Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1807.04437

Finite-State Classical Mechanics

Norman Margolus

Published Jul 12, 2018• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Reversible lattice dynamics embody basic features of physics that govern the time evolution of classical information. They have finite resolution in space and time, don't allow information to be erased, and easily accommodate other structural properties of microscopic physics, such as finite distinct state and locality of interaction. In an ideal quantum realization of a reversible lattice dynamics, finite classical rates of state-change at lattice sites determine average energies and momenta. This is very different than traditional continuous models of classical dynamics, where the number of distinct states is infinite, the rate of change between distinct states is infinite, and energies and momenta are not tied to rates of distinct state change. Here we discuss a family of classical mechanical models that have the informational and energetic realism of reversible lattice dynamics, while retaining the continuity and mathematical framework of classical mechanics. These models may help to clarify the informational foundations of mechanics.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1807.04437

Related papers

Mechanical Systems that are both Classical and Quantum

Norman Margolus

Quantum dynamics can be regarded as a generalization of classical finite-state dynamics. This is a familiar viewpoint for workers in quantum computation, which encompasses classical computation as a special case. Here this viewpoint is extended to mechanics, where classical dynamics has traditionally been viewed as a macroscopic approximation of quantum behavior, not as a special case. When a classical dynamics is recast as a special case of quantum dynamics, the quantum description can be interpreted classically. For example, sometimes extra information is added to the classical state in order to construct the quantum description. This extra information is then eliminated by representing it in a superposition as if it were unknown information about a classical statistical ensemble. This usage of superposition leads to the appearance of Fermions in the quantum description of classical lattice-gas dynamics and turns continuous-space descriptions of finite-state systems into illustrations of classical sampling theory. A direct mapping of classical systems onto quantum systems also allows us to determine the minimum possible energy scale for a classical dynamics, based on a localized rate of state change. We use a partitioning description of dynamics to define locality, and discuss the ideal energy of two model systems.

arXiv:0805.3357•May 22, 2008•5 citations

Quantum emulation of classical dynamics

Norman Margolus

In statistical mechanics, it is well known that finite-state classical lattice models can be recast as quantum models, with distinct classical configurations identified with orthogonal basis states. This mapping makes classical statistical mechanics on a lattice a special case of quantum statistical mechanics, and classical combinatorial entropy a special case of quantum entropy. In a similar manner, finite-state classical dynamics can be recast as finite-energy quantum dynamics. This mapping translates continuous quantities, concepts and machinery of quantum mechanics into a simplified finite-state context in which they have a purely classical and combinatorial interpretation. For example, in this mapping quantum average energy becomes the classical update rate. Interpolation theory and communication theory help explain the truce achieved here between perfect classical determinism and quantum uncertainty, and between discrete and continuous dynamics.

arXiv:1109.4995•Sep 23, 2011•4 citations

The finite-state character of physical dynamics

Norman Margolus

Finite physical systems have only a finite amount of distinct state. This finiteness is fundamental in statistical mechanics, where the maximum number of distinct states compatible with macroscopic constraints defines entropy. Here we show that finiteness of distinct state is similarly fundamental in ordinary mechanics: energy and momentum are defined by the maximum number of distinct states possible in a given time or distance. More generally, any moment of energy or momentum bounds distinct states in time or space. These results generalize both the Nyquist bandwidth-bound on distinct values in classical signals, and quantum uncertainty bounds. The new certainty bounds are achieved by finite-bandwidth evolutions in which time and space are effectively discrete, including quantum evolutions that are effectively classical. Since energy and momentum count distinct states, they are defined in finite-state dynamics, and they relate classical mechanics to finite-state evolution.

arXiv:1109.4994•Sep 23, 2011•4 citations

The maximum average rate of state change

Norman Margolus

For an isolated quantum system, average energy above the ground state and average momentum determine the minimum time and distance needed to transition through $N$ distinct states. Other moments of energy and momentum provide similar bounds. For $N\gg1$, we can equate average energy and momentum with the maximum average rates of distinct state change in time and space. Thus at least vestiges of finite-state dynamics persist in the classical world, and in its interpretation.

•Sep 23, 2011•2 citations

Microscopic State Sums and Above-Cutoff Substrate Dynamics

David Betzer

SCQG paper 19 of 28. Paper 19 develops the microscopic quantum dynamics of the Semantic Commitment / Quantum Gravity framework. It starts with finite physical carriers at the Planck regulator scale. A cell carries registrations, records or comparison data only where the corresponding systems and operations are present. A distinction becomes locally available through the forward physical action that makes it usable. Allowed local changes and their reverse partners define a self-adjoint Hamiltonian. This generator determines quantum evolution, exact sums of transition amplitudes and causal response. The microscopic clock λ is compared with metric time through an explicitly defined positive clock map. Semantic time orders the interactions through which distinctions become usable, compared or maintained. A six-state loop provides an explicit calculation of screen occupation, payload delivery and reciprocal response. Interacting finite chains show how those results change when cells exchange quantum states. The charged construction retains all 8,160 fermionic modes of its stated regulator, together with the links and boundary systems needed to enforce local Gauss constraints. Complete packet exchanges retain the transferred states, correlations and compensating flux. The paper derives exact reduced dynamics with memory and states the additional conditions for quantum channels, memoryless evolution and classical jumps. It constructs positive Euclidean reflection forms from which Hamiltonian dynamics can be recovered, and proves that local observables have well-defined limits as the support grows under the stated locality bounds. Explicit error bounds quantify the comparison between different resolutions. The final sections specify the further action, symmetry, positivity and convergence conditions needed for a relativistic continuum realization and its use by the companion papers.

•Oct 23, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Dynamics

Robert W. Zwanzig

Abstract For present purposes, the first thing to recall about quantum mechanics is that all dynamical quantities, instead of being functions of the location of a system in phase space as in classical mechanics, are now represented by operators in a Hilbert space of quantum states. In particular, the quantum analog of the classical phase space distribution function is the quantum mechanical density matrix. Since this is seldom discussed in introductory texts on either quantum mechanics or statistical mechanics, it may be helpful to summarize some of its basic properties.

•Apr 19, 2001•0 citations
Reversible lattice dynamics embody basic features of physics that govern the time evolution of classical information. They have finite resolution in space and time, don't allow information to be erased, and easily accommodate other structural properties of microscopic physics, such as finite distinct state and locality of interaction. In an ideal quantum realization of a reversible lattice dynamics, finite classical rates of state-change at lattice sites determine average energies and momenta. This is very different than traditional continuous models of classical dynamics, where the number of distinct states is infinite, the rate of change between distinct states is infinite, and energies and momenta are not tied to rates of distinct state change. Here we discuss a family of classical mechanical models that have the informational and energetic realism of reversible lattice dynamics, while retaining the continuity and mathematical framework of classical mechanics. These models may help to clarify the informational foundations of mechanics.
Quantum dynamics can be regarded as a generalization of classical finite-state dynamics. This is a familiar viewpoint for workers in quantum computation, which encompasses classical computation as a special case. Here this viewpoint is extended to mechanics, where classical dynamics has traditionally been viewed as a macroscopic approximation of quantum behavior, not as a special case. When a classical dynamics is recast as a special case of quantum dynamics, the quantum description can be interpreted classically. For example, sometimes extra information is added to the classical state in order to construct the quantum description. This extra information is then eliminated by representing it in a superposition as if it were unknown information about a classical statistical ensemble. This usage of superposition leads to the appearance of Fermions in the quantum description of classical lattice-gas dynamics and turns continuous-space descriptions of finite-state systems into illustrations of classical sampling theory. A direct mapping of classical systems onto quantum systems also allows us to determine the minimum possible energy scale for a classical dynamics, based on a localized rate of state change. We use a partitioning description of dynamics to define locality, and discuss the ideal energy of two model systems.
In statistical mechanics, it is well known that finite-state classical lattice models can be recast as quantum models, with distinct classical configurations identified with orthogonal basis states. This mapping makes classical statistical mechanics on a lattice a special case of quantum statistical mechanics, and classical combinatorial entropy a special case of quantum entropy. In a similar manner, finite-state classical dynamics can be recast as finite-energy quantum dynamics. This mapping translates continuous quantities, concepts and machinery of quantum mechanics into a simplified finite-state context in which they have a purely classical and combinatorial interpretation. For example, in this mapping quantum average energy becomes the classical update rate. Interpolation theory and communication theory help explain the truce achieved here between perfect classical determinism and quantum uncertainty, and between discrete and continuous dynamics.
Finite physical systems have only a finite amount of distinct state. This finiteness is fundamental in statistical mechanics, where the maximum number of distinct states compatible with macroscopic constraints defines entropy. Here we show that finiteness of distinct state is similarly fundamental in ordinary mechanics: energy and momentum are defined by the maximum number of distinct states possible in a given time or distance. More generally, any moment of energy or momentum bounds distinct states in time or space. These results generalize both the Nyquist bandwidth-bound on distinct values in classical signals, and quantum uncertainty bounds. The new certainty bounds are achieved by finite-bandwidth evolutions in which time and space are effectively discrete, including quantum evolutions that are effectively classical. Since energy and momentum count distinct states, they are defined in finite-state dynamics, and they relate classical mechanics to finite-state evolution.
For an isolated quantum system, average energy above the ground state and average momentum determine the minimum time and distance needed to transition through NNN distinct states. Other moments of energy and momentum provide similar bounds. For N≫1N\gg1N≫1, we can equate average energy and momentum with the maximum average rates of distinct state change in time and space. Thus at least vestiges of finite-state dynamics persist in the classical world, and in its interpretation.
SCQG paper 19 of 28. Paper 19 develops the microscopic quantum dynamics of the Semantic Commitment / Quantum Gravity framework. It starts with finite physical carriers at the Planck regulator scale. A cell carries registrations, records or comparison data only where the corresponding systems and operations are present. A distinction becomes locally available through the forward physical action that makes it usable. Allowed local changes and their reverse partners define a self-adjoint Hamiltonian. This generator determines quantum evolution, exact sums of transition amplitudes and causal response. The microscopic clock λ is compared with metric time through an explicitly defined positive clock map. Semantic time orders the interactions through which distinctions become usable, compared or maintained. A six-state loop provides an explicit calculation of screen occupation, payload delivery and reciprocal response. Interacting finite chains show how those results change when cells exchange quantum states. The charged construction retains all 8,160 fermionic modes of its stated regulator, together with the links and boundary systems needed to enforce local Gauss constraints. Complete packet exchanges retain the transferred states, correlations and compensating flux. The paper derives exact reduced dynamics with memory and states the additional conditions for quantum channels, memoryless evolution and classical jumps. It constructs positive Euclidean reflection forms from which Hamiltonian dynamics can be recovered, and proves that local observables have well-defined limits as the support grows under the stated locality bounds. Explicit error bounds quantify the comparison between different resolutions. The final sections specify the further action, symmetry, positivity and convergence conditions needed for a relativistic continuum realization and its use by the companion papers.
Abstract For present purposes, the first thing to recall about quantum mechanics is that all dynamical quantities, instead of being functions of the location of a system in phase space as in classical mechanics, are now represented by operators in a Hilbert space of quantum states. In particular, the quantum analog of the classical phase space distribution function is the quantum mechanical density matrix. Since this is seldom discussed in introductory texts on either quantum mechanics or statistical mechanics, it may be helpful to summarize some of its basic properties.