The central idea of this work is the concept of prespace, a hypothetical structure that is postulated to underlie the fabric of space or space-time. I consider how such a structure could relate to space and space-time, and the implications of the existence of this structure for quantum theory. I compare space and space-time to other spaces used in physics, such as configuration space, phase space, and Hilbert space. I support the 'property view' of space, opposing both the traditional views of space and space-time, substantivalism and relationism. I argue that configuration space has a special status in the microscopic world similar to the status of position space in the macroscopic world. The prespace structure is compared with a computational system, in particular to a cellular automaton, in which space and all physical quantities are broken into discrete units. One way open for a prespace metaphysics can be found if physics is made fully discrete. I suggest as a heuristic principle that the physical laws of our world are such that the computational cost of implementing those laws on an arbitrary computational system is minimized. I discuss the 'measurement problem' of quantum mechanics. Considering how quantum theory could be made fully discrete leads naturally to a suggestion of how standard linear quantum mechanics could be modified to give a solution to the measurement problem, calling this model Critical Complexity Quantum Mechanics (CCQM). I compare CCQM with some other proposed solutions to the measurement problem, in particular, the spontaneous localization model of Ghirardi, Rimini, and Weber. Finally, I argue that the measure of the complexity of quantum mechanical states introduced in CCQM also provides a new definition of entropy for quantum mechanics, and suggests an objective foundation for statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and the arrow of time.
The central idea of this work is the concept of prespace, a hypothetical structure that is postulated to underlie the fabric of space or space-time. I consider how such a structure could relate to space and space-time, and the implications of the existence of this structure for quantum theory. I compare space and space-time to other spaces used in physics, such as configuration space, phase space, and Hilbert space. I support the 'property view' of space, opposing both the traditional views of space and space-time, substantivalism and relationism. I argue that configuration space has a special status in the microscopic world similar to the status of position space in the macroscopic world. The prespace structure is compared with a computational system, in particular to a cellular automaton, in which space and all physical quantities are broken into discrete units. One way open for a prespace metaphysics can be found if physics is made fully discrete. I suggest as a heuristic principle that the physical laws of our world are such that the computational cost of implementing those laws on an arbitrary computational system is minimized. I discuss the 'measurement problem' of quantum mechanics. Considering how quantum theory could be made fully discrete leads naturally to a suggestion of how standard linear quantum mechanics could be modified to give a solution to the measurement problem, calling this model Critical Complexity Quantum Mechanics (CCQM). I compare CCQM with some other proposed solutions to the measurement problem, in particular, the spontaneous localization model of Ghirardi, Rimini, and Weber. Finally, I argue that the measure of the complexity of quantum mechanical states introduced in CCQM also provides a new definition of entropy for quantum mechanics, and suggests an objective foundation for statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and the arrow of time.
The central motivating idea behind the development of this work is the concept of prespace, a hypothetical structure that is postulated by some physicists to underlie the fabric of space or space-time. I consider how such a structure could relate to space and space-time, and the rest of reality as we know it, and the implications of the existence of this structure for quantum theory. Understanding how this structure could relate to space and to the rest of reality requires, I believe, that we consider how space itself relates to reality, and how other so-called “spaces” used in physics relate to reality. In the first chapter I compare space and space-time to other spaces used in physics, such as configuration space, phase space and Hilbert space. I support what is known as the “property view” of space, opposing both the traditional views of space and space-time, substantivalism and relationism. I argue that all these spaces are property spaces. After examining the relationships of these spaces to causality, I argue that configuration space has, due to its role in quantum mechanics, a special status in the microscopic world similar to the status of position space in the macroscopic world. In chapter two prespace itself is considered. One way of approaching this structure is through the comparison of the prespace structure with a computational system, in particular to a cellular automaton, in which space or space-time and all other physical quantities are broken down into discrete units. I suggest that one way open for a prespace metaphysics can be found if physics is made fully discrete in this way. I suggest as a heuristic principle that the physical laws of our world are such that the computational cost of implementing those laws on an arbitrary computational system is minimized, adapting a heuristic principle of this type proposed by Feynman (1982). In the final chapter some of the ideas of the previous chapters are applied in an examination of the physics and metaphysics of quantum theory. I first discuss the “measurement problem” of quantum mechanics: this problem and its proposed solution are the primary subjects of the final chapter. It turns out that considering how quantum theory could be made fully discrete leads naturally to a suggestion of how standard linear quantum mechanics could be modified to give rise to a solution to the measurement problem. The computational heuristic principle reinforces the same solution. I call the modified quantum mechanics Critical Complexity Quantum Mechanics (CCQM). I compare CCQM with some of the other proposed solutions to the measurement problem, in particular the spontaneous localization model of Ghirardi, Rimini and Weber (1986). Finally I argue that the measure of complexity of quantum mechanical states I introduce in CCQM also provides a new definition of entropy for quantum mechanics, and suggests a solution to the problem of providing an objective foundation for statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and the arrow of time.
The space discreteness hypothesis asserts that the nature of space at short distances is radically different from that at large distances. Based on the Bronstein inequality, here, we use a totally disconnected topological space X as a model for the space. However, we consider the time as a real variable. In this framework, the formalism of Dirac-von Neumann can be used. This discreteness hypothesis implies that given two different points in space, there is no continuous curve (a world line) joining them. Consequently, this hypothesis is not compatible with the theory of relativity. We propose R×(R×X)3 as a model of a space-time. For simplicity, we work out our models using R×(R×X) as the configuration space. Quantum mechanics (QM), in the sense of Dirac-von Neumann, on the Hilbert space L2(R×X) is a non-local theory: the Hamiltonians are non-local operators, and thus, spooky action at a distance is allowed. The paradigm asserting that the universe is non-locally real implies that the proposed version of QM admits realism. This version of QM can be specialized to standard QM by using Hamiltonians acting on wavefunctions supported on the region R×R. We apply the developed formalism to the measurement problem. We propose a new mechanism for the collapse of the wavefunction. The mechanism resembles the one proposed by Ghirardi, Ramini, and Weber, but there are significant differences. The most important feature is that the Schrödinger equation describes the dynamics at all times, even at the moment of measurement. We also discuss a model for the two-slit experiment, where bright and dark states of light (proposed recently) naturally occur.
When investigating theories at the tiniest conceivable scales in nature, almost all researchers today revert to the quantum language, accepting the verdict from the Copenhagen doctrine that the only way to describe what is going on will always involve states in Hilbert space, controlled by operator equations. Returning to classical, that is, non quantum mechanical, descriptions will be forever impossible, unless one accepts some extremely contrived theoretical constructions that may or may not reproduce the quantum mechanical phenomena observed in experiments. Dissatisfied, this author investigated how one can look at things differently. This book is an overview of older material, but also contains many new observations and calculations. Quantum mechanics is looked upon as a tool, not as a theory. Examples are displayed of models that are classical in essence, but can be analysed by the use of quantum techniques, and we argue that even the Standard Model, together with gravitational interactions, might be viewed as a quantum mechanical approach to analyse a system that could be classical at its core. We explain how such thoughts can conceivably be reconciled with Bell's theorem, and how the usual objections voiced against the notion of `superdeterminism' can be overcome, at least in principle. Our proposal would eradicate the collapse problem and the measurement problem. Even the existence of an "arrow of time" can perhaps be explained in a more elegant way than usual. Discussions added in v3: the role of the gravitational force, a mathematical physics definition of free will, and an unconventional view on the arrow of time, amongst others.
What is the proper metaphysics of quantum mechanics? In this dissertation, I approach the question from three different but related angles. First, I suggest that the quantum state can be understood intrinsically as relations holding among regions in ordinary space-time, from which we can recover the wave function uniquely up to an equivalence class (by representation and uniqueness theorems). The intrinsic account eliminates certain conventional elements (e.g. overall phase) in the representation of the quantum state. It also dispenses with first-order quantification over mathematical objects, which goes some way towards making the quantum world safe for a nominalistic metaphysics suggested in Field (1980, 2016). Second, I argue that the fundamental space of the quantum world is the low-dimensional physical space and not the high-dimensional space isomorphic to the ``configuration space.'' My arguments are based on considerations about dynamics, empirical adequacy, and symmetries of the quantum mechanics. Third, I show that, when we consider quantum mechanics in a time-asymmetric universe (with a large entropy gradient), we obtain new theoretical and conceptual possibilities. In such a model, we can use the low-entropy boundary condition known as the Past Hypothesis (Albert, 2000) to pin down a natural initial quantum state of the universe. However, the universal quantum state is not a pure state but a mixed state, represented by a density matrix that is the normalized projection onto the Past Hypothesis subspace. This particular choice has interesting consequences for Humean supervenience, statistical mechanical probabilities, and theoretical unity.
Abstract. Is the universe computable? If yes, is it computationally a polynomial place? In standard quantum mechanics, which permits infinite parallelism and the infinitely precise specification of states, a negative answer to both questions is not ruled out. On the other hand, empirical evidence suggests that NP-complete problems are intractable in the physical world. Likewise, computational problems known to be algorithmically uncomputable do not seem to be computable by any physical algorithms on the one hand, and physical computers on the other, finds a natural explanation if the universe is assumed to be algorithmic; that is, that physical reality is the product of discrete subphysical information processing equivalent to the actions of a probabilistic Turing machine. This assumption can be reconciled with the observed exponentiality of quantum systems at microscopic scales, and the consequent possibility of implementing Shor's quantum polynomial time algorithm at that scale, provided the degree of superposition is intrinsically, finitely upper-bounded. If this bound is associated with the quantum-classical divide (the Heisenberg cut), a natural resolution to the quantum measurement problem arises. From this viewpoint, macroscopic classicality is an evidence that the universe is in BPP, and both questions raised above receive affirmative answers. A recently proposed computational model of quantum measurement, which relates the Heisenberg cut to the discreteness of Hilbert space, is briefly discussed. A connection to quantum gravity is noted. Our results are compatible with the philosophy that mathematical truths are independent of the laws of physics.