An operational concept of locality whose quantum violation is indicated independently of any other assumption(s) seems to be lacking in the quantum foundations literature so far. Bell's theorem only shows that quantum correlations violate the conjunction of the ontological assumptions of localism and determinism. Taking a cue from computational complexity theory, here we define such a concept of locality in terms of a class of operational decision problems, and propose that Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering in its basic asymmetric formulation gives a specific realization of this class. Various nonclassical (convex) operational theories, including quantum mechanics, are shown to be nonlocal according to this operational criterion. We discuss several ramifications arising from this result. It indicates a basic difference between quantum no-signaling and relativistic no-signaling, and suggests an information theoretic derivation of the former from other basic principles in the convex framework. It elucidates the connection between two different bounds on nonlocality, due to Oppenheim and Wehner (2010) and Banik et al. (2015), thereby highlighting the interplay and contrast between uncertainty and measurement incompatibility. Our result provides an argument supporting the realist interpretation of the quantum state, and helps clarify why Spekkens' toy model (2007) features steering but not Bell nonlocality.
An operational concept of locality whose quantum violation is indicated independently of any other assumption(s) seems to be lacking in the quantum foundations literature so far. Bell's theorem only shows that quantum correlations violate the conjunction of the ontological assumptions of localism and determinism. Taking a cue from computational complexity theory, here we define such a concept of locality in terms of a class of operational decision problems, and propose that Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering in its basic asymmetric formulation gives a specific realization of this class. Various nonclassical (convex) operational theories, including quantum mechanics, are shown to be nonlocal according to this operational criterion. We discuss several ramifications arising from this result. It indicates a basic difference between quantum no-signaling and relativistic no-signaling, and suggests an information theoretic derivation of the former from other basic principles in the convex framework. It elucidates the connection between two different bounds on nonlocality, due to Oppenheim and Wehner (2010) and Banik et al. (2015), thereby highlighting the interplay and contrast between uncertainty and measurement incompatibility. Our result provides an argument supporting the realist interpretation of the quantum state, and helps clarify why Spekkens' toy model (2007) features steering but not Bell nonlocality.
Is the quantum state real? Does the reduction of the state of a quantum system by a measurement on another system, entangled with it and distant, constitute a real disturbance? As is well acknowledged, there is a lack of consensus among physicists over such ontological questions concerning quantum mechanics (QM). Here we argue that it is possible, surprisingly, to address such questions on the basis of only operational considerations. More generally, we show that the operational perspective itself provides an intrinsic interpretation of QM. The theory's syntax supplies its semantics, as it were. This interpretational framework, which we call ``signaling ontology'', builds on the simple insight that unconditional quantum state reduction, namely the state change of a measured quantum system due to a nonselective measurement, can be used for signaling locally, and that this signal provides a natural, operational criterion for the reality of the state reduction. This argument is formalized in the framework of generalized probability theories and extended to multipartite systems. Among other consequences of this approach, the two questions posed above at the beginning are testably answered in the affirmative. In particular, a steering inequality is proposed whose violation, together with a local signaling condition, provides an experimental test for the reality of the remote disturbance referenced in the second question. Accordingly, quantum correlations that meet this criterion are nonlocal in an operationally real sense. A further ramification of our work is an elucidation of the contrast between quantum no-signaling and relativistic signal locality.
It is shown that when properly analyzed using principles consistent with the use of a Hilbert space to describe microscopic properties, quantum mechanics is a local theory: one system cannot influence another system with which it does not interact. Claims to the contrary based on quantum violations of Bell inequalities are argued to be incorrect. A specific example traces a violation of the CHSH Bell inequality in the case of a spin-3/2 particle to the noncommutation of certain quantum operators in a situation where (non)locality is not an issue. A consistent histories analysis of what quantum measurements measure, in terms of quantum properties, is used to identify the basic problem with derivations of Bell inequalities: the use of classical concepts (hidden variables) rather than a probabilistic structure appropriate to the quantum domain. A difficulty with the original Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) argument for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics is the use of a counterfactual argument which is not valid if one assumes that Hilbert-space quantum mechanics is complete; locality is not an issue. The quantum correlations that violate Bell inequalities can be understood using local quantum common causes. Wave-function collapse and Schr\"odinger steering are calculational procedures, not physical processes. A general Principle of Einstein Locality rules out nonlocal influences between noninteracting quantum systems. Some suggestions are made for changes in terminology that could clarify discussions of quantum foundations and be less confusing to students.
It is shown that when properly analyzed using principles consistent with the
use of a Hilbert space to describe microscopic properties, quantum mechanics is
a local theory: one system cannot influence another system with which it does
not interact. Claims to the contrary based on quantum violations of Bell
inequalities are shown to be incorrect. A specific example traces a violation
of the CHSH Bell inequality in the case of a spin-3/2 particle to the
noncommutation of certain quantum operators in a situation where (non)locality
is not an issue. A consistent histories analysis of what quantum measurements
measure, in terms of quantum properties, is used to identify the basic problem
with derivations of Bell inequalities: the use of classical concepts (hidden
variables) rather than a probabilistic structure appropriate to the quantum
domain. A difficulty with the original Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) argument
for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics is the use of a counterfactual
argument which is not valid if one assumes that Hilbert-space quantum mechanics
is complete; locality is not an issue. The quantum correlations that violate
Bell inequalities can be understood using local quantum common causes.
Wavefunction collapse and Schr\odinger steering are calculational procedures,
not physical processes. A general Principle of Einstein Locality rules out
nonlocal influences between noninteracting quantum systems. Some suggestions
are made for changes in terminology that could clarify discussions of quantum
foundations and be less confusing to students.
Quantum nonlocality has recently been classified into three distinct types: quantum entanglement, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering, and Bell's nonlocality. Experimentally Bell's nonlocality is usually tested by quantum violation of the Clause-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality in the two-qubit system. Bell's nonlocality is the strongest type of nonlocality, also due this reason Bell-test experiments have encountered both the locality loophole and the detection loophole for a very long time. As a weaker nonlocality, EPR steering naturally escapes from the locality loophole and is correspondingly easier to be demonstrated without the detection loophole. In this work, we trigger an extraordinary approach to investigate Bell's nonlocality, which is strongly based on the EPR steering. We present a theorem, showing that for any two-qubit state τ, if its mapped state ρ is EPR steerable, then the state τ must be Bell nonlocal. The result not only pinpoints a deep connection between EPR steering and Bell's nonlocality, but also sheds a new light to realize a loophole-free Bell-test experiment (without the CHSH inequality) through the violation of steering inequality.
Quantum mechanics, despite its extraordinary success in describing microscopic phenomena, continues to raise foundational questions concerning measurement, nonlocality, and the nature of physical reality. These issues are exemplified by the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox and the Bell inequality, which contrast quantum correlations with classical notions of locality and realism. In this work, we critically examine the assumptions underlying Bell’s theorem in light of the incompatible and contextual nature of quantum observables. We show that Bell’s constraint on simultaneous definite values for incompatible observables, together with the assumption of hidden variables, is not applicable to quantum mechanics itself, which is inherently nonclassical and contextual. When measurement is modeled as a local system-environment interaction within the framework of quantum decoherence, the resulting dynamics remain entirely local and unitary in the EPR scenario. Decoherence naturally selects pointer states and suppresses interference, giving rise to the appearance of wavefunction collapse consistent with quantum predictions. Importantly, the Bell correlations obtained in this framework reproduce the standard quantum results and are independent of both system-bath and inter-bath interactions, which affect only the rate of decoherence. Our analysis suggests that, in the EPR scenario, quantum mechanics can be both local and realistic when the wavefunction is treated as an ontic description of reality within the decoherence framework, offering a potential route toward a locally realistic quantum theory aligned with Einstein’s vision. This work contributes to a more rigorous foundation for quantum mechanics, providing insights that can accelerate progress in quantum computing and nanoenergy harvesting.
Nonlocality and contextuality are at the root of conceptual puzzles in quantum mechanics, and are key resources for quantum advantage in information-processing tasks. Bell nonlocality is best understood as the incompatibility between quantum correlations and the classical theory of causality, applied to relativistic causal structure. Contextuality, on the other hand, is on a more controversial foundation. In this work, I provide a common conceptual ground between nonlocality and contextuality as violations of classical causality. First, I show that Bell inequalities can be derived solely from the assumptions of no-signalling and no-fine-tuning of the causal model. This removes two extra assumptions from a recent result from Wood and Spekkens, and remarkably, does not require any assumption related to independence of measurement settings -- unlike all other derivations of Bell inequalities. I then introduce a formalism to represent contextuality scenarios within causal models and show that all classical causal models for violations of a Kochen-Specker inequality require fine-tuning. Thus the quantum violation of classical causality goes beyond the case of space-like separated systems, and manifests already in scenarios involving single systems.