Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1607.08115 · Annals of Physics

Projected Entangled Pair States with non-Abelian gauge symmetries: An SU(2) study

Erez Zohar, Thorsten B. Wahl, Michele Burrello, J. I. Cirac

Published Aug 17, 2016• 53 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.aop.2016.08.008

Related papers

Fermionic projected entangled pair states and local U(1) gauge theories

Erez Zohar, Michele Burrello, Thorsten B. Wahl +1 more

arXiv:1507.08837•Annals of Physics•Oct 31, 2015•78 citations

A beginner's guide to non-abelian iPEPS for correlated fermions

Benedikt Bruognolo, Jheng-Wei Li, Jan von Delft +1 more

Infinite projected entangled pair states (iPEPS) have emerged as a powerful tool for studying interacting two-dimensional fermionic systems. In this review, we discuss the iPEPS construction and some basic properties of this tensor network (TN) ansatz. Special focus is put on (i) a gentle introduction of the diagrammatic TN representations forming the basis for deriving the complex numerical algorithm, and (ii) the technical advance of fully exploiting non-abelian symmetries for fermionic iPEPS treatments of multi-band lattice models. The exploitation of non-abelian symmetries substantially increases the performance of the algorithm, enabling the treatment of fermionic systems up to a bond dimension D=24 D = 24 on a square lattice. A variety of complex two-dimensional (2D) models thus become numerically accessible. Here, we present first promising results for two types of multi-band Hubbard models, one with 2 2 bands of spinful fermions of \mathrm{SU}(2)_\mathrm{spin} \otimes \mathrm{SU}(2)_\mathrm{orb} S U ( 2 ) s p i n ⊗ S U ( 2 ) o r b symmetry, the other with 3 3 flavors of spinless fermions of \mathrm{SU}(3)_\mathrm{flavor} S U ( 3 ) f l a v o r symmetry.

arXiv:2006.08289•SciPost Physics Lecture Notes•Feb 25, 2021•29 citations

Characterizing symmetries in a projected entangled pair state

David Pérez-Garcı́a, Mikel Sanz, Carlos E. González-Guillén +2 more

We show that two different tensors defining the same translational invariant injective projected entangled pair state (PEPS) in a square lattice must be the same up to a trivial gauge freedom. This allows us to characterize the existence of any local or spatial symmetry in the state. As an application of these results we prove that a SU(2) invariant PEPS with half-integer spin cannot be injective, which can be seen as a Lieb–Shultz–Mattis theorem in this context. We also give the natural generalization for U(1) symmetry in the spirit of Oshikawa–Yamanaka–Affleck, and show that a PEPS with Wilson loops cannot be injective.

arXiv:0908.1674•New Journal of Physics•Feb 26, 2010•75 citations

ℤN symmetry breaking in projected entangled pair state models

M. Rispler, Kasper Duivenvoorden, N. Schuch

•Aug 9, 2017•0 citations

A canonical form for Projected Entangled Pair States and applications

Mikel Sanz, David Pérez García, J. I. Cirac +2 more

We show that two different tensors defining the same translational invariant injective Projected Entangled Pair State (PEPS) in a square lattice must be the same up to a trivial gauge freedom. This allows us to characterize the existence of any local or spatial symmetry in the state. As an application of these results we prove that a SU(2) invariant PEPS with half-integer spin cannot be injective, which can be seen as a Lieb-Shultz-Mattis theorem in this context. We also give the natural generalization for U(1) symmetry in the spirit of Oshikawa-Yamanaka-Affleck, and show that a PEPS with Wilson loops cannot be injective.

•Jan 1, 2009•24 citations

Applications of projected entangled-pair states to two-dimensional spin systems

Bela Bauer, Guifré Vidal, Matthias Troyer

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 15, 2010•0 citations
Infinite projected entangled pair states (iPEPS) have emerged as a powerful tool for studying interacting two-dimensional fermionic systems. In this review, we discuss the iPEPS construction and some basic properties of this tensor network (TN) ansatz. Special focus is put on (i) a gentle introduction of the diagrammatic TN representations forming the basis for deriving the complex numerical algorithm, and (ii) the technical advance of fully exploiting non-abelian symmetries for fermionic iPEPS treatments of multi-band lattice models. The exploitation of non-abelian symmetries substantially increases the performance of the algorithm, enabling the treatment of fermionic systems up to a bond dimension D=24 D = 24 on a square lattice. A variety of complex two-dimensional (2D) models thus become numerically accessible. Here, we present first promising results for two types of multi-band Hubbard models, one with 2 2 bands of spinful fermions of \mathrm{SU}(2)_\mathrm{spin} \otimes \mathrm{SU}(2)_\mathrm{orb} S U ( 2 ) s p i n ⊗ S U ( 2 ) o r b symmetry, the other with 3 3 flavors of spinless fermions of \mathrm{SU}(3)_\mathrm{flavor} S U ( 3 ) f l a v o r symmetry.
We show that two different tensors defining the same translational invariant injective projected entangled pair state (PEPS) in a square lattice must be the same up to a trivial gauge freedom. This allows us to characterize the existence of any local or spatial symmetry in the state. As an application of these results we prove that a SU(2) invariant PEPS with half-integer spin cannot be injective, which can be seen as a Lieb–Shultz–Mattis theorem in this context. We also give the natural generalization for U(1) symmetry in the spirit of Oshikawa–Yamanaka–Affleck, and show that a PEPS with Wilson loops cannot be injective.
We show that two different tensors defining the same translational invariant injective Projected Entangled Pair State (PEPS) in a square lattice must be the same up to a trivial gauge freedom. This allows us to characterize the existence of any local or spatial symmetry in the state. As an application of these results we prove that a SU(2) invariant PEPS with half-integer spin cannot be injective, which can be seen as a Lieb-Shultz-Mattis theorem in this context. We also give the natural generalization for U(1) symmetry in the spirit of Oshikawa-Yamanaka-Affleck, and show that a PEPS with Wilson loops cannot be injective.