Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1503.08767 · Physical Review A

Decoherence in adiabatic quantum computation

Tameem Albash, Daniel A. Lidar

Published Jun 17, 2015• 151 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Recent experiments with increasingly larger numbers of qubits have sparked renewed interest in adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular quantum annealing. A central question that is repeatedly asked is whether quantum features of the evolution can survive over the long time scales used for quantum annealing relative to standard measures of the decoherence time. We reconsider the role of decoherence in adiabatic quantum computation and quantum annealing using the adiabatic quantum master-equation formalism. We restrict ourselves to the weak-coupling and singular-coupling limits, which correspond to decoherence in the energy eigenbasis and in the computational basis, respectively. We demonstrate that decoherence in the instantaneous energy eigenbasis does not necessarily detrimentally affect adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular that a short single-qubit ${T}_{2}$ time need not imply adverse consequences for the success of the quantum adiabatic algorithm. We further demonstrate that boundary cancellation methods, designed to improve the fidelity of adiabatic quantum computing in the closed-system setting, remain beneficial in the open-system setting. To address the high computational cost of master-equation simulations, we also demonstrate that a quantum Monte Carlo algorithm that explicitly accounts for a thermal bosonic bath can be used to interpolate between classical and quantum annealing. Our study highlights and clarifies the significantly different role played by decoherence in the adiabatic and circuit models of quantum computing.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.91.062320

Related papers

How detrimental is decoherence in adiabatic quantum computation

Tameem Albash, Daniel A. Lidar

Recent experiments with increasingly larger numbers of qubits have sparked renewed interest in adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular quantum annealing. A central question that is repeatedly asked is whether quantum features of the evolution can survive over the long time-scales used for quantum annealing relative to standard measures of the decoherence time. We reconsider the role of decoherence in adiabatic quantum computation and quantum annealing using the adiabatic quantum master equation formalism. We restrict ourselves to the weak-coupling and singular-coupling limits, which correspond to decoherence in the energy eigenbasis and in the computational basis, respectively. We demonstrate that decoherence in the instantaneous energy eigenbasis does not necessarily detrimentally affect adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular that a short single-qubit $T_2$ time need not imply adverse consequences for the success of the quantum adiabatic algorithm. We further demonstrate that boundary cancellation methods, designed to improve the fidelity of adiabatic quantum computing in the closed system setting, remain beneficial in the open system setting. To address the high computational cost of master equation simulations, we also demonstrate that a quantum Monte Carlo algorithm that explicitly accounts for a thermal bosonic bath can be used to interpolate between classical and quantum annealing. Our study highlights and clarifies the significantly different role played by decoherence in the adiabatic and circuit models of quantum computing.

•Mar 30, 2015•0 citations

Random Matrix Model Of Adiabatic Quantum Computing, Coupled Quantum System Through Continuous Measurement, Magneto-Optical Double-Well Potentials: Receptacle For Test Of Quantum Chaos, Quantum Pumping In Closed Systems, Adiabatic Transport, And The Kubo F

K.N.P. Kumar

Recent experiments with increasingly larger numbers of qubits have sparked renewed interest in adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular quantum annealing. A central question that is repeatedly asked is whether quantum features of the evolution can survive over the long time scales used for quantum annealing relative to standard measures of the decoherence time. Authors reconsider the role of decoherence in adiabatic quantum.... The full paper: http://www.iiste.org/PDFshare/APTA-PAGENO-431867-436194.pdf

Advances in physics theories and applications•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Finite-size scaling in quantum annealing with decoherence

Phillip Weinberg

Quantum annealing represents an essential milestone towards the goal of adiabatic quantum computing. In quantum annealing, the computation involves finding the ground state of a classical Ising-like Hamiltonian realized as interactions between qubits. Quantum fluctuations are introduced to allow the wavefunction of the qubits to explore the energy landscape, the hope being that the wavefunction finds a minimum energy configuration and possibly giving the result of the computation. While quantum annealing likely may not be as powerful as adiabatic quantum computing, it is possible that it may be better at optimization compared to analogous classical algorithms. In physical realizations of quantum annealing, there are still questions as to the role of quantum fluctuations in the operation of a device given the short coherence times of the individual qubits. These questions have consistently posed a serious theoretical challenge making it difficult to verify experimental results. Here we simplify the problem by considering a system of qubits with ferromagnetic interactions, modeling the decoherence effects as classical noise in the transverse-field of each qubit. We compare the calculations to data collected from a system of manufactured qubits produced by D-wave Systems by performing a finite-size scaling analysis that captures the competition between quantum fluctuations of the transverse-field and bit-flip errors from the noise. We argue that on time-scales larger than the single-qubit decoherence time, the device produces the expected quantum fluctuations for the many-body system. Using this finite-size scaling, one can diagnose sources of noise in the system. Hopefully, in the near future, these devices will not only be realizing coherent quantum annealing but will likely be useful as another example of synthetic quantum matter.

•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

On Quantum Simulators and Adiabatic Quantum Algorithms

Sarah Mostame

This Thesis focuses on different aspects of quantum computation theory: adiabatic quantum algorithms, decoherence during the adiabatic evolution and quantum simulators. After an overview on the area of quantum computation and setting up the formal ground for the rest of the Thesis we derive a general error estimate for adiabatic quantum computing. We demonstrate that the first-order correction, which has frequently been used as a condition for adiabatic quantum computation, does not yield a good estimate for the computational error. Therefore, a more general criterion is proposed, which includes higher-order corrections and shows that the computational error can be made exponentially small – which facilitates significantly shorter evolution times than the first-order estimate in certain situations. Based on this criterion and rather general arguments and assumptions, it can be demonstrated that a run-time of order of the inverse minimum energy gap is sufficient and necessary. Furthermore, exploiting the similarity between adiabatic quantum algorithms and quantum phase transitions, we study the impact of decoherence on the sweep through a second-order quantum phase transition for the prototypical example of the Ising chain in a transverse field and compare it to the adiabatic version of Grover’s search algorithm. It turns out that (in contrast to first-order transitions) the impact of decoherence caused by a weak coupling to a rather general environment increases with system size (i.e., number of spins/qubits), which might limit the scalability of the system. Finally, we propose the use of electron systems to construct laboratory systems based on present-day technology which reproduce and thereby simulate the quantum dynamics of the Ising model and the O(3) nonlinear sigma model.

•Oct 2, 2008•0 citations

Adiabaticity in open quantum systems

Lorenzo Campos Venuti, Tameem Albash, Daniel A. Lidar +1 more

We provide a rigorous generalization of the quantum adiabatic theorem for open systems described by a Markovian master equation with time-dependent Liouvillian $\mathcal{L}(t)$. We focus on the finite system case relevant for adiabatic quantum computing and quantum annealing. Adiabaticity is defined in terms of closeness to the instantaneous steady state. While the general result is conceptually similar to the closed-system case, there are important differences. Namely, a system initialized in the zero-eigenvalue eigenspace of $\mathcal{L}(t)$ will remain in this eigenspace with a deviation that is inversely proportional to the total evolution time $T$. In the case of a finite number of level crossings, the scaling becomes ${T}^{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\eta}}$ with an exponent $\ensuremath{\eta}$ that we relate to the rate of the gap closing. For master equations that describe relaxation to thermal equilibrium, we show that the evolution time $T$ should be long compared to the corresponding minimum inverse gap squared of $\mathcal{L}(t)$. Our results are illustrated with several examples.

arXiv:1508.05558•Physical Review A•Mar 14, 2016•98 citations

Multiqubit Tunneling and Evolution in Quantum Annealing

Lucas T. Brady

Quantum computing seeks to use the powers of quantum mechanics to accomplish tasks that classical computers cannot easily accomplish. Adiabatic quantum computing is one flavor of quantum computing that slowly changes a system with time in such a way that the state remains close to the ground state for the entire evolution. An easy way to implement and study adiabatic computing is using stoquastic Hamiltonians with no-sign problem. These Hamiltonians can be readily simulated on classical computers using quantum Monte Carlo schemes; though, it is unknown whether such simulation captures the speed and power of the quantum computation.In this work, I study stoquastic Hamiltonians, focusing on quantum mechanical tunneling through classically inaccessible regions and barriers. I study multi-qubit tunneling problems to determine what properties of the barrier make this problem quantum mechanically or classically hard or inefficient. I compare quantum adiabatic computing with a path-integral Quantum Monte Carlo algorithm, which is a classical algorithm designed to simulate the quantum mechanical dynamics of the adiabatic evolution. Limited numerical data shows strong correlation between adiabatic and Monte Carlo runtimes, but due to computational limits, only small system sizes could be sampled.Additionally, I study the properties of the quantum adiabatic algorithm in both the asymptotic limit of a large number of qubits and long runtimes and more realistic finite system sizes and non-adiabatic conditions. I develop a modification of the existing Villain transformation that allows it to find the asymptotic running time of the quantum evolution for different barrier sizes. Furthermore, I compare this to finite system sizes and discover the extremely large numbers of qubits are needed for these asymptotics to be useful.When the quantum dynamics are run faster than adiabatically, new behavior arises that could potentially lead to enhancements in the quantum runtimes. I explore these enhancements, discovering when they do and do not occur. I also develop a broad framework for determining the nature of the near-adiabatic behavior of any quantum evolution, using only information about the energy gap between the ground state and the first excited state.

•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations
Recent experiments with increasingly larger numbers of qubits have sparked renewed interest in adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular quantum annealing. A central question that is repeatedly asked is whether quantum features of the evolution can survive over the long time scales used for quantum annealing relative to standard measures of the decoherence time. We reconsider the role of decoherence in adiabatic quantum computation and quantum annealing using the adiabatic quantum master-equation formalism. We restrict ourselves to the weak-coupling and singular-coupling limits, which correspond to decoherence in the energy eigenbasis and in the computational basis, respectively. We demonstrate that decoherence in the instantaneous energy eigenbasis does not necessarily detrimentally affect adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular that a short single-qubit T2{T}_{2}T2​ time need not imply adverse consequences for the success of the quantum adiabatic algorithm. We further demonstrate that boundary cancellation methods, designed to improve the fidelity of adiabatic quantum computing in the closed-system setting, remain beneficial in the open-system setting. To address the high computational cost of master-equation simulations, we also demonstrate that a quantum Monte Carlo algorithm that explicitly accounts for a thermal bosonic bath can be used to interpolate between classical and quantum annealing. Our study highlights and clarifies the significantly different role played by decoherence in the adiabatic and circuit models of quantum computing.
Recent experiments with increasingly larger numbers of qubits have sparked renewed interest in adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular quantum annealing. A central question that is repeatedly asked is whether quantum features of the evolution can survive over the long time-scales used for quantum annealing relative to standard measures of the decoherence time. We reconsider the role of decoherence in adiabatic quantum computation and quantum annealing using the adiabatic quantum master equation formalism. We restrict ourselves to the weak-coupling and singular-coupling limits, which correspond to decoherence in the energy eigenbasis and in the computational basis, respectively. We demonstrate that decoherence in the instantaneous energy eigenbasis does not necessarily detrimentally affect adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular that a short single-qubit T2T_2T2​ time need not imply adverse consequences for the success of the quantum adiabatic algorithm. We further demonstrate that boundary cancellation methods, designed to improve the fidelity of adiabatic quantum computing in the closed system setting, remain beneficial in the open system setting. To address the high computational cost of master equation simulations, we also demonstrate that a quantum Monte Carlo algorithm that explicitly accounts for a thermal bosonic bath can be used to interpolate between classical and quantum annealing. Our study highlights and clarifies the significantly different role played by decoherence in the adiabatic and circuit models of quantum computing.
Recent experiments with increasingly larger numbers of qubits have sparked renewed interest in adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular quantum annealing. A central question that is repeatedly asked is whether quantum features of the evolution can survive over the long time scales used for quantum annealing relative to standard measures of the decoherence time. Authors reconsider the role of decoherence in adiabatic quantum.... The full paper: http://www.iiste.org/PDFshare/APTA-PAGENO-431867-436194.pdf
Quantum annealing represents an essential milestone towards the goal of adiabatic quantum computing. In quantum annealing, the computation involves finding the ground state of a classical Ising-like Hamiltonian realized as interactions between qubits. Quantum fluctuations are introduced to allow the wavefunction of the qubits to explore the energy landscape, the hope being that the wavefunction finds a minimum energy configuration and possibly giving the result of the computation. While quantum annealing likely may not be as powerful as adiabatic quantum computing, it is possible that it may be better at optimization compared to analogous classical algorithms. In physical realizations of quantum annealing, there are still questions as to the role of quantum fluctuations in the operation of a device given the short coherence times of the individual qubits. These questions have consistently posed a serious theoretical challenge making it difficult to verify experimental results. Here we simplify the problem by considering a system of qubits with ferromagnetic interactions, modeling the decoherence effects as classical noise in the transverse-field of each qubit. We compare the calculations to data collected from a system of manufactured qubits produced by D-wave Systems by performing a finite-size scaling analysis that captures the competition between quantum fluctuations of the transverse-field and bit-flip errors from the noise. We argue that on time-scales larger than the single-qubit decoherence time, the device produces the expected quantum fluctuations for the many-body system. Using this finite-size scaling, one can diagnose sources of noise in the system. Hopefully, in the near future, these devices will not only be realizing coherent quantum annealing but will likely be useful as another example of synthetic quantum matter.
This Thesis focuses on different aspects of quantum computation theory: adiabatic quantum algorithms, decoherence during the adiabatic evolution and quantum simulators. After an overview on the area of quantum computation and setting up the formal ground for the rest of the Thesis we derive a general error estimate for adiabatic quantum computing. We demonstrate that the first-order correction, which has frequently been used as a condition for adiabatic quantum computation, does not yield a good estimate for the computational error. Therefore, a more general criterion is proposed, which includes higher-order corrections and shows that the computational error can be made exponentially small – which facilitates significantly shorter evolution times than the first-order estimate in certain situations. Based on this criterion and rather general arguments and assumptions, it can be demonstrated that a run-time of order of the inverse minimum energy gap is sufficient and necessary. Furthermore, exploiting the similarity between adiabatic quantum algorithms and quantum phase transitions, we study the impact of decoherence on the sweep through a second-order quantum phase transition for the prototypical example of the Ising chain in a transverse field and compare it to the adiabatic version of Grover’s search algorithm. It turns out that (in contrast to first-order transitions) the impact of decoherence caused by a weak coupling to a rather general environment increases with system size (i.e., number of spins/qubits), which might limit the scalability of the system. Finally, we propose the use of electron systems to construct laboratory systems based on present-day technology which reproduce and thereby simulate the quantum dynamics of the Ising model and the O(3) nonlinear sigma model.
We provide a rigorous generalization of the quantum adiabatic theorem for open systems described by a Markovian master equation with time-dependent Liouvillian L(t)\mathcal{L}(t)L(t). We focus on the finite system case relevant for adiabatic quantum computing and quantum annealing. Adiabaticity is defined in terms of closeness to the instantaneous steady state. While the general result is conceptually similar to the closed-system case, there are important differences. Namely, a system initialized in the zero-eigenvalue eigenspace of L(t)\mathcal{L}(t)L(t) will remain in this eigenspace with a deviation that is inversely proportional to the total evolution time TTT. In the case of a finite number of level crossings, the scaling becomes ${T}^{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\eta}}$ with an exponent $\ensuremath{\eta}$ that we relate to the rate of the gap closing. For master equations that describe relaxation to thermal equilibrium, we show that the evolution time TTT should be long compared to the corresponding minimum inverse gap squared of L(t)\mathcal{L}(t)L(t). Our results are illustrated with several examples.
Quantum computing seeks to use the powers of quantum mechanics to accomplish tasks that classical computers cannot easily accomplish. Adiabatic quantum computing is one flavor of quantum computing that slowly changes a system with time in such a way that the state remains close to the ground state for the entire evolution. An easy way to implement and study adiabatic computing is using stoquastic Hamiltonians with no-sign problem. These Hamiltonians can be readily simulated on classical computers using quantum Monte Carlo schemes; though, it is unknown whether such simulation captures the speed and power of the quantum computation.In this work, I study stoquastic Hamiltonians, focusing on quantum mechanical tunneling through classically inaccessible regions and barriers. I study multi-qubit tunneling problems to determine what properties of the barrier make this problem quantum mechanically or classically hard or inefficient. I compare quantum adiabatic computing with a path-integral Quantum Monte Carlo algorithm, which is a classical algorithm designed to simulate the quantum mechanical dynamics of the adiabatic evolution. Limited numerical data shows strong correlation between adiabatic and Monte Carlo runtimes, but due to computational limits, only small system sizes could be sampled.Additionally, I study the properties of the quantum adiabatic algorithm in both the asymptotic limit of a large number of qubits and long runtimes and more realistic finite system sizes and non-adiabatic conditions. I develop a modification of the existing Villain transformation that allows it to find the asymptotic running time of the quantum evolution for different barrier sizes. Furthermore, I compare this to finite system sizes and discover the extremely large numbers of qubits are needed for these asymptotics to be useful.When the quantum dynamics are run faster than adiabatically, new behavior arises that could potentially lead to enhancements in the quantum runtimes. I explore these enhancements, discovering when they do and do not occur. I also develop a broad framework for determining the nature of the near-adiabatic behavior of any quantum evolution, using only information about the energy gap between the ground state and the first excited state.