Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1606.04759 · Physics Letters A

A minimalist approach to conceptualization of time in quantum theory

Hitoshi Kitada, J. Jeknić-Dugić, M. Arsenijević, M. Dugić

Published Oct 17, 2016• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2016.10.010

Related papers

Which quantum foundations for the minimalist ontology framework?

Emilia Margoni

Abstract Michael Esfeld’s minimalist ontology is committed to two axioms relating to (1) distance relations that identify simple objects (permanent matter points) while (2) the distances between them change. This article scrutinizes such a conceptual strategy to determine whether it can successfully be applied to all levels of physical reality, as Esfeld contends. To do so, it explores one of his paradigmatic sources, that is, Bohmian mechanics. Two arguments are proposed. First, while Bohm’s original formulation of Bohmian mechanics and the interpretation advocated by Dürr, Goldstein & Zanghì are typically taken as mathematically equivalent, this article argues that Esfeld’s minimalist ontology does not cover the former’s ontological richness. To secure its achievement, the minimalist ontology framework needs to (i) break the equivalence between the two versions via a commitment to the nomological interpretation of the wavefunction (ii) yet attribute some kind of physical efficacy to the wavefunction as a guiding parameter for the evolution of particles living in three-dimensional space. Both requirements will be critically addressed. Second, the article shows that Esfeld’s metaphysical program is not only forced to rely on a theoretically suspicious formulation of quantum mechanics, but that more fundamental, under-development approaches in theoretical physics are way less reconcilable with its axioms, thus questioning its alleged universality.

Philosophical Studies•Jan 19, 2026•0 citations

Time in Quantum Theory

H. D. Zeh

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•12 citations

Operational approach to time and clocks in quantum theory

Sandra Stupar

•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

The No-Signaling Theorem under a Minimalist Event-Based Theory of Information

Sagar Kapadia

The no-signaling theorem asserts that quantum entanglement cannot be used to transmitcontrollable information between spacelike-separated parties, preserving relativistic causality Peres [1995]. This paper introduces the Minimalist Event-Based Theory of Information(MEBTI), which defines information as the reliable detection of a binary event deliberately triggered or not triggered at will by an agent. Under MEBTI, we re-evaluate theno-signaling theorem’s universality, arguing that its reliance on classical definitions of information (e.g., Shannon’s ensemble statistics or von Neumann’s state uncertainty Nielsenand Chuang [2000]) renders it ontologically limited. MEBTI bypasses these constraints byfocusing on single, agent-triggered events, challenging the theorem’s applicability to all conceivable definitions of information. While the theorem remains a valid physical constraintwithin standard quantum mechanics, we propose new experiments designed under MEBTIto empirically test whether instantaneous information transmission via entanglement is possible, potentially reshaping our understanding of quantum non-locality

•Sep 27, 2026•0 citations

Time, structure, and objectivity in quantum theory

F. David Peat

Foundations of Physics•Dec 1, 1988•2 citations

Quantum field theory of light

Ulf Leonhardt

Light in media The backbone of theoretical quantum optics is the quantum field theory of light, the quantum theory of the electromagnetic field. Quantum electrodynamics becomes surprisingly complicated if one insists on formulating it in a relativistically and gauge-invariant form, as one surely should do in elementary particle physics. Moreover, in quantum optics, we are concerned with light quanta in materials such as glass, with quantum electromagnetism in media, which is even more complicated. To cut a long story short, here we follow a minimalistic approach where we develop the essentials of quantum electrodynamics with as little technical effort as possible, sailing around the cliffs of relativistic quantum field theories. We do not assume any prior knowledge of classical field theory; we only borrow a few ideas from classical electromagnetism (Jackson, 1998). Complications and problems still remain, but hopefully these are mostly no longer formal difficulties, but rather conceptual problems of the quantum nature of light. As Dr Samuel Johnson said on poetry “We all know what light is; but it is not easy to tell what it is. ” Maxwell's equations What is light? Light is a quantum object - we describe its properties by quantum observables, Hermitian operators, and its state by a state vector | ψ _ or density matrix ρ . We use the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics where the operators evolve in time, but the quantum state does not change.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 18, 2010•0 citations
Abstract Michael Esfeld’s minimalist ontology is committed to two axioms relating to (1) distance relations that identify simple objects (permanent matter points) while (2) the distances between them change. This article scrutinizes such a conceptual strategy to determine whether it can successfully be applied to all levels of physical reality, as Esfeld contends. To do so, it explores one of his paradigmatic sources, that is, Bohmian mechanics. Two arguments are proposed. First, while Bohm’s original formulation of Bohmian mechanics and the interpretation advocated by Dürr, Goldstein & Zanghì are typically taken as mathematically equivalent, this article argues that Esfeld’s minimalist ontology does not cover the former’s ontological richness. To secure its achievement, the minimalist ontology framework needs to (i) break the equivalence between the two versions via a commitment to the nomological interpretation of the wavefunction (ii) yet attribute some kind of physical efficacy to the wavefunction as a guiding parameter for the evolution of particles living in three-dimensional space. Both requirements will be critically addressed. Second, the article shows that Esfeld’s metaphysical program is not only forced to rely on a theoretically suspicious formulation of quantum mechanics, but that more fundamental, under-development approaches in theoretical physics are way less reconcilable with its axioms, thus questioning its alleged universality.
The no-signaling theorem asserts that quantum entanglement cannot be used to transmitcontrollable information between spacelike-separated parties, preserving relativistic causality Peres [1995]. This paper introduces the Minimalist Event-Based Theory of Information(MEBTI), which defines information as the reliable detection of a binary event deliberately triggered or not triggered at will by an agent. Under MEBTI, we re-evaluate theno-signaling theorem’s universality, arguing that its reliance on classical definitions of information (e.g., Shannon’s ensemble statistics or von Neumann’s state uncertainty Nielsenand Chuang [2000]) renders it ontologically limited. MEBTI bypasses these constraints byfocusing on single, agent-triggered events, challenging the theorem’s applicability to all conceivable definitions of information. While the theorem remains a valid physical constraintwithin standard quantum mechanics, we propose new experiments designed under MEBTIto empirically test whether instantaneous information transmission via entanglement is possible, potentially reshaping our understanding of quantum non-locality
Light in media The backbone of theoretical quantum optics is the quantum field theory of light, the quantum theory of the electromagnetic field. Quantum electrodynamics becomes surprisingly complicated if one insists on formulating it in a relativistically and gauge-invariant form, as one surely should do in elementary particle physics. Moreover, in quantum optics, we are concerned with light quanta in materials such as glass, with quantum electromagnetism in media, which is even more complicated. To cut a long story short, here we follow a minimalistic approach where we develop the essentials of quantum electrodynamics with as little technical effort as possible, sailing around the cliffs of relativistic quantum field theories. We do not assume any prior knowledge of classical field theory; we only borrow a few ideas from classical electromagnetism (Jackson, 1998). Complications and problems still remain, but hopefully these are mostly no longer formal difficulties, but rather conceptual problems of the quantum nature of light. As Dr Samuel Johnson said on poetry “We all know what light is; but it is not easy to tell what it is. ” Maxwell's equations What is light? Light is a quantum object - we describe its properties by quantum observables, Hermitian operators, and its state by a state vector | ψ _ or density matrix ρ . We use the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics where the operators evolve in time, but the quantum state does not change.