In the lore of quantum metrology, one often hears (or reads) the following no-go theorem: If you put a vacuum into one input port of a balanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer, then no matter what you put into the other input port, and no matter what your detection scheme, the sensitivity can never be better than the shot-noise limit (SNL). Often the proof of this theorem is cited to be in C. Caves, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981), but upon further inspection, no such claim is made there. Quantum-Fisher-information-based arguments suggestive of this no-go theorem appear elsewhere in the literature, but are not stated in their full generality. Here we thoroughly explore this no-go theorem and give a rigorous statement: the no-go theorem holds whenever the unknown phase shift is split between both of the arms of the interferometer, but remarkably does not hold when only one arm has the unknown phase shift. In the latter scenario, we provide an explicit measurement strategy that beats the SNL. We also point out that these two scenarios are physically different and correspond to different types of sensing applications.
In the lore of quantum metrology, one often hears (or reads) the following no-go theorem: If you put a vacuum into one input port of a balanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer, then no matter what you put into the other input port, and no matter what your detection scheme, the sensitivity can never be better than the shot-noise limit (SNL). Often the proof of this theorem is cited to be in C. Caves, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981), but upon further inspection, no such claim is made there. Quantum-Fisher-information-based arguments suggestive of this no-go theorem appear elsewhere in the literature, but are not stated in their full generality. Here we thoroughly explore this no-go theorem and give a rigorous statement: the no-go theorem holds whenever the unknown phase shift is split between both of the arms of the interferometer, but remarkably does not hold when only one arm has the unknown phase shift. In the latter scenario, we provide an explicit measurement strategy that beats the SNL. We also point out that these two scenarios are physically different and correspond to different types of sensing applications.
In the lore of quantum metrology, one often hears (or reads) the following no-go theorem: If you put a vacuum into one input port of a balanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer, then no matter what you put into the other input port, and no matter what your detection scheme, the sensitivity can never be better than the shot-noise limit (SNL). Often the proof of this theorem is cited to be in C. Caves, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981), but upon further inspection, no such claim is made there. Quantum-Fisher-information-based arguments suggestive of this no-go theorem appear elsewhere in the literature, but are not stated in their full generality. Here we thoroughly explore this no-go theorem and give a rigorous statement: the no-go theorem holds whenever the unknown phase shift is split between both of the arms of the interferometer, but remarkably does not hold when only one arm has the unknown phase shift. In the latter scenario, we provide an explicit measurement strategy that beats the SNL. We also point out that these two scenarios are physically different and correspond to different types of sensing applications.
In 1981, Caves pointed out that the phase sensitivity of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with single-mode inputs is bounded by the shot-noise limit. The quantum Fisher information analysis shows that this statement holds true for the scenario where two antisymmetric phase shifts occur in two arms, but it is invalid for the scenario where an unknown phase is embedded in one of two arms. In this paper, we focus on the phase sensitivity directed against the latter scenario. The optimal single-mode input is discussed by analyzing common states, including displaced squeezed states, displaced number states, squeezed number states, Schrödinger cat states and completely mixed states. We find that the best choice is a squeezed vacuum state and show the specific measurement scheme which is capable of saturating the corresponding phase sensitivity limit. In addition, we study the effects of several realistic factors-anti-squeezing noise, photon loss and dark counts-on the phase sensitivity. Our results suggest that sub-shot-noise-limited phase sensitivity is attainable with low noise or loss, which paves the way for practical metrology.
The fundamental precision limit of an interferometer is crucial since it bounds the best possible sensitivity one could achieve using such a device. This thesis will focus on several different interferometers and try to give the ultimate precision bounds by carefully counting all the resources used in the interferometers. The thesis begins with the basics of the quantum state of light. The fundamentals of quantum metrology are also reviewed and discussed. More specifically, the terminology of classical and quantum Cram\'er-Rao bound and classical and quantum Fisher information are introduced. Chapter 3 discusses the conclusive precision bounds in two-mode interferometer such as Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) and SU(1,1) interferometer. I revisit the quantum Fisher information approach of these two interferometers and show the discrepancy of phase sensitivity on the physically same setup. Then I establish fundamental precision estimation bounds for such device, due to the reason that many works of literature fail to accurately count the resources and knowledge of phase-to-be-estimated used in the interferometers. The analysis suggests that for a MZI, one can never do better than SNL in phase sensitivity, when an input to one of the two ports is the vacuum. If one does not allow the detector to use any external phase reference or power resource, then the precision is limited by the SNL. For a SU(1,1) interferometer, firstly, when one of the input states is restricted to be a vacuum state, I showed that by using either the phase-averaging method or the quantum Fisher information matrix method, different phase configurations of the SU(1,1) interferometer result in the same QFI. Secondly, I compared the results of the phase-averaging method and the quantum Fisher information matrix method, and then I argued that for an SU(1,1) interferometer, phase averaging or quantum Fisher information matrix method is generally required, and they are equivalent. Finally, I used the quantum Fisher information matrix method to calculate the precision limit for other common input states, such as two coherent state inputs or coherent state with squeezed vacuum inputs. In chapter 4, I will consider a passive multi-mode interferometer for multiparameter phase estimation. It was suggested that optical networks with relatively inexpensive overhead---single photon Fock states, passive optical elements, and single photon detection---can show significant improvements over classical strategies for single-parameter estimation, when the number of modes in the network is small. In this chapter, I analytically compute the quantum Cramer-Rao bound to show these
Abstract The Mach–Zehnder interferometer is a fundamental tool for measuring phase shifts between two light paths, serving as a crucial prototype for achieving high-precision measurements in various scientific and technological applications. In this study, we analyze different models for estimating the relative phase shift in a general two-arm Mach–Zehnder interferometer. We demonstrated that single-parameter estimation models can be reduced from the two-parameter estimation model by imposing appropriate constraints on the parameter space. To make quantum Fisher information of the single-parameter estimation models meaningful, the corresponding constraints must be guaranteed in the experiment implementation. Furthermore, we apply the quantum Fisher information approach to analyze the Mach–Zehnder interferometer with the an input state composed of a displaced squeezed vacuum state and a coherent state, providing insights into the precision limits of such configurations.
An important part of optical sensing is interferometry, where direct or homodyne detection at the output of an interferometer yields information about small phase shifts. Classical interferometry operates at the shot-noise limit (SNL), caused by the photon structure of light and reached when an interferometer is fed with coherent light. The use of nonclassical light at the input of an interferometer enables overcoming the SNL. In particular, squeezed light is known to be less noisy than coherent light. An interferometer fed with strongly squeezed light can, in principle, provide the phase sensitivity at the Heisenberg limit, the ultimate limit allowed by the laws of physics. However, this supersensitive operation is strongly degraded by loss – both inside the interferometer and outside it, at the stage of detection. While the former (internal loss) seems to be inevitable, the latter (detection loss) can be overcome, and we demonstrate it in our recent experiment. The clue is to amplify light at the interferometer output using a phase-sensitive optical parametric amplifier. This device does not introduce additional noise, but it amplifies the fragile quantum signal and thus makes it tolerant to loss at the detection stage. In a proof-of-principle experiment, we build a polarization Mach-Zehnder interferometer and feed it with coherent light in one port and a squeezed vacuum in another port. At one output port, we amplify light with an optical parametric amplifier and measure a phase sensitivity of 13 mrad for 1500 photons in the interferometer. This result, achieved with 50% detection efficiency, overcomes the SNL by 3 dB. Moreover, by using stronger amplification, we can overcome the SNL under detection efficiency as low as 13%. Our results outline a way to use squeezed light for real-life sensing, where the detection efficiency cannot be very high, especially in spectral ranges like middle-infrared or terahertz.
When a photon interferes with itself while traversing a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, the output port where it emerges is influenced by the phase difference between the interferometer arms. This allows for highly precise estimation of the path length difference (delay) but is extremely sensitive to phase noise. By contrast, a delay between the arms of the two-photon Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer directly affects the relative indistinguishability of the photon pair, affecting the rate of recorded coincidences. This likewise allows for delay estimation, notably less precise but with the advantage of being less sensitive to perturbations of the photons' phase. Focusing on two-photon input states, we here investigate to what degree of noise Mach-Zehnder interferometry retains its edge over Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometry. We also explore the competing benefits of different two-photon inputs for a Mach-Zehnder interferometer and under what parameter regimes each input performs best.