Within a global physical theory, a notion of locality allows us to find and justify information-processing primitives, like non-signalling between distant agents. Here, we propose exploring the opposite direction: to take agents as the basic building blocks through which we test a physical theory, and recover operational notions of locality from signalling conditions. First, we introduce an operational model for the effective state spaces of individual agents, as well as the range of their actions. We then formulate natural secrecy conditions between agents and identify the aspects of locality relevant for signalling. We discuss the possibility of taking commutation of transformations as a primitive of physical theories, as well as applications to quantum theory and generalized probability frameworks. This 'it from bit' approach establishes an operational connection between local actions and local observations, and gives a global interpretation to concepts like discarding a subsystem or composing local functions.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Foundations of quantum mechanics and their impact on contemporary society'.
Within a global physical theory, a notion of locality allows us to find and justify information-processing primitives, like non-signalling between distant agents. Here, we propose exploring the opposite direction: to take agents as the basic building blocks through which we test a physical theory, and recover operational notions of locality from signalling conditions. First, we introduce an operational model for the effective state spaces of individual agents, as well as the range of their actions. We then formulate natural secrecy conditions between agents and identify the aspects of locality relevant for signalling. We discuss the possibility of taking commutation of transformations as a primitive of physical theories, as well as applications to quantum theory and generalized probability frameworks. This 'it from bit' approach establishes an operational connection between local actions and local observations, and gives a global interpretation to concepts like discarding a subsystem or composing local functions.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Foundations of quantum mechanics and their impact on contemporary society'.
The surprising aspects of quantum information are due to two distinctly non-classical features of the quantum world: first, different quantum states need not be orthogonal and, second, quantum states may be entangled. Non-orthogonality leads to the blurring of classical distinctions. On the other hand, entanglement leads via non-locality to teleportation and other ``entanglement-assisted'' forms of communication that go beyond what is classically possible. In this article we attempt to understand these new possibilities via an analysis of the significance of entanglement for the basic physical concepts of a ``particle'' and a ``localized physical system''. Classical particles can be individuated on the basis of qualitative differences in their sets of properties. But in entangled states the ``particle labels'' of the quantum formalism usually do not pick out such sets of individuating particle properties. It is sometimes nevertheless possible to think in terms of individual particles, which may be localized; but we argue that in general the structure of quantum mechanics is at odds with such a particle interpretation. This finally leads us to the conclusion that quantum mechanics is best seen as not belonging to the category of space-time theories, in which physical quantities are functions on space-time points. The resulting picture of the quantum world is relevant for our understanding of the way in which quantum theory is non-local, and it sheds light on the novel aspects of quantum information.
Quantum non-locality has been an extremely fruitful subject of research, leading the scientific revolution towards quantum information science, in particular, to device-independent quantum information processing. We argue that the time is ripe to work on another basic problem in the foundations of quantum physics, the quantum measurement problem, which should produce good physics in theoretical, mathematical, experimental and applied physics. We briefly review how quantum non-locality contributed to physics (including some outstanding open problems) and suggest ways in which questions around macroscopic quantumness could equally contribute to all aspects of physics.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Foundations of quantum mechanics and their impact on contemporary society'.
Is the quantum state real? Does the reduction of the state of a quantum system by a measurement on another system, entangled with it and distant, constitute a real disturbance? As is well acknowledged, there is a lack of consensus among physicists over such ontological questions concerning quantum mechanics (QM). Here we argue that it is possible, surprisingly, to address such questions on the basis of only operational considerations. More generally, we show that the operational perspective itself provides an intrinsic interpretation of QM. The theory's syntax supplies its semantics, as it were. This interpretational framework, which we call ``signaling ontology'', builds on the simple insight that unconditional quantum state reduction, namely the state change of a measured quantum system due to a nonselective measurement, can be used for signaling locally, and that this signal provides a natural, operational criterion for the reality of the state reduction. This argument is formalized in the framework of generalized probability theories and extended to multipartite systems. Among other consequences of this approach, the two questions posed above at the beginning are testably answered in the affirmative. In particular, a steering inequality is proposed whose violation, together with a local signaling condition, provides an experimental test for the reality of the remote disturbance referenced in the second question. Accordingly, quantum correlations that meet this criterion are nonlocal in an operationally real sense. A further ramification of our work is an elucidation of the contrast between quantum no-signaling and relativistic signal locality.
How far can we take the resource theoretic approach to explore physics? Resource theories like LOCC, reference frames and quantum thermodynamics have proven a powerful tool to study how agents who are subject to certain constraints can act on physical systems. This approach has advanced our understanding of fundamental physical principles, such as the second law of thermodynamics, and provided operational measures to quantify resources such as entanglement or information content. In this work, we significantly extend the approach and range of applicability of resource theories. Firstly we generalize the notion of resource theories to include any description or knowledge that agents may have of a physical state, beyond the density operator formalism. We show how to relate theories that differ in the language used to describe resources, like micro and macroscopic thermodynamics. Finally, we take a top-down approach to locality, in which a subsystem structure is derived from a global theory rather than assumed. The extended framework introduced here enables us to formalize new tasks in the language of resource theories, ranging from tomography, cryptography, thermodynamics and foundational questions, both within and beyond quantum theory.
An operational concept of locality whose quantum violation is indicated independently of any other assumption(s) seems to be lacking in the quantum foundations literature so far. Bell's theorem only shows that quantum correlations violate the conjunction of the ontological assumptions of localism and determinism. Taking a cue from computational complexity theory, here we define such a concept of locality in terms of a class of operational decision problems, and propose that Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering in its basic asymmetric formulation gives a specific realization of this class. Various nonclassical (convex) operational theories, including quantum mechanics, are shown to be nonlocal according to this operational criterion. We discuss several ramifications arising from this result. It indicates a basic difference between quantum no-signaling and relativistic no-signaling, and suggests an information theoretic derivation of the former from other basic principles in the convex framework. It elucidates the connection between two different bounds on nonlocality, due to Oppenheim and Wehner (2010) and Banik et al. (2015), thereby highlighting the interplay and contrast between uncertainty and measurement incompatibility. Our result provides an argument supporting the realist interpretation of the quantum state, and helps clarify why Spekkens' toy model (2007) features steering but not Bell nonlocality.
In this paper, I propose a project of enlisting quantum information science as a source of task-oriented axioms for use in the investigation of operational theories in a general framework capable of encompassing quantum mechanics, classical theory, and more. Whatever else they may be, quantum states of systems are compendia of probabilities for the outcomes of possible operations we may perform on the systems: ``operational theories.'' I discuss appropriate general frameworks for such theories, in which convexity plays a key role. Such frameworks are appropriate for investigating what things look like from an ``inside view,'' i.e. for describing perspectival information that one subsystem of the world can have about another. Understanding how such views can combine, and whether an overall ``geometric'' picture (``outside view'') coordinating them all can be had, even if this picture is very different in nature from the structure of the perspectives within it, is the key to understanding whether we may be able to achieve a unified, ``objective'' physical view in which quantum mechanics is the appropriate description for certain perspectives, or whether quantum mechanics is truly telling us we must go beyond this ``geometric'' conception of physics. The nature of information, its flow and processing, as seen from various operational persepectives, is likely to be key to understanding whether and how such coordination and unification can be achieved.