon enters a network of discrete energy levels, its energy propagating through that network and finally exiting into another output continuum of modes, a process entirely described by a single complex function. In the amplification stage of photodetection, a single excitation is amplified into a macroscopic signal via a nonlinear amplification mechanism. In the final stage, an inefficient ``classical'' measurement is made on the macroscopic signal. By combining these three stages we form a chain of inference from the final ``click'' to the input photon and construct a POVM projecting onto the input Hilbert space. Lastly, we discuss limits and tradeoffs that arise at each stage and implications for photodetection applications.\n\nThis dissertation contains previously published and unpublished material.

•Dec 8, 2020•0 citations

[Dissertation] Fundamental Limits to Single-Photon Detection

Tzula B. Propp

Quantum mechanics cements the intimate relationship between the nature of light and its detection. Historically, quantum theories of photodetection have generally fallen into two categories: the first tries to determine what quantum field observable is measured when photoelectrons are detected, laying the theoretical groundwork for photodetection being possible. The second type are phenomenological theories, which take great care to model the details of specific photodetectors. In this dissertation, we fill in the gap between these two models in the modern literature on photodetection by constructing a fully quantum mechanical and sufficiently realistic model that includes all stages of the photodetection process: transmission, amplification, and a final classical measurement. We accomplish this within the framework of quantum information theory using the language of positive operator valued measures (POVMs). This dissertation contains material previously published in three papers: Propp, Tz. B & van Enk, S. J. (2019). On nonlinear amplification: improved quantum limits for photon counting. Optics Express 27, 16, 23454-23463. Propp, Tz. B & van Enk, S. J. (2019). Quantum networks for single photon detection. Physical Review A, 100, 033836. Propp, Tz. B & van Enk, S. J. (2020). How to project onto an arbitrary single-photon wavepacket. Physical Review A, 102, 053707.

arXiv:2210.04089•Oct 8, 2022•0 citations

Heisenberg picture of photodetection

Saumya Biswas, S. J. van Enk

We construct a class of Hamiltonians that describe the photodetection process from beginning to end. Our Hamiltonians describe the creation of a photon, how the photon travels to an absorber (such as a molecule), how the molecule absorbs the photon, and how the molecule after irreversibly changing its configuration triggers an amplification process---at a wavelength that may be very different from the photon's wavelength---thus producing a macroscopic signal. We use a simple prototype Hamiltonian to describe the single-photon detection process analytically in the Heisenberg picture, which neatly separates desirable from undesirable effects. Extensions to more complicated Hamiltonians are pointed out.

arXiv:2007.05444•Physical Review A•Sep 9, 2020•3 citations

Single-Photon Detection Using Quantum Phase Transitions

Li‐Ping Yang, Zubin Jacob

The temporal dynamics of large quantum systems perturbed weakly by a single excitation can give rise to unique phenomena at the quantum phase boundaries. Here, we develop a time-dependent model to study the temporal dynamics of a single photon interacting with a defect within a large system of interacting spins. Our model can lead to a single-photon detector if the system of spins is engineered to simulate a first-order quantum phase transition (QPT). We show that the absorption of a single photon pulse by an engineered defect (i.e., a nitrogen-vacancy center) can nucleate a single shot quantum measurement. This concept of a single-shot detection event (click) is different from parameter estimation which requires repeated measurements. The crucial step of amplifying the weak quantum signal occurs by coupling the defect to a system of interacting spins biased close to a QPT point. The macroscopic spin-order change during the QPT generates an amplified signal, which can be read out by a classical device. Our work paves the way for studying the temporal dynamics of large quantum systems interacting with a single photon.

•Oct 13, 2019•1 citation

On amplifying and counting bosons

S. J. van Enk, Tzula B. Propp

We show that detection of single photons is not subject to the fundamental limitations that accompany quantum linear amplification of bosonic mode amplitudes, even though a photodetector does amplify a few-photon input signal to a macroscopic output signal. Alternative limits are derived for nonlinear photon-number amplification with optimistic implications for single-photon detection. Our description makes clear that nonlinear amplification takes place, in general, at a different frequency $\omega'$ than the frequency $\omega$ of the input photons, which can be exploited to suppress thermal noise even further. A practical example that fits our description very well is electron shelving.

•Sep 6, 2018•0 citations

Towards a quantum network

Jian‐Shun Tang, Zong‐Quan Zhou, Chuan‐Feng Li

A quantum network is believed to be the next generation of quantum technology [1]. In the past decades, individual quantum systems—for example, quantum dot (QD) [2–4], etc.—have been studied in depth and the technologies are mature; therefore, the consideration of combining different systems to construct a quantum network (especially a hybrid one) is timely. Moreover, a quantum network is absolutely necessary in the fulfilment of a general quantum task, which needs the cooperation of many different kinds of quantum units. On a larger scale, the local quantum networks can be further linked to construct a global quantum network, namely the quantum Internet [1]. With this technology at hand, distributed quantum computation can be realized, making scalable quantum information processing possible in multiple sites over long distances. The primary challenge of the construction of a quantum network is the state distribution among different nodes. An elementary quantum network based on two identical nodes each constituted by a single atom in the optical cavity has been realized in an experiment [5]. However, here we focus on the quantum network comprising heterogeneous nodes, which is more general and can combine advantages of different quantum systems to complete more complicated quantum tasks. The construction of a hybrid quantum network is more difficult, since heterogeneous quantum systems have different properties that are not naturally matched, such as the different emission (or absorption) wavelengths and different bandwidths [8], etc. To establish the hybrid interface, QD is a good candidate. QD can act as a deterministic single [2] or entangled [3] photon source and is also a promising physical carrier for solid-state spin qubit [4]. QD has been interfaced with hot atoms [6] and single ions [7] in recent years. Almost at the same time, Li's group experimentally demonstrated the first optical connection between QD and a solid-state quantum memory [8]. Distinguishing from the former works, the all-solid-state character of this work makes the whole architecture more stable and easier to be manipulated and integrated. During this work, the sample was grown by Niu's group [8]. A special sample design moves the emission band of QDs to approximately 879.7 nm—the memory band of the solid-state memory [9]. Since the fine-tuning range is only several 0.1 nm, hundreds of QDs on the sample were detected by Li et al. and finally one of them was selected, whose emission line is located at 879.5 nm. Using a local-heating technique, the researchers precisely tuned the emission wavelength of this QD to the solid-state memory's memory band, whose bandwidth is as narrow as hundreds of MHz [9]. The quantum memory in this experiment was based on the atomic frequency comb (AFC) protocol [10]. The memory efficiency is as high as 20% when the storage time is 40 ns, and the non-collinear configuration for the pump light and the signal photons can substantially reduce the noise from the pump light. To further reduce the detection noise, a superconducting single-photon detector (SSPD), whose dark count rate can be as low as 1.5 per second, is used instead of the silicon single-photon avalanche diode. With these conditions, Li's experiment clearly shows the stored and retrieved single photons that are originally generated from the QD. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is 9:1. The second-order retrieved single photons are even seen in the data, which further validates the experimental result. Another advantage of Li's work is the demonstration of multi-temporal-mode quantum memory with up to 100 narrow deterministic-single-photon pulses [8]. This result is directly associated with the construction of a quantum repeater [11]—one of the essential components for a long-distance quantum network. The primary characteristics of this experiment, namely the deterministic single-photon memory (differing from the previous works) and the multimode memory, are both critically important in the improvement of a quantum repeater's efficiency [12]. Also, Li's further work finished the quantum memory of 51 spatial modes using the orbital angular momentum (OAM) modes of herald single photons [9]. By combining both the temporal and spatial multiplexing, and the deterministic single-photon source, more efficient quantum repeaters can be constructed. We hope that the recent studies [8,9] will pave the way for the construction of quantum repeaters, and furthermore quantum networks—both in the short term and the long term—based on all-solid-state devices. As a special application of a quantum network, quantum key distribution (QKD) can also benefit from Li's work both in security and transmission distance (key rate). QKD utilizes the principles of quantum mechanics to guarantee secure communication between two authorized parties (or quantum nodes, for instance) and the famous protocols including BB84 (proposed by Bennett and Brassard in 1984) [13]), etc. However, the commonly used weak-coherent-pulse photon source (typically attenuated laser) will decrease the security of QKD because of its multiphoton probability, which means that QKD suffers from several certain attacks, such as the photon number splitting (PNS) attack. Although a decoy state has been introduced to achieve potential solutions to this problem, a substantial shrinking of the sifted key will be required and the complexity of the protocol may contain loopholes [14,15]. Therefore, the unconditional security guaranteed by quantum mechanics still requires a single-photon source, such as QD (experimental work regarding QKD on the basis of a QD single-photon source can be referred to in [14,15]), etc. The deterministic-single-photon pulse train generated by QD in Li's experiment [8] can provide a single-photon-source node (in the network) and keep the security of QKD. Moreover, because of both the elimination of multiphoton probability and the multi-temporal-mode single-photon generation, the key rate of QKD will be improved, which is associated with a longer transmission distance. The quantum repeater that benefited from Li's work will also further improve the transmission distance of QKD.

National Science Review•Aug 22, 2016•1 citation
Single photon detection generally consists of several stages: the photon has to interact with one or more charged particles, its excitation energy will be converted into other forms of energy, and amplification to a macroscopic signal must occur, thus leading to a ``click.'' We focus here on the part of the detection process before amplification (which we have studied in a separate publication). We discuss how networks consisting of coupled discrete quantum states and structured continua (e.g., band gaps) provide generic models for that first part of the detection process. The input to the network is a single continuum (the continuum of single photon states); the output is again a single continuum describing the next irreversible step. The process of a single photon entering the network, its energy propagating through that network, and finally exiting into another output continuum of modes can be described by a single dimensionless complex transmission amplitude, T(\ensuremathω)T(\ensuremath{\omega})T(\ensuremathω). We discuss how to obtain from T(\ensuremathω)T(\ensuremath{\omega})T(\ensuremathω) the photodetection efficiency, how to find sets of parameters that maximize this efficiency, as well as expressions for other input-independent quantities such as the frequency-dependent group delay and spectral bandwidth. We then study a variety of networks, discuss how to engineer different transmission functions T(\ensuremathω)T(\ensuremath{\omega})T(\ensuremathω) amenable to photodetection, and discuss implications for single photon detection technology.
Quantum mechanics cements the intimate relationship between the nature of light and its detection. Historically, quantum theories of photodetection have generally fallen into two categories: the first tries to determine what quantum field observable is measured when photoelectrons are detected, laying the theoretical groundwork for photodetection being possible. The second type are phenomenological theories, which take great care to model the details of specific photodetectors. In this dissertation, we fill in the gap between these two models in the modern literature on photodetection by constructing a fully quantum-mechanical and sufficiently realistic model that includes all stages of the photodetection process. We accomplish this within the framework of quantum information theory using the language of positive operator valued measures (POVMs). \n\nA POVM provides the most general description of a quantum measurement. In the context of single-photon detection, the photodetector POVM provides a complete characterization of the single-photon detector (SPD) from which all figures of merit can be calculated. Each element of the POVM is comprised of a weighted sum over single-photon state projectors. To construct SPD POVMs, we identify the states projected onto by a measurement and the associated weights. We first accomplish this for a simple time-dependent system, laying out how to efficiently project onto arbitrary single-photon states. Then, we describe the three stages of a realistic SPD: transmission, amplification, and measurement.\n\nIn the transmission stage of photodetection a photon enters a network of discrete energy levels, its energy propagating through that network and finally exiting into another output continuum of modes, a process entirely described by a single complex function. In the amplification stage of photodetection, a single excitation is amplified into a macroscopic signal via a nonlinear amplification mechanism. In the final stage, an inefficient ``classical'' measurement is made on the macroscopic signal. By combining these three stages we form a chain of inference from the final ``click'' to the input photon and construct a POVM projecting onto the input Hilbert space. Lastly, we discuss limits and tradeoffs that arise at each stage and implications for photodetection applications.\n\nThis dissertation contains previously published and unpublished material.
Quantum mechanics cements the intimate relationship between the nature of light and its detection. Historically, quantum theories of photodetection have generally fallen into two categories: the first tries to determine what quantum field observable is measured when photoelectrons are detected, laying the theoretical groundwork for photodetection being possible. The second type are phenomenological theories, which take great care to model the details of specific photodetectors. In this dissertation, we fill in the gap between these two models in the modern literature on photodetection by constructing a fully quantum mechanical and sufficiently realistic model that includes all stages of the photodetection process: transmission, amplification, and a final classical measurement. We accomplish this within the framework of quantum information theory using the language of positive operator valued measures (POVMs). This dissertation contains material previously published in three papers: Propp, Tz. B & van Enk, S. J. (2019). On nonlinear amplification: improved quantum limits for photon counting. Optics Express 27, 16, 23454-23463. Propp, Tz. B & van Enk, S. J. (2019). Quantum networks for single photon detection. Physical Review A, 100, 033836. Propp, Tz. B & van Enk, S. J. (2020). How to project onto an arbitrary single-photon wavepacket. Physical Review A, 102, 053707.
We construct a class of Hamiltonians that describe the photodetection process from beginning to end. Our Hamiltonians describe the creation of a photon, how the photon travels to an absorber (such as a molecule), how the molecule absorbs the photon, and how the molecule after irreversibly changing its configuration triggers an amplification process---at a wavelength that may be very different from the photon's wavelength---thus producing a macroscopic signal. We use a simple prototype Hamiltonian to describe the single-photon detection process analytically in the Heisenberg picture, which neatly separates desirable from undesirable effects. Extensions to more complicated Hamiltonians are pointed out.
The temporal dynamics of large quantum systems perturbed weakly by a single excitation can give rise to unique phenomena at the quantum phase boundaries. Here, we develop a time-dependent model to study the temporal dynamics of a single photon interacting with a defect within a large system of interacting spins. Our model can lead to a single-photon detector if the system of spins is engineered to simulate a first-order quantum phase transition (QPT). We show that the absorption of a single photon pulse by an engineered defect (i.e., a nitrogen-vacancy center) can nucleate a single shot quantum measurement. This concept of a single-shot detection event (click) is different from parameter estimation which requires repeated measurements. The crucial step of amplifying the weak quantum signal occurs by coupling the defect to a system of interacting spins biased close to a QPT point. The macroscopic spin-order change during the QPT generates an amplified signal, which can be read out by a classical device. Our work paves the way for studying the temporal dynamics of large quantum systems interacting with a single photon.
We show that detection of single photons is not subject to the fundamental limitations that accompany quantum linear amplification of bosonic mode amplitudes, even though a photodetector does amplify a few-photon input signal to a macroscopic output signal. Alternative limits are derived for nonlinear photon-number amplification with optimistic implications for single-photon detection. Our description makes clear that nonlinear amplification takes place, in general, at a different frequency ω′\omega'ω′ than the frequency ω\omegaω of the input photons, which can be exploited to suppress thermal noise even further. A practical example that fits our description very well is electron shelving.
A quantum network is believed to be the next generation of quantum technology [1]. In the past decades, individual quantum systems—for example, quantum dot (QD) [2–4], etc.—have been studied in depth and the technologies are mature; therefore, the consideration of combining different systems to construct a quantum network (especially a hybrid one) is timely. Moreover, a quantum network is absolutely necessary in the fulfilment of a general quantum task, which needs the cooperation of many different kinds of quantum units. On a larger scale, the local quantum networks can be further linked to construct a global quantum network, namely the quantum Internet [1]. With this technology at hand, distributed quantum computation can be realized, making scalable quantum information processing possible in multiple sites over long distances. The primary challenge of the construction of a quantum network is the state distribution among different nodes. An elementary quantum network based on two identical nodes each constituted by a single atom in the optical cavity has been realized in an experiment [5]. However, here we focus on the quantum network comprising heterogeneous nodes, which is more general and can combine advantages of different quantum systems to complete more complicated quantum tasks. The construction of a hybrid quantum network is more difficult, since heterogeneous quantum systems have different properties that are not naturally matched, such as the different emission (or absorption) wavelengths and different bandwidths [8], etc. To establish the hybrid interface, QD is a good candidate. QD can act as a deterministic single [2] or entangled [3] photon source and is also a promising physical carrier for solid-state spin qubit [4]. QD has been interfaced with hot atoms [6] and single ions [7] in recent years. Almost at the same time, Li's group experimentally demonstrated the first optical connection between QD and a solid-state quantum memory [8]. Distinguishing from the former works, the all-solid-state character of this work makes the whole architecture more stable and easier to be manipulated and integrated. During this work, the sample was grown by Niu's group [8]. A special sample design moves the emission band of QDs to approximately 879.7 nm—the memory band of the solid-state memory [9]. Since the fine-tuning range is only several 0.1 nm, hundreds of QDs on the sample were detected by Li et al. and finally one of them was selected, whose emission line is located at 879.5 nm. Using a local-heating technique, the researchers precisely tuned the emission wavelength of this QD to the solid-state memory's memory band, whose bandwidth is as narrow as hundreds of MHz [9]. The quantum memory in this experiment was based on the atomic frequency comb (AFC) protocol [10]. The memory efficiency is as high as 20% when the storage time is 40 ns, and the non-collinear configuration for the pump light and the signal photons can substantially reduce the noise from the pump light. To further reduce the detection noise, a superconducting single-photon detector (SSPD), whose dark count rate can be as low as 1.5 per second, is used instead of the silicon single-photon avalanche diode. With these conditions, Li's experiment clearly shows the stored and retrieved single photons that are originally generated from the QD. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is 9:1. The second-order retrieved single photons are even seen in the data, which further validates the experimental result. Another advantage of Li's work is the demonstration of multi-temporal-mode quantum memory with up to 100 narrow deterministic-single-photon pulses [8]. This result is directly associated with the construction of a quantum repeater [11]—one of the essential components for a long-distance quantum network. The primary characteristics of this experiment, namely the deterministic single-photon memory (differing from the previous works) and the multimode memory, are both critically important in the improvement of a quantum repeater's efficiency [12]. Also, Li's further work finished the quantum memory of 51 spatial modes using the orbital angular momentum (OAM) modes of herald single photons [9]. By combining both the temporal and spatial multiplexing, and the deterministic single-photon source, more efficient quantum repeaters can be constructed. We hope that the recent studies [8,9] will pave the way for the construction of quantum repeaters, and furthermore quantum networks—both in the short term and the long term—based on all-solid-state devices. As a special application of a quantum network, quantum key distribution (QKD) can also benefit from Li's work both in security and transmission distance (key rate). QKD utilizes the principles of quantum mechanics to guarantee secure communication between two authorized parties (or quantum nodes, for instance) and the famous protocols including BB84 (proposed by Bennett and Brassard in 1984) [13]), etc. However, the commonly used weak-coherent-pulse photon source (typically attenuated laser) will decrease the security of QKD because of its multiphoton probability, which means that QKD suffers from several certain attacks, such as the photon number splitting (PNS) attack. Although a decoy state has been introduced to achieve potential solutions to this problem, a substantial shrinking of the sifted key will be required and the complexity of the protocol may contain loopholes [14,15]. Therefore, the unconditional security guaranteed by quantum mechanics still requires a single-photon source, such as QD (experimental work regarding QKD on the basis of a QD single-photon source can be referred to in [14,15]), etc. The deterministic-single-photon pulse train generated by QD in Li's experiment [8] can provide a single-photon-source node (in the network) and keep the security of QKD. Moreover, because of both the elimination of multiphoton probability and the multi-temporal-mode single-photon generation, the key rate of QKD will be improved, which is associated with a longer transmission distance. The quantum repeater that benefited from Li's work will also further improve the transmission distance of QKD.