We propose a measurement scheme that validates the preparation of an $n$-qubit stabilizer state. The scheme involves a measurement of $n$ Pauli observables, a priori determined from the stabilizer state and which can be realized using single-qubit gates. Based on the proposed validation scheme, we derive an explicit expression for the worst-case fidelity, i.e., the minimum fidelity between the stabilizer state and any other state consistent with the measured data. We also show that the worst-case fidelity can be certified, with high probability, using $O({n}^{2})$ copies of the state.
We propose a measurement scheme that validates the preparation of an n-qubit stabilizer state. The scheme involves a measurement of n Pauli observables, a priori determined from the stabilizer state and which can be realized using single-qubit gates. Based on the proposed validation scheme, we derive an explicit expression for the worst-case fidelity, i.e., the minimum fidelity between the stabilizer state and any other state consistent with the measured data. We also show that the worst-case fidelity can be certified, with high probability, using O(n2) copies of the state.
Statistical verification of a quantum state aims to certify whether a given unknown state is close to the target state with confidence. So far, sample-optimal verification protocols based on local measurements have been found only for disparate groups of states: bipartite pure states, GHZ states, and antisymmetric basis states. In this work, we investigate systematically optimal verification of entangled stabilizer states using Pauli measurements. First, we provide a lower bound on the sample complexity of any verification protocol based on separable measurements, which is independent of the number of qubits and the specific stabilizer state. Then we propose a simple algorithm for constructing optimal protocols based on Pauli measurements. Our calculations suggest that optimal protocols based on Pauli measurements can saturate the above bound for all entangled stabilizer states, and this claim is verified explicitly for states up to seven qubits. Similar results are derived when each party can choose only two measurement settings, say X and Z. Furthermore, by virtue of the chromatic number, we provide an upper bound for the minimum number of settings required to verify any graph state, which is expected to be tight. For experimentalists, optimal protocols and protocols with the minimum number of settings are explicitly provided for all equivalent classes of stabilizer states up to seven qubits. For theorists, general results on stabilizer states (including graph states in particular) and related structures derived here may be of independent interest beyond quantum state verification.
Certifying the fidelity of a prepared state to a target stabilizer state is a fundamental task in quantum information processing. Ref. [Phys. Rev. A 99, 042337 (2019)] gave the optimal worst-case lower bound from one fixed stabilizer generator gauge, but gauge dependence can leave a large fidelity ambiguity. We develop an adaptive extension that reports the full certified fidelity interval. First, for a single gauge, we derive the complementary optimal worst-case upper bound. We then formulate gauge selection as an adaptive design problem in which each round solves exact endpoint linear programs and chooses a new gauge by a witness elimination policy. We prove monotonic tightening, exact recovery once all nontrivial stabilizers are covered, and the worst-case necessity of full coverage. Finally, we identify structured syndrome distributions for which adaptivity beats this exponential benchmark, and we numerically confirm faster concentration.
Can a high-quality quantum gate be certified when uncharacterized state-preparation and measurement errors are dominant? Can this be achieved with low experimental overhead? Here, we introduce a sound black-box certification protocol for a single-qubit gate based on a small set of fixed, deterministic sequences. From the data, the protocol derives finite-sample bounds on the gate's rotation eigenvalue, a gauge-invariant property. Its phase reveals the accuracy of the rotation angle, while its modulus quantifies the loss of coherence under repeated gate applications. We implement the protocol on a 40Ca+ trapped-ion processor and certify the X-gate rotation eigenvalue using 22000 circuit executions, and demonstrate the robustness of certification to state-preparation and measurement errors by deliberately degrading the readout. Finally, we prove that these spectral constraints imply, up to a physically meaningful unitary change of basis, a rigorous average gate-fidelity lower bound for every time-independent qubit model compatible with the data. In both readout settings, the spectral bounds yield the same fidelity certificate of 99.94(3)% with 99% confidence. Our results establish a new standard for quantum-gate certification by combining soundness and experimental efficiency without requiring trusted reference operations, randomized circuits, or model fitting.
Learning a classical description of a quantum state is a fundamental task in quantum computation. Among the most important classes of quantum states are stabilizer states, which play a central role in quantum error correction and fault-tolerant computation. To mitigate the effects of realistic noise, agnostic learning of stabilizer states has emerged as a natural and well-motivated problem. Recently, Chen \textit{et al.} [STOC'25, p. 429-438] resolved this problem for qubit systems by using a stabilizer bootstrapping framework. However, the agnostic learning of qudit stabilizer states remains largely unexplored, since the qudit setting introduces fundamental structural differences that prevent a direct generalization of existing qubit techniques. In this paper, we successfully generalize the stabilizer bootstrapping framework to qudit systems and present the first efficient quantum algorithm for agnostic learning of qudit stabilizer states. Specifically, given copies of an unknown n-qudit pure state ∣ψ⟩ that has fidelity τ with some stabilizer state, our algorithm outputs a stabilizer state ∣φ⟩ such that ∣⟨φ∣ψ⟩∣2≥τ−ε with high probability. The algorithm uses only single-copy and four-copy measurements, and its sample and time complexity scale as (d/τ)O(d2log(1/τ))⋅poly(n,1/ε), where the dimension d is an odd prime. As a direct corollary, our algorithm enables efficient estimation of the magic of a quantum state, as quantified by its stabilizer fidelity. Completing the picture, we also present a streamlined algorithm for the high-fidelity regime τ>cos2(π/8), establishing a qudit analogue of the threshold-based approach in prior qubit work.
Gate fidelity -- an average fidelity over all possible input states -- is the workhorse metric for benchmarking quantum gates or circuits, yet fault-tolerant quantum computing ultimately depends on the worst-case behavior, typically quantifiable by so-called the diamond distance. In the low-error regime, the coherent errors can inflate the worst-case error even when the reported gate fidelity is high, making the gate fidelity alone an unreliable proxy for fault-tolerance readiness. To capture the missing information, we introduce a companion observable -- what we dub the fidelity deviation -- that quantifies how strongly the state-dependent fidelities fluctuate across input states. Adopting such fluctuations in assessing the fault-tolerance is physically natural because some input directions are nearly unaffected while others form narrow "valleys" that dominate adversarial circuit behavior. For coherent (unitary) gate errors on two or more qubits, we show that the gate fidelity together with the fidelity deviation constrains the relevant spectral moments of the error unitary, enabling an explicit and tight certificate of the worst-case error. Both quantities are estimated directly from the same randomized input-measurement experiment, without full process tomography. We show that the fidelity and its deviation can provide an economical, operationally meaningful, and accurate standard for assessing the fault tolerance of the engineered quantum gates and circuits.
We study single-copy stabilizer learning, the problem of identifying a stabilizer group of dimension n−t from an n-qubit quantum state ρ. We obtain two complementary results. First, in the average case, logarithmic-depth local Clifford circuits suffice to efficiently learn almost all stabilizer groups with t=O(logn), instead of the linear-depth measurements required in previous approaches. We support this result with numerical simulations for systems of up to 100 qubits. Second, we show that, in the worst case, any adaptive single-copy measurement scheme requires a number of samples that scales exponentially in t. Together with existing results on two-copy learning, our findings suggest that, for large t, identifying Pauli symmetries of a quantum system exhibits a quantum advantage in the learning setting.