We construct quantifiable generalizations of Leggett-Garg tests for macro- and mesoscopic realism and noninvasive measurability that apply when not all outcomes of measurement can be identified as arising from one of two macroscopically distinguishable states. We show how quantum mechanics predicts a negation of the Leggett-Garg premises for strategies involving ideal negative-result, weak, and minimally invasive (``nonclumsy'') projective measurements on dynamical entangled systems, as might be realized with Bose-Einstein condensates in a double-well potential, path-entangled NOON states, and atom interferometers. Potential loopholes associated with each strategy are discussed.
In the tests for macrorealism proposed by Leggett and Garg, the temporal correlation functions of a dichotomic variable
Q must be measured in a noninvasive way to rule out alternative classical explanations of Leggett-Garg inequality violations. Ideal negative measurements in which a null result is argued to be a noninvasive determination of the system's state are often used. From a quantum-mechanical perspective, such a measurement collapses the wave function and will therefore typically be found to be invasive under any experimental check. Here, a simple modified ideal negative measurement protocol is described for measuring the correlation functions, which is argued to be noninvasive from both classical and quantum perspectives and hence the noninvasiveness can then be checked experimentally, thereby permitting a quantitative measure of the degree of clumsiness of the measurement. It is also shown how this procedure may be extended to measure higher-order correlation functions, and a number of higher-order conditions for macrorealism are derived.
We show how one may test macroscopic local realism where, differently from conventional Bell tests, all relevant measurements that lead to a violation of a Bell inequality need only distinguish between two macroscopically distinct states of the system being measured. Here, measurements give macroscopically distinct outcomes for some property of the system and do not resolve microscopically (of order $\ensuremath{\hbar}$). To obtain a quantifiable test, we define
N-scopic local realism where the outcomes are separated by an amount $\ensuremath{\sim}N$. We show for
N up to 20 that violations of
N-scopic local realism are predicted for entangled systems of
N bosons at each of two sites. We further demonstrate for arbitrarily large $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ the violation of $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-scopic local realism, for entangled superpositions of coherent states with amplitudes $\ensuremath{\sim}\phantom{\rule{1.0pt}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\alpha}$, infinitely separated in phase space, as $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$. To achieve the Bell violations, the two separated subsystems evolve dynamically according to a local nonlinear unitary interaction. The tests may be understood in two ways. First, they are macroscopic Bell tests involving spacelike separated measurement events, where the choice of measurement setting at each site corresponds to a choice between two different times of local interaction. The interaction may be seen as the unitary stage of a local measurement process. Second, the proposal is a strong version of a Leggett-Garg test of "macrorealism" that uses two trajectories, where the usual assumption of noninvasive measurability as applied to measurements at one site is replaced by that of macroscopic locality. For
N=1, tests are feasible and give a way to demonstrate ``no classical trajectories'' without the assumption of noninvasive measurability, using instead that of locality.
The violation of a Leggett–Garg inequality confirms the incompatibility between quantum mechanics and the combined premises (called macro-realism) of macroscopic realism (MR) and noninvasive measurability (NIM). Arguments can be given that the incompatibility arises because MR fails for systems in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states—or else, that NIM fails. In this paper, we consider a strong negation of macro-realism, involving superpositions of coherent states, where the NIM premise is replaced by Bell’s locality premise. We follow recent work and propose the validity of a subset of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) and Leggett–Garg premises, referred to as weak macroscopic realism (wMR). In finding consistency with wMR, we identify that the Leggett–Garg inequalities are violated because of failure of both MR and NIM, but also that both are valid in a weaker (less restrictive) sense. Weak MR is distinguished from deterministic macroscopic realism (dMR) by recognizing that a measurement involves a reversible unitary interaction that establishes the measurement setting. Weak MR posits that a predetermined value for the outcome of a measurement can be attributed to the system after the interaction, when the measurement setting is experimentally specified. An extended definition of wMR considers the “element of reality” defined by EPR for system A, where one can predict with certainty the outcome of a measurement on A by performing a measurement on system B. Weak MR posits that this element of reality exists once the unitary interaction determining the measurement setting at B has occurred. We demonstrate compatibility of systems violating Leggett–Garg inequalities with wMR but point out that dMR has been shown to be falsifiable. Other tests of wMR are proposed, the predictions of wMR agreeing with quantum mechanics. Finally, we compare wMR with macro-realism models discussed elsewhere. An argument in favour of wMR is presented: wMR resolves a potential contradiction pointed out by Leggett and Garg between failure of macro-realism and assumptions intrinsic to quantum measurement theory.
Macrorealism is a classical world view asserting that the properties of macro-objects exist independently and irrespective of observation. One practical approach to test this view in quantum theory is to observe the quantum coherence for a macro-object in an interference experiment. An elegant and conceptually appealing approach for testing the notion of macrorealism in quantum theory is through the violation of Leggett-Garg inequality. However, a conclusive Leggett-Garg test hinges on how the noninvasive measurability criteria are guaranteed in an experiment and remains a debated issue to date. In this work, we connect the practical and the conceptual approaches for testing the macrorealism through the weak value. We argue that whenever a quantum effect is observed in an interference experiment there is an existence of anomalous weak value. Further, we demonstrate that whenever such weak value exists, one obtains the violation of a Leggett-Garg inequality in any interference experiment. Since in a path-only interference experiment effectively no prior measurement is performed, the Leggett-Garg test of macrorealism presented here is without assuming the noninvasive measurability. We provide a rigorous discussion about the assumptions involved in the Leggett-Garg scenario and how our scheme fits into it. Further, we provide a simple argument about the macrorealistic understanding of our results by using the recently developed approach involving quasiprobability.
We consider tests of Leggett-Garg's macrorealism and of macroscopic local realism, where for spacelike separated measurements the assumption of macroscopic noninvasive measurability is justified by that of macroscopic Bell locality. We give a mapping between the Bell and Leggett-Garg experiments for microscopic qubits based on spin-
1/2 eigenstates and gedanken experiments for macroscopic qubits based on two macroscopically distinct coherent states $|\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\rangle}$ and $|\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\rangle}$ (as $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$). In this mapping, the unitary rotation ${U}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ of the Stern-Gerlach analyzer or polarizing beam splitter is realized by a local interaction $H=\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}{\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{n}}^{4}$ where $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{n}$ is the number of quanta. By adjusting the time of interaction, one alters the measurement setting $\ensuremath{\theta}$. We thus predict violations of Leggett-Garg and Bell inequalities in a macroscopic regime where coarse-grained measurements $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{M}$ need only discriminate between two macroscopically distinct coherent states. To interpret the violations, we distinguish between different definitions of macroscopic realism. Deterministic macroscopic local realism (dMR) assumes the system is in a state with a definite outcome ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ for the measurement $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{M}$ prior to the unitary rotation ${U}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$, and is negated by the violations. Weak macroscopic realism (wMR) assumes a definite outcome for systems prepared in a superposition ${\ensuremath{\psi}}_{\text{pointer}}$ of two macroscopically distinct eigenstates of $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{M}$, after the unitary rotation ${U}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$. We find that wMR can be viewed consistently with the violations and with the predictions of quantum mechanics for two tests of wMR. A model is presented in which wMR holds and the macroscopic violations emerge over the course of the unitary dynamics occurring at both sites. Implications for the realism of the micro-macro state generated during a quantum measurement are discussed. Finally, we point out an EPR-type paradox, which demonstrates inconsistency between wMR and the completeness of quantum mechanics at a microscopic level.
The Leggett-Garg inequality holds for any macrorealistic system that is being measured noninvasively. A violation of the inequality can signal that a system does not conform to our primal intuition about the physical world. Alternatively, a violation can simply indicate that a ``clumsy'' experimental technique led to invasive measurements. Here, we consider a recent Leggett-Garg test designed to try to rule out the mundane second possibility. We tailor this Leggett-Garg test to the IBM 5Q Quantum Experience system and find compelling evidence that qubit
Q2 of the system cannot be described by noninvasive macrorealism.