Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1611.09299

Reply to "Comment on `Gleason-type theorem including qubits and projective measurements: the Born rule beyond quantum physics' ", by Michael J. W. Hall

F. De Zela

Published Nov 28, 2016• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We present a reply to the objections raised by M. J. W. Hall against our extension of Gleason's theorem.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1611.09299

Related papers

Gleason-Type Theorem for Projective Measurements, Including Qubits: The Born Rule Beyond Quantum Physics

F. De Zela

Foundations of Physics•May 26, 2016•11 citations

Comment on "Gleason-Type Theorem for Projective Measurements, Including Qubits" by F. De Zela

Michael J. W. Hall

It has recently been claimed by De Zela that Gleason's theorem, for probability measures on the lattice of projection operators, can be extended to qubits by adding assumptions related to continuity and the existence of 'eigenstates'. This amounts to a claim of the derivation of Born's rule for Hermitian qubit observables. I point out a simple counterexample, and the flaw in De Zela's derivation (these are equally applicable to the repetition of the derivation given in a recent Reply). I also briefly discuss a valid extension to qubits given by Busch.

arXiv:1611.00613•Nov 2, 2016•3 citations

Reply to "Comment on ‘Association between quantum paradoxes based on weak values and a realistic interpretation of quantum measurements’"

Anonymous

Physical Review A•May 12, 2025•0 citations

A Gleason-type theorem for qubits based on mixtures of projective measurements

Stefan Weigert, Victoria J Wright

We derive Born's rule and the density-operator formalism for quantum systems with Hilbert spaces of dimension two or larger. Our extension of Gleason's theorem only relies upon the consistent assignment of probabilities to the outcomes of projective measurements and their classical mixtures. This assumption is significantly weaker than those required for existing Gleason-type theorems valid in dimension two.

•Jan 10, 2019•28 citations

Reply to a Comment on “Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity”

Richard Healey

arXiv:1907.10395•Foundations of Physics•Aug 15, 2019•3 citations

Gleason's Theorem for a Qubit as Part of a Composite System

Vincenzo Fiorentino, Stefan Weigert

We extend Gleason's theorem to the two-dimensional Hilbert space of a qubit by invoking the standard axiom that describes composite quantum systems. The tensor-product structure allows us to derive density matrices and Born's rule for $d=2$ from a simple requirement: the probabilities assigned to measurement outcomes must not depend on whether a system is considered on its own or as a subsystem of a larger one. In line with Gleason's original theorem, our approach assigns probabilities only to projection-valued measures, while other known extensions rely on considering more general classes of measurements. This extension of Gleason's theorem to two-dimensional systems is shown to remain valid for some foil theories of quantum theory.

quant-pharXiv:2511.15607•Physical Review A•Nov 20, 2025•0 citations
It has recently been claimed by De Zela that Gleason's theorem, for probability measures on the lattice of projection operators, can be extended to qubits by adding assumptions related to continuity and the existence of 'eigenstates'. This amounts to a claim of the derivation of Born's rule for Hermitian qubit observables. I point out a simple counterexample, and the flaw in De Zela's derivation (these are equally applicable to the repetition of the derivation given in a recent Reply). I also briefly discuss a valid extension to qubits given by Busch.
We extend Gleason's theorem to the two-dimensional Hilbert space of a qubit by invoking the standard axiom that describes composite quantum systems. The tensor-product structure allows us to derive density matrices and Born's rule for d=2d=2d=2 from a simple requirement: the probabilities assigned to measurement outcomes must not depend on whether a system is considered on its own or as a subsystem of a larger one. In line with Gleason's original theorem, our approach assigns probabilities only to projection-valued measures, while other known extensions rely on considering more general classes of measurements. This extension of Gleason's theorem to two-dimensional systems is shown to remain valid for some foil theories of quantum theory.