Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1609.06558 · Physical review. B./Physical review. B

Nonstoquastic Hamiltonians and quantum annealing of an Ising spin glass

Layla Hormozi, Ethan Brown, Giuseppe Carleo, Matthias Troyer

Published May 15, 2017• 97 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum annealers are computing machines that utilize quantum effects to solve hard optimization problems. Understanding the circumstances under which quantum annealers are more efficient than other optimization methods is a challenging open problem. A clue to this conundrum comes from studying the complexity of quantum annealers. In general, the complexity of a physical system relates to how efficiently the system can be simulated by classical algorithms. One then asks: if some class of quantum annealers are hard to simulate classically, are they also more powerful optimization machines? Here, the authors study quantum annealers belonging to two different complexity classes: the so-called ``stoquastic'' systems, which can be efficiently simulated with classical algorithms, and ``nonstoquastic'' systems, currently with no efficient classical treatment. Applied to a prototypical optimization problem, the authors observe that, on average, the stoquastic systems perform better on easier instances of the problem, while the more complex nonstoquastic annealers show significant advantage when applied to the hardest instances. The authors conjecture that the performance of the nonstoquastic Hamiltonians is closely related to their internal structure during the annealing process and elucidate how properties such as magnetic frustration can play a key role in devising more powerful quantum annealers.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.95.184416

Related papers

Improving nonstoquastic quantum annealing with spin-reversal transformations

E. M. Lykiardopoulou, Alex Zucca, Sam A. Scivier +1 more

Nonstoquastic Hamiltonians are hard to simulate due to the sign problem in quantum Monte Carlo simulation. It is, however, unclear whether nonstoquasticity can lead to advantage in quantum annealing. Here we show that $YY$ interactions between the qubits make the adiabatic path during quantum annealing, and therefore the performance, dependent on spin-reversal transformations. With the right choice of spin-reversal transformation, a nonstoquastic Hamiltonian with $YY$ interaction can outperform stoquastic Hamiltonians with similar parameters. We introduce an optimization protocol to determine the optimal transformation and discuss the effect of suboptimality.

arXiv:2010.00065•Physical Review A•Jul 29, 2021•5 citations

Optimization Via Open System Quantum Annealing

Sergio Boixo, Robert F. Lucas, Daniel A. Lidar +2 more

Abstract : Many computationally challenging problems can be reduced to Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO), which can be solved by a quantum evolution from a strong transverse field to a spin glass Hamiltonian (also known as quantum annealing or QA). We have examined open system QA, using theoretical and experimental techniques to deepen our understanding of open system QA by situating it in the context of related, well studied classical and quantum problems. We have explored and elucidated the significance of tunneling in QA with Path Integral Monte Carlo. We have also provided signatures of quantum behavior of QA against closely related simulated annealing implementations, analytically, numerically, and experimentally. We have carried out a comprehensive comparison of geometrically-local open-system QA and classical solvers for computationally hard problems such as MAX-2-SAT. We have exploited and further developed a graph-theoretical mapping between the Ising spin glass partition function and circuit model decision problems, discovered in a previous ARO Quantum Algorithms funded project. We have made significant progress on error correction techniques for QA, both theoretically and experimentally, and in demonstration of quantum speedup.

•Jan 7, 2016•0 citations

Quantum resources in non-stoquastic quantum annealing

Chiara Capecci, Sebastian Nagies, Naga Dileep Varikuti +1 more

Quantum annealing promises to solve combinatorial optimization problems by preparing the ground state of a target Hamiltonian. Standard annealing protocols are, however, stoquastic and can thus be simulated by sign-problem-free quantum Monte-Carlo methods. To obtain a true quantum advantage, it has been proposed to use non-stoquastic catalyst Hamiltonians. Active only at intermediate stages of the protocol, these can, for certain problems, convert first-order into second-order quantum phase transitions and thus permit an exponential speedup over the stoquastic protocol. At the same time, the non-stoquastic catalyst renders quantum Monte-Carlo methods inefficient. It remains, however, an open question how other classical computation methods are affected by the non-stoquastic terms. We address this question by computing quantum resources -- entanglement entropy and stabilizer Rényi entropy -- whose presence makes classical computations based on tensor networks and stabilizer-tableau methods exponentially hard. We compare these with the spectral gap along the annealing path for two paradigmatic benchmark models, the fully connected $p$-spin model and a geometrically local Ising model. While the exact behavior shows a subtle dependency on the underlying model and the annealing path, our numerics suggest consistently that the scaling of entanglement and non-stabilizerness is at least maintained in the deeply non-stoquastic regime and in some cases even significantly enhanced. Our results thus suggest that improvements of quantum performance in non-stoquastic annealing coincide with significant presence of quantum computational resources.

quant-pharXiv:2606.09995•Jun 10, 2026•0 citations

Seeking Quantum Speedup Through Spin Glasses: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Helmut G. Katzgraber, Firas Hamze, Zhu, Zheng +2 more

There has been considerable progress in the design and construction of quantum annealing devices. However, a conclusive detection of quantum speedup over traditional silicon-based machines remains elusive, despite multiple careful studies. In this work we outline strategies to design hard tunable benchmark instances based on insights from the study of spin glasses - the archetypal random benchmark problem for novel algorithms and optimization devices. We propose to complement head-to-head scaling studies that compare quantum annealing machines to state-of-the-art classical codes with an approach that compares the performance of different algorithms and/or computing architectures on different classes of computationally hard tunable spin-glass instances. The advantage of such an approach lies in having to only compare the performance hit felt by a given algorithm and/or architecture when the instance complexity is increased. Furthermore, we propose a methodology that might not directly translate into the detection of quantum speedup, but might elucidate whether quantum annealing has a "`quantum advantage" over corresponding classical algorithms like simulated annealing. Our results on a 496 qubit D-Wave Two quantum annealing device are compared to recently-used state-of-the-art thermal simulated annealing codes.

•Jan 1, 2015•86 citations

Message-passing Algorithm of Quantum Annealing with Nonstoquastic Hamiltonian

Masayuki Ohzeki

Quantum annealing (QA) is a generic method for solving optimization problems using fictitious quantum fluctuation. The current device performing QA involves controlling the transverse field; it is classically simulatable by using the standard technique for mapping the quantum spin systems to the classical ones. In this sense, the current system for QA is not powerful despite utilizing quantum fluctuation. Hence, we developed a system with a time-dependent Hamiltonian consisting of a combination of the formulated Ising model and the "driver" Hamiltonian with only quantum fluctuation. In the previous study, for a fully connected spin model, quantum fluctuation can be addressed in a relatively simple way. We proved that the fully connected antiferromagnetic interaction can be transformed into a fluctuating transverse field and is thus classically simulatable at sufficiently low temperatures. Using the fluctuating transverse field, we established several ways to simulate part of the nonstoquastic Hamiltonian on classical computers. We formulated a message-passing algorithm in the present study. This algorithm is capable of assessing the performance of QA with part of the nonstoquastic Hamiltonian having a large number of spins. In other words, we developed a different approach for simulating the nonstoquastic Hamiltonian without using the quantum Monte Carlo technique. Our results were validated by comparison to the results obtained by the replica method.

arXiv:1901.06901•Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Apr 17, 2019•7 citations

Unraveling Quantum Annealers using Classical Hardness

Victor Martin-Mayor, Itay Hen

Recent advances in quantum technology have led to the development and manufacturing of experimental programmable quantum annealing optimizers that contain hundreds of quantum bits. These optimizers, commonly referred to as 'D-Wave' chips, promise to solve practical optimization problems potentially faster than conventional 'classical' computers. Attempts to quantify the quantum nature of these chips have been met with both excitement and skepticism but have also brought up numerous fundamental questions pertaining to the distinguishability of experimental quantum annealers from their classical thermal counterparts. Inspired by recent results in spin-glass theory that recognize 'temperature chaos' as the underlying mechanism responsible for the computational intractability of hard optimization problems, we devise a general method to quantify the performance of quantum annealers on optimization problems suffering from varying degrees of temperature chaos: A superior performance of quantum annealers over classical algorithms on these may allude to the role that quantum effects play in providing speedup. We utilize our method to experimentally study the D-Wave Two chip on different temperature-chaotic problems and find, surprisingly, that its performance scales unfavorably as compared to several analogous classical algorithms. We detect, quantify and discuss several purely classical effects that possibly mask the quantum behavior of the chip.

arXiv:1502.02494•Scientific Reports•Oct 20, 2015•61 citations
Quantum annealers are computing machines that utilize quantum effects to solve hard optimization problems. Understanding the circumstances under which quantum annealers are more efficient than other optimization methods is a challenging open problem. A clue to this conundrum comes from studying the complexity of quantum annealers. In general, the complexity of a physical system relates to how efficiently the system can be simulated by classical algorithms. One then asks: if some class of quantum annealers are hard to simulate classically, are they also more powerful optimization machines? Here, the authors study quantum annealers belonging to two different complexity classes: the so-called stoquastic'' systems, which can be efficiently simulated with classical algorithms, and nonstoquastic'' systems, currently with no efficient classical treatment. Applied to a prototypical optimization problem, the authors observe that, on average, the stoquastic systems perform better on easier instances of the problem, while the more complex nonstoquastic annealers show significant advantage when applied to the hardest instances. The authors conjecture that the performance of the nonstoquastic Hamiltonians is closely related to their internal structure during the annealing process and elucidate how properties such as magnetic frustration can play a key role in devising more powerful quantum annealers.
Nonstoquastic Hamiltonians are hard to simulate due to the sign problem in quantum Monte Carlo simulation. It is, however, unclear whether nonstoquasticity can lead to advantage in quantum annealing. Here we show that YYYYYY interactions between the qubits make the adiabatic path during quantum annealing, and therefore the performance, dependent on spin-reversal transformations. With the right choice of spin-reversal transformation, a nonstoquastic Hamiltonian with YYYYYY interaction can outperform stoquastic Hamiltonians with similar parameters. We introduce an optimization protocol to determine the optimal transformation and discuss the effect of suboptimality.
Abstract : Many computationally challenging problems can be reduced to Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO), which can be solved by a quantum evolution from a strong transverse field to a spin glass Hamiltonian (also known as quantum annealing or QA). We have examined open system QA, using theoretical and experimental techniques to deepen our understanding of open system QA by situating it in the context of related, well studied classical and quantum problems. We have explored and elucidated the significance of tunneling in QA with Path Integral Monte Carlo. We have also provided signatures of quantum behavior of QA against closely related simulated annealing implementations, analytically, numerically, and experimentally. We have carried out a comprehensive comparison of geometrically-local open-system QA and classical solvers for computationally hard problems such as MAX-2-SAT. We have exploited and further developed a graph-theoretical mapping between the Ising spin glass partition function and circuit model decision problems, discovered in a previous ARO Quantum Algorithms funded project. We have made significant progress on error correction techniques for QA, both theoretically and experimentally, and in demonstration of quantum speedup.
Quantum annealing promises to solve combinatorial optimization problems by preparing the ground state of a target Hamiltonian. Standard annealing protocols are, however, stoquastic and can thus be simulated by sign-problem-free quantum Monte-Carlo methods. To obtain a true quantum advantage, it has been proposed to use non-stoquastic catalyst Hamiltonians. Active only at intermediate stages of the protocol, these can, for certain problems, convert first-order into second-order quantum phase transitions and thus permit an exponential speedup over the stoquastic protocol. At the same time, the non-stoquastic catalyst renders quantum Monte-Carlo methods inefficient. It remains, however, an open question how other classical computation methods are affected by the non-stoquastic terms. We address this question by computing quantum resources -- entanglement entropy and stabilizer Rényi entropy -- whose presence makes classical computations based on tensor networks and stabilizer-tableau methods exponentially hard. We compare these with the spectral gap along the annealing path for two paradigmatic benchmark models, the fully connected ppp-spin model and a geometrically local Ising model. While the exact behavior shows a subtle dependency on the underlying model and the annealing path, our numerics suggest consistently that the scaling of entanglement and non-stabilizerness is at least maintained in the deeply non-stoquastic regime and in some cases even significantly enhanced. Our results thus suggest that improvements of quantum performance in non-stoquastic annealing coincide with significant presence of quantum computational resources.
There has been considerable progress in the design and construction of quantum annealing devices. However, a conclusive detection of quantum speedup over traditional silicon-based machines remains elusive, despite multiple careful studies. In this work we outline strategies to design hard tunable benchmark instances based on insights from the study of spin glasses - the archetypal random benchmark problem for novel algorithms and optimization devices. We propose to complement head-to-head scaling studies that compare quantum annealing machines to state-of-the-art classical codes with an approach that compares the performance of different algorithms and/or computing architectures on different classes of computationally hard tunable spin-glass instances. The advantage of such an approach lies in having to only compare the performance hit felt by a given algorithm and/or architecture when the instance complexity is increased. Furthermore, we propose a methodology that might not directly translate into the detection of quantum speedup, but might elucidate whether quantum annealing has a "`quantum advantage" over corresponding classical algorithms like simulated annealing. Our results on a 496 qubit D-Wave Two quantum annealing device are compared to recently-used state-of-the-art thermal simulated annealing codes.
Quantum annealing (QA) is a generic method for solving optimization problems using fictitious quantum fluctuation. The current device performing QA involves controlling the transverse field; it is classically simulatable by using the standard technique for mapping the quantum spin systems to the classical ones. In this sense, the current system for QA is not powerful despite utilizing quantum fluctuation. Hence, we developed a system with a time-dependent Hamiltonian consisting of a combination of the formulated Ising model and the "driver" Hamiltonian with only quantum fluctuation. In the previous study, for a fully connected spin model, quantum fluctuation can be addressed in a relatively simple way. We proved that the fully connected antiferromagnetic interaction can be transformed into a fluctuating transverse field and is thus classically simulatable at sufficiently low temperatures. Using the fluctuating transverse field, we established several ways to simulate part of the nonstoquastic Hamiltonian on classical computers. We formulated a message-passing algorithm in the present study. This algorithm is capable of assessing the performance of QA with part of the nonstoquastic Hamiltonian having a large number of spins. In other words, we developed a different approach for simulating the nonstoquastic Hamiltonian without using the quantum Monte Carlo technique. Our results were validated by comparison to the results obtained by the replica method.
Recent advances in quantum technology have led to the development and manufacturing of experimental programmable quantum annealing optimizers that contain hundreds of quantum bits. These optimizers, commonly referred to as 'D-Wave' chips, promise to solve practical optimization problems potentially faster than conventional 'classical' computers. Attempts to quantify the quantum nature of these chips have been met with both excitement and skepticism but have also brought up numerous fundamental questions pertaining to the distinguishability of experimental quantum annealers from their classical thermal counterparts. Inspired by recent results in spin-glass theory that recognize 'temperature chaos' as the underlying mechanism responsible for the computational intractability of hard optimization problems, we devise a general method to quantify the performance of quantum annealers on optimization problems suffering from varying degrees of temperature chaos: A superior performance of quantum annealers over classical algorithms on these may allude to the role that quantum effects play in providing speedup. We utilize our method to experimentally study the D-Wave Two chip on different temperature-chaotic problems and find, surprisingly, that its performance scales unfavorably as compared to several analogous classical algorithms. We detect, quantify and discuss several purely classical effects that possibly mask the quantum behavior of the chip.