Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1606.05748 · American Journal of Physics

Gauge transformations and conserved quantities in classical and quantum mechanics

Bertrand Berche, D. Malterre, Ernesto A. Medina

Published Jul 20, 2016• 10 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We are taught that gauge transformations in classical and quantum mechanics do not change the physics of the problem. Nevertheless, here we discuss three broad scenarios where under gauge transformations: (i) conservation laws are not preserved in the usual manner; (ii) non-gauge-invariant quantities can be associated with physical observables; and (iii) there are changes in the physical boundary conditions of the wave function that render it non-single-valued. We give worked examples that illustrate these points, in contrast to general opinions from classic texts. We also give a historical perspective on the development of Abelian gauge theory in relation to our particular points. Our aim is to provide a discussion of these issues at the graduate level.

DOI
10.1119/1.4955153

Related papers

The physical significance of gauge independence and gauge covariance in quantum mechanics

T. E. Feuchtwang, Emil Kazes, Paul H. Cutler +1 more

The distinction between gauge independence and gauge covariance in electrodynamics is considered for quantities of physical interest. The gauge independence of directly observable quantities, such as the spectra of operators and energy conserving transition rates, is discussed and contrasted with the gauge covariance of other quantities such as scalar products. The quasigauge-invariance of the classical Lagrangian and the invariance of the Euler-Lagrange equations under the addition of a total time derivative to the Lagrangian are discussed. The consequent inherent nonuniqueness of the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations of classical mechanics is pointed out. A physical interpretation of the explicit gauge dependence of classical canonical momenta and of the expectation values of the corresponding quantum mechanical operators is presented. The gauge independence of energy conserving transition rates calculated in the conventional finite-order time dependent perturbation theory is discussed and illustrated. The gauge dependence of the conventional time dependent transition amplitudes in the presence of electromagnetic fields is then discussed, and gauge independent transition amplitudes are constructed. An alternative formulation of the quantum mechanics of charged particles is obtained in terms of a new gauge independent Hamiltonian, which is, as might be expected, unique only within an arbitrary canonical transformation.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jan 11, 1984•15 citations

Quadratic Gauge Transformation

Sunita Singh, Akshit Sharma

Symmetries plays a significant role in understanding the conservation laws in Quantum field theories. Here, we attempted a quadratic type dimensionless gauge transformation to achieve the invariance in QFTs. We have shown the extensive study of invariance of complex scalar, Abelian and Non- Abelian theories and established the conservation laws. We included an explicit graphical analysis to invoke the invariance. This is studied in a physical context, where different field configurations correspond to the same physical state. The necessity of the covariant derivative is studied in detail, highlighting how it ensures consistent transformation under local symmetry operations. The meaning of covariance is clarified as the preservation of the form of physical laws under transformations.

hep-thCross-listedarXiv:2606.30177•Jun 30, 2026

Quantum Theory From a Non-Conventional Perspective

Dieter Schuch

Quantum mechanics is essentially described in terms of complex quantities like wave functions. The interesting point is that phase and amplitude of the complex quantities are not independent of each other, but coupled by some kind of conservation law. This coupling exists in time-independent quantum mechanics as well as in in its time-dependent form. It can be traced back to a reformulation of quantum mechanics in terms of complex nonlinear Riccati equations, where the quadratic term in the latter equation explains the origin of the phase-amplitude coupling. Since realistic physical systems are always in contact with some kind of environment this aspect is also taken into account. It turns out that this dissipative effect can either affect the amplitude or the phase of the complex quantity describing the open quantum system. This suggests a relation between non-unitary transformations and gauge-transformations for these systems. A change of the amplitude also seems to be connected with a second quantum of action for "radial" changes, compared to ħ for "angular" changes, leading to an interpretation of Sommerfeld's constant.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•May 26, 2017•0 citations

Where do the laws of physics come from

V. J. Stenger

The laws of physics were not handed down from above. Neither are they rules somehow built into the structure of the universe. They are ingredients of the models that physicists invent to describe observations. Rather than being restrictions on the behavior of matter, the laws of physics are restrictions on the behavior of physicists. If the models of physics are to describe observations based on an objective reality, then those models cannot depend on the point of view of the observer. This suggests a principle of point-of-view invariance that is equivalent to the principle of covariance when applied to space-time. As Noether showed, space-time symmetries lead to the principles of energy, linear momentum, and angular momentum conservation--essentially all of classical mechanics. It also leads to Lorentz invariance and special relativity. When generalized to the abstract space of functions such as the quantum state vector, point-of-view invariance is identified with gauge invariance. Quantum mechanics is then just the mathematics of gauge transformations with no additional assumptions needed to obtain its rules, including the superposition and uncertainty principles. The conservation and quantization of electric charge follow from global gauge invariance. The electromagnetic force is introduced to preserve local gauge invariance. Although not discussed here, the other forces in the standard model of elementary particles are also fields introduced to preserve local gauge invariance. Gravity can also be viewed as such a field. Thus practically all of fundamental physics as we know it follows directly from the single principle of point-of-view invariance.

•Nov 1, 2007•3 citations

Gauge-Invariant Non-Hermitian Quantum Theory: Foundation and Applications to Dynamical Phase Transitions

Fei Wang, Guoying Liang, Zecheng Zhao +1 more

The description of states and dynamics in non-Hermitian systems is fundamentally linked to the choice of an appropriate theoretical framework -- a point of ongoing debate in the field. This work addresses this issue by proposing a consistent formulation that reconciles existing controversies and establishes a unified theoretical understanding. Our approach rests on two foundational premises: (i) the dynamics of both left and right-vectors of a non-Hermitian system must satisfy the Schrödinger equation; (ii) the theoretical framework must preserve gauge invariance, ensuring that physical quantities are independent of unobservable phase choices. Building on these physically motivated assumptions, we refine the biorthogonal framework, leading to a gauge-invariant non-Hermitian quantum theory. Our framework naturally encompasses the open-system effective non-Hermitian evolution as a special case, and can naturally reduce to standard quantum mechanics in the Hermitian limit. As a concrete application, we analyze the dynamical phase transition in a one-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model within this gauge-invariant non-Hermitian quantum theory. Notably, our formulation naturally generalizes the known condition for such transitions in Hermitian two-band systems, namely, $\mathbf{d}_{k}^i\cdot\mathbf{d}_{k}^f=0$, to the non-Hermitian case, where it takes the form $\mathrm{Re}\Bigl[\frac{\mathbf{d}_{k}^i}{d_{k}^i}\cdot\frac{\mathbf{d}_{k}^f}{d_{k}^f}\Bigr]=0$. Furthermore, we identify entirely new dynamical phase transitions that cannot be characterized by the winding number. We hope that this gauge-invariant non-Hermitian quantum theory will find broad applications in the study of non-Hermitian systems.

quant-pharXiv:2603.21281•Mar 24, 2026•0 citations

Active and passive views of gauge invariance in quantum mechanics

Donald H. Kobe

For a quantum mechanical particle in a classical electromagnetic field, the active and passive views of gauge invariance are compared. In the active point of view, both the wavefunction and the potentials are transformed so that the Schrödinger equation is form invariant. In the passive point of view, a change in the representation of the canonical momentum is made which just cancels the change in the gauge of the potentials. The condition that a gauge-invariant operator has the same expectation value in all gauges gives a functional equation, the solution of which shows that gauge-invariant operators depend only on the kinetic momentum or coordinates.

American Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1986•5 citations
We are taught that gauge transformations in classical and quantum mechanics do not change the physics of the problem. Nevertheless, here we discuss three broad scenarios where under gauge transformations: (i) conservation laws are not preserved in the usual manner; (ii) non-gauge-invariant quantities can be associated with physical observables; and (iii) there are changes in the physical boundary conditions of the wave function that render it non-single-valued. We give worked examples that illustrate these points, in contrast to general opinions from classic texts. We also give a historical perspective on the development of Abelian gauge theory in relation to our particular points. Our aim is to provide a discussion of these issues at the graduate level.
The distinction between gauge independence and gauge covariance in electrodynamics is considered for quantities of physical interest. The gauge independence of directly observable quantities, such as the spectra of operators and energy conserving transition rates, is discussed and contrasted with the gauge covariance of other quantities such as scalar products. The quasigauge-invariance of the classical Lagrangian and the invariance of the Euler-Lagrange equations under the addition of a total time derivative to the Lagrangian are discussed. The consequent inherent nonuniqueness of the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations of classical mechanics is pointed out. A physical interpretation of the explicit gauge dependence of classical canonical momenta and of the expectation values of the corresponding quantum mechanical operators is presented. The gauge independence of energy conserving transition rates calculated in the conventional finite-order time dependent perturbation theory is discussed and illustrated. The gauge dependence of the conventional time dependent transition amplitudes in the presence of electromagnetic fields is then discussed, and gauge independent transition amplitudes are constructed. An alternative formulation of the quantum mechanics of charged particles is obtained in terms of a new gauge independent Hamiltonian, which is, as might be expected, unique only within an arbitrary canonical transformation.
Symmetries plays a significant role in understanding the conservation laws in Quantum field theories. Here, we attempted a quadratic type dimensionless gauge transformation to achieve the invariance in QFTs. We have shown the extensive study of invariance of complex scalar, Abelian and Non- Abelian theories and established the conservation laws. We included an explicit graphical analysis to invoke the invariance. This is studied in a physical context, where different field configurations correspond to the same physical state. The necessity of the covariant derivative is studied in detail, highlighting how it ensures consistent transformation under local symmetry operations. The meaning of covariance is clarified as the preservation of the form of physical laws under transformations.
Quantum mechanics is essentially described in terms of complex quantities like wave functions. The interesting point is that phase and amplitude of the complex quantities are not independent of each other, but coupled by some kind of conservation law. This coupling exists in time-independent quantum mechanics as well as in in its time-dependent form. It can be traced back to a reformulation of quantum mechanics in terms of complex nonlinear Riccati equations, where the quadratic term in the latter equation explains the origin of the phase-amplitude coupling. Since realistic physical systems are always in contact with some kind of environment this aspect is also taken into account. It turns out that this dissipative effect can either affect the amplitude or the phase of the complex quantity describing the open quantum system. This suggests a relation between non-unitary transformations and gauge-transformations for these systems. A change of the amplitude also seems to be connected with a second quantum of action for "radial" changes, compared to ħ for "angular" changes, leading to an interpretation of Sommerfeld's constant.
The laws of physics were not handed down from above. Neither are they rules somehow built into the structure of the universe. They are ingredients of the models that physicists invent to describe observations. Rather than being restrictions on the behavior of matter, the laws of physics are restrictions on the behavior of physicists. If the models of physics are to describe observations based on an objective reality, then those models cannot depend on the point of view of the observer. This suggests a principle of point-of-view invariance that is equivalent to the principle of covariance when applied to space-time. As Noether showed, space-time symmetries lead to the principles of energy, linear momentum, and angular momentum conservation--essentially all of classical mechanics. It also leads to Lorentz invariance and special relativity. When generalized to the abstract space of functions such as the quantum state vector, point-of-view invariance is identified with gauge invariance. Quantum mechanics is then just the mathematics of gauge transformations with no additional assumptions needed to obtain its rules, including the superposition and uncertainty principles. The conservation and quantization of electric charge follow from global gauge invariance. The electromagnetic force is introduced to preserve local gauge invariance. Although not discussed here, the other forces in the standard model of elementary particles are also fields introduced to preserve local gauge invariance. Gravity can also be viewed as such a field. Thus practically all of fundamental physics as we know it follows directly from the single principle of point-of-view invariance.
The description of states and dynamics in non-Hermitian systems is fundamentally linked to the choice of an appropriate theoretical framework -- a point of ongoing debate in the field. This work addresses this issue by proposing a consistent formulation that reconciles existing controversies and establishes a unified theoretical understanding. Our approach rests on two foundational premises: (i) the dynamics of both left and right-vectors of a non-Hermitian system must satisfy the Schrödinger equation; (ii) the theoretical framework must preserve gauge invariance, ensuring that physical quantities are independent of unobservable phase choices. Building on these physically motivated assumptions, we refine the biorthogonal framework, leading to a gauge-invariant non-Hermitian quantum theory. Our framework naturally encompasses the open-system effective non-Hermitian evolution as a special case, and can naturally reduce to standard quantum mechanics in the Hermitian limit. As a concrete application, we analyze the dynamical phase transition in a one-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model within this gauge-invariant non-Hermitian quantum theory. Notably, our formulation naturally generalizes the known condition for such transitions in Hermitian two-band systems, namely, dki⋅dkf=0\mathbf{d}_{k}^i\cdot\mathbf{d}_{k}^f=0dki​⋅dkf​=0, to the non-Hermitian case, where it takes the form Re[dkidki⋅dkfdkf]=0\mathrm{Re}\Bigl[\frac{\mathbf{d}_{k}^i}{d_{k}^i}\cdot\frac{\mathbf{d}_{k}^f}{d_{k}^f}\Bigr]=0Re[dki​dki​​⋅dkf​dkf​​]=0. Furthermore, we identify entirely new dynamical phase transitions that cannot be characterized by the winding number. We hope that this gauge-invariant non-Hermitian quantum theory will find broad applications in the study of non-Hermitian systems.
For a quantum mechanical particle in a classical electromagnetic field, the active and passive views of gauge invariance are compared. In the active point of view, both the wavefunction and the potentials are transformed so that the Schrödinger equation is form invariant. In the passive point of view, a change in the representation of the canonical momentum is made which just cancels the change in the gauge of the potentials. The condition that a gauge-invariant operator has the same expectation value in all gauges gives a functional equation, the solution of which shows that gauge-invariant operators depend only on the kinetic momentum or coordinates.