arXiv:1109.4995

Quantum emulation of classical dynamics

Norman Margolus

Published Sep 23, 2011• 4 citations

Abstract

In statistical mechanics, it is well known that finite-state classical lattice models can be recast as quantum models, with distinct classical configurations identified with orthogonal basis states. This mapping makes classical statistical mechanics on a lattice a special case of quantum statistical mechanics, and classical combinatorial entropy a special case of quantum entropy. In a similar manner, finite-state classical dynamics can be recast as finite-energy quantum dynamics. This mapping translates continuous quantities, concepts and machinery of quantum mechanics into a simplified finite-state context in which they have a purely classical and combinatorial interpretation. For example, in this mapping quantum average energy becomes the classical update rate. Interpolation theory and communication theory help explain the truce achieved here between perfect classical determinism and quantum uncertainty, and between discrete and continuous dynamics.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1109.4995

Related papers

Mechanical Systems that are both Classical and Quantum

Norman Margolus

Quantum dynamics can be regarded as a generalization of classical finite-state dynamics. This is a familiar viewpoint for workers in quantum computation, which encompasses classical computation as a special case. Here this viewpoint is extended to mechanics, where classical dynamics has traditionally been viewed as a macroscopic approximation of quantum behavior, not as a special case. When a classical dynamics is recast as a special case of quantum dynamics, the quantum description can be interpreted classically. For example, sometimes extra information is added to the classical state in order to construct the quantum description. This extra information is then eliminated by representing it in a superposition as if it were unknown information about a classical statistical ensemble. This usage of superposition leads to the appearance of Fermions in the quantum description of classical lattice-gas dynamics and turns continuous-space descriptions of finite-state systems into illustrations of classical sampling theory. A direct mapping of classical systems onto quantum systems also allows us to determine the minimum possible energy scale for a classical dynamics, based on a localized rate of state change. We use a partitioning description of dynamics to define locality, and discuss the ideal energy of two model systems.

arXiv:0805.3357May 22, 20085 citations

Finite-State Classical Mechanics

Norman Margolus

Reversible lattice dynamics embody basic features of physics that govern the time evolution of classical information. They have finite resolution in space and time, don't allow information to be erased, and easily accommodate other structural properties of microscopic physics, such as finite distinct state and locality of interaction. In an ideal quantum realization of a reversible lattice dynamics, finite classical rates of state-change at lattice sites determine average energies and momenta. This is very different than traditional continuous models of classical dynamics, where the number of distinct states is infinite, the rate of change between distinct states is infinite, and energies and momenta are not tied to rates of distinct state change. Here we discuss a family of classical mechanical models that have the informational and energetic realism of reversible lattice dynamics, while retaining the continuity and mathematical framework of classical mechanics. These models may help to clarify the informational foundations of mechanics.

arXiv:1807.04437Jul 12, 20180 citations

From Entropic Dynamics to Quantum Theory ∗

Ariel Caticha

Non-relativistic quantum theory is derived from information codified into an appropriate statistical model. The basic assumption is that there is an irreducible uncertainty in the location of particles so that the configuration space is a statistical manifold. The dynamics then follows from a principle of inference, the method of Maximum Entropy. The concept of time is introduced as a convenient way to keep track of change. The resulting formalism is close to Nelson’s stochastic mechanics. The statistical manifold is a dynamical entity: its (information) geometry determines the evolution of the probability distribution which, in its turn, reacts back and determines the evolution of the geometry. As in General Relativity there is a kind of equivalence principle in that “fictitious ” forces – in this case diffusive “osmotic ” forces – turn out to be “real”. This equivalence of quantum and statistical fluctuations – or of quantum and classical probabilities – leads to a natural explanation of the equality of inertial and “osmotic ” masses and allows explaining quantum theory as a sophisticated example of entropic inference. Mass and the phase of the wave function are explained as features of purely statistical origin.

Aug 4, 201310 citations

Quantum to Statistical Mechanics

R. Shankar

We have thus far looked at the classical statistical mechanics of a collection of Ising spins in terms of their partition function. We have seen how to extract the free energy per site and correlation functions of the d = 1 Ising model. We will now consider a second way to do this. While the results are, of course, going to be the same, the method exposes a deep connection between classical statistical mechanics in d = 1 and the quantum mechanics of a single spin-12 particle. This is the simplest way to learn about a connection that has a much wider range of applicability: the classical statistical mechanics of a problem in d dimensions may be mapped on to a quantum problem in d – 1 dimensions. The nature of the quantum variable will depend on the nature of the classical variable. In general, the allowed values of the classical variable ( s =±1 in our example) will correspond to the maximal set of simultaneous eigenvalues of the operators in the quantum problem ( σz in our example). Subsequently we will study a problem where the classical variable called x lies in the range –∞ < x < ∞ and will correspond to the eigenvalues of the familiar position operator X that appears in the quantum problem. The correlation functions will become the expectation values in the ground state of a certain transfer matrix . The different sites in the d = 1 lattice will correspond to different, discrete, times in the life of the quantum degree of freedom. By the same token, a quantum problem may be mapped into a statistical mechanics problem in one-higher dimensions, essentially by running the derivation backwards. In this case the resulting partition function is also called the path integral for the quantum problem. There is, however, no guarantee that the classical partition function generated by a legitimate quantum problem (with a Hermitian Hamiltonian) will always make physical sense: the corresponding Boltzmann weights may be negative, or even complex! In the quantum mechanics we first learn, time t is a real parameter. For our purposes we also need to get familiar with quantum mechanics in which time takes on purely imaginary values t = –iτ , where τ is real. It turns out that it is possible to define such a Euclidean quantum mechanics .

Cambridge University Press eBooksAug 31, 20170 citations

From Entropic Dynamics to Quantum Theory

Ariel Caticha, Paul M. Goggans, Chun-Yong Chan

Non-relativistic quantum theory is derived from information codified into an appropriate statistical model. The basic assumption is that there is an irreducible uncertainty in the location of particles: positions constitute a configuration space and the corresponding probability distributions constitute a statistical manifold. The dynamics follows from a principle of inference, the method of Maximum Entropy. The concept of time is introduced as a convenient way to keep track of change. A welcome feature is that the entropic dynamics notion of time incorporates a natural distinction between past and future. The statistical manifold is assumed to be a dynamical entity: its curved and evolving geometry determines the evolution of the particles which, in their turn, react back and determine the evolution of the geometry. Imposing that the dynamics conserve energy leads to the Schroedinger equation and to a natural explanation of its linearity, its unitarity, and of the role of complex numbers. The phase of the wave function is explained as a feature of purely statistical origin. There is a quantum analogue to the gravitational equivalence principle.

arXiv:0907.4335AIP conference proceedingsJan 1, 20093 citations

Quantum mechanics as an approximation of classical statistical mechanics

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

We show that the probabilistic formalism of QM can be obtained as a special projection of classical statistical mechanics for systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom. Such systems can be interpreted as classical fields. Thus in our approach QM is a projection of (prequantum) classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). This projection is based on the Taylor expansion of classical physical variables – maps f: Ω → R, where Ω is the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. The space of classical statistical states consists of Gaussian measures on Ω having zero mean value and negligibly small dispersion. On one hand, the creation of such a prequantum model strongly supports attempts (first of all by Schrödinger and Einstein) to create purely field model of QM. On the other hand, it gives the possibility to go beyond QM. The main experimental prediction is that averages calculated in the mathematical formalism of QM (von Neumann’s trace formula) are only approximative averages. If predictions of PCSFT are correct then it would be possible to find deviations of experimental averages from quantum ones. 1

Jun 3, 20050 citations