Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1705.07053 · Quantum

Macroscopic superpositions require tremendous measurement devices

Michalis Skotiniotis, Wolfgang Dür, Pavel Sekatski

Published Nov 21, 2017• 53 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We consider fundamental limits on the detectable size of macroscopic quantum superpositions. We argue that a full quantum mechanical treatment of system plus measurement device is required, and that a (classical) reference frame for phase or direction needs to be established to certify the quantum state. When taking the size of such a classical reference frame into account, we show that to reliably distinguish a quantum superposition state from an incoherent mixture requires a measurement device that is quadratically bigger than the superposition state. Whereas for moderate system sizes such as generated in previous experiments this is not a stringent restriction, for macroscopic superpositions of the size of a cat the required effort quickly becomes intractable, requiring measurement devices of the size of the Earth. We illustrate our results using macroscopic superposition states of photons, spins, and position. Finally, we also show how this limitation can be circumvented by dealing with superpositions in relative degrees of freedom.

DOI
10.22331/q-2017-11-21-34

Related papers

Size of quantum superpositions as measured with classical detectors

Pavel Sekatski, Nicolas Sangouard, Nicolas Gisin

We propose a criterion which defines whether a superposition of two photonic components is macroscopic. It is based on the ability to discriminate these components with a particular class of ``classical'' detectors, namely, a photon number measurement with a resolution coarse-grained by noise. We show how our criterion can be extended to a measure of the size of macroscopic superpositions by quantifying the amount of noise that can be tolerated and taking the distinctness of two Fock states differing by N photons as a reference. After applying our measure to several well-known examples, we demonstrate that the superpositions which meet our criterion are very sensitive to phase fluctuations. This suggests that quantifying the macroscopicity of a superposition state through the distinguishability of its components with ``classical'' detectors not only is a natural measure but also explains why it is difficult to observe superpositions at the macroscopic scale.

arXiv:1306.0843•Physical Review A•Jan 17, 2014•46 citations

Measurement- and comparison-based sizes of Schrödinger cat states of light

Tyler J. Volkoff, K. Birgitta Whaley

We extend several measurement-based definitions of effective superposition size to coherent state superpositions with branches composed of either single coherent states or tensor products of coherent states. These measures of superposition size depend on determining the maximal quantum distinguishability of certain states associated with the superposition state: e.g., in one measure, the maximal distinguishability of the branches of the superposition is considered as in quantum binary decision theory; in another measure, the maximal distinguishability of the initial superposition and its image after a one-parameter evolution generated by a local Hermitian operator is of interest. The scaling of the size of the superposition with the number of modes and mode intensity (i.e., photon number) is compared to the scaling of certain geometric properties of the Wigner function of the superposition and also to the superposition size estimated experimentally from decoherence. We also apply earlier comparison-based methods for determining macroscopic superposition size that require a reference Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state. The case of a hierarchical Schr\"odinger cat state with branches composed of smaller superpositions is also analyzed from a measurement-based perspective.

arXiv:1310.6053•Physical Review A•Jan 23, 2014•17 citations

Are Cloned Quantum States Macroscopic?

Florian Fröwis, Wolfgang Dür

We study quantum states produced by optimal phase covariant quantum cloners. We argue that cloned quantum superpositions are not macroscopic superpositions in the spirit of Schrödinger's cat, despite their large particle number. This is indicated by calculating several measures for macroscopic superpositions from the literature, as well as by investigating the distinguishability of the two superposed cloned states. The latter rapidly diminishes when considering imperfect detectors or noisy states and does not increase with the system size. In contrast, we find that cloned quantum states themselves are macroscopic, in the sense of both proposed measures and their usefulness in quantum metrology with an optimal scaling in system size. We investigate the applicability of cloned states for parameter estimation in the presence of different kinds of noise.

arXiv:1203.0319•Physical Review Letters•Oct 24, 2012•16 citations

Macroscopic Quantum Superpositions Cannot Be Measured, Even in Principle

Andrew Knight

I show in this paper why the universality of quantum mechanics at all scales, which implies the possibility of Schrodinger's Cat and Wigner's Friend thought experiments, cannot be experimentally confirmed, and why macroscopic superpositions in general cannot be observed or measured, even in principle. Through the relativity of quantum superposition and the transitivity of correlation, it is shown that from the perspective of an object that is in quantum superposition relative to a macroscopic measuring device and observer, the observer is already sufficiently well correlated to the measuring device that once the object correlates to the measuring device, there is no time period in which the observer can perform an appropriate interference experiment to show that the measuring device is in a superposition.

•Aug 25, 2020•1 citation

How Difficult Is It to Prove the Quantumness of Macroscropic States?

Pavel Sekatski, Nicolas Gisin, Nicolas Sangouard

General wisdom tells us that if two quantum states are "macroscopically distinguishable" then their superposition should be hard to observe. We make this intuition precise and general by quantifying the difficulty to observe the quantum nature of a superposition of two states that can be distinguished without microscopic accuracy. First, we quantify the distinguishability of any given pair of quantum states with measurement devices lacking microscopic accuracy, i.e., measurements suffering from limited resolution or limited sensitivity. Next, we quantify the required stability that has to be fulfilled by any measurement setup able to distinguish their superposition from a mere mixture. Finally, by establishing a relationship between the stability requirement and the "distinguishability with inaccurate measurements" of the two superposed states, we demonstrate that, indeed, the more distinguishable the states are, the more demanding the stability requirements.

arXiv:1402.2542•Physical Review Letters•Aug 28, 2014•42 citations

Specifying the operational meaning of quantum reference frames

Augustin Vanrietvelde

In their strongest usage, quantum reference frames have been described as referring to "the measurements performed by a superposed lab", "the perspective of a quantum particle", "the point of view of a superposed observer", etc. While exciting, these operational proposals have remained brief and ambiguous, leading to misinterpretations and criticism. Here, we provide a detailed specification and defense of the notion of a position-superposed lab or observer. We argue that this requires no exotic claims about quantum physics and raises no greater interpretive difficulty than ordinary quantum measurements. We then derive several consequences of taking this operational meaning seriously. We stress that the position-superposed observers that define quantum references frames are different from, and considerably less problematic than, the outcome-superposed observers considered in Wigners' friend scenarios. In particular, we show that outcomes obtained by a position-superposed observer may (without decohering the superposition) be broadcast to a well-localised one, in contrast with Wigner's friend scenarios, which require the outcomes to remain internal to the system at hand. Finally, we defend the possibility to roleplay a quantum reference frame from a classical reference frame.

quant-pharXiv:2607.03417•Jul 6, 2026•0 citations
We consider fundamental limits on the detectable size of macroscopic quantum superpositions. We argue that a full quantum mechanical treatment of system plus measurement device is required, and that a (classical) reference frame for phase or direction needs to be established to certify the quantum state. When taking the size of such a classical reference frame into account, we show that to reliably distinguish a quantum superposition state from an incoherent mixture requires a measurement device that is quadratically bigger than the superposition state. Whereas for moderate system sizes such as generated in previous experiments this is not a stringent restriction, for macroscopic superpositions of the size of a cat the required effort quickly becomes intractable, requiring measurement devices of the size of the Earth. We illustrate our results using macroscopic superposition states of photons, spins, and position. Finally, we also show how this limitation can be circumvented by dealing with superpositions in relative degrees of freedom.
We propose a criterion which defines whether a superposition of two photonic components is macroscopic. It is based on the ability to discriminate these components with a particular class of ``classical'' detectors, namely, a photon number measurement with a resolution coarse-grained by noise. We show how our criterion can be extended to a measure of the size of macroscopic superpositions by quantifying the amount of noise that can be tolerated and taking the distinctness of two Fock states differing by N photons as a reference. After applying our measure to several well-known examples, we demonstrate that the superpositions which meet our criterion are very sensitive to phase fluctuations. This suggests that quantifying the macroscopicity of a superposition state through the distinguishability of its components with ``classical'' detectors not only is a natural measure but also explains why it is difficult to observe superpositions at the macroscopic scale.
We extend several measurement-based definitions of effective superposition size to coherent state superpositions with branches composed of either single coherent states or tensor products of coherent states. These measures of superposition size depend on determining the maximal quantum distinguishability of certain states associated with the superposition state: e.g., in one measure, the maximal distinguishability of the branches of the superposition is considered as in quantum binary decision theory; in another measure, the maximal distinguishability of the initial superposition and its image after a one-parameter evolution generated by a local Hermitian operator is of interest. The scaling of the size of the superposition with the number of modes and mode intensity (i.e., photon number) is compared to the scaling of certain geometric properties of the Wigner function of the superposition and also to the superposition size estimated experimentally from decoherence. We also apply earlier comparison-based methods for determining macroscopic superposition size that require a reference Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state. The case of a hierarchical Schr\"odinger cat state with branches composed of smaller superpositions is also analyzed from a measurement-based perspective.
We study quantum states produced by optimal phase covariant quantum cloners. We argue that cloned quantum superpositions are not macroscopic superpositions in the spirit of Schrödinger's cat, despite their large particle number. This is indicated by calculating several measures for macroscopic superpositions from the literature, as well as by investigating the distinguishability of the two superposed cloned states. The latter rapidly diminishes when considering imperfect detectors or noisy states and does not increase with the system size. In contrast, we find that cloned quantum states themselves are macroscopic, in the sense of both proposed measures and their usefulness in quantum metrology with an optimal scaling in system size. We investigate the applicability of cloned states for parameter estimation in the presence of different kinds of noise.
I show in this paper why the universality of quantum mechanics at all scales, which implies the possibility of Schrodinger's Cat and Wigner's Friend thought experiments, cannot be experimentally confirmed, and why macroscopic superpositions in general cannot be observed or measured, even in principle. Through the relativity of quantum superposition and the transitivity of correlation, it is shown that from the perspective of an object that is in quantum superposition relative to a macroscopic measuring device and observer, the observer is already sufficiently well correlated to the measuring device that once the object correlates to the measuring device, there is no time period in which the observer can perform an appropriate interference experiment to show that the measuring device is in a superposition.
General wisdom tells us that if two quantum states are "macroscopically distinguishable" then their superposition should be hard to observe. We make this intuition precise and general by quantifying the difficulty to observe the quantum nature of a superposition of two states that can be distinguished without microscopic accuracy. First, we quantify the distinguishability of any given pair of quantum states with measurement devices lacking microscopic accuracy, i.e., measurements suffering from limited resolution or limited sensitivity. Next, we quantify the required stability that has to be fulfilled by any measurement setup able to distinguish their superposition from a mere mixture. Finally, by establishing a relationship between the stability requirement and the "distinguishability with inaccurate measurements" of the two superposed states, we demonstrate that, indeed, the more distinguishable the states are, the more demanding the stability requirements.
In their strongest usage, quantum reference frames have been described as referring to "the measurements performed by a superposed lab", "the perspective of a quantum particle", "the point of view of a superposed observer", etc. While exciting, these operational proposals have remained brief and ambiguous, leading to misinterpretations and criticism. Here, we provide a detailed specification and defense of the notion of a position-superposed lab or observer. We argue that this requires no exotic claims about quantum physics and raises no greater interpretive difficulty than ordinary quantum measurements. We then derive several consequences of taking this operational meaning seriously. We stress that the position-superposed observers that define quantum references frames are different from, and considerably less problematic than, the outcome-superposed observers considered in Wigners' friend scenarios. In particular, we show that outcomes obtained by a position-superposed observer may (without decohering the superposition) be broadcast to a well-localised one, in contrast with Wigner's friend scenarios, which require the outcomes to remain internal to the system at hand. Finally, we defend the possibility to roleplay a quantum reference frame from a classical reference frame.