Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1501.04929 · Annals of Physics

On the role of joint probability distributions of incompatible observables in Bell and Kochen–Specker Theorems

́Angel Rivas

Published Sep 2, 2019• 11 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.aop.2019.167939

Related papers

New variants of the Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem

Adán Cabello, JoséM. Estebaranz, Guillermo García Alcaine

arXiv:quant-ph/9706010•Physics Letters A•Aug 1, 1996•15 citations

A simplified basis for Bell–Kochen–Specker theorems

James D. Malley, Arthur I. Fine

arXiv:1407.4838•Physics Letters A•Jul 1, 2014•2 citations

On the existence of joint probability distributions for arbitrary incompatible observables in quantum mechanics

O. Abu-Zeid

Physics Letters A•Nov 1, 1987•9 citations

Reexamination of the Kochen-Specker theorem: Relaxation of the completeness assumption

Kelvin Onggadinata, Dagomir Kaszlikowski, Paweł Kurzyński

The Kochen-Specker theorem states that exclusive and complete deterministic outcome assignments are impossible for certain sets of measurements, called Kochen-Specker (KS) sets. A straightforward consequence is that KS sets do not have joint probability distributions because no set of joint outcomes over such a distribution can be constructed. However, we show it is possible to construct a joint quasiprobability distribution over any KS set by relaxing the completeness assumption. Interestingly, completeness is still observable at the level of measurable marginal probability distributions. This suggests the observable completeness might not be a fundamental feature, but a secondary property.

arXiv:2210.06822•Physical Review A•Feb 22, 2023•2 citations

Joint measurement of incompatible observables and the bell inequalities

Willem M. de Muynck, Hans Martens

Physics Letters A•Dec 1, 1989•15 citations

Contextuality in composite systems: the role of entanglement in the Kochen-Specker theorem

Victoria J Wright, Ravi Kunjwal

The Kochen–Specker (KS) theorem reveals the nonclassicality of single quantum systems. In contrast, Bell's theorem and entanglement concern the nonclassicality of composite quantum systems. Accordingly, unlike incompatibility, entanglement and Bell non-locality are not necessary to demonstrate KS-contextuality. However, here we find that for multiqubit systems, entanglement and non-locality are both essential to proofs of the Kochen–Specker theorem. Firstly, we show that unentangled measurements (a strict superset of local measurements) can never yield a logical (state-independent) proof of the KS theorem for multiqubit systems. In particular, unentangled but nonlocal measurements—whose eigenstates exhibit ''nonlocality without entanglement"—are insufficient for such proofs. This also implies that proving Gleason's theorem on a multiqubit system necessarily requires entangled projections, as shown by Wallach [Contemp Math, 305: 291-298 (2002)]. Secondly, we show that a multiqubit state admits a statistical (state-dependent) proof of the KS theorem if and only if it can violate a Bell inequality with projective measurements. We also establish the relationship between entanglement and the theorems of Kochen–Specker and Gleason more generally in multiqudit systems by constructing new examples of KS sets. Finally, we discuss how our results shed new light on the role of multiqubit contextuality as a resource within the paradigm of quantum computation with state injection.

arXiv:2109.13594•Quantum•Jan 19, 2023•9 citations
The Kochen-Specker theorem states that exclusive and complete deterministic outcome assignments are impossible for certain sets of measurements, called Kochen-Specker (KS) sets. A straightforward consequence is that KS sets do not have joint probability distributions because no set of joint outcomes over such a distribution can be constructed. However, we show it is possible to construct a joint quasiprobability distribution over any KS set by relaxing the completeness assumption. Interestingly, completeness is still observable at the level of measurable marginal probability distributions. This suggests the observable completeness might not be a fundamental feature, but a secondary property.
The Kochen–Specker (KS) theorem reveals the nonclassicality of single quantum systems. In contrast, Bell's theorem and entanglement concern the nonclassicality of composite quantum systems. Accordingly, unlike incompatibility, entanglement and Bell non-locality are not necessary to demonstrate KS-contextuality. However, here we find that for multiqubit systems, entanglement and non-locality are both essential to proofs of the Kochen–Specker theorem. Firstly, we show that unentangled measurements (a strict superset of local measurements) can never yield a logical (state-independent) proof of the KS theorem for multiqubit systems. In particular, unentangled but nonlocal measurements—whose eigenstates exhibit ''nonlocality without entanglement"—are insufficient for such proofs. This also implies that proving Gleason's theorem on a multiqubit system necessarily requires entangled projections, as shown by Wallach [Contemp Math, 305: 291-298 (2002)]. Secondly, we show that a multiqubit state admits a statistical (state-dependent) proof of the KS theorem if and only if it can violate a Bell inequality with projective measurements. We also establish the relationship between entanglement and the theorems of Kochen–Specker and Gleason more generally in multiqudit systems by constructing new examples of KS sets. Finally, we discuss how our results shed new light on the role of multiqubit contextuality as a resource within the paradigm of quantum computation with state injection.