Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1708.07400 · Computational and Mathematical Biophysics

Dynamics of Current, Charge and Mass

Bob Eisenberg, Xavier Oriols, David K. Ferry

Published Oct 26, 2017• 32 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract Electricity plays a special role in our lives and life. The dynamics of electrons allow light to flow through a vacuum. The equations of electron dynamics are nearly exact and apply from nuclear particles to stars. These Maxwell equations include a special term, the displacement current (of a vacuum). The displacement current allows electrical signals to propagate through space. Displacement current guarantees that current is exactly conserved from inside atoms to between stars, as long as current is defined as the entire source of the curl of the magnetic field, as Maxwell did.We show that the Bohm formulation of quantum mechanics allows the easy definition of the total current, and its conservation, without the dificulties implicit in the orthodox quantum theory. The orthodox theory neglects the reality of magnitudes, like the currents, during times that they are not being explicitly measured.We show how conservation of current can be derived without mention of the polarization or dielectric properties of matter. We point out that displacement current is handled correctly in electrical engineering by ‘stray capacitances’, although it is rarely discussed explicitly. Matter does not behave as physicists of the 1800’s thought it did. They could only measure on a time scale of seconds and tried to explain dielectric properties and polarization with a single dielectric constant, a real positive number independent of everything. Matter and thus charge moves in enormously complicated ways that cannot be described by a single dielectric constant,when studied on time scales important today for electronic technology and molecular biology. When classical theories could not explain complex charge movements, constants in equations were allowed to vary in solutions of those equations, in a way not justified by mathematics, with predictable consequences. Life occurs in ionic solutions where charge is moved by forces not mentioned or described in the Maxwell equations, like convection and diffusion. These movements and forces produce crucial currents that cannot be described as classical conduction or classical polarization. Derivations of conservation of current involve oversimplified treatments of dielectrics and polarization in nearly every textbook. Because real dielectrics do not behave in that simple way-not even approximately-classical derivations of conservation of current are often distrusted or even ignored. We show that current is conserved inside atoms. We show that current is conserved exactly in any material no matter how complex are the properties of dielectric, polarization, or conduction currents. Electricity has a special role because conservation of current is a universal law.Most models of chemical reactions do not conserve current and need to be changed to do so. On the macroscopic scale of life, conservation of current necessarily links far spread boundaries to each other, correlating inputs and outputs, and thereby creating devices.We suspect that correlations created by displacement current link all scales and allow atoms to control the machines and organisms of life. Conservation of current has a special role in our lives and life, as well as in physics. We believe models, simulations, and computations should conserve current on all scales, as accurately as possible, because physics conserves current that way. We believe models will be much more successful if they conserve current at every level of resolution, the way physics does.We surely need successful models as we try to control macroscopic functions by atomic interventions, in technology, life, and medicine. Maxwell’s displacement current lets us see stars. We hope it will help us see how atoms control life.

DOI
10.1515/mlbmb-2017-0006

Related papers

A charged space as the origin of sources, fields and potentials

Koen J. van Vlaenderen

The wave function $ψ$ is interpreted as charge density, or charge distribution, at each point in space. This is a physical interpretation of $ψ$. The notion of speed can be associated with $ψ$, which leads to the concept of conduction currents and (displacement) convection currents. The charge distribution is the origin of electrical and mechanical sources, potentials and fields. The notion of self potential is essential for defining electrical or mechanical sources. Maxwell's equations are derived from the condition of charge conservation and mass conservation. There are two methods of modelling the mass of a charge: The mass of a charge is its electrostatic energy. The mass of a charge is the energy of the Zero Point Field (ZPF) that interacts with the point charge. It is shown that the two models are related by a simple energy equation for a particle at rest.

arXiv:physics/9910022•Oct 16, 1999•5 citations

Classical Quantum Mechanics

Randell L Mills

Despite its successes, quantum mechanics (QM) has remained mysterious to all who have encountered it. Starting with Bohr and progressing into the present, the departure from intuitive, physical reality has widened. The connection between QM and reality is more than just a “philosophical” issue. It reveals that QM is not a correct or complete theory of the physical world and that inescapable internal inconsistencies and incongruities arise when attempts are made to treat it as physical as opposed to a purely mathematical “tool.” Some of these issues are discussed in a review by F. Laloe [Am. J. Phys. 69, 655 (2001)]. In an attempt to provide some physical insight into atomic problems and starting with the same essential physics as Bohr of e moving in the Coulombic field of the proton and the wave equation as modified by Schrodinger, a classical approach is explored that yields a remarkably accurate model and provides insight into physics on the atomic level. The proverbial view, deeply seated in the wave-particle duality notion, that there is no large-scale physical counterpart to the nature of the electron may not be correct. Physical laws and intuition may be restored when dealing with the wave equation and quantummechanical problems. Specifically, a theory of classical quantum mechanics (CQM) is derived from first principles that successfully applies physical laws on all scales. Rather than using the postulated Schrodinger boundary condition “Ψ → 0 as r → ∞,” which leads to a purely mathematical model of the electron, the constraint is based on experimental observation. Using Maxwell’s equations, the classical wave equation is solved with the constraint that the bound (n = 1)state electron cannot radiate energy. By further application of Maxwell’s equations to electromagnetic and gravitational fields at particle production, the Schwarzschild metric is derived from the classical wave equation, which modifies general relativity to include conservation of spacetime in addition to momentum and matter/energy. The result gives a natural relationship among Maxwell’s equations, special relativity, and general relativity. CQM holds over a scale of spacetime of 85 orders of magnitude — it correctly predicts the nature of the universe from the scale of the quarks to that of the cosmos. A review is given by G. Landvogt [Internat. J. Hydrogen Energy 28, 1155 (2003)].

Physics Essays•Dec 1, 2003•26 citations

Maxwell's Equations from Quantum Mechanics III: Synthesis: Gauge Invariance, Conserved Currents, and Hydrogen Atoms as the Sources of the Electromagnetic Field

Daniel Scretching

Maxwell’s equations, formulated in 1865, preceded quantum mechanics by six decades. When the logical direction is reversed, however, the electromagnetic field structure can be interpreted as the form required for a quantum theory of charged matter once three standard ingredients are imposed: local gauge invariance, conserved electric current, and a dynamical electromagnetic field. Quantum mechanics supplies the charged-particle state, probability amplitudes, quantum currents, and—through the Dirac equation—a relativistically consistent description of electron charge and spin. Gauge symmetry then organizes the electromagnetic interaction, while current conservation constrains the admissible source structure. The homogeneous Maxwell identities follow naturally from expressing the field through a four-potential, whereas the sourced Maxwell equations require an additional electromagnetic field action or equivalent dynamical assumption. The resulting framework clarifies both the strength and the limit of a “Maxwell from quantum mechanics” program: quantum theory and gauge structure strongly constrain electromagnetism, but Maxwell field dynamics are not obtained from the electron wave equation alone.

•Oct 4, 2026•0 citations

Maxwell's Equations from Quantum Mechanics I: Gauge Invariance, Conserved Currents, and Hydrogen Atoms as the Sources of the Electromagnetic Field

Daniel Scretching

This paper examines how Maxwell electrodynamics can be recovered as the field-theoretic structure required to consistently couple quantum matter to electromagnetism, while distinguishing what follows from quantum mechanics from what must be supplied independently. Local phase invariance introduces electromagnetic potentials through minimal coupling and yields the homogeneous Maxwell equations as geometric identities, while quantum probability conservation provides a conserved electric current and Ehrenfest dynamics recover the Lorentz-force form. The inhomogeneous Maxwell equations require an additional Lorentz- and gauge-invariant electromagnetic field action, whose vacuum constants satisfy μ0ε0=1/c2\mu_0\varepsilon_0=1/c^2, linking the construction to the SQC/MSC electric–magnetic prefactor relation. Hydrogen is used as an explicit microscopic source: the 1s1s state generates a quantum charge distribution, 2p2p states provide orbital currents and magnetic moments, and 1s1s–2p2p superpositions produce radiative dipole transitions. The treatment is then extended from individual atoms to a hydrogen gas, where polarization and magnetization generate the macroscopic fields DD and HH. The resulting framework shows how quantum sources and material response fit consistently within Maxwell electrodynamics without claiming that quantum mechanics alone uniquely derives the complete electromagnetic field dynamics.

•Oct 2, 2026•0 citations

A philosopher looks at quantum mechanics

Hilary Putnam

Those defile the purity of mathematical and philosophical truthy who confound real quantities with their relations and sensible measures. —ISAAC NEWTON, Principia Before we say anything about quantum mechanics, let us take a quick look at the Newtonian (or ‘classical’) view of the physical universe. According to that view, nature consists of an enormous number of particles. When Newtonian physics is combined with the theory of the electromagnetic field, it becomes convenient to think of these particles as dimensionless (even if there is a kind of conceptual strain involved in trying to think of something as having a mass but not any size ), and as possessing electrical properties – negative charge, or positive charge, or neutrality. This leads to the well-known ‘solar system’ view of the atom – with the electrons whirling around the nucleons (neutrons and protons) just as the planets whirl around the sun. Out of atoms are built molecules; out of molecules, macroscopic objects, scaling from dust motes to whole planets and stars. These latter also fall into larger groupings – solar systems and galaxies – but these larger structures differ from the ones previously mentioned in being held together exclusively by gravitational forces. At every level, however, one has trajectories (ultimately that means the possibility of continuously tracing the movements of the elementary particles) and one has causality (ultimately that means the possibility of extrapolating from the history of the universe up to a given time to its whole sequence of future states).

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 30, 1979•60 citations

The Mechanics Of An Atom In A Molecule

Richard F. W. Bader

Abstract Schrodinger’s belief in the ability of his ‘wave mechanics’ to provide a description of the properties of matter as demonstrated in the opening quotation was well founded and his mechanics has been used to understand phenomena unknown in 1926. The roles of the charge and current densities in quantum mechanics go beyond their use in the description of the electrical and magnetic properties of matter. The charge density provides a description of the distribution of charge throughout real space and is the bridge between the concept of state functions in Hilbert space and the physical model of matter in real space. Schrodinger subscribed to this same view, pointing out in his fourth paper wherein he defines the electric density at a point in real space, ‘that the Ψ function itself cannot be and may not be directly interpreted in terms of three-dimensional space—because it is in general a function in configuration space, and not real space.’ The zero-flux boundary condition, as stated in terms of the gradient vector field of the charge density, defines a single atom and objects made from collections of atoms. As demonstrated in this chapter, the form and ultimately the properties of an object, microscopic or macroscopic, are determined by its distribution of charge.

•Dec 13, 1990•2 citations
Abstract Electricity plays a special role in our lives and life. The dynamics of electrons allow light to flow through a vacuum. The equations of electron dynamics are nearly exact and apply from nuclear particles to stars. These Maxwell equations include a special term, the displacement current (of a vacuum). The displacement current allows electrical signals to propagate through space. Displacement current guarantees that current is exactly conserved from inside atoms to between stars, as long as current is defined as the entire source of the curl of the magnetic field, as Maxwell did.We show that the Bohm formulation of quantum mechanics allows the easy definition of the total current, and its conservation, without the dificulties implicit in the orthodox quantum theory. The orthodox theory neglects the reality of magnitudes, like the currents, during times that they are not being explicitly measured.We show how conservation of current can be derived without mention of the polarization or dielectric properties of matter. We point out that displacement current is handled correctly in electrical engineering by ‘stray capacitances’, although it is rarely discussed explicitly. Matter does not behave as physicists of the 1800’s thought it did. They could only measure on a time scale of seconds and tried to explain dielectric properties and polarization with a single dielectric constant, a real positive number independent of everything. Matter and thus charge moves in enormously complicated ways that cannot be described by a single dielectric constant,when studied on time scales important today for electronic technology and molecular biology. When classical theories could not explain complex charge movements, constants in equations were allowed to vary in solutions of those equations, in a way not justified by mathematics, with predictable consequences. Life occurs in ionic solutions where charge is moved by forces not mentioned or described in the Maxwell equations, like convection and diffusion. These movements and forces produce crucial currents that cannot be described as classical conduction or classical polarization. Derivations of conservation of current involve oversimplified treatments of dielectrics and polarization in nearly every textbook. Because real dielectrics do not behave in that simple way-not even approximately-classical derivations of conservation of current are often distrusted or even ignored. We show that current is conserved inside atoms. We show that current is conserved exactly in any material no matter how complex are the properties of dielectric, polarization, or conduction currents. Electricity has a special role because conservation of current is a universal law.Most models of chemical reactions do not conserve current and need to be changed to do so. On the macroscopic scale of life, conservation of current necessarily links far spread boundaries to each other, correlating inputs and outputs, and thereby creating devices.We suspect that correlations created by displacement current link all scales and allow atoms to control the machines and organisms of life. Conservation of current has a special role in our lives and life, as well as in physics. We believe models, simulations, and computations should conserve current on all scales, as accurately as possible, because physics conserves current that way. We believe models will be much more successful if they conserve current at every level of resolution, the way physics does.We surely need successful models as we try to control macroscopic functions by atomic interventions, in technology, life, and medicine. Maxwell’s displacement current lets us see stars. We hope it will help us see how atoms control life.
The wave function ψψψ is interpreted as charge density, or charge distribution, at each point in space. This is a physical interpretation of ψψψ. The notion of speed can be associated with ψψψ, which leads to the concept of conduction currents and (displacement) convection currents. The charge distribution is the origin of electrical and mechanical sources, potentials and fields. The notion of self potential is essential for defining electrical or mechanical sources. Maxwell's equations are derived from the condition of charge conservation and mass conservation. There are two methods of modelling the mass of a charge: The mass of a charge is its electrostatic energy. The mass of a charge is the energy of the Zero Point Field (ZPF) that interacts with the point charge. It is shown that the two models are related by a simple energy equation for a particle at rest.
Despite its successes, quantum mechanics (QM) has remained mysterious to all who have encountered it. Starting with Bohr and progressing into the present, the departure from intuitive, physical reality has widened. The connection between QM and reality is more than just a “philosophical” issue. It reveals that QM is not a correct or complete theory of the physical world and that inescapable internal inconsistencies and incongruities arise when attempts are made to treat it as physical as opposed to a purely mathematical “tool.” Some of these issues are discussed in a review by F. Laloe [Am. J. Phys. 69, 655 (2001)]. In an attempt to provide some physical insight into atomic problems and starting with the same essential physics as Bohr of e moving in the Coulombic field of the proton and the wave equation as modified by Schrodinger, a classical approach is explored that yields a remarkably accurate model and provides insight into physics on the atomic level. The proverbial view, deeply seated in the wave-particle duality notion, that there is no large-scale physical counterpart to the nature of the electron may not be correct. Physical laws and intuition may be restored when dealing with the wave equation and quantummechanical problems. Specifically, a theory of classical quantum mechanics (CQM) is derived from first principles that successfully applies physical laws on all scales. Rather than using the postulated Schrodinger boundary condition “Ψ → 0 as r → ∞,” which leads to a purely mathematical model of the electron, the constraint is based on experimental observation. Using Maxwell’s equations, the classical wave equation is solved with the constraint that the bound (n = 1)state electron cannot radiate energy. By further application of Maxwell’s equations to electromagnetic and gravitational fields at particle production, the Schwarzschild metric is derived from the classical wave equation, which modifies general relativity to include conservation of spacetime in addition to momentum and matter/energy. The result gives a natural relationship among Maxwell’s equations, special relativity, and general relativity. CQM holds over a scale of spacetime of 85 orders of magnitude — it correctly predicts the nature of the universe from the scale of the quarks to that of the cosmos. A review is given by G. Landvogt [Internat. J. Hydrogen Energy 28, 1155 (2003)].
Maxwell’s equations, formulated in 1865, preceded quantum mechanics by six decades. When the logical direction is reversed, however, the electromagnetic field structure can be interpreted as the form required for a quantum theory of charged matter once three standard ingredients are imposed: local gauge invariance, conserved electric current, and a dynamical electromagnetic field. Quantum mechanics supplies the charged-particle state, probability amplitudes, quantum currents, and—through the Dirac equation—a relativistically consistent description of electron charge and spin. Gauge symmetry then organizes the electromagnetic interaction, while current conservation constrains the admissible source structure. The homogeneous Maxwell identities follow naturally from expressing the field through a four-potential, whereas the sourced Maxwell equations require an additional electromagnetic field action or equivalent dynamical assumption. The resulting framework clarifies both the strength and the limit of a “Maxwell from quantum mechanics” program: quantum theory and gauge structure strongly constrain electromagnetism, but Maxwell field dynamics are not obtained from the electron wave equation alone.
This paper examines how Maxwell electrodynamics can be recovered as the field-theoretic structure required to consistently couple quantum matter to electromagnetism, while distinguishing what follows from quantum mechanics from what must be supplied independently. Local phase invariance introduces electromagnetic potentials through minimal coupling and yields the homogeneous Maxwell equations as geometric identities, while quantum probability conservation provides a conserved electric current and Ehrenfest dynamics recover the Lorentz-force form. The inhomogeneous Maxwell equations require an additional Lorentz- and gauge-invariant electromagnetic field action, whose vacuum constants satisfy μ0ε0=1/c2\mu_0\varepsilon_0=1/c^2, linking the construction to the SQC/MSC electric–magnetic prefactor relation. Hydrogen is used as an explicit microscopic source: the 1s1s state generates a quantum charge distribution, 2p2p states provide orbital currents and magnetic moments, and 1s1s–2p2p superpositions produce radiative dipole transitions. The treatment is then extended from individual atoms to a hydrogen gas, where polarization and magnetization generate the macroscopic fields DD and HH. The resulting framework shows how quantum sources and material response fit consistently within Maxwell electrodynamics without claiming that quantum mechanics alone uniquely derives the complete electromagnetic field dynamics.
Those defile the purity of mathematical and philosophical truthy who confound real quantities with their relations and sensible measures. —ISAAC NEWTON, Principia Before we say anything about quantum mechanics, let us take a quick look at the Newtonian (or ‘classical’) view of the physical universe. According to that view, nature consists of an enormous number of particles. When Newtonian physics is combined with the theory of the electromagnetic field, it becomes convenient to think of these particles as dimensionless (even if there is a kind of conceptual strain involved in trying to think of something as having a mass but not any size ), and as possessing electrical properties – negative charge, or positive charge, or neutrality. This leads to the well-known ‘solar system’ view of the atom – with the electrons whirling around the nucleons (neutrons and protons) just as the planets whirl around the sun. Out of atoms are built molecules; out of molecules, macroscopic objects, scaling from dust motes to whole planets and stars. These latter also fall into larger groupings – solar systems and galaxies – but these larger structures differ from the ones previously mentioned in being held together exclusively by gravitational forces. At every level, however, one has trajectories (ultimately that means the possibility of continuously tracing the movements of the elementary particles) and one has causality (ultimately that means the possibility of extrapolating from the history of the universe up to a given time to its whole sequence of future states).
Abstract Schrodinger’s belief in the ability of his ‘wave mechanics’ to provide a description of the properties of matter as demonstrated in the opening quotation was well founded and his mechanics has been used to understand phenomena unknown in 1926. The roles of the charge and current densities in quantum mechanics go beyond their use in the description of the electrical and magnetic properties of matter. The charge density provides a description of the distribution of charge throughout real space and is the bridge between the concept of state functions in Hilbert space and the physical model of matter in real space. Schrodinger subscribed to this same view, pointing out in his fourth paper wherein he defines the electric density at a point in real space, ‘that the Ψ function itself cannot be and may not be directly interpreted in terms of three-dimensional space—because it is in general a function in configuration space, and not real space.’ The zero-flux boundary condition, as stated in terms of the gradient vector field of the charge density, defines a single atom and objects made from collections of atoms. As demonstrated in this chapter, the form and ultimately the properties of an object, microscopic or macroscopic, are determined by its distribution of charge.