Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1211.4738

Is Hardy's paradox a paradox?

Y. Ben-Aryeh

Published Nov 20, 2012• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In the present Note it is shown that Hardy thought experiment does not lead to any paradox and its explanation can be made by using quantum mechanical methods, without the need of weak measurements theories. The confusion arising about this thought experiment follows from ignoring the use of a projective measurement of the kind of knowledge. A certain comment about the realization of Hardy thought experiment with photons is made.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1211.4738

Related papers

Experimental Joint Weak Measurement on a Photon Pair as a Probe of Hardy’s Paradox

Jeff S. Lundeen, Aephraim M. Steinberg

It has been proposed that the ability to perform joint weak measurements on postselected systems would allow us to study quantum paradoxes. These measurements can investigate the history of those particles that contribute to the paradoxical outcome. Here we experimentally perform weak measurements of joint (i.e., nonlocal) observables. In an implementation of Hardy's paradox, we weakly measure the locations of two photons, the subject of the conflicting statements behind the paradox. Remarkably, the resulting weak probabilities verify all of these statements but, at the same time, resolve the paradox.

arXiv:0810.4229•Physical Review Letters•Jan 14, 2009•368 citations

Weak Value Theory

Yutaka Shikano, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Gregg S. Jaeger +2 more

I show that the weak value theory is useful from the viewpoints of the experimentally verifiability, consistency, capacity for explanation as to many quantum paradoxes, and practical advantages. As an example, the initial state in the Hardy paradox can be experimentally verified using the weak value via the weak measurement.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

A note on Hardy's paradox

Johannes F. Geurdes

A classical probabilistic explanation for Hardy's quantum paradox is demonstrated.

arXiv:0910.4737•Oct 25, 2009•0 citations

Weak Value Theory

Yutaka Shikano

I show that the weak value theory is useful from the viewpoints of the experimentally verifiability, consistency, capacity for explanation as to many quantum paradoxes, and practical advantages. As an example, the initial state in the Hardy paradox can be experimentally verified using the weak value via the weak measurement.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•1 citation

Experimental weak measurements in Hardy's Paradox

Jeff S. Lundeen, Aephraim M. Steinberg

Hardy's Paradox brings to light some of the striking difficulties in the interpretation of indirect quantum measurements. We weakly measure the location of the particles in Hardy's Paradox. The results provide a self-consistent resolution.

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•Dec 10, 2005•0 citations

Direct observation of Hardy's paradox by joint weak measurement with an entangled photon pair

Kazuhiro Yokota, Takashi Yamamoto, Masato Koashi +1 more

We implemented a joint weak measurement of the trajectories of two photons in a photonic version of Hardy's experiment. The joint weak measurement has been performed via an entangled meter state in polarization degrees of freedom of the two photons. Unlike Hardy's original argument in which the contradiction is inferred by retrodiction, our experiment reveals its paradoxical nature as preposterous values actually read out from the meter. Such a direct observation of a paradox gives us new insights into the spooky action of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:0811.1625•New Journal of Physics•Mar 4, 2009•272 citations
In the present Note it is shown that Hardy thought experiment does not lead to any paradox and its explanation can be made by using quantum mechanical methods, without the need of weak measurements theories. The confusion arising about this thought experiment follows from ignoring the use of a projective measurement of the kind of knowledge. A certain comment about the realization of Hardy thought experiment with photons is made.
It has been proposed that the ability to perform joint weak measurements on postselected systems would allow us to study quantum paradoxes. These measurements can investigate the history of those particles that contribute to the paradoxical outcome. Here we experimentally perform weak measurements of joint (i.e., nonlocal) observables. In an implementation of Hardy's paradox, we weakly measure the locations of two photons, the subject of the conflicting statements behind the paradox. Remarkably, the resulting weak probabilities verify all of these statements but, at the same time, resolve the paradox.
We implemented a joint weak measurement of the trajectories of two photons in a photonic version of Hardy's experiment. The joint weak measurement has been performed via an entangled meter state in polarization degrees of freedom of the two photons. Unlike Hardy's original argument in which the contradiction is inferred by retrodiction, our experiment reveals its paradoxical nature as preposterous values actually read out from the meter. Such a direct observation of a paradox gives us new insights into the spooky action of quantum mechanics.