Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1506.09193 · Physical Review A

Molecular geometric phase from the exact electron-nuclear factorization

Ryan Requist, Falk Tandetzky, Eberhard K. U. Gross

Published Apr 13, 2016• 81 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The Born-Oppenheimer electronic wave function ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}^{\text{BO}}(r)$ picks up a topological phase factor $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$, a special case of Berry phase, when it is transported around a conical intersection of two adiabatic potential energy surfaces in $R$ space. We show that this topological quantity reverts to a geometric quantity ${e}^{i\ensuremath{\gamma}}$ if the geometric phase $\ensuremath{\gamma}=\ensuremath{\oint}\mathrm{Im}\ensuremath{\langle}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}|{\mathbf{\ensuremath{\nabla}}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}\ensuremath{\rangle}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}d{\mathbf{R}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ is evaluated with the conditional electronic wave function ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}(r)$ from the exact electron-nuclear factorization ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}(r)\ensuremath{\chi}(R)$ instead of the adiabatic function ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}^{\text{BO}}(r)$. A model of a pseudorotating triatomic molecule, also applicable to dynamical Jahn-Teller ions in bulk crystals, provides examples of nontrivial induced vector potentials and molecular geometric phase from the exact factorization. The induced vector potential gives a contribution to the circulating nuclear current that cannot be removed by a gauge transformation. The exact potential energy surface is calculated and found to contain a term depending on the Fubini-Study metric for the conditional electronic wave function.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.93.042108

Related papers

Born–Oppenheimer invariants along nuclear configuration paths

Roi Baer

Whenever a quantum chemist extracts the eigenstate of an electronic Hamiltonian, he makes, consciously or not, a decision concerning the phase of the wave function. This is done for each calculated state at each nuclear position. Thus he defines a Born–Oppenheimer (BO) frame of reference. There is no absolute phase just as there is no absolute position or time in mechanics. This leads naturally to the question: What are the quantities which do not depend on the arbitrary phases, i.e., what are the BO invariants? In this article we identify BO invariants with respect to an arbitrary path in nuclear configuration space. We identify invariant electronic states along these paths and their Aharonov–Anandan geometric phases. For closed loops not passing through electronic energy degeneracies these invariant states are the BO adiabatic wave functions and the phases are the Berry phases. The results establish rigorous relations between the full nonadiabatic couplings matrix and the geometric phases.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Oct 10, 2002•22 citations

Is the Molecular Berry Phase an Artifact of the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation?

Seung Kyu Min, Ali Abedi, Kwang S. Kim +1 more

We demonstrate that the molecular Berry phase and the corresponding nonanalyticity in the electronic Born-Oppenheimer wave function is, in general, not a true topological feature of the exact solution of the full electron-nuclear Schrödinger equation. For a numerically exactly solvable model we show that a nonanalyticity, and the associated geometric phase, only appear in the limit of infinite nuclear mass, while a perfectly smooth behavior is found for any finite nuclear mass.

arXiv:1402.0227•Physical Review Letters•Dec 30, 2014•116 citations

Dynamical Consequences of Nontrivial Topology of Molecular Conical Intersections

Indranil Ghosh, Kush Banker, Gregory S. Engel

The topology of the electronic structure for an avoided crossing and a conical intersection (CI) is different and is characterized by the presence of the geometric phase in the electronic wavefunction in the latter. Using the linear Jahn-Teller model, we show that an avoided crossing can be created from the conical intersection while preserving the nontrivial topology of the latter by adding a Pauli $σ_y$ term to the Hamiltonian. Analogously to solid state systems, we derive a half-integer topological invariant as the integral of the Berry curvature over the CI nuclear branching space. We investigate the influence of electronic topology on chemical dynamics by conducting fewest-switches surface hopping simulations and find distinct hopping rates on identical eigensurfaces but with different topologies. Our work extends the influence of topology on molecular excited state dynamics beyond the Berry phase that can be practically realized through electron-nuclear and spin-orbit coupling.

physics.chem-phCross-listedarXiv:2608.24864•Aug 26, 2026

Electronic Vector Potential from the Exact Factorization of a Complex Wavefunction

Sara Giarrusso, Paola Gori‐Giorgi, Federica Agostini

, which are relevant to properly describe phenomena such as molecular dissociation with density-functional theory, to the case in which the electronic wavefunction corresponds to a complex current-carrying state. In such a case, an extra term in the form of a vector potential appears which cannot be gauged away. Both scalar and vector potentials are introduced via the exact factorization formalism which allows us to express the given Schrödinger equation as two coupled equations, one for the marginal and one for the conditional amplitude. The electronic vector potential is directly related to the paramagnetic current density carried by the total wavefunction and to the diamagnetic current density in the equation for the marginal amplitude. An explicit example of this vector potential in a triplet state of two non-interacting electrons is showcased together with its associated circulation, giving rise to a non-vanishing geometric phase. Some connections with the exact factorization for the full molecular wavefunction beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation are also discussed.

ChemPhysChem•Jun 5, 2024•5 citations

The geometric phase in molecular systems

C. Alden Mead

The fundamental theory of the geometric phase is summarized in a way suitable for use in molecular systems treated by the Born-Oppenheimer approach. Both Abelian and non-Abelian cases are considered. Applications discussd include the Abelian geometric phase associated with an intersection of two electronic potential-energy surfaces; screening of nuclei by the electrons from an external magnetic field; non-Abelian gauge potentials in molecular systems with Kramers degeneracy; and the coupling between different electronic levels (Born-Oppenheimer breakdown) represented as a gauge potential. Experimental tests for these systems are discussed, as well as a number of experiments on spin systems.

Reviews of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 1992•613 citations

What solvable models reveal about Born-Oppenheimer, Born-Huang, and exact factorization

Stephen Wiggins

The Born-Oppenheimer (BO) and single-surface Born-Huang (BH) approximations replace the full molecular problem by nuclear motion associated with one clamped electronic state, whereas the full BH expansion and exact factorization (EF) are exact representations. We use two analytically transparent models to identify what controls one-surface error. For Fernández's bilinearly coupled oscillators, the Brattsev ground-state bracket was already known; we derive closed-form differences proving strictness for every positive nuclear mass and nonzero stable coupling. Using Hunter's conditional-amplitude construction, we place the closed-form ground-state EF potential alongside BO and single-surface BH. Exact excited-state calculations show that the bracket does not extend through the spectrum. The diagonal BH correction is the quantum-metric coefficient of the retained electronic state divided by twice the nuclear mass. Fernández's sixth-order expansion shows that the next omitted correction contains the same derivative couplings, an additional inverse electronic-energy separation, and a factor depending on the nuclear state. We therefore add a two-state model with a position-dependent gap. Decreasing its minimum separation makes the metric higher and narrower while leaving the total Fubini-Study length equal to pi/2. The exact EF, BO, and BH potentials can differ visibly even when their nuclear ground-state amplitudes are nearly identical. The two models show that one-surface accuracy depends on nuclear mass, electronic-state variation, energy separation from omitted states, and the nuclear wavefunction.

quant-pharXiv:2608.08668•Aug 11, 2026
The Born-Oppenheimer electronic wave function \ensuremathΦRBO(r){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}^{\text{BO}}(r)\ensuremathΦRBO​(r) picks up a topological phase factor \ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi1\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi1, a special case of Berry phase, when it is transported around a conical intersection of two adiabatic potential energy surfaces in RRR space. We show that this topological quantity reverts to a geometric quantity ei\ensuremathγ{e}^{i\ensuremath{\gamma}}ei\ensuremathγ if the geometric phase \ensuremathγ=\ensuremath∮Im\ensuremath⟨\ensuremathΦR∣\ensuremath∇\ensuremathμ\ensuremathΦR\ensuremath⟩\ifmmode⋅\else\textperiodcentered\fidR\ensuremathμ\ensuremath{\gamma}=\ensuremath{\oint}\mathrm{Im}\ensuremath{\langle}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}|{\mathbf{\ensuremath{\nabla}}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}\ensuremath{\rangle}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}d{\mathbf{R}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}\ensuremathγ=\ensuremath∮Im\ensuremath⟨\ensuremathΦR​∣\ensuremath∇\ensuremathμ​\ensuremathΦR​\ensuremath⟩\ifmmode⋅\else\textperiodcentered\fidR\ensuremathμ​ is evaluated with the conditional electronic wave function \ensuremathΦR(r){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}(r)\ensuremathΦR​(r) from the exact electron-nuclear factorization \ensuremathΦR(r)\ensuremathχ(R){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}(r)\ensuremath{\chi}(R)\ensuremathΦR​(r)\ensuremathχ(R) instead of the adiabatic function \ensuremathΦRBO(r){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}^{\text{BO}}(r)\ensuremathΦRBO​(r). A model of a pseudorotating triatomic molecule, also applicable to dynamical Jahn-Teller ions in bulk crystals, provides examples of nontrivial induced vector potentials and molecular geometric phase from the exact factorization. The induced vector potential gives a contribution to the circulating nuclear current that cannot be removed by a gauge transformation. The exact potential energy surface is calculated and found to contain a term depending on the Fubini-Study metric for the conditional electronic wave function.
Whenever a quantum chemist extracts the eigenstate of an electronic Hamiltonian, he makes, consciously or not, a decision concerning the phase of the wave function. This is done for each calculated state at each nuclear position. Thus he defines a Born–Oppenheimer (BO) frame of reference. There is no absolute phase just as there is no absolute position or time in mechanics. This leads naturally to the question: What are the quantities which do not depend on the arbitrary phases, i.e., what are the BO invariants? In this article we identify BO invariants with respect to an arbitrary path in nuclear configuration space. We identify invariant electronic states along these paths and their Aharonov–Anandan geometric phases. For closed loops not passing through electronic energy degeneracies these invariant states are the BO adiabatic wave functions and the phases are the Berry phases. The results establish rigorous relations between the full nonadiabatic couplings matrix and the geometric phases.
The topology of the electronic structure for an avoided crossing and a conical intersection (CI) is different and is characterized by the presence of the geometric phase in the electronic wavefunction in the latter. Using the linear Jahn-Teller model, we show that an avoided crossing can be created from the conical intersection while preserving the nontrivial topology of the latter by adding a Pauli σyσ_yσy​ term to the Hamiltonian. Analogously to solid state systems, we derive a half-integer topological invariant as the integral of the Berry curvature over the CI nuclear branching space. We investigate the influence of electronic topology on chemical dynamics by conducting fewest-switches surface hopping simulations and find distinct hopping rates on identical eigensurfaces but with different topologies. Our work extends the influence of topology on molecular excited state dynamics beyond the Berry phase that can be practically realized through electron-nuclear and spin-orbit coupling.
, which are relevant to properly describe phenomena such as molecular dissociation with density-functional theory, to the case in which the electronic wavefunction corresponds to a complex current-carrying state. In such a case, an extra term in the form of a vector potential appears which cannot be gauged away. Both scalar and vector potentials are introduced via the exact factorization formalism which allows us to express the given Schrödinger equation as two coupled equations, one for the marginal and one for the conditional amplitude. The electronic vector potential is directly related to the paramagnetic current density carried by the total wavefunction and to the diamagnetic current density in the equation for the marginal amplitude. An explicit example of this vector potential in a triplet state of two non-interacting electrons is showcased together with its associated circulation, giving rise to a non-vanishing geometric phase. Some connections with the exact factorization for the full molecular wavefunction beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation are also discussed.
The fundamental theory of the geometric phase is summarized in a way suitable for use in molecular systems treated by the Born-Oppenheimer approach. Both Abelian and non-Abelian cases are considered. Applications discussd include the Abelian geometric phase associated with an intersection of two electronic potential-energy surfaces; screening of nuclei by the electrons from an external magnetic field; non-Abelian gauge potentials in molecular systems with Kramers degeneracy; and the coupling between different electronic levels (Born-Oppenheimer breakdown) represented as a gauge potential. Experimental tests for these systems are discussed, as well as a number of experiments on spin systems.
The Born-Oppenheimer (BO) and single-surface Born-Huang (BH) approximations replace the full molecular problem by nuclear motion associated with one clamped electronic state, whereas the full BH expansion and exact factorization (EF) are exact representations. We use two analytically transparent models to identify what controls one-surface error. For Fernández's bilinearly coupled oscillators, the Brattsev ground-state bracket was already known; we derive closed-form differences proving strictness for every positive nuclear mass and nonzero stable coupling. Using Hunter's conditional-amplitude construction, we place the closed-form ground-state EF potential alongside BO and single-surface BH. Exact excited-state calculations show that the bracket does not extend through the spectrum. The diagonal BH correction is the quantum-metric coefficient of the retained electronic state divided by twice the nuclear mass. Fernández's sixth-order expansion shows that the next omitted correction contains the same derivative couplings, an additional inverse electronic-energy separation, and a factor depending on the nuclear state. We therefore add a two-state model with a position-dependent gap. Decreasing its minimum separation makes the metric higher and narrower while leaving the total Fubini-Study length equal to pi/2. The exact EF, BO, and BH potentials can differ visibly even when their nuclear ground-state amplitudes are nearly identical. The two models show that one-surface accuracy depends on nuclear mass, electronic-state variation, energy separation from omitted states, and the nuclear wavefunction.