Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1808.02739 · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter

Exotic topological point and line nodes in the plaquette excitations of a frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice

Moumita Deb, Asim Kumar Ghosh

Published Apr 2, 2020• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

antiferromagnetic Heisenberg honeycomb model when the ground state of the system lies in a spin-disordered plaquette-valence-bond-solid phase. A six-spin plaquette operator theory of this honeycomb model has been developed for this purpose by using the eigenstates of an isolated Heisenberg hexagonal plaquette. Spin-1/2 operators are thus expressed in the Fock space spanned by the plaquette operators those are obtained in terms of exact analytic form of eigenstates for a single frustrated Heisenberg hexagon. Ultimately, an effective interacting boson model of this system is obtained on the basis of low energy singlets and triplets plaquette operators by employing a mean-field approximation. The values of ground state energy and spin gap of this system have been estimated and the validity of this formalism has been tested upon comparison with the known results. Emergence of topological point and line nodes on the basis of spin-disordered ground state noted in this investigation is very rare on any frustrated system as well as the presence of triplet flat band. Evolution of those topological nodes is studied throughout the full frustrated regime. Finally, emergence of topological phases has been reported upon adding a time-reversal-symmetry breaking term to the Hamiltonian. Coexistence of spin gap with either topological nodes or phases turns this honeycomb model an interesting one.

DOI
10.1088/1361-648x/ab85f7

Related papers

Dirac and Weyl nodes in the plaquette excitations of the frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice

Moumita Deb, Asim Kumar Ghosh

The plaquette valence bond solid (VBS) phase of the $J_1-J_2$ antiferromagnetic (AFM) Heisenberg honeycomb model has been studied using plaquette operator theory. Considering six $S =\frac{1}{2}$ spins on a single plaquette the plaquette operator representation for the spin operators in terms of plaquette-singlet and plaquette-triplet boson operators has been developed. The formalism has been applied to the $J_1-J_2$ honeycomb antiferromagnet to derive an effective interacting boson model in terms of those singlets and triplets. The effective model has been analyzed within the harmonic approximation and results have been compared with the exact diagonalization data. The evolution of Dirac and Weyl nodes with respect to $J_2/J_1$ for this model has been studied.

•Aug 8, 2018•0 citations

Plaquette valence-bond solid in the square-lattice J1 - J2 antiferromagnet Heisenberg model: A bond operator approach

R. L. Doretto

We study the plaquette valence-bond solid phase of the spin-$1/2$${J}_{1}$-${J}_{2}$ antiferromagnet Heisenberg model on the square lattice within the bond-operator theory. We start by considering four $S=1/2$ spins on a single plaquette and determine the bond operator representation for the spin operators in terms of singlet, triplet, and quintet boson operators. The formalism is then applied to the ${J}_{1}$-${J}_{2}$ model and an effective interacting boson model in terms of singlets and triplets is derived. The effective model is analyzed within the harmonic approximation and the previous results of Zhitomirsky and Ueda [Phys. Rev. B 54, 9007 (1996)] are recovered. By perturbatively including cubic (triplet-triplet-triplet and singlet-triplet-triplet) and quartic interactions, we find that the plaquette valence-bond solid phase is stable within the parameter region $0.34<{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}<0.59$, which is narrower than the harmonic one. Differently from the harmonic approximation, the excitation gap vanishes at both critical couplings ${J}_{2}=0.34{J}_{1}$ and ${J}_{2}=0.59{J}_{1}$. Interestingly, for ${J}_{2}<0.48{J}_{1}$, the excitation gap corresponds to a singlet-triplet excitation at the $\ensuremath{\Gamma}$ point while, for ${J}_{2}>0.48{J}_{1}$, it is related to a singlet-singlet excitation at the $\mathbf{X}=(\ensuremath{\pi}/2,0)$ point of the tetramerized Brillouin zone.

arXiv:1309.6490•Physical Review B•Mar 19, 2014•55 citations

Phase diagram of a frustrated quantum antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice: Magnetic order versus valence-bond crystal formation

A. Fabricio Albuquerque, David R. Schwandt, Balázs Hetényi +3 more

We present a comprehensive computational study of the phase diagram of the frustrated $S=1/2$ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice, with second-nearest $({J}_{2})$ and third-neighbor $({J}_{3})$ couplings. Using a combination of exact diagonalizations (EDs) of the original spin model, of the Hamiltonian projected into the nearest-neighbor short-range valence-bond basis, and of an effective quantum dimer model, as well as a self-consistent cluster mean-field theory, we determine the boundaries of several magnetically ordered phases in the region ${J}_{2},{J}_{3}\ensuremath{\in}[0,1]$, and find a sizable magnetically disordered region in between. We characterize part of this magnetically disordered phase as a plaquette valence-bond crystal phase. At larger ${J}_{2}$, we locate a sizable region in which staggered valence-bond crystal correlations are found to be important, either due to genuine valence-bond crystal (VBC) ordering or as a consequence of magnetically ordered phases, which break lattice rotational symmetry. Furthermore, we find that a particular parameter-free Gutzwiller projected tight-binding wave function has remarkably accurate energies compared to finite-size extrapolated ED energies along the transition line from conventional N\'eel to plaquette VBC phases, a fact that points to possibly interesting critical behavior---such as a deconfined critical point---across this transition. We also comment on the relevance of this spin model to model the spin liquid region found in the half filled Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice.

arXiv:1102.5325•Physical Review B•Jul 6, 2011•204 citations

Plaquette valence bond ordering in a J 1 – J 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a honeycomb lattice

H Mosadeq, F Shahbazi, S A Jafari

We study an S = 1/2 Heisenberg model on the honeycomb lattice with first and second neighbor antiferromagnetic exchange (J(1)-J(2) model), employing exact diagonalization in both the S(z) = 0 basis and nearest neighbor singlet valence bond (NNVB) basis. We find that for 0.2 < J(2)/J(1) < 0.3, the NNVB basis gives a proper description of the ground state in comparison with the exact results. By analyzing the dimer-dimer as well as the plaquette-plaquette correlations and also defining appropriate structure factors, we investigate possible symmetry breaking states as the candidates for the ground state in the frustrated region. We provide a body of evidence in favor of plaquette valence bond ordering for 0.2 < J(2)/J(1) < 0.3. By further increasing the ratio J(2)/J(1), this state undergoes a transition to the staggered dimerized state.

arXiv:1007.0127•Journal of Physics Condensed Matter•May 19, 2011•76 citations

Plaquette resonating valence bond state in a frustrated honeycomb antiferromagnet

R. Ganesh, Satoshi Nishimoto, Jeroen van den Brink

We study the proposed plaquette resonating valence bond (pRVB) state in the honeycomb lattice ${J}_{1}\ensuremath{-}{J}_{2}$ model with frustration arising from next-nearest-neighbor interactions. Starting with the limit of decoupled hexagons, we develop a plaquette operator approach to describe the pRVB state and its low-energy excitations. Our calculation clarifies that the putative pRVB state necessarily has $f$-wave symmetry: the plaquette wave function is an antisymmetric combination of the Kekul\'e structures. We estimate the plaquette ordering amplitude, ground-state energy, and spin gap as a function of ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}$. The pRVB state is most stable around ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\sim}0.25$. We identify the wave vectors of the lowest triplet excitations, which can be verified using exact diagonalization or density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) studies. When ${J}_{2}$ is reduced, we can have either a deconfined quantum phase transition (QPT) or a first-order transition into a N\'eel state. When ${J}_{2}$ is increased, we surmise that the system will undergo a first-order phase transition into a state which breaks lattice rotational symmetry.

arXiv:1209.6091•Physical Review B•Feb 13, 2013•26 citations

Frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice: A candidate for deconfined quantum criticality

DAMIAN J. J. FARNELL, R. F. Bishop, P. H. Y. Li +2 more

We study the ground-state (gs) phase diagram of the frustrated spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ ${J}_{1}$--${J}_{2}$--${J}_{3}$ antiferromagnet with ${J}_{2}={J}_{3}=\ensuremath{\kappa}{J}_{1}$ on the honeycomb lattice using coupled-cluster theory and exact diagonalization methods. We present results for the gs energy, magnetic order parameter, spin-spin correlation function, and plaquette valence-bond crystal (PVBC) susceptibility. We find a N\'eel antiferromagnetic (AFM) phase for $\ensuremath{\kappa}<{\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{1}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.47$, a collinear striped AFM phase for $\ensuremath{\kappa}>{\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{2}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.60$, and a paramagnetic PVBC phase for ${\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{1}}\ensuremath{\lesssim}\ensuremath{\kappa}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{2}}$. The transition at ${\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{2}}$ appears to be of first-order type, while that at ${\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{1}}$ is continuous. Since the N\'eel and PVBC phases break different symmetries our results favor the deconfinement scenario for the transition at ${\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{1}}$.

arXiv:1103.3856•Physical Review B•Jul 8, 2011•65 citations
antiferromagnetic Heisenberg honeycomb model when the ground state of the system lies in a spin-disordered plaquette-valence-bond-solid phase. A six-spin plaquette operator theory of this honeycomb model has been developed for this purpose by using the eigenstates of an isolated Heisenberg hexagonal plaquette. Spin-1/2 operators are thus expressed in the Fock space spanned by the plaquette operators those are obtained in terms of exact analytic form of eigenstates for a single frustrated Heisenberg hexagon. Ultimately, an effective interacting boson model of this system is obtained on the basis of low energy singlets and triplets plaquette operators by employing a mean-field approximation. The values of ground state energy and spin gap of this system have been estimated and the validity of this formalism has been tested upon comparison with the known results. Emergence of topological point and line nodes on the basis of spin-disordered ground state noted in this investigation is very rare on any frustrated system as well as the presence of triplet flat band. Evolution of those topological nodes is studied throughout the full frustrated regime. Finally, emergence of topological phases has been reported upon adding a time-reversal-symmetry breaking term to the Hamiltonian. Coexistence of spin gap with either topological nodes or phases turns this honeycomb model an interesting one.
The plaquette valence bond solid (VBS) phase of the J1−J2J_1-J_2J1​−J2​ antiferromagnetic (AFM) Heisenberg honeycomb model has been studied using plaquette operator theory. Considering six S=12S =\frac{1}{2}S=21​ spins on a single plaquette the plaquette operator representation for the spin operators in terms of plaquette-singlet and plaquette-triplet boson operators has been developed. The formalism has been applied to the J1−J2J_1-J_2J1​−J2​ honeycomb antiferromagnet to derive an effective interacting boson model in terms of those singlets and triplets. The effective model has been analyzed within the harmonic approximation and results have been compared with the exact diagonalization data. The evolution of Dirac and Weyl nodes with respect to J2/J1J_2/J_1J2​/J1​ for this model has been studied.
We study the plaquette valence-bond solid phase of the spin-1/21/21/2J1{J}_{1}J1​-J2{J}_{2}J2​ antiferromagnet Heisenberg model on the square lattice within the bond-operator theory. We start by considering four S=1/2S=1/2S=1/2 spins on a single plaquette and determine the bond operator representation for the spin operators in terms of singlet, triplet, and quintet boson operators. The formalism is then applied to the J1{J}_{1}J1​-J2{J}_{2}J2​ model and an effective interacting boson model in terms of singlets and triplets is derived. The effective model is analyzed within the harmonic approximation and the previous results of Zhitomirsky and Ueda [Phys. Rev. B 54, 9007 (1996)] are recovered. By perturbatively including cubic (triplet-triplet-triplet and singlet-triplet-triplet) and quartic interactions, we find that the plaquette valence-bond solid phase is stable within the parameter region 0.34<J2/J1<0.590.34<{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}<0.590.34<J2​/J1​<0.59, which is narrower than the harmonic one. Differently from the harmonic approximation, the excitation gap vanishes at both critical couplings J2=0.34J1{J}_{2}=0.34{J}_{1}J2​=0.34J1​ and J2=0.59J1{J}_{2}=0.59{J}_{1}J2​=0.59J1​. Interestingly, for J2<0.48J1{J}_{2}<0.48{J}_{1}J2​<0.48J1​, the excitation gap corresponds to a singlet-triplet excitation at the $\ensuremath{\Gamma}$ point while, for J2>0.48J1{J}_{2}>0.48{J}_{1}J2​>0.48J1​, it is related to a singlet-singlet excitation at the $\mathbf{X}=(\ensuremath{\pi}/2,0)$ point of the tetramerized Brillouin zone.
We present a comprehensive computational study of the phase diagram of the frustrated S=1/2S=1/2S=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice, with second-nearest (J2)({J}_{2})(J2​) and third-neighbor (J3)({J}_{3})(J3​) couplings. Using a combination of exact diagonalizations (EDs) of the original spin model, of the Hamiltonian projected into the nearest-neighbor short-range valence-bond basis, and of an effective quantum dimer model, as well as a self-consistent cluster mean-field theory, we determine the boundaries of several magnetically ordered phases in the region ${J}_{2},{J}_{3}\ensuremath{\in}[0,1]$, and find a sizable magnetically disordered region in between. We characterize part of this magnetically disordered phase as a plaquette valence-bond crystal phase. At larger J2{J}_{2}J2​, we locate a sizable region in which staggered valence-bond crystal correlations are found to be important, either due to genuine valence-bond crystal (VBC) ordering or as a consequence of magnetically ordered phases, which break lattice rotational symmetry. Furthermore, we find that a particular parameter-free Gutzwiller projected tight-binding wave function has remarkably accurate energies compared to finite-size extrapolated ED energies along the transition line from conventional N\'eel to plaquette VBC phases, a fact that points to possibly interesting critical behavior---such as a deconfined critical point---across this transition. We also comment on the relevance of this spin model to model the spin liquid region found in the half filled Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice.
We study an S = 1/2 Heisenberg model on the honeycomb lattice with first and second neighbor antiferromagnetic exchange (J(1)-J(2) model), employing exact diagonalization in both the S(z) = 0 basis and nearest neighbor singlet valence bond (NNVB) basis. We find that for 0.2 < J(2)/J(1) < 0.3, the NNVB basis gives a proper description of the ground state in comparison with the exact results. By analyzing the dimer-dimer as well as the plaquette-plaquette correlations and also defining appropriate structure factors, we investigate possible symmetry breaking states as the candidates for the ground state in the frustrated region. We provide a body of evidence in favor of plaquette valence bond ordering for 0.2 < J(2)/J(1) < 0.3. By further increasing the ratio J(2)/J(1), this state undergoes a transition to the staggered dimerized state.
We study the proposed plaquette resonating valence bond (pRVB) state in the honeycomb lattice ${J}_{1}\ensuremath{-}{J}_{2}$ model with frustration arising from next-nearest-neighbor interactions. Starting with the limit of decoupled hexagons, we develop a plaquette operator approach to describe the pRVB state and its low-energy excitations. Our calculation clarifies that the putative pRVB state necessarily has fff-wave symmetry: the plaquette wave function is an antisymmetric combination of the Kekul\'e structures. We estimate the plaquette ordering amplitude, ground-state energy, and spin gap as a function of J2/J1{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}J2​/J1​. The pRVB state is most stable around ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\sim}0.25$. We identify the wave vectors of the lowest triplet excitations, which can be verified using exact diagonalization or density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) studies. When J2{J}_{2}J2​ is reduced, we can have either a deconfined quantum phase transition (QPT) or a first-order transition into a N\'eel state. When J2{J}_{2}J2​ is increased, we surmise that the system will undergo a first-order phase transition into a state which breaks lattice rotational symmetry.
We study the ground-state (gs) phase diagram of the frustrated spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ J1{J}_{1}J1​--J2{J}_{2}J2​--J3{J}_{3}J3​ antiferromagnet with ${J}_{2}={J}_{3}=\ensuremath{\kappa}{J}_{1}$ on the honeycomb lattice using coupled-cluster theory and exact diagonalization methods. We present results for the gs energy, magnetic order parameter, spin-spin correlation function, and plaquette valence-bond crystal (PVBC) susceptibility. We find a N\'eel antiferromagnetic (AFM) phase for $\ensuremath{\kappa}<{\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{1}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.47$, a collinear striped AFM phase for $\ensuremath{\kappa}>{\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{2}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.60$, and a paramagnetic PVBC phase for ${\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{1}}\ensuremath{\lesssim}\ensuremath{\kappa}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{2}}$. The transition at ${\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{2}}$ appears to be of first-order type, while that at ${\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{1}}$ is continuous. Since the N\'eel and PVBC phases break different symmetries our results favor the deconfinement scenario for the transition at ${\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{{c}_{1}}$.