Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1607.03501 · Foundations of Physics

The Transition from Quantum Field Theory to One-Particle Quantum Mechanics and a Proposed Interpretation of Aharonov–Bohm Effect

Benliang Li, Daniel W. Hewak, Qi Jie Wang

Published Jun 22, 2018• 12 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-018-0191-y

Related papers

Study of the Aharonov-Bohm effect: a derivation of one particle quantum mechanics from quantum field theory

Benliang Li, Daniel William Hewak, Qijie Wang

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 16, 2017•0 citations

The double slit experiment, the Aharonov-Bohm effect, and a new quantum potential theory: Towards a realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics

R. E. L. Mónaco, G. G. Cabrera

Foundations of Physics Letters•Feb 1, 1994•5 citations

A study of Aharonov-Bohm effect: from quantum electrodynamics to one particle quantum mechanics

Benliang Li, Daniel William Hewak, Qi Jie Wang

In this article, we start our discussion on the Aharonov-Bohm effect then raise a plausible interpretation within the quantum electrodynamics (QED) framework. We provide a quantum treatment of the source of the electromagnetic potential and argue that the underlying mechanism in AB effect can be viewed as interactions between electrons described by QED theory where the interactions are mediated by virtue photons. On further analysis, we claim that the framework of one particle quantum mechanics (OPQM) can be shown, in general, as a mathematically approximated model which can be reformulated from QED theory. In addition, the classical Maxwell equations are derived from QED scattering process while both classical electromagnetic fields and potentials serve as mathematical tools that are constructed to approximate the interactions among elementary particles described by QED physics, i.e. neither classical fields nor potentials represent any real entities of nature. At the conclusion of this article, we make a few remarks on the hypnosis of the existence of magnetic monopoles.

•Jul 12, 2016•2 citations

Bohm’s Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory

Christopher Dewdney

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1994•0 citations

Consistency of the Aharonov-Bohm effect with quantum theory

Yakir Aharonov, C. K. Au, E. C. Lerner +1 more

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Feb 1, 1984•7 citations

Canonical force and electromagnetic geometrical phase in particle interference

S. A. R. Horsley, M. Babiker

We provide arguments which demonstrate that the Berry phase effects involving particle interference in the presence of external electric and magnetic fields—namely the Aharonov–Bohm (AB), Aharonov–Casher (AC) and the Röntgen (R) effects—cannot be unambiguously explained (as has been controversially argued) through the use of any classical mechanical force. In fact, in the three scenarios which we consider, the only means to reclaim the standard quantum mechanical results is to use the expressions for the force that fail to satisfy the necessary conditions of gauge invariance. Our arguments explain the foundation of the controversy and confirm the standard idea that the Berry phase effects in question are non-local phenomena which only arise in the application of quantum theory. We lay special emphasis on the use of the concept of a canonical force, this being the quantity which ensures the agreement between the classical and quantum formulations. It is shown that if the Aharonov–Bohm effect is interpreted as being due to a force, through the use of the Bohmian formulation of quantum mechanics, then this force is equal in magnitude to the canonical force.

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•May 18, 2007•3 citations
In this article, we start our discussion on the Aharonov-Bohm effect then raise a plausible interpretation within the quantum electrodynamics (QED) framework. We provide a quantum treatment of the source of the electromagnetic potential and argue that the underlying mechanism in AB effect can be viewed as interactions between electrons described by QED theory where the interactions are mediated by virtue photons. On further analysis, we claim that the framework of one particle quantum mechanics (OPQM) can be shown, in general, as a mathematically approximated model which can be reformulated from QED theory. In addition, the classical Maxwell equations are derived from QED scattering process while both classical electromagnetic fields and potentials serve as mathematical tools that are constructed to approximate the interactions among elementary particles described by QED physics, i.e. neither classical fields nor potentials represent any real entities of nature. At the conclusion of this article, we make a few remarks on the hypnosis of the existence of magnetic monopoles.
We provide arguments which demonstrate that the Berry phase effects involving particle interference in the presence of external electric and magnetic fields—namely the Aharonov–Bohm (AB), Aharonov–Casher (AC) and the Röntgen (R) effects—cannot be unambiguously explained (as has been controversially argued) through the use of any classical mechanical force. In fact, in the three scenarios which we consider, the only means to reclaim the standard quantum mechanical results is to use the expressions for the force that fail to satisfy the necessary conditions of gauge invariance. Our arguments explain the foundation of the controversy and confirm the standard idea that the Berry phase effects in question are non-local phenomena which only arise in the application of quantum theory. We lay special emphasis on the use of the concept of a canonical force, this being the quantity which ensures the agreement between the classical and quantum formulations. It is shown that if the Aharonov–Bohm effect is interpreted as being due to a force, through the use of the Bohmian formulation of quantum mechanics, then this force is equal in magnitude to the canonical force.