arXiv:1606.01186 · Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Spin-glass phase transition and behavior of nonlinear susceptibility in the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model with random fields
C.V. Morais, Fábio M. Zimmer, Matheus J. Lazo, S. G. Magalhães, Fernando Dantas Nobre
Abstract
The behavior of the nonlinear susceptibility ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{3}$ and its relation to the spin-glass transition temperature ${T}_{f}$ in the presence of random fields are investigated. To accomplish this task, the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model is studied through the replica formalism, within a one-step replica-symmetry-breaking procedure. In addition, the dependence of the Almeida-Thouless eigenvalue ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{AT}}$ (replicon) on the random fields is analyzed. Particularly, in the absence of random fields, the temperature ${T}_{f}$ can be traced by a divergence in the spin-glass susceptibility ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{SG}}$, which presents a term inversely proportional to the replicon ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{AT}}$. As a result of a relation between ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{SG}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{3}$, the latter also presents a divergence at ${T}_{f}$, which comes as a direct consequence of ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{AT}}=0$ at ${T}_{f}$. However, our results show that, in the presence of random fields, ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{3}$ presents a rounded maximum at a temperature ${T}^{*}$ which does not coincide with the spin-glass transition temperature ${T}_{f}$ (i.e., ${T}^{*}>{T}_{f}$ for a given applied random field). Thus, the maximum value of ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{3}$ at ${T}^{*}$ reflects the effects of the random fields in the paramagnetic phase instead of the nontrivial ergodicity breaking associated with the spin-glass phase transition. It is also shown that ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{3}$ still maintains a dependence on the replicon ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{AT}}$, although in a more complicated way as compared with the case without random fields. These results are discussed in view of recent observations in the ${\mathrm{LiHo}}_{x}{\mathrm{Y}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{F}}_{4}$ compound.