The yield of physical qubits fabricated in the laboratory is much lower than that of classical transistors in production semiconductor fabrication. Actual implementations of quantum computers will be susceptible to loss in the form of physically faulty qubits. Though these physical faults must negatively affect the computation, we can deal with them by adapting error-correction schemes. In this paper we have simulated statically placed single-fault lattices and lattices with randomly placed faults at functional qubit yields of 80%, 90%, and 95%, showing practical performance of a defective surface code by employing actual circuit constructions and realistic errors on every gate, including identity gates. We extend Stace et al 's superplaquettes solution against dynamic losses for the surface code to handle static losses such as physically faulty qubits [ 1 ]. The single-fault analysis shows that a static loss at the periphery of the lattice has less negative effect than a static loss at the center. The randomly faulty analysis shows that 95% yield is good enough to build a large-scale quantum computer. The local gate error rate threshold is , and a code distance of seven suppresses the residual error rate below the original error rate at . 90% yield is also good enough when we discard badly fabricated quantum computation chips, while 80% yield does not show enough error suppression even when discarding 90% of the chips. We evaluated several metrics for predicting chip performance, and found that the average of the product of the number of data qubits and the cycle time of a stabilizer measurement of stabilizers gave the strongest correlation with logical error rates. Our analysis will help with selecting usable quantum computation chips from among the pool of all fabricated chips.
The yield of physical qubits fabricated in the laboratory is much lower than that of classical transistors in production semiconductor fabrication. Actual implementations of quantum computers will be susceptible to loss in the form of physically faulty qubits. Though these physical faults must negatively affect the computation, we can deal with them by adapting error-correction schemes. In this paper we have simulated statically placed single-fault lattices and lattices with randomly placed faults at functional qubit yields of 80%, 90%, and 95%, showing practical performance of a defective surface code by employing actual circuit constructions and realistic errors on every gate, including identity gates. We extend Stace et al 's superplaquettes solution against dynamic losses for the surface code to handle static losses such as physically faulty qubits [ 1 ]. The single-fault analysis shows that a static loss at the periphery of the lattice has less negative effect than a static loss at the center. The randomly faulty analysis shows that 95% yield is good enough to build a large-scale quantum computer. The local gate error rate threshold is , and a code distance of seven suppresses the residual error rate below the original error rate at . 90% yield is also good enough when we discard badly fabricated quantum computation chips, while 80% yield does not show enough error suppression even when discarding 90% of the chips. We evaluated several metrics for predicting chip performance, and found that the average of the product of the number of data qubits and the cycle time of a stabilizer measurement of stabilizers gave the strongest correlation with logical error rates. Our analysis will help with selecting usable quantum computation chips from among the pool of all fabricated chips.
The construction of topological error correction codes requires the ability to fabricate a lattice of physical qubits embedded on a manifold with a nontrivial topology such that the quantum information is encoded in the global degrees of freedom (i.e., the topology) of the manifold. However, the manufacturing of large-scale topological devices will undoubtedly suffer from fabrication errors---permanent faulty components such as missing physical qubits or failed entangling gates---introducing permanent defects into the topology of the lattice and hence significantly reducing the distance of the code and the quality of the encoded logical qubits. In this work we investigate how fabrication errors affect the performance of topological codes, using the surface code as the test bed. A known approach to mitigate defective lattices involves the use of primitive swap gates in a long sequence of syndrome extraction circuits. Instead, we show that in the presence of fabrication errors the syndrome can be determined using the supercheck operator approach and the outcome of the defective gauge stabilizer generators without any additional computational overhead or use of swap gates. We report numerical fault-tolerance thresholds in the presence of both qubit fabrication and gate fabrication errors using a circuit-based noise model and the minimum-weight perfect-matching decoder. Our numerical analysis is most applicable to two-dimensional chip-based technologies, but the techniques presented here can be readily extended to other topological architectures. We find that in the presence of 8 qubit fabrication errors, the surface code can still tolerate a computational error rate of up to 0.1.
A remarkable characteristic of quantum computing is the potential for reliable computation despite faulty qubits. This can be achieved through quantum error correction, which is typically implemented by repeatedly applying static syndrome checks, permitting correction of logical information. Recently, the development of time-dynamic approaches to error correction has enabled different codes and implementations that do not rely on static syndrome measurements. Here we experimentally demonstrate three time-dynamic implementations of the surface code, each offering a distinct solution to hardware design challenges faced by surface code realizations. First, we embed the surface code on a hexagonal lattice, reducing the necessary couplings per qubit from four to three. Second, we walk a surface code, swapping the role of data and measure qubits each round, achieving error correction with built-in removal of accumulated non-computational errors. Finally, we realize the surface code using iSWAP gates instead of the traditional CNOT, extending the set of viable gates for error correction without additional overhead. We measure the error suppression factor when scaling from distance-3 to distance-5 codes of Λ35,hex = 2.15(2), Λ35,walk = 1.69(6) and Λ35,iSWAP = 1.56(2), achieving state-of-the-art error suppression for each. Our work demonstrates that dynamic circuit approaches meet the demands for fault tolerance and enable alternative strategies for scalable hardware design. Typical quantum error correcting codes assign fixed roles to the underlying physical qubits. Now the performance benefits of alternative, dynamic error correction schemes have been demonstrated on a superconducting quantum processor.
A solid-state quantum-computing architecture will require the fabrication of arrays of many coupled qubits. It is inevitable that this process will produce qubits and couplers with varying performance, with some components underperforming due to imperfect fabrication. Quantum error-correction requires high-performing components and hence these defects must be dealt with, either by adapting the code to exclude the defects, or by informing the decoder to accommodate defects in post-processing. Here we implement and compare strategies to operate distance-5 surface codes on a quantum processor consisting of a square-lattice array of 120 superconducting qubits. We demonstrate a dramatic reduction in the probability of a logical error in a memory experiment by excluding underperforming components, compared with both a standard approach of ignoring defects, and a defect-aware decoding approach. We observe up to 2.8X improvement in logical errors per round when excluding defects compared with the standard defect-ignorant approach (1.62% compared to 4.49%). In contrast, defect-aware decoding gives only modest gains. Defects are also expected to be particularly harmful for measurement-based logical operations. Using a stability experiment we show that excluding defects resurrects measurement-based logic gate performance, observing a 6.3% per-round suppression of failure rate when excluding defects, compared to zero suppression otherwise. Furthermore, we show a further substantial decrease in logical errors when using leakage post-selection in combination with our defect exclusion strategies, resulting in a distance-5 code outperforming the best distance-3 in one basis. Our experiments therefore give a proof-of-principle demonstration of the essential utility of defect exclusion methods in the scale-up of solid-state quantum computing approaches.
A remarkable characteristic of quantum computing is the potential for reliable computation despite faulty qubits. This can be achieved through quantum error correction, which is typically implemented by repeatedly applying static syndrome checks, permitting correction of logical information. Recently, the development of time-dynamic approaches to error correction has uncovered new codes and new code implementations. In this work, we experimentally demonstrate three time-dynamic implementations of the surface code, each offering a unique solution to hardware design challenges and introducing flexibility in surface code realization. First, we embed the surface code on a hexagonal lattice, reducing the necessary couplings per qubit from four to three. Second, we walk a surface code, swapping the role of data and measure qubits each round, achieving error correction with built-in removal of accumulated non-computational errors. Finally, we realize the surface code using iSWAP gates instead of the traditional CNOT, extending the set of viable gates for error correction without additional overhead. We measure the error suppression factor when scaling from distance-3 to distance-5 codes of Λ35,hex=2.15(2), Λ35,walk=1.69(6), and Λ35,iSWAP=1.56(2), achieving state-of-the-art error suppression for each. With detailed error budgeting, we explore their performance trade-offs and implications for hardware design. This work demonstrates that dynamic circuit approaches satisfy the demands for fault-tolerance and opens new alternative avenues for scalable hardware design.
To make practical quantum algorithms work, large-scale quantum processors protected by error-correcting codes are required to resist noise and ensure reliable computational outcomes. However, a major challenge arises from defects in processor fabrication, as well as occasional losses or cosmic rays during the computing process, all of which can lead to qubit malfunctions and disrupt error-correcting codes’ normal operations. In this context, we introduce an automatic adapter to implement the surface code on defective lattices. Unlike previous approaches, this adapter leverages newly proposed bandage-like super-stabilizers to save more qubits when defects are clustered, thus enhancing the code distance and reducing super-stabilizer weight. For instance, in comparison with earlier methods, with a code size of 27 and a random defect rate of 2%, the disabled qubits decrease by 1/3, and the average preserved code distance increases by 63%. This demonstrates a significant reduction in overhead when handling defects using our approach, and this advantage amplifies with increasing processor size and defect rates. Our work presents a low-overhead, automated solution to the challenge of adapting the surface code to defects, an essential step towards scaling up the construction of large-scale quantum computers for practical applications.