Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1804.02670

Martingale Strategy for Modeling Quantum Adiabatic Evolution

Elnaz Darsheshdar, Seyed Mostafa Moniri, Patrick Navez, Alexandre M. Zagoskin

Published Apr 8, 2018• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We propose a strategy for modeling the behavior of an adiabatic quantum computer described by an Ising Hamiltonian with $N$ sites and the coordination number $Z$. The method is based on the $1/Z$ expansion for the density matrix of the system. In each order, the ground state energy is found neglecting the higher-order correlations between the sites, as long as the set of equations remains non-singular. The conditions of the appearance of a singularity, equivalent to the disappearance of energy gap in the given approximation, can be directly obtained from the equations. Then the next order in the expansion must be used, at the price of an $N$-fold increase in computational resources. This "martingale" strategy allows reducing the computational costs to a power of $N$ rather than $2^N$, with a finite probability of success. The strategy is illustrated by the case of a two-spin system and extended to a large number of qubits. Comparing the predictions to the experimental results obtained by using an adiabatic quantum computer would help quantify the importance of multi-site correlations, and the influence of decoherence, on its operation.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1804.02670

Related papers

On Quantum Simulators and Adiabatic Quantum Algorithms

Sarah Mostame

This Thesis focuses on different aspects of quantum computation theory: adiabatic quantum algorithms, decoherence during the adiabatic evolution and quantum simulators. After an overview on the area of quantum computation and setting up the formal ground for the rest of the Thesis we derive a general error estimate for adiabatic quantum computing. We demonstrate that the first-order correction, which has frequently been used as a condition for adiabatic quantum computation, does not yield a good estimate for the computational error. Therefore, a more general criterion is proposed, which includes higher-order corrections and shows that the computational error can be made exponentially small – which facilitates significantly shorter evolution times than the first-order estimate in certain situations. Based on this criterion and rather general arguments and assumptions, it can be demonstrated that a run-time of order of the inverse minimum energy gap is sufficient and necessary. Furthermore, exploiting the similarity between adiabatic quantum algorithms and quantum phase transitions, we study the impact of decoherence on the sweep through a second-order quantum phase transition for the prototypical example of the Ising chain in a transverse field and compare it to the adiabatic version of Grover’s search algorithm. It turns out that (in contrast to first-order transitions) the impact of decoherence caused by a weak coupling to a rather general environment increases with system size (i.e., number of spins/qubits), which might limit the scalability of the system. Finally, we propose the use of electron systems to construct laboratory systems based on present-day technology which reproduce and thereby simulate the quantum dynamics of the Ising model and the O(3) nonlinear sigma model.

•Oct 2, 2008•0 citations

Experimental performance of a quantum simulator: Optimizing adiabatic evolution and identifying many-body ground states

Philip Richerme, Crystal Senko, J. Smith +3 more

We use local adiabatic evolution to experimentally create and determine the ground-state spin ordering of a fully connected Ising model with up to 14 spins. Local adiabatic evolution---in which the system evolution rate is a function of the instantaneous energy gap---is found to maximize the ground-state probability compared with other adiabatic methods while requiring knowledge only of the lowest $\ensuremath{\sim}$$N$ of the ${2}^{N}$ Hamiltonian eigenvalues. We also demonstrate that the ground-state ordering can be experimentally identified as the most probable of all possible spin configurations, even when the evolution is highly nonadiabatic.

arXiv:1305.2253•Physical Review A•Jul 31, 2013•71 citations

Decoherence in adiabatic quantum computation

Tameem Albash, Daniel A. Lidar

Recent experiments with increasingly larger numbers of qubits have sparked renewed interest in adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular quantum annealing. A central question that is repeatedly asked is whether quantum features of the evolution can survive over the long time scales used for quantum annealing relative to standard measures of the decoherence time. We reconsider the role of decoherence in adiabatic quantum computation and quantum annealing using the adiabatic quantum master-equation formalism. We restrict ourselves to the weak-coupling and singular-coupling limits, which correspond to decoherence in the energy eigenbasis and in the computational basis, respectively. We demonstrate that decoherence in the instantaneous energy eigenbasis does not necessarily detrimentally affect adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular that a short single-qubit ${T}_{2}$ time need not imply adverse consequences for the success of the quantum adiabatic algorithm. We further demonstrate that boundary cancellation methods, designed to improve the fidelity of adiabatic quantum computing in the closed-system setting, remain beneficial in the open-system setting. To address the high computational cost of master-equation simulations, we also demonstrate that a quantum Monte Carlo algorithm that explicitly accounts for a thermal bosonic bath can be used to interpolate between classical and quantum annealing. Our study highlights and clarifies the significantly different role played by decoherence in the adiabatic and circuit models of quantum computing.

arXiv:1503.08767•Physical Review A•Jun 17, 2015•151 citations

Multiqubit Tunneling and Evolution in Quantum Annealing

Lucas T. Brady

Quantum computing seeks to use the powers of quantum mechanics to accomplish tasks that classical computers cannot easily accomplish. Adiabatic quantum computing is one flavor of quantum computing that slowly changes a system with time in such a way that the state remains close to the ground state for the entire evolution. An easy way to implement and study adiabatic computing is using stoquastic Hamiltonians with no-sign problem. These Hamiltonians can be readily simulated on classical computers using quantum Monte Carlo schemes; though, it is unknown whether such simulation captures the speed and power of the quantum computation.In this work, I study stoquastic Hamiltonians, focusing on quantum mechanical tunneling through classically inaccessible regions and barriers. I study multi-qubit tunneling problems to determine what properties of the barrier make this problem quantum mechanically or classically hard or inefficient. I compare quantum adiabatic computing with a path-integral Quantum Monte Carlo algorithm, which is a classical algorithm designed to simulate the quantum mechanical dynamics of the adiabatic evolution. Limited numerical data shows strong correlation between adiabatic and Monte Carlo runtimes, but due to computational limits, only small system sizes could be sampled.Additionally, I study the properties of the quantum adiabatic algorithm in both the asymptotic limit of a large number of qubits and long runtimes and more realistic finite system sizes and non-adiabatic conditions. I develop a modification of the existing Villain transformation that allows it to find the asymptotic running time of the quantum evolution for different barrier sizes. Furthermore, I compare this to finite system sizes and discover the extremely large numbers of qubits are needed for these asymptotics to be useful.When the quantum dynamics are run faster than adiabatically, new behavior arises that could potentially lead to enhancements in the quantum runtimes. I explore these enhancements, discovering when they do and do not occur. I also develop a broad framework for determining the nature of the near-adiabatic behavior of any quantum evolution, using only information about the energy gap between the ground state and the first excited state.

•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Simulating adiabatic evolution of gapped spin systems

Tobias J. Osborne

We show that adiabatic evolution of a low-dimensional lattice of quantum spins with a spectral gap can be simulated efficiently. In particular, we show that as long as the spectral gap $\ensuremath{\Delta}E$ between the ground state and the first excited state is any constant independent of $n$, the total number of spins, then the ground-state expectation values of local operators, such as correlation functions, can be computed using polynomial space and time resources. Our results also imply that the local ground-state properties of any two spin models in the same quantum phase can be efficiently obtained from each other. A consequence of these results is that adiabatic quantum algorithms can be simulated efficiently if the spectral gap does not scale with $n$. The simulation method we describe takes place in the Heisenberg picture and does not make use of the finitely correlated state--matrix product state formalism.

arXiv:quant-ph/0601019•Physical Review A•Mar 14, 2007•91 citations

Adiabatic quantum computation: Noise in the adiabatic theorem and using the Jordan -Wigner transform to find effective Hamiltonians

Michael J. O’Hara

This thesis explores two mathematical aspects of adiabatic quantum computation. Adiabatic quantum computation depends on the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechanics, and (a) we provide a rigorous formulation of the adiabatic theorem with explicit definitions of constants, and (b) we bound error in the adiabatic approximation under conditions of noise and experimental error. We apply the new results to a standard example of violation of the adiabatic approximation, and to a superconducting flux qubit. Further, adiabatic quantum computation requires large ground-state energy gaps throughout a Hamiltonian evolution if it is to solve problems in polynomial time. We identify a class of random Hamiltonians with non-nearest-neighbor interactions and a ground-state energy gap of $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{n})$, where $n$ is the number of qubits. We also identify two classes of Hamiltonians with non-nearest-neighbor interactions whose ground state can be found in polynomial time with adiabatic quantum computing. We then use the Jordan-Wigner transformation to derive equivalent results for Hamiltonians defined using Pauli operators.

•Apr 22, 2008•0 citations
We propose a strategy for modeling the behavior of an adiabatic quantum computer described by an Ising Hamiltonian with NNN sites and the coordination number ZZZ. The method is based on the 1/Z1/Z1/Z expansion for the density matrix of the system. In each order, the ground state energy is found neglecting the higher-order correlations between the sites, as long as the set of equations remains non-singular. The conditions of the appearance of a singularity, equivalent to the disappearance of energy gap in the given approximation, can be directly obtained from the equations. Then the next order in the expansion must be used, at the price of an NNN-fold increase in computational resources. This "martingale" strategy allows reducing the computational costs to a power of NNN rather than 2N2^N2N, with a finite probability of success. The strategy is illustrated by the case of a two-spin system and extended to a large number of qubits. Comparing the predictions to the experimental results obtained by using an adiabatic quantum computer would help quantify the importance of multi-site correlations, and the influence of decoherence, on its operation.
This Thesis focuses on different aspects of quantum computation theory: adiabatic quantum algorithms, decoherence during the adiabatic evolution and quantum simulators. After an overview on the area of quantum computation and setting up the formal ground for the rest of the Thesis we derive a general error estimate for adiabatic quantum computing. We demonstrate that the first-order correction, which has frequently been used as a condition for adiabatic quantum computation, does not yield a good estimate for the computational error. Therefore, a more general criterion is proposed, which includes higher-order corrections and shows that the computational error can be made exponentially small – which facilitates significantly shorter evolution times than the first-order estimate in certain situations. Based on this criterion and rather general arguments and assumptions, it can be demonstrated that a run-time of order of the inverse minimum energy gap is sufficient and necessary. Furthermore, exploiting the similarity between adiabatic quantum algorithms and quantum phase transitions, we study the impact of decoherence on the sweep through a second-order quantum phase transition for the prototypical example of the Ising chain in a transverse field and compare it to the adiabatic version of Grover’s search algorithm. It turns out that (in contrast to first-order transitions) the impact of decoherence caused by a weak coupling to a rather general environment increases with system size (i.e., number of spins/qubits), which might limit the scalability of the system. Finally, we propose the use of electron systems to construct laboratory systems based on present-day technology which reproduce and thereby simulate the quantum dynamics of the Ising model and the O(3) nonlinear sigma model.
We use local adiabatic evolution to experimentally create and determine the ground-state spin ordering of a fully connected Ising model with up to 14 spins. Local adiabatic evolution---in which the system evolution rate is a function of the instantaneous energy gap---is found to maximize the ground-state probability compared with other adiabatic methods while requiring knowledge only of the lowest $\ensuremath{\sim}$NNN of the 2N{2}^{N}2N Hamiltonian eigenvalues. We also demonstrate that the ground-state ordering can be experimentally identified as the most probable of all possible spin configurations, even when the evolution is highly nonadiabatic.
Recent experiments with increasingly larger numbers of qubits have sparked renewed interest in adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular quantum annealing. A central question that is repeatedly asked is whether quantum features of the evolution can survive over the long time scales used for quantum annealing relative to standard measures of the decoherence time. We reconsider the role of decoherence in adiabatic quantum computation and quantum annealing using the adiabatic quantum master-equation formalism. We restrict ourselves to the weak-coupling and singular-coupling limits, which correspond to decoherence in the energy eigenbasis and in the computational basis, respectively. We demonstrate that decoherence in the instantaneous energy eigenbasis does not necessarily detrimentally affect adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular that a short single-qubit T2{T}_{2}T2​ time need not imply adverse consequences for the success of the quantum adiabatic algorithm. We further demonstrate that boundary cancellation methods, designed to improve the fidelity of adiabatic quantum computing in the closed-system setting, remain beneficial in the open-system setting. To address the high computational cost of master-equation simulations, we also demonstrate that a quantum Monte Carlo algorithm that explicitly accounts for a thermal bosonic bath can be used to interpolate between classical and quantum annealing. Our study highlights and clarifies the significantly different role played by decoherence in the adiabatic and circuit models of quantum computing.
Quantum computing seeks to use the powers of quantum mechanics to accomplish tasks that classical computers cannot easily accomplish. Adiabatic quantum computing is one flavor of quantum computing that slowly changes a system with time in such a way that the state remains close to the ground state for the entire evolution. An easy way to implement and study adiabatic computing is using stoquastic Hamiltonians with no-sign problem. These Hamiltonians can be readily simulated on classical computers using quantum Monte Carlo schemes; though, it is unknown whether such simulation captures the speed and power of the quantum computation.In this work, I study stoquastic Hamiltonians, focusing on quantum mechanical tunneling through classically inaccessible regions and barriers. I study multi-qubit tunneling problems to determine what properties of the barrier make this problem quantum mechanically or classically hard or inefficient. I compare quantum adiabatic computing with a path-integral Quantum Monte Carlo algorithm, which is a classical algorithm designed to simulate the quantum mechanical dynamics of the adiabatic evolution. Limited numerical data shows strong correlation between adiabatic and Monte Carlo runtimes, but due to computational limits, only small system sizes could be sampled.Additionally, I study the properties of the quantum adiabatic algorithm in both the asymptotic limit of a large number of qubits and long runtimes and more realistic finite system sizes and non-adiabatic conditions. I develop a modification of the existing Villain transformation that allows it to find the asymptotic running time of the quantum evolution for different barrier sizes. Furthermore, I compare this to finite system sizes and discover the extremely large numbers of qubits are needed for these asymptotics to be useful.When the quantum dynamics are run faster than adiabatically, new behavior arises that could potentially lead to enhancements in the quantum runtimes. I explore these enhancements, discovering when they do and do not occur. I also develop a broad framework for determining the nature of the near-adiabatic behavior of any quantum evolution, using only information about the energy gap between the ground state and the first excited state.
We show that adiabatic evolution of a low-dimensional lattice of quantum spins with a spectral gap can be simulated efficiently. In particular, we show that as long as the spectral gap $\ensuremath{\Delta}E$ between the ground state and the first excited state is any constant independent of nnn, the total number of spins, then the ground-state expectation values of local operators, such as correlation functions, can be computed using polynomial space and time resources. Our results also imply that the local ground-state properties of any two spin models in the same quantum phase can be efficiently obtained from each other. A consequence of these results is that adiabatic quantum algorithms can be simulated efficiently if the spectral gap does not scale with nnn. The simulation method we describe takes place in the Heisenberg picture and does not make use of the finitely correlated state--matrix product state formalism.
This thesis explores two mathematical aspects of adiabatic quantum computation. Adiabatic quantum computation depends on the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechanics, and (a) we provide a rigorous formulation of the adiabatic theorem with explicit definitions of constants, and (b) we bound error in the adiabatic approximation under conditions of noise and experimental error. We apply the new results to a standard example of violation of the adiabatic approximation, and to a superconducting flux qubit. Further, adiabatic quantum computation requires large ground-state energy gaps throughout a Hamiltonian evolution if it is to solve problems in polynomial time. We identify a class of random Hamiltonians with non-nearest-neighbor interactions and a ground-state energy gap of O(1/n)\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{n})O(1/n​), where nnn is the number of qubits. We also identify two classes of Hamiltonians with non-nearest-neighbor interactions whose ground state can be found in polynomial time with adiabatic quantum computing. We then use the Jordan-Wigner transformation to derive equivalent results for Hamiltonians defined using Pauli operators.