We establish a quantitative relation between Hardy's paradox and the breaking of the uncertainty principle in the sense of measurement-disturbance relations in the conditional measurement of noncommuting operators. The analysis of the inconsistency of local realism with entanglement by Hardy is simplified if this breaking of measurement-disturbance relations is taken into account, and a much simplified experimental test of local realism is illustrated in the framework of Hardy's thought experiment. The essence of Hardy's model is identified as a combination of two conditional measurements, which give rise to definite eigenvalues to two noncommuting operators simultaneously in hidden-variables models. Better understanding of the intimate interplay of entanglement and measurement disturbance is crucial in the current discussions of Hardy's paradox using the idea of weak measurement, which is based on a general analysis of measurement-disturbance relations.
We establish a quantitative relation between Hardy's paradox and the breaking of the uncertainty principle in the sense of measurement-disturbance relations in the conditional measurement of noncommuting operators. The analysis of the inconsistency of local realism with entanglement by Hardy is simplified if this breaking of measurement-disturbance relations is taken into account, and a much simplified experimental test of local realism is illustrated in the framework of Hardy's thought experiment. The essence of Hardy's model is identified as a combination of two conditional measurements, which give rise to definite eigenvalues to two noncommuting operators simultaneously in hidden-variables models. Better understanding of the intimate interplay of entanglement and measurement disturbance is crucial in the current discussions of Hardy's paradox using the idea of weak measurement, which is based on a general analysis of measurement-disturbance relations.
Bell's theorem states that the quantum mechanical description of physical quantities cannot be fully explained by local realistic theories, laying a solid basis for various quantum information applications. Hardy's paradox is celebrated as the simplest form of Bell's theorem concerning its "All versus Nothing" approach to test local realism. However, due to experimental imperfections, existing tests of Hardy's paradox require additional assumptions of the experimental systems, and these assumptions constitute potential loopholes for faithfully testing local realistic theories. Here, we experimentally demonstrate Hardy's nonlocality through a photonic entanglement source. By achieving a detection efficiency of 82.2%, a quantum state fidelity of 99.10%, and applying high-speed quantum random number generators for the measurement setting switching, the experiment is implemented in a loophole-free manner. During 6 h of running, a strong violation of P_{Hardy}=4.646×10^{-4} up to 5 standard deviations is observed with 4.32×10^{9} trials. A null hypothesis test shows that the results can be explained by local realistic theories with an upper bound probability of 10^{-16348}. These testing results provide affirmative evidence against local realism, and establish an advancing benchmark for quantum information applications based on Hardy's paradox.
Hardy’s paradox provides an “All-versus-Nothing” fashion to directly certify that quantum mechanics cannot be completely described by local realistic theory. However, when considering potential imperfections in experiments, like noisy entanglement source and low detection efficiency, the original Hardy’s paradox can only induce a rather small Hardy violation, and is difficult to reveal. To overcome this challenge, we have proposed a realigned Hardy’s paradox, which can dramatically improve the Hardy violation. Furthermore, we have generalized the realigned Hardy’s paradox to arbitrary even n dichotomic measurements. For n=2, 4 and 6 cases, the realigned Hardy’s paradox can achieve Hardy values approximate 0.4140, 0.7734 and 0.8875 respectively for qubit systems, compared with only 0.09 of the original Hardy’s paradox. Meanwhile, the structure of the realigned Hardy’s paradox is simpler and more robust, in the sense that there is only one Hardy condition. We anticipate that the realigned Hardy’s paradox can tolerate more experimental imperfections and help to stimulate more fascinating quantum information applications.
We have performed a test of local realism using entangled photons produced by spontaneous parametric downconversion. This experimental test is based on an idea originally proposed by Hardy for a test of local realism without inequalities, although our experiment actually measures an inequality (as any experiment must). We find a more-than-70 standard deviation violation of the predictions of local realism. The experimental effort required for this test is essentially the same as that required for a test of a Bell inequality. However, this test is based on concepts that are easier to understand and more compelling than those behind the original Bell inequality.
Entanglement and nonlocality are studied in the framework of pre-/postselected ensembles with the aid of weak measurements and the two-state-vector formalism. In addition to the EPR–Bohm experiment, we revisit the Hardy and Cheshire Cat experiments, whose entangled pre- or postselected states give rise to curious phenomena. We then turn to even more peculiar phenomenon suggesting “emerging correlations” between independent preand postselected ensembles of particles. This can be viewed as a quantum violation of the classical “pigeonhole principle.” Introduction It is seldom acknowledged that seven years before the celebrated Bell paper [1], Bohm and Aharonov [2] published an analysis of the EPR paradox [3]. They suggested an experimental setup, based on Compton scattering, for testing nonlocal correlations between the polarizations of two annihilation photons. In 1964, Bell proposed his general inequality, thereby excluding local realism. During the same time, Aharonov et al. constructed the foundations of a time-symmetric formalism of quantum mechanics [4]. While Bell's proof utilizes entanglement to demonstrate nonlocal correlations,wewill describe inwhat follows the emergence of nonlocal correlations between product states. For this purpose, however, we shall invoke weak measurements of pre- and postselected ensembles. In classical mechanics, initial conditions of position and velocity for every particle fully determine the time evolution of the system. Therefore, trying to impose an additional final condition would lead either to redundancy or to inconsistency with the initial conditions. This is radically different in quantum mechanics. Because of the uncertainty principle, an initial state vector does not fully determine, in general, the outcome of a future measurement. However, adding a final (backward-evolving) state vector results in a more complete description of the quantum system in between these two boundary conditions, which has a bearing on the determination of measurement outcomes. The basis for this time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics was laid down by Aharonov, Bergman, and Lebowitz (ABL), who derived a symmetric probability rule concerning measurements performed on systems, while taking into account the final state of the system, in addition to the usual initial state [4].
Tests such as Bell's inequality and Hardy's paradox show that joint probabilities and correlations between distant particles in quantum mechanics are inconsistent with local realistic theories. Here we experimentally demonstrate these concepts in the time domain, using a photonic entangling gate to perform nondestructive measurements on a single photon at different times. We show that Hardy's paradox is much stronger in time and demonstrate the violation of a temporal Bell inequality independent of the quantum state, including for fully mixed states.