Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1510.00127 · The European Physical Journal Special Topics

The dissipative Bose-Hubbard model

G. Kordas, Dirk Witthaut, Pierfrancesco Buonsante, A. Vezzani, Raffaella Burioni, A. I. Karanikas, Sandro Wimberger

Published Sep 8, 2015• 66 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1140/epjst/e2015-02528-2

Related papers

Phase Diagram of a driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard model

Alexandre Le Boit 'e, Giuliano Orso, Cristiano Ciuti

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 19, 2013•0 citations

Dissipation of repulsively bound pairs in the Bose-Hubbard model

Mathias Schneider, Bernd G Schmidt, Michael Fleischhauer

APS•Mar 1, 2010•0 citations

Quantum Many-Body Dynamics of the Bose-Hubbard System with Artificial and Intrinsic Dissipation

Takafumi Tomita

•Mar 25, 2019•0 citations

Phase-slip-induced dissipation in an atomic Bose–Hubbard system

David C. McKay, Matthew White, Matthew Pasienski +1 more

arXiv:0708.3074•Nature•Apr 30, 2008•77 citations

Dynamical hysteresis properties of the driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard model with a Gutzwiller Monte Carlo approach

Dolf Huybrechts, Michiel Wouters

We study the dynamical properties of a driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard model in the strongly interacting regime through a quantum trajectory approach with a cluster Gutzwiller Ansatz for the wave function. This allows us to take classical and quantum correlations into account. By studying the dynamical hysteresis surface that arises by sweeping through the coherent driving strength we show that the phase diagram for this system is in qualitative correspondence with the Gutzwiller mean-field result. However, quantitative differences are present and the inclusion of classical and quantum correlations causes a significant shift of the critical parameters. Additionally, we show that approximation techniques relying on a unimodal distribution such as the mean field and $1/z$ expansion drastically underestimate the particle number fluctuations. Finally, we show that a proposed mapping of the driven-dissipative many-body Bose-Hubbard model onto a single driven-dissipative Kerr model is not accurate for parameters in the hysteresis regime.

arXiv:2008.07316•Physical Review A•Nov 5, 2020•21 citations

Simulation of the Bose—Hubbard Model

Peking University-World Scientific advanced physics series/Peking University-World Scientific advance physics series•Nov 1, 2018•0 citations
We study the dynamical properties of a driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard model in the strongly interacting regime through a quantum trajectory approach with a cluster Gutzwiller Ansatz for the wave function. This allows us to take classical and quantum correlations into account. By studying the dynamical hysteresis surface that arises by sweeping through the coherent driving strength we show that the phase diagram for this system is in qualitative correspondence with the Gutzwiller mean-field result. However, quantitative differences are present and the inclusion of classical and quantum correlations causes a significant shift of the critical parameters. Additionally, we show that approximation techniques relying on a unimodal distribution such as the mean field and 1/z1/z1/z expansion drastically underestimate the particle number fluctuations. Finally, we show that a proposed mapping of the driven-dissipative many-body Bose-Hubbard model onto a single driven-dissipative Kerr model is not accurate for parameters in the hysteresis regime.