Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1402.0227 · Physical Review Letters

Is the Molecular Berry Phase an Artifact of the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation?

Seung Kyu Min, Ali Abedi, Kwang S. Kim, Eberhard K. U. Gross

Published Dec 30, 2014• 116 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We demonstrate that the molecular Berry phase and the corresponding nonanalyticity in the electronic Born-Oppenheimer wave function is, in general, not a true topological feature of the exact solution of the full electron-nuclear Schrödinger equation. For a numerically exactly solvable model we show that a nonanalyticity, and the associated geometric phase, only appear in the limit of infinite nuclear mass, while a perfectly smooth behavior is found for any finite nuclear mass.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.113.263004

Related papers

Molecular geometric phase from the exact electron-nuclear factorization

Ryan Requist, Falk Tandetzky, Eberhard K. U. Gross

The Born-Oppenheimer electronic wave function ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}^{\text{BO}}(r)$ picks up a topological phase factor $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$, a special case of Berry phase, when it is transported around a conical intersection of two adiabatic potential energy surfaces in $R$ space. We show that this topological quantity reverts to a geometric quantity ${e}^{i\ensuremath{\gamma}}$ if the geometric phase $\ensuremath{\gamma}=\ensuremath{\oint}\mathrm{Im}\ensuremath{\langle}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}|{\mathbf{\ensuremath{\nabla}}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}\ensuremath{\rangle}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}d{\mathbf{R}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ is evaluated with the conditional electronic wave function ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}(r)$ from the exact electron-nuclear factorization ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}(r)\ensuremath{\chi}(R)$ instead of the adiabatic function ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}^{\text{BO}}(r)$. A model of a pseudorotating triatomic molecule, also applicable to dynamical Jahn-Teller ions in bulk crystals, provides examples of nontrivial induced vector potentials and molecular geometric phase from the exact factorization. The induced vector potential gives a contribution to the circulating nuclear current that cannot be removed by a gauge transformation. The exact potential energy surface is calculated and found to contain a term depending on the Fubini-Study metric for the conditional electronic wave function.

arXiv:1506.09193•Physical Review A•Apr 13, 2016•81 citations

Born–Oppenheimer invariants along nuclear configuration paths

Roi Baer

Whenever a quantum chemist extracts the eigenstate of an electronic Hamiltonian, he makes, consciously or not, a decision concerning the phase of the wave function. This is done for each calculated state at each nuclear position. Thus he defines a Born–Oppenheimer (BO) frame of reference. There is no absolute phase just as there is no absolute position or time in mechanics. This leads naturally to the question: What are the quantities which do not depend on the arbitrary phases, i.e., what are the BO invariants? In this article we identify BO invariants with respect to an arbitrary path in nuclear configuration space. We identify invariant electronic states along these paths and their Aharonov–Anandan geometric phases. For closed loops not passing through electronic energy degeneracies these invariant states are the BO adiabatic wave functions and the phases are the Berry phases. The results establish rigorous relations between the full nonadiabatic couplings matrix and the geometric phases.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Oct 10, 2002•22 citations

The Berry phase revisited: application to Born–Oppenheimer molecular systems

Tamás Vértesi, Ágnes Vibók, Gábor J. Halász +1 more

In this paper, we study the implementation of the Berry approach as expressed in his seminal publication (1984 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392 45) within Born–Oppenheimer molecular systems (1927 Ann. Phys., Lpz. 84 457). This was done with the purpose of revealing the relation between the various time-dependent magnitudes in the adiabatic limit and their time-independent counterparts. The two main results are: (1) in the adiabatic limit, a single Born–Oppenheimer state becomes an eigenstate of the system during the excursion of a system along a given contour, and (2) at the end of a closed contour, the topological phases associated with the states that moved adiabatically along a closed contour are well presented by the diagonal D -matrix as obtained from the time-independent treatment. The theoretical study is supported by a detailed numerical study carried out for two ab initio molecular systems, namely the (Na, H 2 ) and the (H, H 2 ) systems.

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Nov 23, 2004•13 citations

A general reduction scheme for the time-dependent Born–Oppenheimer approximation

André Martínez, Vania Sordoni

We construct a general reduction scheme for the study of the quantum propagator of molecular Schrödinger operators with smooth potentials. This reduction is made up to infinitely (resp. exponentially) small error terms with respect to the inverse square root of the mass of the nuclei, depending on the C ∞ (resp. analytic) smoothness of the interactions. Then we apply this result to the case when an electronic level is isolated from the rest of the spectrum of the electronic Hamiltonian.

Comptes Rendus Mathématique•Feb 1, 2002•50 citations

Electronic–nuclear entanglement in Born–Oppenheimer wave functions and beyond

Juan F. P. Mosquera, José Luis Sanz‐Vicario

We analyze the entanglement between electronic and nuclear motions in molecular wave functions widely used by theoretical chemists, namely, (i) Born-Oppenheimer factorization in the adiabatic picture, (ii) the transformation into a diabatic picture, (iii) the use of a Born-Huang expansion, and (iv) the eigenfunction of the full molecular Hamiltonian. Our showcase is based on two one-electron one-dimensional molecular Hamiltonians (H2+ and the Shin-Metiu model). We find that within the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, any molecular state (although factorizable) is always entangled, and its entanglement content may be assessed by the variation of the electronic wave function along the different nuclear geometries, with the nuclear wave function indeed playing the role of a tester. The presence of avoided crossings among the adiabatic potential energy curves brings about dramatic changes in the entanglement content of the wave function: sharp avoided crossings favor a diabatic picture (real crossings between potential energy curves), while in broad avoided crossings, the adiabatic picture prevails. The total eigenfunction of the molecular Shin-Metiu Hamiltonian indicates that nuclear densities accommodate well within the diabatic curves for strong adiabatic couplings but within adiabatic curves for weak ones. Consequently, we find that the electron-nuclei entanglement content is a valid witness to unveil strong or weak nonadiabatic couplings in molecules. In terms of entanglement, we also find that the Born-Huang expansion, based on Born-Oppenheimer adiabatic electronic states, does not provide a correct trend of entanglement compared with that of the total molecular eigenfunction, thus indicating a very slow convergence of this expansion.

arXiv:2508.21578•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 10, 2026•0 citations

TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF BERRY'S PHASE

KAZUO FUJIKAWA

By using a second quantized formulation of level crossing, which does not assume adiabatic approximation, a convenient formula for geometric terms including off-diagonal terms is derived. The analysis of geometric phases is reduced to a simple diagonalization of the Hamiltonian in the present formulation. If one diagonalizes the geometric terms in the infinitesimal neighborhood of level crossing, the geometric phases become trivial for any finite time interval T. The topological interpretation of Berry's phase such as the topological proof of phase-change rule thus fails in the practical Born–Oppenheimer approximation, where a large but finite ratio of two time scales is involved.

arXiv:quant-ph/0411006•Modern Physics Letters A•Feb 20, 2005•19 citations
We demonstrate that the molecular Berry phase and the corresponding nonanalyticity in the electronic Born-Oppenheimer wave function is, in general, not a true topological feature of the exact solution of the full electron-nuclear Schrödinger equation. For a numerically exactly solvable model we show that a nonanalyticity, and the associated geometric phase, only appear in the limit of infinite nuclear mass, while a perfectly smooth behavior is found for any finite nuclear mass.
The Born-Oppenheimer electronic wave function ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}^{\text{BO}}(r)$ picks up a topological phase factor $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$, a special case of Berry phase, when it is transported around a conical intersection of two adiabatic potential energy surfaces in RRR space. We show that this topological quantity reverts to a geometric quantity ${e}^{i\ensuremath{\gamma}}$ if the geometric phase $\ensuremath{\gamma}=\ensuremath{\oint}\mathrm{Im}\ensuremath{\langle}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}|{\mathbf{\ensuremath{\nabla}}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}\ensuremath{\rangle}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}d{\mathbf{R}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ is evaluated with the conditional electronic wave function ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}(r)$ from the exact electron-nuclear factorization ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}(r)\ensuremath{\chi}(R)$ instead of the adiabatic function ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{R}^{\text{BO}}(r)$. A model of a pseudorotating triatomic molecule, also applicable to dynamical Jahn-Teller ions in bulk crystals, provides examples of nontrivial induced vector potentials and molecular geometric phase from the exact factorization. The induced vector potential gives a contribution to the circulating nuclear current that cannot be removed by a gauge transformation. The exact potential energy surface is calculated and found to contain a term depending on the Fubini-Study metric for the conditional electronic wave function.
Whenever a quantum chemist extracts the eigenstate of an electronic Hamiltonian, he makes, consciously or not, a decision concerning the phase of the wave function. This is done for each calculated state at each nuclear position. Thus he defines a Born–Oppenheimer (BO) frame of reference. There is no absolute phase just as there is no absolute position or time in mechanics. This leads naturally to the question: What are the quantities which do not depend on the arbitrary phases, i.e., what are the BO invariants? In this article we identify BO invariants with respect to an arbitrary path in nuclear configuration space. We identify invariant electronic states along these paths and their Aharonov–Anandan geometric phases. For closed loops not passing through electronic energy degeneracies these invariant states are the BO adiabatic wave functions and the phases are the Berry phases. The results establish rigorous relations between the full nonadiabatic couplings matrix and the geometric phases.
In this paper, we study the implementation of the Berry approach as expressed in his seminal publication (1984 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392 45) within Born–Oppenheimer molecular systems (1927 Ann. Phys., Lpz. 84 457). This was done with the purpose of revealing the relation between the various time-dependent magnitudes in the adiabatic limit and their time-independent counterparts. The two main results are: (1) in the adiabatic limit, a single Born–Oppenheimer state becomes an eigenstate of the system during the excursion of a system along a given contour, and (2) at the end of a closed contour, the topological phases associated with the states that moved adiabatically along a closed contour are well presented by the diagonal D -matrix as obtained from the time-independent treatment. The theoretical study is supported by a detailed numerical study carried out for two ab initio molecular systems, namely the (Na, H 2 ) and the (H, H 2 ) systems.
We analyze the entanglement between electronic and nuclear motions in molecular wave functions widely used by theoretical chemists, namely, (i) Born-Oppenheimer factorization in the adiabatic picture, (ii) the transformation into a diabatic picture, (iii) the use of a Born-Huang expansion, and (iv) the eigenfunction of the full molecular Hamiltonian. Our showcase is based on two one-electron one-dimensional molecular Hamiltonians (H2+ and the Shin-Metiu model). We find that within the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, any molecular state (although factorizable) is always entangled, and its entanglement content may be assessed by the variation of the electronic wave function along the different nuclear geometries, with the nuclear wave function indeed playing the role of a tester. The presence of avoided crossings among the adiabatic potential energy curves brings about dramatic changes in the entanglement content of the wave function: sharp avoided crossings favor a diabatic picture (real crossings between potential energy curves), while in broad avoided crossings, the adiabatic picture prevails. The total eigenfunction of the molecular Shin-Metiu Hamiltonian indicates that nuclear densities accommodate well within the diabatic curves for strong adiabatic couplings but within adiabatic curves for weak ones. Consequently, we find that the electron-nuclei entanglement content is a valid witness to unveil strong or weak nonadiabatic couplings in molecules. In terms of entanglement, we also find that the Born-Huang expansion, based on Born-Oppenheimer adiabatic electronic states, does not provide a correct trend of entanglement compared with that of the total molecular eigenfunction, thus indicating a very slow convergence of this expansion.
By using a second quantized formulation of level crossing, which does not assume adiabatic approximation, a convenient formula for geometric terms including off-diagonal terms is derived. The analysis of geometric phases is reduced to a simple diagonalization of the Hamiltonian in the present formulation. If one diagonalizes the geometric terms in the infinitesimal neighborhood of level crossing, the geometric phases become trivial for any finite time interval T. The topological interpretation of Berry's phase such as the topological proof of phase-change rule thus fails in the practical Born–Oppenheimer approximation, where a large but finite ratio of two time scales is involved.