The Kochen-Specker theorem states that exclusive and complete deterministic outcome assignments are impossible for certain sets of measurements, called Kochen-Specker (KS) sets. A straightforward consequence is that KS sets do not have joint probability distributions because no set of joint outcomes over such a distribution can be constructed. However, we show it is possible to construct a joint quasiprobability distribution over any KS set by relaxing the completeness assumption. Interestingly, completeness is still observable at the level of measurable marginal probability distributions. This suggests the observable completeness might not be a fundamental feature, but a secondary property.
The Kochen-Specker theorem states that exclusive and complete deterministic outcome assignments are impossible for certain sets of measurements, called Kochen-Specker (KS) sets. A straightforward consequence is that KS sets do not have joint probability distributions because no set of joint outcomes over such a distribution can be constructed. However, we show it is possible to construct a joint quasiprobability distribution over any KS set by relaxing the completeness assumption. Interestingly, completeness is still observable at the level of measurable marginal probability distributions. This suggests the observable completeness might not be a fundamental feature, but a secondary property.
The Kochen–Specker (KS) theorem is a cornerstone result in quantum foundations, establishing that quantum correlations in Hilbert spaces of dimension d ≥ 3 cannot be explained by (consistent) hidden variable theories that assign a single deterministic outcome to each measurement. Specifically, there exist finite sets of vectors in these dimensions such that no non-contextual deterministic ({0, 1}) outcome assignment is possible obeying the rules of exclusivity and completeness—that the sum of assignments to every set of mutually orthogonal vectors be ≤1 and the sum of value assignments to any d mutually orthogonal vectors be equal to 1. Another central result in quantum foundations is Gleason’s theorem that justifies the Born rule as a mathematical consequence of the quantum formalism. The KS theorem can be seen as a consequence of Gleason’s theorem and the logical compactness theorem. In a similar vein, Gleason’s theorem also indicates the existence of KS-type finite vector constructions to rule out other finite-alphabet outcome assignments beyond the {0, 1} case. Here, we propose a generalisation of the KS theorem that rules out hidden variable theories with outcome assignments in the set {0, p, 1 − p, 1} for p ∈ [0, 1/d) ∪ (1/d, 1/2]. The case p = 1/2 is especially physically significant. We show that in this case the result rules out (consistent) hidden variable theories that are fundamentally binary, i.e., theories where each measurement has fundamentally at most two outcomes (in contrast to the single deterministic outcome per measurement ruled out by KS). We present a device-independent application of this generalised KS theorem by constructing a two-player non-local game for which a perfect quantum winning strategy exists (a Pseudo-telepathy game) while no perfect classical strategy exists even if the players are provided with additional no-signaling resources of PR-box type (with marginals in {0, 1/2, 1}).
A characterization of noncontextual models which fall within the ambit of Fine's theorem is provided. In particular, the equivalence between the existence of three notions is made explicit: a joint probability distribution over the outcomes of all the measurements considered, a measurement-noncontextual and outcome-deterministic (or KS-noncontextual, where KS stands for Kochen-Specker) model for these measurements, and a measurement-noncontextual and factorizable model for them. A KS inequality, therefore, is implied by each of these three notions. Following this characterization of noncontextual models that fall within the ambit of Fine's theorem, nonfactorizable noncontextual models which lie outside the domain of Fine's theorem are considered. While outcome determinism for projective (sharp) measurements in quantum theory can be shown to follow from the assumption of preparation noncontextuality, such a justification is not available for nonprojective (unsharp) measurements which ought to admit outcome-indeterministic response functions. The Liang-Spekkens-Wiseman (LSW) inequality is cited as an example of a noncontextuality inequality that should hold in any noncontextual model of quantum theory without assuming factorizability. Three other noncontextuality inequalities, which turn out to be equivalent to the LSW inequality under relabelings of measurement outcomes, are derived for Specker's scenario. The polytope of correlations admissible in this scenario, given the no-disturbance condition, is characterized.
The Kochen-Specker theorem proves the inability to assign, simultaneously, noncontextual definite values to all (of a finite set of) quantum mechanical observables in a consistent manner. If one assumes that any definite values behave noncontextually, one can nonetheless only conclude that some observables (in this set) are value indefinite. In this paper, we prove a variant of the Kochen-Specker theorem showing that, under the same assumption of noncontextuality, if a single one-dimensional projection observable is assigned the definite value 1, then no one-dimensional projection observable that is incompatible (i.e., non-commuting) with this one can be assigned consistently a definite value. Unlike standard proofs of the Kochen-Specker theorem, in order to localise and show the extent of value indefiniteness, this result requires a constructive method of reduction between Kochen-Specker sets. If a system is prepared in a pure state ψ, then it is reasonable to assume that any value assignment (i.e., hidden variable model) for this system assigns the value 1 to the observable projecting onto the one-dimensional linear subspace spanned by ψ, and the value 0 to those projecting onto linear subspaces orthogonal to it. Our result can be interpreted, under this assumption, as showing that the outcome of a measurement of any other incompatible one-dimensional projection observable cannot be determined in advance, thus formalising a notion of quantum randomness.
Kochen—Specker (KS) theorem denies the possibility for the noncontextual hidden variable theories to reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics. A set of projection operators (projectors) and bases used to show the impossibility of noncontextual definite values assignment is named as the KS set. Since one KS set with a mixture of 16 rank-1 projectors and 14 rank-2 projectors was proposed in 1995 [Kernaghan M and Peres A Phys. Lett. A 198 (1995) 1 ] for a three-qubit system, there have been plenty of the same type KS sets and we propose a systematic way to produce them. We also propose a probabilistic state-dependent proof of the KS theorem that mainly focuses on the values assignment for all the rank-2 projectors.
One of the main theorems on the impossibility of hidden variables in quantum mechanics is Kochen-Specker theorem (KS). This theorem says that any hidden variable theory that satisfies quantum mechanics must be contextual. More specifically, it asserts that, in Hilbert space of dimension ≥ 3, it is impossible to associate definite numerical values, 1 or 0, with every projection operator Pm, in such a way that, if a set of commuting Pm satisfies 1=ΣmP, the corresponding values will also satisfy . Since the first proof of Kochen and Specker using 117 vectors in R3, there were many attempts to reduce the number of vector either via conceiving ingenious models or extending the system being considered to higher dimension. By considering eight dimensional three qubits system, we found a state dependent proof that requires only five vectors. The state that we assign value of 1 is the ray that arises from intersection of two planes. The recent advancements show that the KS theorem proof can be extended to two dimensional quantum system through generalized measurement represented by positive operator-valued measured (POVM). In POVMs the number of available outcomes of a measurement may be higher than the dimensionality of the Hilbert space and N-outcome generalized measurement is represented by N-element POVM which consists of N positive semidefinite operators {}dE that sum to identity. Each pair of elements is not mutually orthogonal if the number of outcome of measurements is bigger than the dimensionality. In terms of POVM, Kochen-Specker theorem asserts that and could not be satisfied for . We developed a general model that enables us to generate different sizes of the POVM for the proof of the Kochen-Specker theorem. We show that the current simplest Nakamura model is in fact a special case of our model. W also provide another model which is as simple as the Nakamura’s but consists of different sets of POVM.