Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1504.05259 · Foundations of Physics

Analysis of Wallace’s Proof of the Born Rule in Everettian Quantum Mechanics: Formal Aspects

André L. G. Mandolesi

Published Jun 5, 2018• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-018-0179-7

Related papers

Analysis of Wallace’s Proof of the Born Rule in Everettian Quantum Mechanics II: Concepts and Axioms

André L. G. Mandolesi

arXiv:1803.08762•Foundations of Physics•Nov 21, 2018•8 citations

Analysis of Wallace's Decision Theoretic Proof of the Born Rule in Everettian Quantum Mechanics

André L. G. Mandolesi

We analyse Wallace’s adaptation of Decision Theory to formally prove the Born Rule in Everettian Quantum Mechanics. His proof was reorganized with some improvements, and many details were filled in. In the process, we detected some inconsistencies in his concepts and axioms, as well as other problems, which, if not fixed, would invalidate the proof.

•Apr 20, 2015•0 citations

Remarks on the Everett-Wheeler Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Roland E. Allen

American Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 1971•2 citations

Against the empirical viability of the Deutsch–Wallace–Everett approach to quantum mechanics

Richard Dawid, Karim P. Y. Thébault

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Jun 11, 2014•36 citations

Non-Probabilistic Decoherent Histories and Causal Histories in Everettian Quantum Mechanics

André L. G. Mandolesi

D. Wallace has combined the Decoherent Histories formalism and Everettian Quantum Mechanics, in an attempt to solve the preferred basis problem. This in turn serves as a foundation for his proof of the Born rule. But approximations used in decoherence depend on the probabilistic interpretation of Born weights, resulting in a circular reasoning. We contest his arguments that the approximations are valid even without probabilities, and show that, without them, the combination of those theories leads to unacceptable results. There is a proliferation of ill behaved histories, compromising his proof of the Born rule. We propose the development of a new causal histories formalism, which might improve the situation. Histories of small amplitude are discarded, not on probability grounds, but for suffering too much interference, which blurs causal relations. The remaining histories might still suffer small amounts of interference, leaving open the possibility of experimental verification.

•Apr 4, 2017•0 citations

A note on the Hilbert space formalism of quantum mechanics

Bedřich Pondělíček

Reports on Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 1975•0 citations
D. Wallace has combined the Decoherent Histories formalism and Everettian Quantum Mechanics, in an attempt to solve the preferred basis problem. This in turn serves as a foundation for his proof of the Born rule. But approximations used in decoherence depend on the probabilistic interpretation of Born weights, resulting in a circular reasoning. We contest his arguments that the approximations are valid even without probabilities, and show that, without them, the combination of those theories leads to unacceptable results. There is a proliferation of ill behaved histories, compromising his proof of the Born rule. We propose the development of a new causal histories formalism, which might improve the situation. Histories of small amplitude are discarded, not on probability grounds, but for suffering too much interference, which blurs causal relations. The remaining histories might still suffer small amounts of interference, leaving open the possibility of experimental verification.