Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1805.06495

Geometric Phase using Diagonal Coherent State Representation

Prosenjit Maity, Sobhan Kumar Sounda

Published May 16, 2018• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Glauber-Sudarshan diagonal coherent state P-representation has been used to determine geometric phase for non-classical states of light. For a given density operator $\hat{ρ_1}$ of two mode optical beam, we evolve it in complex projective ray space $(\cal R)$ to $\hat{ρ_2}$ and to $\hat{ρ_3}$ by changing its state of polarisation using unitary operator $\mathrm{\hat{U}_p}(θ)$. The diagonal coherent state basis has been utilized to represent the density operators instead of fock state basis as in the fock state basis the state vector in present work evolve under unitary operator produe infinitely numerous terms which make the density operators very messy to handle. This cumbersome situation can be easily avoided by using the approach proposed above. The trace of the product of $\hat{ρ_1}$, $\hat{ρ_2}$ and $\hat{ρ_3}$ is taken to get three vertex Bargmann invariant. Argument of this gives the geometric phase which is represented in terms of phase space variables containing a notion of symplectic area.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1805.06495

Related papers

Calculating Density Operator from Diagonal Coherent State Representation

Fan Hong-Yi, Huan Tu-Nan

By means of combining the coherent's properties with the normal product's properties we put forward to a formulation for obtaining density operators from Glauber-Suaaishan “P representation” and other non-diagonal representations directly in quantum optics.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Jul 1, 1985•7 citations

Quantization of the optical phase space in terms of the group

H.A. Kastrup

Abstract The problem of quantizing properly the canonical pair “angle and action variables”, φ and I, is almost as old as quantum mechanics itself and since decades an intensively debated but still unresolved issue in quantum optics. The present paper proposes a new approach to the problem, namely quantization in terms of the group SO(1,2): The crucial point is that the phase space has the global structure (a simple cone) and cannot be quantized in the conventional manner. As the group SO(1,2) acts transitively, effectively and Hamilton‐like on that space its irreducible unitary representations of the positive discrete series provide the appropriate quantum theoretical framework. The phase space has the conic structure of an orbifold . That structure is closely related to a Z2 gauge symmetry which corresponds to the center of a 2‐fold covering of SO(1,2), the symplectic group . The basic variables on the phase space are the functions h0 = I, h1 = I cos φ and h2 = ‐I sin φ the Poisson brackets of which obey the Lie algebra . In the quantum theory they are represented by the self‐adjoint Lie algebra generators K0, K1, and K2 of a unitary representation, where K0 has the spectrum {k + n, n = 0, 1, …; k > 0}. A crucial prediction is that the classical Pythagorean relation h12 + h22 = h02 can be violated in the quantum theory. For each representation one can define three different types of coherent states the complex phases of which may be “measured” by means of the operators K1 and K2 alone without introducing any new phase operators! The SO(1,2) structure of optical squeezing and interference properties as well as that of the harmonic oscillator are analyzed in detail. The additional coherent states can be used for the introduction of (Husimi type) “Q” distributions and (Sudarshan‐Glauber type) “P” representations of the density operator. The three operators K0, K1, and K2 are fundamental in the sense that one can construct composite position and momentum operators out of them! The new framework poses quite a number of fascinating experimental and theoretical challenges.

arXiv:quant-ph/0307069•Fortschritte der Physik•Sep 10, 2003•43 citations

Comprehensive Analysis of Geometric Phase for SU(3) Representations

Abhirup Chatterjee, Sobhan Kumar Sounda

Geometric Phase in Quantum Mechanics is generally formulated entirely in terms of geometric structure of the Complex Hilbert Space. We will exploit this fact in case of mixed states for three level open systems undergoing depolarization using the eight dimensional Poincare sphere in the SU(2) Polarisation picture and non unit vector rays in H3 within the limit of pure state approach may be found to be in agreement with the Pancharatnam Phase, Berry Phase and Aharonov-Anandan Phase.

quant-pharXiv:2511.08323•Nov 12, 2025•0 citations

Geometric phase in open two-level system

Zhisong Wang, L. C. Kwek, C. H Lai +1 more

A mapping is established in connecting density matrices, associated with an evolution of a quantum open system, with vector ray in a complex projective Hilbert space. By using the corresponding vector ray to represent the open two-level system, we may observe the geometric phase for the open two-level system. The geometric phase of the open two-level system depends only on the smooth (open or closed) curve in the complex projective Hilbert space of ray, which is formulated entirely in terms of geometric structures on this space.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•May 16, 2006•48 citations

Off-diagonal generalization of the mixed-state geometric phase

Stefan Filipp, Erik Sjöqvist

The concept of off-diagonal geometric phases for mixed quantal states in unitary evolution is developed. We show that these phases arise from three basic ideas: (1) fulfillment of quantum parallel transport of a complete basis, (2) a concept of mixed-state orthogonality adapted to unitary evolution, and (3) a normalization condition. We provide a method for computing the off-diagonal mixed-state phases to any order for unitarities that divide the parallel transported basis of Hilbert space into two parts: one part where each basis vector undergoes cyclic evolution and one part where all basis vectors are permuted among each other. We also demonstrate a purification based experimental procedure for the two lowest-order mixed-state phases and consider a physical scenario for a full characterization of the qubit mixed-state geometric phases in terms of polarization-entangled photon pairs. An alternative second order off-diagonal mixed-state geometric phase, which can be tested in single-particle experiments, is proposed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0307012•Physical Review A•Oct 23, 2003•28 citations

Group theoretical aspects of the geometric phase in quantum mechanics.

Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

The geometric phase in quantum mechanics was originally elucidated in the context of the adiabatic theorem. This and other limitations were later removed. We show how this phase can be presented as the simplest functional of smooth open curves of unit vectors in Hilbert space, invariant under the two groups of local phase changes and monotonic reparametrisations. This viewpoint clarifies the role of the early Pancharatnam criterion for two Hilbert space vectors to be `in phase', in the later geometric phase context. Noncyclic evolution is handled in a very direct manner. Connections to the Bargmann invariants of quantum mechanics are immediate and can be exploited. A class of geometric phases arises in connection with unitary representations of Lie groups. In this case a surprisingly complete analysis of the structure of the geometric phase is possible, motivated by the Wigner-Eckart theorem. The interplay between geometric phase ideas and Lie group unitary representations is extraordinarily rich; the differential geometric structures of Lie groups and coset spaces play very important roles and allow classification of all possible geometric phases associated with a given Lie group. Examples involving SU(2), SU(3) and the metaplectic group Mp(2) are presented.

•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations
Glauber-Sudarshan diagonal coherent state P-representation has been used to determine geometric phase for non-classical states of light. For a given density operator ρ1^\hat{ρ_1}ρ1​^​ of two mode optical beam, we evolve it in complex projective ray space (R)(\cal R)(R) to ρ2^\hat{ρ_2}ρ2​^​ and to ρ3^\hat{ρ_3}ρ3​^​ by changing its state of polarisation using unitary operator U^p(θ)\mathrm{\hat{U}_p}(θ)U^p​(θ). The diagonal coherent state basis has been utilized to represent the density operators instead of fock state basis as in the fock state basis the state vector in present work evolve under unitary operator produe infinitely numerous terms which make the density operators very messy to handle. This cumbersome situation can be easily avoided by using the approach proposed above. The trace of the product of ρ1^\hat{ρ_1}ρ1​^​, ρ2^\hat{ρ_2}ρ2​^​ and ρ3^\hat{ρ_3}ρ3​^​ is taken to get three vertex Bargmann invariant. Argument of this gives the geometric phase which is represented in terms of phase space variables containing a notion of symplectic area.
Abstract The problem of quantizing properly the canonical pair “angle and action variables”, φ and I, is almost as old as quantum mechanics itself and since decades an intensively debated but still unresolved issue in quantum optics. The present paper proposes a new approach to the problem, namely quantization in terms of the group SO(1,2): The crucial point is that the phase space has the global structure (a simple cone) and cannot be quantized in the conventional manner. As the group SO(1,2) acts transitively, effectively and Hamilton‐like on that space its irreducible unitary representations of the positive discrete series provide the appropriate quantum theoretical framework. The phase space has the conic structure of an orbifold . That structure is closely related to a Z2 gauge symmetry which corresponds to the center of a 2‐fold covering of SO(1,2), the symplectic group . The basic variables on the phase space are the functions h0 = I, h1 = I cos φ and h2 = ‐I sin φ the Poisson brackets of which obey the Lie algebra . In the quantum theory they are represented by the self‐adjoint Lie algebra generators K0, K1, and K2 of a unitary representation, where K0 has the spectrum {k + n, n = 0, 1, …; k > 0}. A crucial prediction is that the classical Pythagorean relation h12 + h22 = h02 can be violated in the quantum theory. For each representation one can define three different types of coherent states the complex phases of which may be “measured” by means of the operators K1 and K2 alone without introducing any new phase operators! The SO(1,2) structure of optical squeezing and interference properties as well as that of the harmonic oscillator are analyzed in detail. The additional coherent states can be used for the introduction of (Husimi type) “Q” distributions and (Sudarshan‐Glauber type) “P” representations of the density operator. The three operators K0, K1, and K2 are fundamental in the sense that one can construct composite position and momentum operators out of them! The new framework poses quite a number of fascinating experimental and theoretical challenges.
A mapping is established in connecting density matrices, associated with an evolution of a quantum open system, with vector ray in a complex projective Hilbert space. By using the corresponding vector ray to represent the open two-level system, we may observe the geometric phase for the open two-level system. The geometric phase of the open two-level system depends only on the smooth (open or closed) curve in the complex projective Hilbert space of ray, which is formulated entirely in terms of geometric structures on this space.
The concept of off-diagonal geometric phases for mixed quantal states in unitary evolution is developed. We show that these phases arise from three basic ideas: (1) fulfillment of quantum parallel transport of a complete basis, (2) a concept of mixed-state orthogonality adapted to unitary evolution, and (3) a normalization condition. We provide a method for computing the off-diagonal mixed-state phases to any order for unitarities that divide the parallel transported basis of Hilbert space into two parts: one part where each basis vector undergoes cyclic evolution and one part where all basis vectors are permuted among each other. We also demonstrate a purification based experimental procedure for the two lowest-order mixed-state phases and consider a physical scenario for a full characterization of the qubit mixed-state geometric phases in terms of polarization-entangled photon pairs. An alternative second order off-diagonal mixed-state geometric phase, which can be tested in single-particle experiments, is proposed.
The geometric phase in quantum mechanics was originally elucidated in the context of the adiabatic theorem. This and other limitations were later removed. We show how this phase can be presented as the simplest functional of smooth open curves of unit vectors in Hilbert space, invariant under the two groups of local phase changes and monotonic reparametrisations. This viewpoint clarifies the role of the early Pancharatnam criterion for two Hilbert space vectors to be `in phase', in the later geometric phase context. Noncyclic evolution is handled in a very direct manner. Connections to the Bargmann invariants of quantum mechanics are immediate and can be exploited. A class of geometric phases arises in connection with unitary representations of Lie groups. In this case a surprisingly complete analysis of the structure of the geometric phase is possible, motivated by the Wigner-Eckart theorem. The interplay between geometric phase ideas and Lie group unitary representations is extraordinarily rich; the differential geometric structures of Lie groups and coset spaces play very important roles and allow classification of all possible geometric phases associated with a given Lie group. Examples involving SU(2), SU(3) and the metaplectic group Mp(2) are presented.