arXiv:1611.06005 · Europhysics Letters (EPL)

II. Comment on “Critique and correction of the currently accepted solution of the infinite spherical well in quantum mechanics” by Huang Young-Sea and Thomann Hans-Rudolph

A. Prados, Carlos A. Plata

Published Dec 1, 2016• 1 citation

Abstract

II. Comment on “Critique and correction of the currently accepted solution of the infinite spherical well in quantum mechanics” by Huang Young-Sea and Thomann Hans-Rudolph, Prados, Antonio, Plata, Carlos A.

DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/116/60011

Related papers

I. Comment on “Critique and correction of the currently accepted solution of the infinite spherical well in quantum mechanics” by Huang Young-Sea and Thomann Hans-Rudolf

Mohammad Khorrami

Europhysics Letters (EPL)Dec 1, 20161 citation

Critique and correction of the currently accepted solution of the infinite spherical well in quantum mechanics

Young‐Sea Huang, Hans-Rudolf Thomann

An error in the currently accepted solution of the problem of the infinite spherical well is pointed out.The problem is then solved by considering the self-adjointness of the Hamiltonian operator.In contrast to the currently accepted solution, the radial probability density for finding the particle at the center of the spherical well is not necessarily zero, in accordance with the solutions obtained.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)Sep 1, 20167 citations

Comments on “Agreement between Classical and Quantum Mechanical Solutions for a Linear Potential inside a One-Dimensional Infinite Potential Well”

Noble M. Johnson, John N. Churchill

American Journal of PhysicsDec 1, 19691 citation

Comment to the paper “Quantum mechanical effects for a hydrogen atom confined in a dielectric spherical microcavity”

Michael‐Adán Martínez‐Sánchez, Rubicelia Vargas, Jorge Garza

Chemical PhysicsAug 7, 20230 citations

Can quantum mechanics be considered as statistical?(comment)

Aurélien Drezet

This is a short manuscript which was initially submitted to Nature Physics as a comment to the PBR (Pusey, M. F., Barrett, J., Rudolph, T) paper just after its publication in 2012. The comment was not accepted. I however think that the argumentation is correct: one is free to judge!

arXiv:1209.2862Sep 13, 20121 citation

Comment on “The hidden symmetry for a quantum system with an infinitely deep square-well potential,” by Shi-Hai Dong and Zhong-Qi Ma [Am. J. Phys. 70 (5), 520–521 (2002)]

Asim Gangopadhyaya, Jeffry V. Mallow A

American Journal of PhysicsJan 10, 20031 citation