Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1805.05227 · Physical Review A

Testing quantum fault tolerance on small systems

Dennis Willsch, Madita Willsch, Fengping Jin, Hans A. De Raedt, Kristel F. L. Michielsen

Published Nov 28, 2018• 28 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We extensively test a recent protocol to demonstrate quantum fault tolerance on three systems: (1) a real-time simulation of five spin qubits coupled to an environment with two-level defects, (2) a real-time simulation of transmon quantum computers, and (3) the 16-qubit processor of the IBM Q Experience. In the simulations, the dynamics of the full system is obtained by numerically solving the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation. We find that the fault-tolerant scheme provides a systematic way to improve the results when the errors are dominated by the inherent control and measurement errors present in transmon systems. However, the scheme fails to satisfy the criterion for fault tolerance when decoherence effects are dominant.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.98.052348

Related papers

Supercomputer simulations of transmon quantum computers

Dennis Willsch

We develop a simulator for quantum computers composed of superconducting transmon qubits. The simulation model supports an arbitrary number of transmons and resonators. Quantum gates are implemented by time-dependent pulses. Nontrivial effects such as crosstalk, leakage to non-computational states, entanglement between transmons and resonators, and control errors due to the pulses are inherently included. The time evolution of the quantum computer is obtained by solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The simulation algorithm shows excellent scalability on high-performance supercomputers. We present results for the simulation of up to 16 transmons and resonators. Additionally, the model can be used to simulate environments, and we demonstrate the transition from an isolated system to an open quantum system governed by a Lindblad master equation. We also describe a procedure to extract model parameters from electromagnetic simulations or experiments. We compare simulation results to experiments on several NISQ processors of the IBM Q Experience. We find nearly perfect agreement between simulation and experiment for quantum circuits designed to probe crosstalk in transmon systems. By studying common gate metrics such as the fidelity or the diamond distance, we find that they cannot reliably predict the performance of repeated gate applications or practical quantum algorithms. As an alternative, we find that the results from two-transmon gate set tomography have an exceptional predictive power. Finally, we test a protocol from the theory of quantum error correction and fault tolerance. We find that the protocol systematically improves the performance of transmon quantum computers in the presence of characteristic control and measurement errors.

arXiv:2008.13490•Jan 1, 2020•4 citations

Fault-Tolerance Testing on Small Quantum Error-Correcting Codes

Yaoling Yang

Quantum computers hold the promise to solve some hard problems that are intractable for even the most powerful current supercomputers. One of the most famous examples is Shor's algorithm for factorizing large numbers, which has exponential speedup compared to its best classical counterparts. However, running such an algorithm will require to build a large-scale quantum computer consisting of thousands or even millions of qubits that include quantum error correction (QEC) and fault-tolerant (FT) mechanisms. Quantum computing is already a reality with the so-called Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) processors, some of them available in the cloud. Noisy refers to the imperfect control over the qubits and intermediate-scale to the relatively low number of quits (from fifty to a few hundred). Although current and near-term quantum devices will not have enough qubits for implementing large and fully corrected quantum computations, the use of small quantum error correction codes may extend the computation lifetime of NISQ devices. In this context and as a first step, it is important to test and demonstrate the fault-tolerance of these QEC codes. In this thesis, we explore the fault-tolerance of two small quantum correction codes that are good candidates to be applied to NISQ processors, the [[4,2,2]] code and the [[7,1,3]] Steane code. To this purpose, by following the FT criterion prosed by Daniel Gottesman in 2016, we tested both codes using two simulators, the stabilizer formalism simulator that includes quite simple error models and a full density matrix simulator called quantumsim, which includes more realistic noise. The simulations are performed under reasonable noise parameter values. For the [[4,2,2]] code, 235 circuits are tested based on the two simulators. The results show that in the stabilizer formalism simulation, the FT criterion is satised for all circuits, while not fully satisfied in the full density matrix simulation. For the [[7,1,3]] Steane code, we use a parallel-flag error correction implementation which is tested using the full density matrix simulator. Our results show that without applying any QEC cycle, for all circuits (84 circuits for 1 logical qubit simulation and 452 circuits for 2 logical qubits simulation), the error rate of the encoded circuits is lower than the unencoded ones. Adding a quantum error correction (QEC) cycle will in general increase the error rate of the computation.

•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Quantum fault tolerance in small experiments

Daniel Gottesman

I discuss a variety of issues relating to near-future experiments demonstrating fault-tolerant quantum computation. I describe a family of fault-tolerant quantum circuits that can be performed with 5 qubits arranged on a ring with nearest-neighbor interactions. I also present a criterion whereby we can say that an experiment has succeeded in demonstrating fault tolerance. Finally, I discuss the possibility of using future fault-tolerant experiments to answer important questions about the interaction of fault-tolerant protocols with real experimental errors.

arXiv:1610.03507•Oct 11, 2016•34 citations

Testing of flag-based fault-tolerance on IBM quantum devices

Anirudh Lanka

It is hard to achieve a theoretical quantum advantage on NISQ devices. Besides the attempts to reduce error using error mitigation and dynamical decoupling, small quantum error correction and fault-tolerant schemes that reduce the high overhead of traditional schemes have also been proposed. According to the recent advancements in fault tolerance, it is possible to minimize the number of ancillary qubits using flags. While implementing those schemes is still impossible, it is worthwhile to bridge the gap between the NISQ era and the FTQC era. Here, we introduce a benchmarking method to test fault-tolerant quantum error correction with flags for the [[5,1,3]] code on NISQ devices. Based on results obtained using IBM's qasm simulator and its 15-qubit Melbourne processor, we show that this flagged scheme is testable on NISQ devices by checking how much the subspace of intermediate state overlaps with the expected state in the presence of noise.

arXiv:2011.03224•Nov 6, 2020•0 citations

Experimental Characterization of Fault-Tolerant Circuits in Small-Scale Quantum Processors

Rosie Cane, Daryus Chandra, Soon Xin Ng +1 more

Experiments conducted on open-access cloud-based IBM Quantum devices are presented for characterizing their fault tolerance using [4,2,2]-encoded gate sequences. Up to 100 logical gates are activated in the Ibmq_Bogota and Ibmq_Santiago devices and we found that a [4,2,2] code’s logical gate set may be deemed fault-tolerant for gate sequences larger than 10 gates. However, certain circuits did not satisfy the fault tolerance criterion. In some cases the encoded-gate sequences show a high error rate that is lower bounded at ≈ 0.1, whereby the error inherent in these circuits cannot be mitigated by classical post-selection. A comparison of the experimental results to a simple error model reveal that the dominant gate errors cannot be readily represented by the popular Pauli error model. Finally, it is most accurate to assess the fault tolerance criterion when the circuits tested are restricted to those that give rise to an output state with a low dimension.

arXiv:2112.04076•IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2021•6 citations

Experimental Demonstration of Fault-Tolerant State Preparation with Superconducting Qubits

Maika Takita, Andrew W. Cross, Antonio D. Corcoles +2 more

Robust quantum computation requires encoding delicate quantum information into degrees of freedom that are hard for the environment to change. Quantum encodings have been demonstrated in many physical systems by observing and correcting storage errors, but applications require not just storing information; we must accurately compute even with faulty operations. The theory of fault-tolerant quantum computing illuminates a way forward by providing a foundation and collection of techniques for limiting the spread of errors. Here we implement one of the smallest quantum codes in a five-qubit superconducting transmon device and demonstrate fault-tolerant state preparation. We characterize the resulting code words through quantum process tomography and study the free evolution of the logical observables. Our results are consistent with fault-tolerant state preparation in a protected qubit subspace.

arXiv:1705.09259•Physical Review Letters•Oct 31, 2017•228 citations
We extensively test a recent protocol to demonstrate quantum fault tolerance on three systems: (1) a real-time simulation of five spin qubits coupled to an environment with two-level defects, (2) a real-time simulation of transmon quantum computers, and (3) the 16-qubit processor of the IBM Q Experience. In the simulations, the dynamics of the full system is obtained by numerically solving the time-dependent Schr"odinger equation. We find that the fault-tolerant scheme provides a systematic way to improve the results when the errors are dominated by the inherent control and measurement errors present in transmon systems. However, the scheme fails to satisfy the criterion for fault tolerance when decoherence effects are dominant.
We develop a simulator for quantum computers composed of superconducting transmon qubits. The simulation model supports an arbitrary number of transmons and resonators. Quantum gates are implemented by time-dependent pulses. Nontrivial effects such as crosstalk, leakage to non-computational states, entanglement between transmons and resonators, and control errors due to the pulses are inherently included. The time evolution of the quantum computer is obtained by solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The simulation algorithm shows excellent scalability on high-performance supercomputers. We present results for the simulation of up to 16 transmons and resonators. Additionally, the model can be used to simulate environments, and we demonstrate the transition from an isolated system to an open quantum system governed by a Lindblad master equation. We also describe a procedure to extract model parameters from electromagnetic simulations or experiments. We compare simulation results to experiments on several NISQ processors of the IBM Q Experience. We find nearly perfect agreement between simulation and experiment for quantum circuits designed to probe crosstalk in transmon systems. By studying common gate metrics such as the fidelity or the diamond distance, we find that they cannot reliably predict the performance of repeated gate applications or practical quantum algorithms. As an alternative, we find that the results from two-transmon gate set tomography have an exceptional predictive power. Finally, we test a protocol from the theory of quantum error correction and fault tolerance. We find that the protocol systematically improves the performance of transmon quantum computers in the presence of characteristic control and measurement errors.
Quantum computers hold the promise to solve some hard problems that are intractable for even the most powerful current supercomputers. One of the most famous examples is Shor's algorithm for factorizing large numbers, which has exponential speedup compared to its best classical counterparts. However, running such an algorithm will require to build a large-scale quantum computer consisting of thousands or even millions of qubits that include quantum error correction (QEC) and fault-tolerant (FT) mechanisms. Quantum computing is already a reality with the so-called Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) processors, some of them available in the cloud. Noisy refers to the imperfect control over the qubits and intermediate-scale to the relatively low number of quits (from fifty to a few hundred). Although current and near-term quantum devices will not have enough qubits for implementing large and fully corrected quantum computations, the use of small quantum error correction codes may extend the computation lifetime of NISQ devices. In this context and as a first step, it is important to test and demonstrate the fault-tolerance of these QEC codes. In this thesis, we explore the fault-tolerance of two small quantum correction codes that are good candidates to be applied to NISQ processors, the [[4,2,2]] code and the [[7,1,3]] Steane code. To this purpose, by following the FT criterion prosed by Daniel Gottesman in 2016, we tested both codes using two simulators, the stabilizer formalism simulator that includes quite simple error models and a full density matrix simulator called quantumsim, which includes more realistic noise. The simulations are performed under reasonable noise parameter values. For the [[4,2,2]] code, 235 circuits are tested based on the two simulators. The results show that in the stabilizer formalism simulation, the FT criterion is satised for all circuits, while not fully satisfied in the full density matrix simulation. For the [[7,1,3]] Steane code, we use a parallel-flag error correction implementation which is tested using the full density matrix simulator. Our results show that without applying any QEC cycle, for all circuits (84 circuits for 1 logical qubit simulation and 452 circuits for 2 logical qubits simulation), the error rate of the encoded circuits is lower than the unencoded ones. Adding a quantum error correction (QEC) cycle will in general increase the error rate of the computation.
I discuss a variety of issues relating to near-future experiments demonstrating fault-tolerant quantum computation. I describe a family of fault-tolerant quantum circuits that can be performed with 5 qubits arranged on a ring with nearest-neighbor interactions. I also present a criterion whereby we can say that an experiment has succeeded in demonstrating fault tolerance. Finally, I discuss the possibility of using future fault-tolerant experiments to answer important questions about the interaction of fault-tolerant protocols with real experimental errors.
It is hard to achieve a theoretical quantum advantage on NISQ devices. Besides the attempts to reduce error using error mitigation and dynamical decoupling, small quantum error correction and fault-tolerant schemes that reduce the high overhead of traditional schemes have also been proposed. According to the recent advancements in fault tolerance, it is possible to minimize the number of ancillary qubits using flags. While implementing those schemes is still impossible, it is worthwhile to bridge the gap between the NISQ era and the FTQC era. Here, we introduce a benchmarking method to test fault-tolerant quantum error correction with flags for the [[5,1,3]] code on NISQ devices. Based on results obtained using IBM's qasm simulator and its 15-qubit Melbourne processor, we show that this flagged scheme is testable on NISQ devices by checking how much the subspace of intermediate state overlaps with the expected state in the presence of noise.
Experiments conducted on open-access cloud-based IBM Quantum devices are presented for characterizing their fault tolerance using [4,2,2]-encoded gate sequences. Up to 100 logical gates are activated in the Ibmq_Bogota and Ibmq_Santiago devices and we found that a [4,2,2] code’s logical gate set may be deemed fault-tolerant for gate sequences larger than 10 gates. However, certain circuits did not satisfy the fault tolerance criterion. In some cases the encoded-gate sequences show a high error rate that is lower bounded at ≈ 0.1, whereby the error inherent in these circuits cannot be mitigated by classical post-selection. A comparison of the experimental results to a simple error model reveal that the dominant gate errors cannot be readily represented by the popular Pauli error model. Finally, it is most accurate to assess the fault tolerance criterion when the circuits tested are restricted to those that give rise to an output state with a low dimension.
Robust quantum computation requires encoding delicate quantum information into degrees of freedom that are hard for the environment to change. Quantum encodings have been demonstrated in many physical systems by observing and correcting storage errors, but applications require not just storing information; we must accurately compute even with faulty operations. The theory of fault-tolerant quantum computing illuminates a way forward by providing a foundation and collection of techniques for limiting the spread of errors. Here we implement one of the smallest quantum codes in a five-qubit superconducting transmon device and demonstrate fault-tolerant state preparation. We characterize the resulting code words through quantum process tomography and study the free evolution of the logical observables. Our results are consistent with fault-tolerant state preparation in a protected qubit subspace.