Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1812.00969 · Physical review. E

Spin quantum heat engines with shortcuts to adiabaticity

Barış Çakmak, Özgür Esat Müstecaplıoğlu

Published Mar 6, 2019• 96 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We consider a finite-time quantum Otto cycle with single- and two spin-1/2 systems as its working medium. To mimic adiabatic dynamics at a finite time, we employ a shortcut-to-adiabaticity technique and evaluate the performance of the engine including the cost of the shortcut. We compare our results with the true adiabatic and nonadiabatic performances of the same cycle. Our findings indicate that the use of the shortcut-to-adiabaticity scheme significantly enhances the performance of the quantum Otto engine as compared to its adiabatic and nonadiabatic counterparts for different figures of merit.

DOI
10.1103/physreve.99.032108

Related papers

Finite-time two-spin quantum Otto engines: Shortcuts to adiabaticity vs. irreversibility

Barış Çakmak

We propose a quantum Otto cycle in a two spin-1/2 anisotropic XY model in a transverse external magnetic field. We first characterize the parameter regime that the working medium operates as an engine in the adiabatic regime. Then, we consider finite-time behavior of the engine with and without utilizing a shortcut to adiabaticity (STA) technique. STA schemes guarantee that the dynamics of a system follows the adiabatic path, at the expense of introducing an external control. We compare the performance of the nonadiabatic and STA engines for a fixed adiabatic efficiency but different parameters of the working medium. We observe that, for certain parameter regimes, the irreversibility, as measured by the efficiency lags, due to finite-time driving is so low that nonadiabatic engine performs quite close to the adiabatic engine, leaving the STA engine only marginally better than the nonadiabatic one. This suggests that by designing the working medium Hamiltonian one may spare the difficulty of dealing with an external control protocol.

arXiv:2102.11657•TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICS•Feb 26, 2021•10 citations

Experimental investigation of a quantum Otto heat engine with shortcuts to adiabaticity implemented using counter-adiabatic driving

Krishna Shende, Matreyee Kandpal, Arvind +1 more

The finite time operation of a quantum Otto heat engine leads to a trade-off between efficiency and output power, which is due to the deviation of the system from the adiabatic path. This trade-off caveat can be bypassed by using the shortcut-to-adiabaticity protocol. We experimentally implemented a quantum Otto heat engine using spin-1/2 nuclei on a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) quantum processor. We investigated its performance using the shortcut-to-adiabaticity technique via counter-adiabatic driving with the inclusion of the cost to perform the shortcut. We use two different metrics that incorporate the cost of shortcut-to-adiabaticity to define engine efficiency and experimentally analyze which one is more appropriate for the NMR platform. We found a significant improvement in the performance of the quantum Otto heat engine driven by shortcut-to-adiabaticity, as compared to the non-adiabatic heat engine.

arXiv:2412.20194•Dec 28, 2024•0 citations

Scaling-Up Quantum Heat Engines Efficiently via Shortcuts to Adiabaticity

Mathieu Beau, Juan Jaramillo, Adolfo Del Campo

The finite-time operation of a quantum heat engine that uses a single particle as a working medium generally increases the output power at the expense of inducing friction that lowers the cycle efficiency. We propose to scale up a quantum heat engine utilizing a many-particle working medium in combination with the use of shortcuts to adiabaticity to boost the nonadiabatic performance by eliminating quantum friction and reducing the cycle time. To this end, we first analyze the finite-time thermodynamics of a quantum Otto cycle implemented with a quantum fluid confined in a time-dependent harmonic trap. We show that nonadiabatic effects can be controlled and tailored to match the adiabatic performance using a variety of shortcuts to adiabaticity. As a result, the nonadiabatic dynamics of the scaled-up many-particle quantum heat engine exhibits no friction, and the cycle can be run at maximum efficiency with a tunable output power. We demonstrate our results with a working medium consisting of particles with inverse-square pairwise interactions that includes non-interacting and hard-core bosons as limiting cases.

arXiv:1603.06019•Entropy•Apr 30, 2016•158 citations

Performance of shortcut-to-adiabaticity quantum engines

Obinna Abah, Eric Lutz

We consider a paradigmatic quantum harmonic Otto engine operating in finite time. We investigate its performance when shortcut-to-adiabaticity techniques are used to speed up its cycle. We compute efficiency and power by taking the energetic cost of the shortcut driving explicitly into account. We analyze in detail three different shortcut methods: counterdiabatic driving, local counterdiabatic driving, and inverse engineering. We demonstrate that all three lead to a simultaneous increase of efficiency and power for fast cycles, thus outperforming traditional heat engines.

arXiv:1707.09963•Physical review. E•Sep 17, 2018•99 citations

Enhancing quantum heat engine performance via unitary-enabled exponential speedup of thermalization

Dehua Liu, Jianhui Wang

In this work we investigate a finite-time quantum Otto-like heat engine with a single-qubit working substance, distinguished from the standard Otto cycle by introducing a unitary operation before the cold isochore. This operation suppresses the slowest decaying mode of the open-system dynamics and broadens the spectral gap, thereby inducing an exponential to accelerate the subsequent thermalization process toward stationarity. We derive analytic expressions for the work, heat, and efficiency, and perform numerical simulations comparing the standard Otto engine, the shortcut to adiabatic engine, and our proposed Otto-like engine. Our analysis demonstrates that with an appropriate parameter selection, the additional unitary operation can significantly boost the system's power and efficiency. Finally, using the unified optimization criterion Φ, we further show that the modified cycle consistently outperforms both the conventional cycle and the shortcut to adiabatic protocol.

Physical review. E•Mar 24, 2026•0 citations

The invariant-based shortcut to adiabaticity for qubit heat engine operates under quantum Otto cycle

T. Kiran, M. Ponmurugan

In this paper, we study the role and relevance of the cost for an invariant-based shortcut to adiabaticity enabled qubit heat engine operates in a quantum Otto cycle. We consider a qubit heat engine with Landau-Zener Hamiltonian and improve its performance using the Lewis-Riesenfeld invariant-based shortcut to adiabaticity method. Addressing the importance of cost for better performance, the paper explores its relationship with the work and efficiency of the heat engine. We analyze the cost variation with the time duration of non-adiabatic unitary processes involved in the heat engine cycle. The cost required to attain the quasi-static performance of the qubit heat engine is also discussed. We found the efficiency lost due to non-adiabaticity of the engine can be revived using the shortcut method and it is even possible to attain quasi-static performance under finite time with higher cost.

arXiv:2203.05911•Mar 11, 2022•0 citations
We consider a finite-time quantum Otto cycle with single- and two spin-1/2 systems as its working medium. To mimic adiabatic dynamics at a finite time, we employ a shortcut-to-adiabaticity technique and evaluate the performance of the engine including the cost of the shortcut. We compare our results with the true adiabatic and nonadiabatic performances of the same cycle. Our findings indicate that the use of the shortcut-to-adiabaticity scheme significantly enhances the performance of the quantum Otto engine as compared to its adiabatic and nonadiabatic counterparts for different figures of merit.
We propose a quantum Otto cycle in a two spin-1/2 anisotropic XY model in a transverse external magnetic field. We first characterize the parameter regime that the working medium operates as an engine in the adiabatic regime. Then, we consider finite-time behavior of the engine with and without utilizing a shortcut to adiabaticity (STA) technique. STA schemes guarantee that the dynamics of a system follows the adiabatic path, at the expense of introducing an external control. We compare the performance of the nonadiabatic and STA engines for a fixed adiabatic efficiency but different parameters of the working medium. We observe that, for certain parameter regimes, the irreversibility, as measured by the efficiency lags, due to finite-time driving is so low that nonadiabatic engine performs quite close to the adiabatic engine, leaving the STA engine only marginally better than the nonadiabatic one. This suggests that by designing the working medium Hamiltonian one may spare the difficulty of dealing with an external control protocol.
The finite time operation of a quantum Otto heat engine leads to a trade-off between efficiency and output power, which is due to the deviation of the system from the adiabatic path. This trade-off caveat can be bypassed by using the shortcut-to-adiabaticity protocol. We experimentally implemented a quantum Otto heat engine using spin-1/2 nuclei on a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) quantum processor. We investigated its performance using the shortcut-to-adiabaticity technique via counter-adiabatic driving with the inclusion of the cost to perform the shortcut. We use two different metrics that incorporate the cost of shortcut-to-adiabaticity to define engine efficiency and experimentally analyze which one is more appropriate for the NMR platform. We found a significant improvement in the performance of the quantum Otto heat engine driven by shortcut-to-adiabaticity, as compared to the non-adiabatic heat engine.
The finite-time operation of a quantum heat engine that uses a single particle as a working medium generally increases the output power at the expense of inducing friction that lowers the cycle efficiency. We propose to scale up a quantum heat engine utilizing a many-particle working medium in combination with the use of shortcuts to adiabaticity to boost the nonadiabatic performance by eliminating quantum friction and reducing the cycle time. To this end, we first analyze the finite-time thermodynamics of a quantum Otto cycle implemented with a quantum fluid confined in a time-dependent harmonic trap. We show that nonadiabatic effects can be controlled and tailored to match the adiabatic performance using a variety of shortcuts to adiabaticity. As a result, the nonadiabatic dynamics of the scaled-up many-particle quantum heat engine exhibits no friction, and the cycle can be run at maximum efficiency with a tunable output power. We demonstrate our results with a working medium consisting of particles with inverse-square pairwise interactions that includes non-interacting and hard-core bosons as limiting cases.
We consider a paradigmatic quantum harmonic Otto engine operating in finite time. We investigate its performance when shortcut-to-adiabaticity techniques are used to speed up its cycle. We compute efficiency and power by taking the energetic cost of the shortcut driving explicitly into account. We analyze in detail three different shortcut methods: counterdiabatic driving, local counterdiabatic driving, and inverse engineering. We demonstrate that all three lead to a simultaneous increase of efficiency and power for fast cycles, thus outperforming traditional heat engines.
In this work we investigate a finite-time quantum Otto-like heat engine with a single-qubit working substance, distinguished from the standard Otto cycle by introducing a unitary operation before the cold isochore. This operation suppresses the slowest decaying mode of the open-system dynamics and broadens the spectral gap, thereby inducing an exponential to accelerate the subsequent thermalization process toward stationarity. We derive analytic expressions for the work, heat, and efficiency, and perform numerical simulations comparing the standard Otto engine, the shortcut to adiabatic engine, and our proposed Otto-like engine. Our analysis demonstrates that with an appropriate parameter selection, the additional unitary operation can significantly boost the system's power and efficiency. Finally, using the unified optimization criterion Φ, we further show that the modified cycle consistently outperforms both the conventional cycle and the shortcut to adiabatic protocol.
In this paper, we study the role and relevance of the cost for an invariant-based shortcut to adiabaticity enabled qubit heat engine operates in a quantum Otto cycle. We consider a qubit heat engine with Landau-Zener Hamiltonian and improve its performance using the Lewis-Riesenfeld invariant-based shortcut to adiabaticity method. Addressing the importance of cost for better performance, the paper explores its relationship with the work and efficiency of the heat engine. We analyze the cost variation with the time duration of non-adiabatic unitary processes involved in the heat engine cycle. The cost required to attain the quasi-static performance of the qubit heat engine is also discussed. We found the efficiency lost due to non-adiabaticity of the engine can be revived using the shortcut method and it is even possible to attain quasi-static performance under finite time with higher cost.