arXiv:1708.04275

Two time solution to quantum measurement paradoxes

Michael Grady

Published Aug 14, 2017• 0 citations

Abstract

It is hypothesized that the Langevin time of stochastic quantum quantization is a physical time over which quantum fields at all values of space and coordinate time fluctuate. The average over paths becomes a time average as opposed to an ensemble average. It is further hypothesized that the Langevin time also paces the motion of particles through coordinate time and is equal to the coordinate time of the present hypersurface in the frame of the Hubble expansion. Despite having a preferred frame, special relativity continues to hold in this formulation as a dynamical symmetry due to the presumed Lorentz invariance of interactions. The measurement process becomes an integral part of the theory and is realized as a process of spontaneous symmetry breaking. The continuously fluctuating history of fields, characteristic of having two times, and the switch from ensemble averages to time averages allows for logical and straightforward explanations of many quantum measurement paradoxes. The fluctuating history also evades hidden-variable prohibitions allowing an essentially classical system to underlie quantum mechanics. These changes to the stochastic quantization paradigm makes this stochastic classical system differ somewhat from standard quantum mechanics, so, in principle, distinguishable from it.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1708.04275

Related papers

Quantum spacetime operationally based on propagators for extended test particles

Eduard Prugovečki

By taking into account the quantum aspects intrinsic to any operational definition of spatio-temporal relationships, a stochastic concept of spacetime emerges. In relation to its classical counterpart is realized as a stochastic mean around which quantum fluctuations become negligible only in the limit of macroscopic spacetime intervals. The test-particle propagators used in the proposed quantum concept of spacetime are derived by solving in a consistent manner the localizability problem for relativistic particles. This is achieved in the framework of the stochastic phase space formulation of quantum mechanics, which in the nonrelativistic context is shown to result from systems of imprimitivity related to phase space conserved probability currents derivable from bona fide convariant probability densities in stochastic phase spaces of one particle systems, which can be interpreted as due to measurements performed with extended rather than pointlike test particles. The associated particle propagators can be therefore consistently related to coordinate probability densities measurable by the exchange of photons in between test particles from a chosen standard. Quantum spacetime is defined as the family of propagators corresponding to all conceivable coherent flows of test particles. This family of free-fall propagators has to satisfy certain self-consistency conditions as well as consistent laws ofmore » motion which inplicitly determine the stochastic geometro-dynamics of quantum space-time. Field theory on quantum spacetime retains many of the formal features of conventional quantum field theory. On a fundamental epistemological level stochastic geometries emerge as essential prerequisites in the construction of spacetime models that would be operationally based and yet consistent with the relativity principle as well as with the uncertinty principle.« less

Hadronic J.; (United States)Apr 1, 19814 citations

Langevin Formulation of Quantum Dynamics

M. Roncadelli

We first point out that nonrelativistic quantum mechanics formulated at imaginary time s = it can formally be recognized as the Fokker-Planck description of a classical Brownian motion, which occurs (in general) in a medium where particles are absorbed and emitted. We next offer a new formulation of quantum dynamics, which is basically the Langevin treatment of that Brownian motion. More explicitly, we derive a noise average representation of the transition probability W ( X", s"|X', s' ) in terms of the solutions to a Langevin equation with a Gaussian white noise. Upon analytic continuation back to real time W ( X", s"|X', s' ) becomes the propagator of the original Schrödinger equation, namely we have ⟨ X", t"|X', t' ⟩ = W ( X", it"|X', it' ). The main advantage of this approach is to permit a systematic application to quantum-dynamical problems of the mathematical techniques developed in the theory of classical stochastic processes, even when vector potentials and/or time-dependent potentials are present.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)Oct 14, 19919 citations

Stochastic quantum mechanics and quantum spacetime : a consistent unification of relativity and quantum theory based on stochastic spaces

Eduard Prugovečki

I: Stochastic Quantum Mechanics.- 1 / Nonrelativistic Stochastic Quantum Mechanics.- 1.1 Stochastic Values and Stochastic Phase Spaces.- 1.2. Sharp Localizability and Systems of Imprimitivity.- 1.3. Stochastic Localizability and Systems of Co variance.- 1.4. Phase-Space Representations of the Galilei Group.- 1.5. Localizability in Nonrelativistic Stochastic Phase Spaces.- 1.6. Stochastic Phase-Space Systems of Covariance.- 1.7. Resolution Generators and Gauge Freedom in Stochastic Phase Spaces.- 1.8. Stochastic Probability Currents and Their Sharp-Point Limits.- 1.9. Propagators in Nonrelativistic Stochastic Phase Spaces.- 1.10. Quantum Stochastic Processes and Phase-Space Path Integrals.- 1.11. Semiclassical Propagators in Stochastic Phase Spaces.- 1.12. The Physical Nature and the Measurement of Proper Wave Functions and of Stochastic Position and Momentum.- Notes.- 2 / Relativistic Stochastic Quantum Mechanics.- 2.1. The Nonexistence of Relativistic Probability Currents at Sharp Space time Points.- 2.2. The Unfeasibility of Sharp Localization in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics.- 2.3. Phase-Space Representations of the Poincare Group.- 2.4. Resolution Generators and Relativistic Phase-Space Representations.- 2.5. Localizability in Relativistic Stochastic Phase Spaces.- 2.6. Systems of Covariance in Relativistic Stochastic Phase Spaces.- 2.7. Relativistic Canonical Commutation Relations and Gauge Freedom.- 2.8. Relativistically Covariant and Conserved Probability and Charge Currents.- 2.9. Propagators in Relativistic Stochastic Phase Spaces.- 2.10. Relativistic Extended Quantum Particles in External Electromagnetic Fields.- Notes.- 3 / Statistical Mechanics on Stochastic Phase Spaces.- 3.1. Phase-Space Representations of Quantum Statistical Mechanics.- 3.2. Informational Equivalence and Completeness of POV Measures.- 3.3. Generalized Stochastic Phase-Space Systems of Covariance.- 3.4. Classical and Quantum Mechanics in L2 (?N).- 3.5. Classical and Quantum Statistical Mechanics in Master Liouville Space ?(?N).- 3.6. Quantum Observables as Density Distributions on Stochastic Phase Spaces.- 3.7. Unified Formulations of Classical and Quantum Boltzmann Equations and Scattering Cross-Sections.- Notes.- II: Quantum Spacetime.- 4 / Reciprocity Theory and the Geometrization of Stochastic Quantum Mechanics.- 4.1. The Operational Foundations of Special and General Relativity.- 4.2. Coordinate Fluctuation Amplitudes for Coherent Flows of Quantum Test Particles.- 4.3. Quantum Lorentz Frames and Minkowski Quantum Spacetime.- 4.4. General Quantum Spacetimes and Stochastic Geometries.- 4.5. Reciprocity Theory and Born's Quantum Metric Operator.- 4.6. Unitary Internal Symmetries and Generalized Representations of Relativistic Canonical Commutation Relations.- Notes.- 5 / Field Theory on Quantum Spacetime.- 5.1. Free Scalar Fields on Minkowski Quantum Spacetime.- 5.2. LSZ Formalism and Causality on Quantum Spacetime.- 5.3. Lagrangian Field Theory on Quantum Spacetime.- 5.4. Dirac Bispinors and Free Fields on Quantum Spacetime.- 5.5. Photon Localizability and the Electromagnetic Field on Quantum Spacetime.- 5.6. Reciprocally Invariant Quantum Electrodynamics for Extended Fermions.- Notes.- Appendix A / Elements of Measure Theory.- Appendix B / Elements of Operator Theory on Hilbert Spaces.- Notes.- References.

Jan 1, 198410 citations

A stochastic model for quantum measurement

Agung Budiyono

We develop a statistical model of microscopic stochastic deviation from classical mechanics based on a stochastic process with a transition probability that is assumed to be given by an exponential distribution of infinitesimal stationary action. We apply the statistical model to stochastically modify a classical mechanical model for the measurement of physical quantities reproducing the prediction of quantum mechanics. The system+apparatus always has a definite configuration at all times, as in classical mechanics, fluctuating randomly following a continuous trajectory. On the other hand, the wavefunction and quantum mechanical Hermitian operator corresponding to the physical quantity arise formally as artificial mathematical constructs. During a single measurement, the wavefunction of the whole system+apparatus evolves according to a Schrödinger equation and the configuration of the apparatus acts as the pointer of the measurement so that there is no wavefunction collapse. We will also show that while the outcome of each single measurement event does not reveal the actual value of the physical quantity prior to measurement, its average in an ensemble of identical measurements is equal to the average of the actual value of the physical quantity prior to measurement over the distribution of the configuration of the system.

arXiv:1310.6028Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and ExperimentNov 15, 20132 citations

Emergences in Quantum Measurement Processes

Roger Balian

Abstract Quantum mechanics is acknowledged as the fundamental theory on which the whole fabric of physics is supposed to rely. And yet, the features of quantum measurements, processes that provide information about microscopic objects, seem to contradict the principles of quantum mechanics. We make a qualitative presentation of this long standing problem and give an idea of recent progress in the elucidation of the paradox. Although governed solely by the quantum equations of motion, the dynamical process involving the tested system and the measuring apparatus veils the quantum oddities that oppose our standard logic and gives rise to the expected properties of measurements. In spite of the irreducibly probabilistic nature of the underlying quantum physics, classical concepts emerge, such as standard probabilities, ordinary correlations, disappearance of quantum fluctuations, and the possibility of making statements about individual systems.

KronoScopeJan 1, 20133 citations

The quantum measurement of time

Scott Roger Shepard

Traditionally, in non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics, time is considered to be a parameter, rather than an observable quantity like space. In relativistic Quantum Field Theory, space and time are treated equally by reducing space to also be a parameter. Herein, after a brief review of other measurements, we describe a third possibility, which is to treat time as a directly observable quantity.

May 1, 19940 citations