Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1610.07479

Coalescence and anti-coalescence of surface plasmons on a lossy beamsplitter

Benjamin Vest, Marie-Christine Dheur, Éloïse Devaux, Thomas W. Ebbesen, Alexandre Baron, Emmanuel Rousseau, Jean‐Paul Hugonin, Jean‐Jacques Greffet, Gaétan Messin, François Marquier

Published Oct 24, 2016• 42 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Surface plasma waves are collective oscillations of electrons that propagate along a metal-dielectric interface. In the last ten years, several groups have reproduced fundamental quantum optics experiments with surface plasmons. Observation of single-plasmon states, waveparticle duality, preservation of entanglement of photons in plasmon-assisted transmission, and more recently, two-plasmon interference have been reported. While losses are detrimental for the observation of squeezed states, they can be seen as a new degree of freedom in the design of plasmonic devices, thus revealing new quantum interference scenarios. Here we report the observation of two-plasmon quantum interference between two freely-propagating, non-guided SPPs interfering on lossy plasmonic beamsplitters. As discussed in the article "Quantum optics of lossy beam splitters" by Barnett et al. (Phys. Rev. A 57, 2134 (1998)) , the presence of losses (scattering or absorption) relaxes constraints on the reflection and transmission factors of the beamsplitter, allowing the control of their relative phase. By using this degree of freedom, we are able to observe either coalescence or anticoalescence of identical plasmons.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1610.07479

Related papers

Revisiting quantum optics with surface plasmons (Orale)

François Marquier, Marie-Christine Dheur, Benjamin Vest +3 more

Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) result from collective oscillations of free electrons coupled to an electromagnetic field at a plane interface between a metal and a dielectric medium. As photons, SPPs can be considered either as waves or as bosonic particles [1] and they can experience striking quantum interferences such as Hong-Ou-Mandel (HOM) effect [2]. We use in this paper a plasmonic platform (Fig.1) that can convert photons into plasmons, and separate or recombine them on a plasmonic beamsplitter [3]. Single SPPs are excited using single photons created by parametric down conversion into a periodically-poled KTP crystal. The platform is placed in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer in order to vary the path difference between SPPs before impinging on the beamsplitter. The setup allows us to revisit quantum optics experiments using SPP as carriers of the quantum of energy. Using the same device, we can test the wave-particle duality, two-particle (HOM) interference and non-local control of single plasmon interference using the entanglement between a photon and a SPP [4]. In the case of the HOM experiment, we demonstrate that the losses can be used as a new degree of freedom [5]. Playing with the dephasing between transmission and reflection coefficient of the beamsplitter, we can observe a peak instead of the usually expected dip in the HOM interference (Fig.2), i.e. an anti-coalescence effect of SPP. In this talk, we will introduce the plasmonic device main features as well as the different quantum plasmonics experiments that have been performed thanks to the SPP beamsplitter. These results are essential to understand the SPP quantum behavior or to develop hybrid plasmon-photon systems for potential future applications in quantum communication mediated by SPP. [1] JM Elson and R.H. Ritchie, Phys. Rev. B 4, 4129 (1971) [2] J.S. Fakonas et al., Nat. Phot. 8, 317 (2014) [3] M.C. Dheur et al. , Sc. Advances 2, e151574 (2016) [4] M.C. Dheur et al. ArXiv 1610.07493, B. Vest et al. ArXiv 1610.07479 [5] S. Barnett et al., Phys. Rev. A 57, 2134 (1998) Fig.1: Plasmonic platform used for the quantum optics experiment (B). It consists in two SPP launchers (A), a plasmonic beamsplitter, and two slits to convert SPP to photons in the glass substrate. The plasmonic interference can thus be probed using single photon counting modules. Fig2: HOM experiment on a lossy plasmonic beamsplitter, whose complex amplitude reflection and transmission factors are denoted r and t respectively. The usual HOM dip is observed when r = it (left), a peak in the coincidence rate is shown when r = t.

•Jan 8, 2017•0 citations

Quantum Interference and Entanglement of Surface Plasmons

James S. Fakonas

Surface plasma waves arise from the collective oscillations of billions of electrons at the surface of a metal in unison. The simplest way to quantize these waves is by direct analogy to electromagnetic fields in free space, with the surface plasmon, the quantum of the surface plasma wave, playing the same role as the photon. It follows that surface plasmons should exhibit all of the same quantum phenomena that photons do, including quantum interference and entanglement. Unlike photons, however, surface plasmons suffer strong losses that arise from the scattering of free electrons from other electrons, phonons, and surfaces. Under some circumstances, these interactions might also cause “pure dephasing,” which entails a loss of coherence without absorption. Quantum descriptions of plasmons usually do not account for these effects explicitly, and sometimes ignore them altogether. In light of this extra microscopic complexity, it is necessary for experiments to test quantum models of surface plasmons. In this thesis, I describe two such tests that my collaborators and I performed. The first was a plasmonic version of the Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment, in which we observed two-particle quantum interference between plasmons with a visibility of 93 ± 1%. This measurement confirms that surface plasmons faithfully reproduce this effect with the same visibility and mutual coherence time, to within measurement error, as in the photonic case. The second experiment demonstrated path entanglement between surface plasmons with a visibility of 95 ± 2%, confirming that a path-entangled state can indeed survive without measurable decoherence. This measurement suggests that elastic scattering mechanisms of the type that might cause pure dephasing must have been weak enough not to significantly perturb the state of the metal under the experimental conditions we investigated. These two experiments add quantum interference and path entanglement to a growing list of quantum phenomena that surface plasmons appear to exhibit just as clearly as photons, confirming the predictions of the simplest quantum models.

•Jan 8, 2015•0 citations

Quantum properties of plasmonic waveguides

Frederik Dieleman

This thesis investigates properties of quantum states of light while travelling as surface plasmon polaritons in plasmonic waveguides and structures. The bosonic nature of SPPs has been shown in previous work by performing a Hong-Ou-Mandel interference experiment with a plasmonic scattering-based beam splitter. Here, we show the same interference with a higher statistical power thanks to an improved set-up. A visibility of 59 ± 1 % is obtained in the two-photon interference, clearly breaking the classical limit of 50 %. The importance of the phase-relations between the different modes in the beam splitter is experimentally probed. The output state of the interference is then further analyzed by a quantum state tomography set-up. This makes it possible to quantify the entanglement generated in the interference. As the interference happens in the plasmonic beam splitter, this shows, to our knowledge for the first time, entanglement generated in a plasmonic structure. Together with the recent results in terms of entanglement and coherence preservation of SPPs, this clearly shows the potential of quantum plasmonic devices. To move into the realm of applications, we also investigate theoretically the enhancements in sensitivity quantum states of light can deliver for plasmonic sensing. It is shown that despite the losses, quantum metrology techniques can be useful in an interferometer with plasmonic waveguides. Considering the strengths and successes of plasmonic sensing techniques in a wide range of fields, we envision that entangled and squeezed states of light will become a new route to push the limits in sensitivity.

•Mar 1, 2017•1 citation

Plasmonic interferences of two-particle N00N states

Benjamin Vest, Ilan Shlesinger, Marie-Christine Dheur +4 more

Quantum plasmonics lies at the intersection between nanophotonics and quantum optics. Genuine quantum effects can be observed with non-classical states such as Fock states and with entangled states. A N00N state combines both aspects: it is a quantum superposition state of a Fock state with N excitations in two spatial modes. Here we report the first observation of two-plasmon ( N = 2) N00N state interferences using a plasmonic beamsplitter etched on a planar interface between gold and air. We analyze in detail the role of losses at the beamsplitter and during the propagation along the metal/air interface. While the intrinsic losses of the beamsplitter are responsible for the emergence of quantum nonlinear absorption, we note that N00N states decay N times faster than classical states due to propagation losses.

arXiv:1807.08515•New Journal of Physics•May 3, 2018•18 citations

Controlling Optical Quantum Interference with Plasmonic Metasurfaces

Lawrence M. Qin, Sky Semone, Matthew J. Brandsema +1 more

The ability to efficiently control optical quantum interference by the same device is a challenging task that promises to enable key operations in quantum information processing. Here, we tackle this problem by presenting a composite quantum plasmonic metasurface operating as an ultrathin non-unitary beamsplitter capable of achieving both single photon bosonic bunching and fermionic anti-bunching interference just by varying the incident photons frequency or changing the design dimensions. The presented metasurface combines a plasmonic grating corrugated by periodic nanoslits that can achieve extraordinary optical transmission with additional nanostripes on top forming nanocavities characterized by localized gap plasmon resonances. The photon-photon interactions are analyzed based on calculating the quantum coalescence metric which accurately portrays the obtained bunching or anti-bunching quantum interference. The presented quantum interference operation is applicable to both fundamental non-classical light interactions and in the design of more applied quantum optical logic gates used in quantum computing and communications.

physics.opticsCross-listedarXiv:2610.27226•Oct 21, 2026

Revisiting quantum optics with surface plasmons

Benjamin Vest, Marie-Christine Dheur, Ilan Shlesinger +5 more

In this experiment, pairs of identical photons at 806 nm through a single-photon down conversion in a nonlinear crystal that are sent onto a plasmonic platform were generated. The plasmonic platform consists in several elements that are etched on a 300 nm-thick gold film on top of a silica substrate, on a total 40x40μm footprint. The input channels of the plasmonic platform are made of two unidirectional launchers. Those asymmetric 11-grooves gratings have been designed to efficiently couple a normally incident Gaussian mode into directional SPPs. The SPPs generated by each launcher then freely propagate and recombine on the surface plasmon beamsplitter (SPBS). It is made of two identical grooves in the metallic surface, oriented at 45° with respect to the propagation direction of waves. The succession of metal and air allows a scattering process that generates both a transmitted and a reflected SPP. The SPPs then propagate towards two large outcoupling strip slits. They are decoupled into photons propagating in the glass substrate on the rear of the platform.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC)•Jun 1, 2017•0 citations
Surface plasma waves are collective oscillations of electrons that propagate along a metal-dielectric interface. In the last ten years, several groups have reproduced fundamental quantum optics experiments with surface plasmons. Observation of single-plasmon states, waveparticle duality, preservation of entanglement of photons in plasmon-assisted transmission, and more recently, two-plasmon interference have been reported. While losses are detrimental for the observation of squeezed states, they can be seen as a new degree of freedom in the design of plasmonic devices, thus revealing new quantum interference scenarios. Here we report the observation of two-plasmon quantum interference between two freely-propagating, non-guided SPPs interfering on lossy plasmonic beamsplitters. As discussed in the article "Quantum optics of lossy beam splitters" by Barnett et al. (Phys. Rev. A 57, 2134 (1998)) , the presence of losses (scattering or absorption) relaxes constraints on the reflection and transmission factors of the beamsplitter, allowing the control of their relative phase. By using this degree of freedom, we are able to observe either coalescence or anticoalescence of identical plasmons.
Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) result from collective oscillations of free electrons coupled to an electromagnetic field at a plane interface between a metal and a dielectric medium. As photons, SPPs can be considered either as waves or as bosonic particles [1] and they can experience striking quantum interferences such as Hong-Ou-Mandel (HOM) effect [2]. We use in this paper a plasmonic platform (Fig.1) that can convert photons into plasmons, and separate or recombine them on a plasmonic beamsplitter [3]. Single SPPs are excited using single photons created by parametric down conversion into a periodically-poled KTP crystal. The platform is placed in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer in order to vary the path difference between SPPs before impinging on the beamsplitter. The setup allows us to revisit quantum optics experiments using SPP as carriers of the quantum of energy. Using the same device, we can test the wave-particle duality, two-particle (HOM) interference and non-local control of single plasmon interference using the entanglement between a photon and a SPP [4]. In the case of the HOM experiment, we demonstrate that the losses can be used as a new degree of freedom [5]. Playing with the dephasing between transmission and reflection coefficient of the beamsplitter, we can observe a peak instead of the usually expected dip in the HOM interference (Fig.2), i.e. an anti-coalescence effect of SPP. In this talk, we will introduce the plasmonic device main features as well as the different quantum plasmonics experiments that have been performed thanks to the SPP beamsplitter. These results are essential to understand the SPP quantum behavior or to develop hybrid plasmon-photon systems for potential future applications in quantum communication mediated by SPP. [1] JM Elson and R.H. Ritchie, Phys. Rev. B 4, 4129 (1971) [2] J.S. Fakonas et al., Nat. Phot. 8, 317 (2014) [3] M.C. Dheur et al. , Sc. Advances 2, e151574 (2016) [4] M.C. Dheur et al. ArXiv 1610.07493, B. Vest et al. ArXiv 1610.07479 [5] S. Barnett et al., Phys. Rev. A 57, 2134 (1998) Fig.1: Plasmonic platform used for the quantum optics experiment (B). It consists in two SPP launchers (A), a plasmonic beamsplitter, and two slits to convert SPP to photons in the glass substrate. The plasmonic interference can thus be probed using single photon counting modules. Fig2: HOM experiment on a lossy plasmonic beamsplitter, whose complex amplitude reflection and transmission factors are denoted r and t respectively. The usual HOM dip is observed when r = it (left), a peak in the coincidence rate is shown when r = t.
Surface plasma waves arise from the collective oscillations of billions of electrons at the surface of a metal in unison. The simplest way to quantize these waves is by direct analogy to electromagnetic fields in free space, with the surface plasmon, the quantum of the surface plasma wave, playing the same role as the photon. It follows that surface plasmons should exhibit all of the same quantum phenomena that photons do, including quantum interference and entanglement. Unlike photons, however, surface plasmons suffer strong losses that arise from the scattering of free electrons from other electrons, phonons, and surfaces. Under some circumstances, these interactions might also cause “pure dephasing,” which entails a loss of coherence without absorption. Quantum descriptions of plasmons usually do not account for these effects explicitly, and sometimes ignore them altogether. In light of this extra microscopic complexity, it is necessary for experiments to test quantum models of surface plasmons. In this thesis, I describe two such tests that my collaborators and I performed. The first was a plasmonic version of the Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment, in which we observed two-particle quantum interference between plasmons with a visibility of 93 ± 1%. This measurement confirms that surface plasmons faithfully reproduce this effect with the same visibility and mutual coherence time, to within measurement error, as in the photonic case. The second experiment demonstrated path entanglement between surface plasmons with a visibility of 95 ± 2%, confirming that a path-entangled state can indeed survive without measurable decoherence. This measurement suggests that elastic scattering mechanisms of the type that might cause pure dephasing must have been weak enough not to significantly perturb the state of the metal under the experimental conditions we investigated. These two experiments add quantum interference and path entanglement to a growing list of quantum phenomena that surface plasmons appear to exhibit just as clearly as photons, confirming the predictions of the simplest quantum models.
This thesis investigates properties of quantum states of light while travelling as surface plasmon polaritons in plasmonic waveguides and structures. The bosonic nature of SPPs has been shown in previous work by performing a Hong-Ou-Mandel interference experiment with a plasmonic scattering-based beam splitter. Here, we show the same interference with a higher statistical power thanks to an improved set-up. A visibility of 59 ± 1 % is obtained in the two-photon interference, clearly breaking the classical limit of 50 %. The importance of the phase-relations between the different modes in the beam splitter is experimentally probed. The output state of the interference is then further analyzed by a quantum state tomography set-up. This makes it possible to quantify the entanglement generated in the interference. As the interference happens in the plasmonic beam splitter, this shows, to our knowledge for the first time, entanglement generated in a plasmonic structure. Together with the recent results in terms of entanglement and coherence preservation of SPPs, this clearly shows the potential of quantum plasmonic devices. To move into the realm of applications, we also investigate theoretically the enhancements in sensitivity quantum states of light can deliver for plasmonic sensing. It is shown that despite the losses, quantum metrology techniques can be useful in an interferometer with plasmonic waveguides. Considering the strengths and successes of plasmonic sensing techniques in a wide range of fields, we envision that entangled and squeezed states of light will become a new route to push the limits in sensitivity.
Quantum plasmonics lies at the intersection between nanophotonics and quantum optics. Genuine quantum effects can be observed with non-classical states such as Fock states and with entangled states. A N00N state combines both aspects: it is a quantum superposition state of a Fock state with N excitations in two spatial modes. Here we report the first observation of two-plasmon ( N = 2) N00N state interferences using a plasmonic beamsplitter etched on a planar interface between gold and air. We analyze in detail the role of losses at the beamsplitter and during the propagation along the metal/air interface. While the intrinsic losses of the beamsplitter are responsible for the emergence of quantum nonlinear absorption, we note that N00N states decay N times faster than classical states due to propagation losses.
The ability to efficiently control optical quantum interference by the same device is a challenging task that promises to enable key operations in quantum information processing. Here, we tackle this problem by presenting a composite quantum plasmonic metasurface operating as an ultrathin non-unitary beamsplitter capable of achieving both single photon bosonic bunching and fermionic anti-bunching interference just by varying the incident photons frequency or changing the design dimensions. The presented metasurface combines a plasmonic grating corrugated by periodic nanoslits that can achieve extraordinary optical transmission with additional nanostripes on top forming nanocavities characterized by localized gap plasmon resonances. The photon-photon interactions are analyzed based on calculating the quantum coalescence metric which accurately portrays the obtained bunching or anti-bunching quantum interference. The presented quantum interference operation is applicable to both fundamental non-classical light interactions and in the design of more applied quantum optical logic gates used in quantum computing and communications.
In this experiment, pairs of identical photons at 806 nm through a single-photon down conversion in a nonlinear crystal that are sent onto a plasmonic platform were generated. The plasmonic platform consists in several elements that are etched on a 300 nm-thick gold film on top of a silica substrate, on a total 40x40μm footprint. The input channels of the plasmonic platform are made of two unidirectional launchers. Those asymmetric 11-grooves gratings have been designed to efficiently couple a normally incident Gaussian mode into directional SPPs. The SPPs generated by each launcher then freely propagate and recombine on the surface plasmon beamsplitter (SPBS). It is made of two identical grooves in the metallic surface, oriented at 45° with respect to the propagation direction of waves. The succession of metal and air allows a scattering process that generates both a transmitted and a reflected SPP. The SPPs then propagate towards two large outcoupling strip slits. They are decoupled into photons propagating in the glass substrate on the rear of the platform.