The Grassmann representation for the system of qubits, is considered. The treatment is based on natural description of the qubits system as fermions and uses coherent states of fermions. The quantum logic gates are represented in two forms - by symbols of operations and by partial differential operators on the symbols of the states. The considered representation of quantum logic is called as superlogic. The examples are given for classical logic operations of negation, conjunction, disjunction and for reversible three-bit Toffoli gate and its quantum generalization - three-qbit Deutsch gate. The representation for composite gates is also considered. Path integral represenatation in Grassmann algebra for quantum automaton with qubits memory is described. In particular for the autonomous automaton corresponding to the special case of general dynamic system this description differ from path integral representation in commutative memory phase space by the specific nonliner term in superaction.
The Grassmann representation for the system of qubits, is considered. The treatment is based on natural description of the qubits system as fermions and uses coherent states of fermions. The quantum logic gates are represented in two forms - by symbols of operations and by partial differential operators on the symbols of the states. The considered representation of quantum logic is called as superlogic. The examples are given for classical logic operations of negation, conjunction, disjunction and for reversible three-bit Toffoli gate and its quantum generalization - three-qbit Deutsch gate. The representation for composite gates is also considered. Path integral represenatation in Grassmann algebra for quantum automaton with qubits memory is described. In particular for the autonomous automaton corresponding to the special case of general dynamic system this description differ from path integral representation in commutative memory phase space by the specific nonliner term in superaction.
The phase-space description of bosonic quantum systems has numerous applications in such fields as quantum optics, trapped ultracold atoms, and transport phenomena. Extension of this description to the case of fermionic systems leads to formal Grassmann phase-space quasiprobability distributions and master equations. The latter are usually considered as not possessing probabilistic interpretation and as not directly computationally accessible. Here, we describe how to construct c-number interpretations of Grassmann phase-space representations and their master equations. As a specific example, the Grassmann B representation is considered. We discuss how to introduce c-number probability distributions on Grassmann algebra and how to integrate them. A measure of size and proximity is defined for Grassmann numbers, and the Grassmann derivatives are introduced which are based on infinitesimal variations of function arguments. An example of c-number interpretation of formal Grassmann equations is presented.
Abstract The operator algebra of fermionic modes is isomorphic to that of qubits, the difference between them is twofold: the embedding of subalgebras corresponding to mode subsets and multiqubit subsystems on the one hand, and the parity superselection in the fermionic case on the other. We discuss these two fundamental differences extensively, and illustrate these through the Jordan–Wigner representation in a coherent, self-contained, pedagogical way, from the point of view of quantum information theory. Our perspective leads us to develop useful new tools for the treatment of fermionic systems, such as the fermionic (quasi-)tensor product, fermionic canonical embedding, fermionic partial trace, fermionic products of maps and fermionic embeddings of maps. We formulate these by direct, easily applicable formulas, without mode permutations, for arbitrary partitionings of the modes. It is also shown that fermionic reduced states can be calculated by the fermionic partial trace, containing the proper phase factors. We also consider variants of the notions of fermionic mode correlation and entanglement, which can be endowed with the usual, local operation based motivation, if the parity superselection rule is imposed. We also elucidate some other fundamental points, related to joint map extensions, which make the parity superselection inevitable in the description of fermionic systems.
Presented is a second quantized technology for representing fermionic and bosonic entanglement in terms of generalized joint ladder operators, joint number operators, interchangers, and pairwise entanglement operators. The joint number operators generate conservative quantum logic gates that are used for pairwise entanglement in quantum dynamical systems. These are most useful for quantum computational physics. The generalized joint operator approach provides a pathway to represent the Temperley-Lieb algebra and to represent braid group operators for either fermionic or bosonic many-body quantum systems. Moreover, the entanglement operators allow for a representation of quantum measurement, quantum maps (associated with quantum Boltzmann equation dynamics), and for a way to completely and efficiently extract all accessible bits of joint information from entangled quantum systems in terms of quantum propositions.
The aim of this paper is to give a self-contained and unified presentation of a fermionic coherent state theory with the necessary mathematical details, discussing their definition, properties and some applications. After defining Grassmann algebras, it is possible to get a classical analog for the fermionic degrees of freedom in a quantum system. Following the basic work of Berezin (1966 The Method of Second Quantization (New York: Academic); 1987 Introduction to Superanalysis (Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company)), we show that we can compute with Grassmann numbers as we do with complex numbers: derivation, integration, Fourier transform. After that we show that we have quantization formulas for fermionic observables. In particular, there exists a Moyal product formula. As an application, we consider explicit computations for propagators with quadratic Hamiltonians in annihilation and creation operators. We prove a Mehler formula for the propagator and Mehlig–Wilkinson-type formulas for the covariant and contravariant symbols of ‘metaplectic’ transformations for fermionic states. This article is part of a special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical devoted to ‘Coherent states: mathematical and physical aspects’.
This chapter introduces the holomorphic representation of quantum mechanics, because it allows a study of the properties of boson systems both from the point of view of evolution and of quantum statistical physics (in the so-called second quantization formalism). Path integrals then take the form of integrals over trajectories in phase space in a complex parametrization. A parallel formalism, based on integration over anti-commuting type or Grassmann variables, makes it possible to handle fermions in a way quite analogous to bosons. The corresponding path integral representation of the statistical operator is then derived. The holomorphic formalism is specially well adapted to a study of the harmonic oscillator and, more generally, of perturbed harmonic oscillators. As an illustration, the formalism is applied to the Bose-Einstein condensation. This chapter also considers complex integrals and Wick's theorem, kernel of operators, general Hamiltonians, partition function, and the quantum Bose gas.
In this paper, we formulate the phase space description of qubit systems using coadjoint orbits of SU(2) and the Stratonovich-Weyl correspondence, yielding a deformation quantization on the sphere. The resulting star product reproduces the operator algebra of complexified quaternions and its antisymmetric part induces the Lie-Poisson structure associated with the Kirillov-Kostant-Souriau symplectic form. We show that quantum dynamics can be expressed entirely in phase space through star exponentials of Hamiltonian symbols, leading to an explicit representation of the propagator. Further, we establish the equivalence between the coherent-state path integral formulation on S2 and the algebraic description in terms of star exponentials. Some examples illustrating the construction of the star-exponential functions and the resulting Poisson structure are included.